The Adversary System.  To provide a procedure for disputing parties to present and resolve their cases in as fair a manner as possible  Controlled by.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
 The 5 th Amendment limits the national government, but the 14 th guarantees that states cannot deprive rights without “Due Process.”  Due process.
Advertisements

THE ADVERSARY SYSTEM “Identify issues and provide points FOR and AGAINST” ISSUE 1 FOR AGAINST ISSUE 2 FOR AGAINST Name an issue DISCUSS the use of the.
Chapter 9.  A system of trial where the court is actively involved in determining the facts and conduct of trial.  Originated – 1000 year Roman law.
D ISPUTE R ESOLUTION - A COMPARISON. The legal system presents individuals with a range of ways in which they can resolve disputes. Taking a case to court.
Q UINCY COLLEGE Paralegal Studies Program Paralegal Studies Program Interviewing & Investigation Foundations of Investigating.
2:05 sec Today you will be learning about how to conduct and participate in a mock trial. You will become familiar with some basic courtroom procedures.
The Adjudication Process Virginia Department of Health Professions New Board Member Training October 2008.
EVALUATION OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION METHODS. Strengths of Mediation  Strengths 1) Mediation is often less expensive. Mediation avoids the costs of a trial,
R OLES & R ESPONSIBILITIES From Speaking With A Purpose: Jo Thornton & Jessica Pegis.
Alaska Mock Trial Glossary of Terms. Laws Rules created by society to govern the behavior of people in society. Among other things, the laws are one formal.
DISPUTE RESOLUTION METHODS
Dispute Resolution Methods
 The 5 th Amendment limits the national government, but the 14 th guarantees that states cannot deprive rights without “Due Process.”  Due process is.
The accused (Robin Michael) The accused – someone charged with or on trial for a crime If you were accused.
Civil vs. Criminal courts
Court processes and procedures, and engaging in justice
1 Chapter 7 Litigation, the legal process and alternative dispute resolution Copyright © Nelson Australia Pty Ltd 2003.
 Generates competition between Crown and defence  Aim of both is to seek justice  Crown- Burden of proof is on the Crown to “prove case beyond a reasonable.
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. Business Law in Canada, 7/e, Chapter 2 Business Law in Canada, 7/e Chapter 2 The Resolution of Disputes.
Chapter is based on two parties battling to win the case, each acting as the adversary of the other. ROLE: to provide a procedure for the parties.
Trial Procedures II CLN4U. The Judge, The Crown, The Defence Judge: Judge: Impartial and unbiased Impartial and unbiased Applies law to case, instructs.
Chapter 7 – The adversary system Key Knowledge
LEGAL STUDIES Unit 4 AOS2 Overview U4.AOS2. Unit 4 Area of Study 2 Unit 4 Area of Study 2 Court processes and procedures, and engaging in justice 1. Elements.
Access to the courts is vital for an effective legal system.
THE TRIAL. For next time:  Read page in Pakes.
Chapter 5 The Court System
Unit 4 Area of Study 1 Booklet 1.3 Answers. Advantages of ADR ADR (mediation, conciliation, arbitration) is a MUCH LESS FORMAL compared to the adversarial.
Trial Courts (pages 46 to 50). Trial Courts Courts that listen to testimony, consider evidence, and decide the facts.
Legal Studies 3C.  People must be treated fairly  Right to be heard by an unbiased decision-maker  Know allegations made against you  Given a chance.
 We use the Adversary system of trial.  HOWEVER, the Coroner’s Court, Family Court, Children’s Cases Program, some tribunals and some alternative methods.
The Adversarial System. What is the Adversarial system? The system of dispute resolution used in Australia. Resolution of conflict Relies on an impartial.
Evidence in Court Holy Trinity Law Audrius Stonkus.
Objections Criminal law – unit #3.
9.2 – Deciding whether or not to take civil action.
F.A.T..  For a legal system to operate effectively it must provide processes and procedures to help ensure that all parties involved in a legal dispute.
The Criminal Trial Process Section 11 (d) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms states that each person charged with an offence is to be ‘presumed innocent.
VCE Legal Studies: Evaluating the role of the court as a law-maker
The Adversary System Part I Chapter 7. Learning Intention Explain the processes and procedures for the resolution of criminal cases and civil disputes.
The Inquisitorial System of Trial. An inquisitorial system is a legal system where the court or a part of the court is actively involved in investigating.
By Paramita Khisa.  VCAT and court use a range of methods to resolve criminal and civil disputes.  Criminal cases are solved by the judge in courts.
Formal Adjudications Chapter 8. In General Lawyers and legal assistants play an important role in the adjudication aspect of administrative procedure.
Trial Procedures & Courtroom Personnel
Attorney/Judge. The purpose of opening statements by each side is to tell jurors something about the case they will be hearing. The opening statements.
Comparing the Inquisitorial and Adversarial Systems.
MAJOR FEATURES OF THE ADVERSARY SYSTEM OF TRIAL, INCLUDING THE ROLE OF THE PARTIES, THE ROLE OF THE JUDGE, THE NEED FOR THE RULES OF EVIDENCE AND PROCEDURE,
THE JUDICIAL BRANCH COURTS, JUDGES, AND THE LAW. MAIN ROLE Conflict Resolution! With every law, comes potential conflict Role of judicial system is to.
Article III: The Judicial Branch Chapters: 11,12
Lesson 18: How Has the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment Changed the Constitution?
TRIAL PROCEDURES.
The Adversary System.
Also known as the ‘accusatorial’ system.
Lesson 18: How Has the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment Changed the Constitution?
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
The Inquisitorial System of Trial
Lesson 6- Copy the following
Unit 3 Rights & Justice Area of study 1 – The Victorian criminal justice system 50% Area of study 2 – The Victorian civil justice system – 50%
J. Max Wawrik Nancy Rosado Colon Law 16 Spring 2017
Principles of Justice:
The Adversary System.
Possible reforms to the adversary system
The Adversary System Part II
Objections Criminal law – unit #3.
Outcome 1 REVISON NOTES Part I
Civil Pretrial Practice
Objections How, when, why…...
Justice in the Criminal Justice System
The Inquisitorial System
Unit 3 Rights & Justice Area of study 1 – The Victorian criminal justice system 50% Area of study 2 – The Victorian civil justice system – 50%
Responsibilities of Key Personnel in a Civil Trial
Presentation transcript:

The Adversary System

 To provide a procedure for disputing parties to present and resolve their cases in as fair a manner as possible  Controlled by strict rules of evidence and procedure Role of the Adversary System

 Major features of the adversary system  Role of the parties  Role of the judge  Standard and burden of proof  Need for legal representation  Need for rules of evidence and procedure Features of the Adversary System

 Party Control - Each party controls their own case (within the rules of evidence and procedure)  Parties are responsible for:  Instigating the proceedings – the person who believes they have been wronged (plaintiff is civil, prosecution in criminal) brings the case to court  Investigating the facts Role of the parties

 Parties are also responsible for:  Deciding which facts to bring to court – each side decides which evidence they wish to present to court (although prosecution must disclose all evidence even if it is not beneficial)  Investigating the law that is relevant to the case Role of the parties

 Parties are also responsible for:  Deciding whether to have a jury in a civil case  Choosing whether to have legal representation Role of the parties

 Party control allows the parties to feel that they are in control of the situation and are responsible for the outcome  Satisfies the competitive spirit  Gives people the opportunity to fight to win their case – leads to a sense of satisfaction Role of the parties

 In civil cases – it means that cases can be resolved  But it makes the process expensive – which means that not everyone has effective access to mechanisms to resolve disputes The elements

 Impartial umpire - Ensures the court processes and procedures are carried out according to the rules of evidence and procedure  May only ask questions to clarify matters  Minimises unfairness to either party Role of the Judge

 Decides:  Admissibility of evidence  Questions of law  Directs the jury whether there is one  Decides the outcome of a case where there is no jury Role of the judge

 For the adversary system to work effectively the judge must be impartial  Essential that the decision maker (judge or jury) is independent from the case  Judge has no prior knowledge of the case before hearing the evidence presented Role of the Judge

 The impartial, independent judge ensures a fair and unbiased hearing The elements

 Burden of proof lies with the party bringing the case to court  Criminal – prosecution  Civil – plaintiff  Person who brings the case must prove the other party was in the wrong Burden and Standard of Proof

 Standard of proof – the strength of evidence needed to prove the case  Criminal – beyond reasonable doubt  Civil – on the balance of probabilities Burden and Standard of Proof

 Essential elements of the adversary system  Burden of proof indicates who must begin the battle  Standard of proof indicates the strength of proof required to decide the winner Burden and Standard of Proof

 Burden and standard of proof ensure a fair and unbiased hearing The elements

 Legal representatives – prepare the case on behalf of the parties  Legal representatives are experts – are familiar with rules of evidence and procedure  Help to ensure that the parties are able to present their best possible case  Assists in achieving a just outcome Need for legal representation

 Bringing out the truth and showing your case in the best light depends on being legally represented – with the best possible lawyer  Presenting a case without legal representation is very difficult and can result in an unjust outcome Need for legal representation

 For the adversary system to work effectively there needs to be equal representation  Parties should have an equal opportunity to present their cases  Truth should be brought out through both sides bringing their evidence and cross examination by the other side Need for legal representation

 If one party is better represented than the other, this could lead to an unfair advantage and possibly an incorrect result – so it will not be a fair and unbiased hearing The elements

 A person who can afford a more competent barrister is more likely to win than a person represented by a less experienced barrister this means that there is not effective access for everyone The elements

 Evidence is concerned with proof of facts  Rules of evidence aim to ensure fair and equal treatment Need for rules of evidence and procedure

 Evidence can be  Oral – given by witnesses  Sworn statements (called an affidavit)  Objects – murder weapons, photos diagrams, tape-recording  Circumstances and facts (called circumstantial evidence) Need for rules of evidence and procedure

 Adversary system relies more heavily on oral evidence given by witnesses than documentary evidence Need for rules of evidence and procedure

 Rules of evidence are primarily for the protection of the parties  Ensure that  Parties are treated fairly  Jury is not distracted by irrelevant material  Unreliable or illegally obtained evidence is not heard by the court  Evidence is not unduly prejudicial to the defence  Prior convictions are not admissible Need for rules of evidence and procedure

 Rules of procedure provide a framework in which court cases take place  Provide the way in which the court will try to bring about a resolution  Procedures are aimed at treating both sides fairly  Create at atmosphere of formality so that the decision is followed Need for rules of evidence and procedure

 Assist the parties in achieving a just outcome  Rule of evidence keep the contest fair  Rules of procedure should assist the truth to emerge Need for rules of evidence and procedure

 Hearsay evidence  Prior convictions (unless used as propensity evidence)  Irrelevant evidence  Opinion  Evidence obtained illegally  Privileged information Evidence not admissible

 Only allow certain types of evidence to ensure a fair and unbiased hearing  Rules of procedure help assist timely resolution of disputes The elements

The jury system is NOT a feature of the adversary system – it is an entirely different system! Juries