Progress on H/Abb -> 4b’s channel for the FTK physics case ~ 4jets Trigger w/ and w/o FTK ~ Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of the FTK.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

UK egamma meeting, Sept 22, 2005M. Wielers, RAL1 Status of Electron Triggers Rates/eff for different triggers Check on physics channels Crack region, comparison.

Advertisements

H/Abb -> 4b’s process & Multi-Et-Threshold Study for 4jet Trigger Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of the FTK Meeting on July 13 th, 2006.

Search for Top Flavor Changing Neutral Current Decay t → qZ Ingyin Zaw DOE Review August 21, 2006.

Visible and Invisible Higgs Decays at 350 GeV Mark Thomson University of Cambridge =+

Skeleton outline for the physics case document M. Shochet December 15, 2005.

FTK Studies: H  hh  bbbb FTK Physics Case Meeting 11/03/05 Erik Brubaker University of Chicago.

FTK Production on UC Tier3 and Hidden Valley Processes Jan 23, 2007 Erik Brubaker FTK meeting.

September 27, 2005FAKT 2005, ViennaSlide 1 B-Tagging and ttH, H → bb Analysis on Fully Simulated Events in the ATLAS Experiment A.H. Wildauer Universität.

Progress on the FTK Physics Case (For H/Abb 4b signal) Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of FTK Meeting on January 26 th, 2006 (1)Brief Sample.

Progress on H/Abb -> 4b’s channel for the FTK physics case ~ 4jets trigger w/ and w/o FTK ~ Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of the FTK.

Top Turns Ten March 2 nd, Measurement of the Top Quark Mass The Low Bias Template Method using Lepton + jets events Kevin Black, Meenakshi Narain.

Daniele Benedetti CMS and University of Perugia Chicago 07/02/2004 High Level Trigger for the ttH channel in fully hadronic decay at LHC with the CMS detector.

Update on Tools FTK Meeting 06/06/06 Erik Brubaker U of Chicago.

Update on H/Abb -> 4b’s process (4jet Trigger) Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of the FTK Meeting on Sep. 7 th, 2006.

Sept 30 th 2004Iacopo Vivarelli – INFN Pisa FTK meeting Z  bb measurement in ATLAS Iacopo Vivarelli, Alberto Annovi Scuola Normale Superiore,University.

S. Martí i García Liverpool December 02 1 Selection of events in the all-hadronic channel S. Martí i García CDF End Of Year Review Liverpool / December.

Progress on FTK Studies FTK Physics Case Meeting 07/20/05 Erik Brubaker University of Chicago.

Update FTK Meeting 07/13/06 Erik Brubaker U of Chicago.

Physics Studies Update FTK Meeting 02/23/06 Erik Brubaker U of Chicago.

1 A Feasibility Study for a Strange Sea Asymmetry Analysis at ATLAS: update II Laura Gilbert and Jeff Tseng 13/12/07.

Status Report on hbb Analysis Jyothsna Rani for the hbb group Andy, Avto, Marine, Tim, Boris All D0 Meeting 28 th January th January 2005.

Update on H  studies Catalin and Tony FTK meeting, July 13, 2006.

Single-Top Cross Section Measurements at ATLAS Patrick Ryan (Michigan State University) Introduction to Single-Top The measurement.

FTK update H→  Tony, Catalin By speeding up/adding rejection at LVL2, we can have a higher rate coming in from LVL1. Therefore some of the LVL1 threshold.

Update Apr 24, 2007 Erik Brubaker FTK meeting. April 24, 2007FTK Meeting2 LVL1/LVL2 jet triggers Set trigger thresholds according to TDR scheme. E.g.,

Dijet Mass Sherpa vs Pythia Multi-Threshold e.t.c. for H/Abb->4b’s Kohei Yorita University of Chicago FTK Meeting 12/19/2006.

Update FTK Meeting 05/02/06 Erik Brubaker U of Chicago.

E. Devetak - LCWS t-tbar analysis at SiD Erik Devetak Oxford University LCWS /11/2008 Flavour tagging for ttbar Hadronic ttbar events ID.

10 TeV Updates on Efficiencies and Event Shapes Ken Johns, Venkat Kaushik, Xiaowen Lei (U. Arizona) Single lepton + jets channel.

Associated top Higgs search: with ttH (H  bb) Chris Collins-Tooth, 17 June 2008.

1 2vtx tagged diBjets mass cross section measurement Univeristy of Notre Dame Hong Luo Mar 3 th 2005.

Z AND W PHYSICS AT CEPC Haijun Yang, Hengne Li, Qiang Li, Jun Guo, Manqi Ruan, Yusheng Wu, Zhijun Liang 1.

September 30, 2004FTK meeting1 Making the FTK Physics Case M. Shochet 9/30/04.

A few slides to summarise what Alessandro and I were up to for March 24th video meeting Taking for granted that W+/- are good measurements to make- are.

Study of the to Dilepton Channel with the Total Transverse Energy Kinematic Variable Athens, April 17 th 2003 Victoria Giakoumopoulou University of Athens,

Selection cuts on Bs→ with FTK F. Crescioli, P. Giannetti, M. Dell'Orso, G. Punzi, G. Volpi 2/5/2006.

HERA-LHC, CERN Oct Preliminary study of Z+b in ATLAS /1 A preliminary study of Z+b production in ATLAS The D0 measurement of  (Z+b)/  (Z+jet)

Sensitivity Prospects for Light Charged Higgs at 7 TeV J.L. Lane, P.S. Miyagawa, U.K. Yang (Manchester) M. Klemetti, C.T. Potter (McGill) P. Mal (Arizona)

Possibility of tan  measurement with in CMS Majid Hashemi CERN, CMS IPM,Tehran,Iran QCD and Hadronic Interactions, March 2005, La Thuile, Italy.

1 TTU report “Dijet Resonances” Kazim Gumus and Nural Akchurin Texas Tech University Selda Esen and Robert M. Harris Fermilab Jan. 26, 2006.

Simone Gennai SNS, INFN-Pisa1 Radion searches in CMS A first look to  hh G. Dewhirst, L. Fano, S. Gennai, S. Nikitenko.

30/Jul/20101 Research of Z generation Ken-ichiro KOIKE.

Measurements of Top Quark Properties at Run II of the Tevatron Erich W.Varnes University of Arizona for the CDF and DØ Collaborations International Workshop.

Physics at LHC Prague, 6-12 July, 2003 R. Kinnunen Helsinki Institute of Physics A/H ->  and H + ->  in CMS R. Kinnunen Physics at LHC Prague July 6.

1 Single top in e+jets channel Outline : - Data and MC samples - Overview of the analysis - Loose and topological cuts - MC efficiencies and expected number.

Jet Tagging Studies at TeV LC Tomáš Laštovička, University of Oxford Linear Collider Physics/Detector Meeting 14/9/2009 CERN.

Study on search of a SM Higgs (120GeV) produced via VBF and decaying in two hadronic taus V.Cavasinni, F.Sarri, I.Vivarelli.

1 Update on tt-bar signal and background simulation Stan Bentvelsen.

Hggs-D meeting MPI 11/20061 Higgs Physics – Activities in Bonn/Siegen Jörn Große-Knetter ATLAS-Higgs-D Treffen München,

1 Jet Triggers and Dijet Mass Selda Esen and Robert M. Harris Fermilab TTU Weekly HEP Group Meeting Feb 16, 2006.

Update on Diffractive Dijets Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham 12/07/2013.

Kinematics of Top Decays in the Dilepton and the Lepton + Jets channels: Probing the Top Mass University of Athens - Physics Department Section of Nuclear.

Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.

Search for the Standard Model Higgs in  and  lepton final states P. Grannis, ICHEP 2012 for the DØ Collaboration Tevatron, pp √s = 1.96 TeV -

La Thuile, March, 15 th, 2003 f Makoto Tomoto ( FNAL ) Prospects for Higgs Searches at DØ Makoto Tomoto Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (For the.

EPS Manchester Daniela Bortoletto Associated Production for the Standard Model Higgs at CDF D. Bortoletto Purdue University Outline: Higgs at the.

1 UCSD Meeting Calibration of High Pt Hadronic W Haifeng Pi 10/16/2007 Outline Introduction High Pt Hadronic W in TTbar and Higgs events Reconstruction.

Electron Identification Efficiency from Z→ee Maria Fiascaris University of Oxford In collaboration with Tony Weidberg and Lucia di Ciaccio ATLAS UK SM.

Viktor Veszpremi Purdue University, CDF Collaboration Tev4LHC Workshop, Oct , Fermilab ZH->vvbb results from CDF.

Higgs to  at CDF Amit Lath Rutgers University Tev4LHC Workshop, Sep

Search for Standard Model Higgs in ZH  l + l  bb channel at DØ Shaohua Fu Fermilab For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006, Oct. 29 – Nov. 3 Honolulu, Hawaii.

Upsilon production and μ-tagged jets in DØ Horst D. Wahl Florida State University (DØ collaboration) 29 April 2005 DIS April to 1 May 2005 Madison.

Investigation on CDF Top Physics Group Ye Li Graduate Student UW - Madison.

ATLAS UK physics meeting, 10/01/08 1 Triggers for B physics Julie Kirk RAL Overview of B trigger strategy Algorithms – current status and plans Menus Efficiencies.

Higgs → t+t- in Vector Boson Fusion

Hidden Valley Processes

Erik Brubaker U of Chicago

Physics Studies Update

Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of Chicago

Study of Top properties at LHC

Presentation transcript:

Progress on H/Abb -> 4b’s channel for the FTK physics case ~ 4jets Trigger w/ and w/o FTK ~ Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of the FTK Meeting on October 19 th, 2006

Review of 4J Trigger (MC) We have looked at many variations of MC samples. > Sherpa - version (patch) change - different configuration - yt cut - w/ and w/o UE > Pythia - v6.2 (v10 Athena) - v6.3 (v11 Athena) Now it is time to decide “default” sample to conclude studies. (whatever it is, big unknown factors (always) still remain.) Now Default Sample : SHERPA 2->3, yt>25 ; 10M events

Systematics on MC Choice Again, Default Sample : SHERPA 2->3, yt>25 ; 10M events Comparison to 2-> % systematics5% systematics Comparison of yt cuts Correlated & poor stat.

Comparison to PYTHIA Pythia 6.2 Pythia 6.3 Old UE/MI New UE/MI Pt>15 : +-30% x3~4 Pt>20 : +-30% x2~3 Pt>50 : +-20% x~1.4 > Big Unknown : UE/MI tuning. > Why v6.3 changes so much by Ptcut ? > My Signal sample (H/Abb) is still v so we should take +- 30%. So total is ~32%. Might differ by ~2-3 though.

Issues on Underlying Events Fit : Expo+Linear Functions From 20 GeV to 120 GeV. After correction, fluctuation is at the level of 3-5% which is negligible compared to other systematics (~32%). Default Sherpa sample is w/o UE. Erik generated ~2M events w/ UE. Because some jobs are crashed and slow?, Here trying to get Scale Factor here.

Finalizing Trigger Rate as a function of ATLFAST Pt 1KHz (w/ FTK) 100Hz (w/o FTK) 3050 So new working points : - 30 GeV (w/ FTK) and 50 GeV(w/o FTK). OLD setting : - 40 GeV (w/ FTK) and 70 GeV (w/o FTK) -> All studies had to be redone ! * This is what we get with our current best knowledge.

Based on LVL1 8x8 Calorimeter Parameterization UE scale factor 1KHz (w/ FTK) 200Hz (w/o FTK) w/ FTK (1KHz) : 25 GeV Then w/o FTK (200Hz) : 35 GeV Then Jet

Summary of Trigger Rates & Threshold 4Jet Trigger Rates1KHz (LVL1 Max)200Hz (LVL1 TDR)100Hz (LVL2) Atlfast Pt Thresh.> 30 GeV> 45 GeV> 50 GeV 8x8 Calo. Cluster E> 25 GeV (50% effi. to 30 GeV jet) > 35 GeV (50% effi. to 45 GeV jet) - LVL1 Calo vs Atlfast Pt Correspondence* For Atlfast Jets, Assuming LVL2 Jet =~ Atlfast Jet We need LVL2 reduction rate of 10 by either > Btagging (wFTK) > Raising Pt thresh (w/oFTK) Is it possible (by FTK) ? Need mistag rate. (next page.)

Issues on LVL2 Reduction The reduction rate depends on trigger strategy : i.e. btagging is applied for means (1)Only Leading jets. (e.g. 4b for 4 leading jets) OLD (2)Any fiducial jets (eta<2.5) NEW (1) Updated to (2) Not straightforward like linear behavior.

LVL2 Reduction (Cont.) > It depends on the number of fiducial jets and real b quark contents. > Pythia and Sherpa are not much different. But it seems PYTHIA gives lower reduction i.e. it has either more fiducial Jets or/and more real b quarks. With FTK btagging at LVL2, We need a reduction factor of >10 in order to keep Jet Pt threshold. So the following condition would be enough : > 2tag if Ru > 10 (10% mistag) > 3tag if Ru > 4 (25% mistag) > 4tag for any Ru (>2) better Working point in this talk.

Let’s Look at Signal Process (each sample was generated with Atlfast simulation) Coupling to up-type is enhanced at low tan , so decay into tt becomes large. > bb decay : ~85-90% if tan  >20 M A (GeV ) No Pt cut Pt > Cross section  BR (pb)

Signal Trigger Level

Signal Trigger Level (Cont.) Still expected N of background is ~1.5x10^9. So for the analysis, we have to optimize selection criteria.

What if Trigger Rate is x3 higher ? If Trigger (Background) rate is x3 higher, Thresholds have to be raised accordingly to keep LVL1 rate(1KHz) and LVL2 rate(100Hz). -> This is good study for uncertain QCD bkg & higher luminosity (10^34). We lose signal acceptance, but relative improvement looks even powerful.

(Offline) Optimization based on w/ and w/o FTK Conditions > Requiring btag for “leading 3/4jets” for 3/4btags. > 1 st,2 nd,3 rd jet thresholds are optimized for different M A separately. > 4btag is more powerful than 3btag.

(Offline) Optimization based on w/ & w/o FTK Conditions Now results are not so good as before (which is more or less same as right plot (x3 bkg).). But I think that the most important thing is that even if the background rate is much higher due to high lum or MC miscalculation (in this case, x1 or x3), FTK can provide almost same sensitivity ! But without FTK, very weak against higher background (compare dotted line.)

Plan > Again, need inputs of realistic btagging efficiency and mistag rate to conclude. 2tag with effb=50%, Ru=10 is required in order to reduce the rate by 10 (1KHz->100Hz).) > Missing Pieces : - Complete & Summarize Multi-Threshold Study. - Dijet Mass Distribution > Document it ! > FTK Simulation ?