Collaborating on the Development of Warn-On-Forecast Mike Foster / David Andra WFO Norman OK Feb. 18, 2010 Mike Foster / David Andra WFO Norman OK Feb.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Storm Prediction Center Highlights NCEP Production Suite Review December 3, 2013 Steven Weiss, Israel Jirak, Chris Melick, Andy Dean, Patrick Marsh, and.
Advertisements

Dr. Heather Lazrus Dr. Eve Gruntfest Warn on Forecast Kickoff Workshop Norman, OK February 18, 2010 Social Science Contributions to Warn-on-Forecast.
SPC Potential Products and Services and Attributes of Operational Supporting NWP Probabilistic Outlooks of Tornado, Severe Hail, and Severe Wind.
Travis Smith NSSL / OU / CIMMS The Hazardous Weather Testbed / Experimental Warning Program.
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to operations GOES-R Proving Ground Activities at the NASA Short-term Prediction Research and.
David J. Stensrud Hazardous Weather Forecasts & Warnings Hazardous Weather Forecasts.
1 GOES Users’ Conference October 1, 2002 GOES Users’ Conference October 1, 2002 John (Jack) J. Kelly, Jr. National Weather Service Infusion of Satellite.
February 17-19, 2009 National Weather Center Norman, Oklahoma February 17-19, 2009 National Weather Center Norman, Oklahoma National Severe Storms Laboratory.
SPC Convective Outlook Changes Changes in Category Names/Definitions Bill Sammler Warning Coordination Meteorologist National Weather Service, Wakefield.
NOAA’s National Weather Service 2009 President’s Budget Rollout Jack Hayes NOAA Assistant Administrator & Director, National Weather Service National Weather.
Introduction to The Hazardous Weather Testbed Norman, Oklahoma.
Update on the Regional Modeling System NASA Roses Meeting April 13, 2007.
Travis Smith (OU/CIMMS) February 25–27, 2015 National Weather Center
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting. The National Weather Service The National Weather Service (NWS) is responsible for forecasts several times.
Jack Kain Hazardous Weather Forecasts & Warnings Jack Kain Hazardous Weather Forecasts & Warnings Science Infusion 1.
The National Severe Storms Laboratory Jeff Kimpel, Director NSSL NOAA Science Advisory Board Norman, Oklahoma November 5, 2002.
Sebastián Torres Weather Radar Research Innovative Techniques to Improve Weather Observations.
17 July 2006Summer WAS*IS 2006Greg Stumpf – CIMMS/NWS/MDL CIMMS / University of Oklahoma NWS Meteorological Development Laboratory Decision Assistance.
Your NOAA National Weather Service Forecast Office and Emergency Management: A Life Saving Partnership! National Severe Weather Workshop Midwest City,
Warn on Forecast Briefing September 2014 Warn on Forecast Brief for NCEP planning NSSL and GSD September 2014.
GIS Activities at NWS Norman with a Focus on the May 2013 Tornadoes Aaron Anderson Information Technology Officer NWS Norman Forecast Office.
Ensemble Numerical Prediction of the 4 May 2007 Greensburg, Kansas Tornadic Supercell using EnKF Radar Data Assimilation Dr. Daniel T. Dawson II NRC Postdoc,
Forecasting in a Changing Climate Harold E. Brooks NOAA/National Severe Storms Laboratory (Thanks to Andy Dean, Dave Stensrud, Tara Jensen, J J Gourley,
1 FY10-14 Planning. 2 Vision for 2015 NOAA is closer to its customers and better able to respond to severe events. NOAA information is routinely incorporated.
NOAA’s Role in Weather Forecasting and Community Preparedness Decision Support NOAA remains focused on supporting high impact events where weather is a.
GOES-R Proving Ground Activities at the NWS Storm Prediction Center Dr. Russell S. Schneider Chief, Science Support Branch NWS Storm Prediction Center.
GOES-R Proving Ground Storm Prediction Center and Hazardous Weather Testbed Chris Siewert 1,2, Kristin Calhoun 1,3 and Geoffrey Stano OU-CIMMS, 2.
Woody Roberts Tom LeFebvre Kevin Manross Paul Schultz Evan Polster Xiangbao Jing ESRL/Global Systems Division Application of RUA/RTMA to AWIPS and the.
1 CIMSS Participation in the Development of a GOES-R Proving Ground Timothy J. Schmit NOAA/NESDIS/Satellite Applications and Research Advanced Satellite.
NASA SPoRT’s Pseudo Geostationary Lightning Mapper (PGLM) GOES-R Science Week Meeting September, 2011 Huntsville, Alabama Geoffrey Stano ENSCO, Inc./NASA.
Advanced Nowcasting Capabilities Richard L. Carpenter, Jr., Ph.D., CCM Weather Decision Technologies, Inc. MDSS Stakeholder Meeting – October 2005, Boulder,
HWT Spring Forecasting Experiment: History and Success Dr. Adam Clark February 25, 2015 National Weather Center Norman, Oklahoma.
1 Agenda Topic: National Blend Presented By: Kathryn Gilbert (NWS/NCEP) Team Leads: Dave Myrick, David Ruth (NWS/OSTI/MDL), Dave Novak (NCEP/WPC), Jeff.
Hazardous Weather Testbed (HWT) “Tales from the Testbed” Forecaster Briefing Warning Decision Training Branch (WDTB)
Assimilating Reflectivity Observations of Convective Storms into Convection-Permitting NWP Models David Dowell 1, Chris Snyder 2, Bill Skamarock 2 1 Cooperative.
Better Preparing the NWS to meet America's Growing Needs Information Brief 1.
Numerical Prediction of High-Impact Local Weather: How Good Can It Get? Kelvin K. Droegemeier Regents’ Professor of Meteorology Vice President for Research.
Storm Based Warnings A New Direction in the Warning Process Add Name National Weather Service Add Office.
1 Development of a convection- resolving CONUS ensemble system (aka: Warn on Forecast) Presented By: Lou Wicker (NSSL) Contributors Geoff DiMego (NCEP)
NSSL’s Warn-on-Forecast Project Dr. Lou Wicker February 25–27, 2015 National Weather Center Norman, Oklahoma.
SPC Ensemble Applications: Current Status, Recent Developments, and Future Plans David Bright Storm Prediction Center Science Support Branch Norman, OK.
Hazardous Weather Forecasts and Warnings Overview: Forecast Division Jack Kain (NSSL) February 25–27, 2015 National Weather Center Norman, Oklahoma.
1 John Ferree Severe Storms Services NOAA National Weather Service NWS Partners Meeting AMS 2009 Annual Meeting Phoenix, AZ January 15, 2009 National Weather.
NWS Tornado Operations DIA Control Tower Discussion August 21, 2014 NWS Tornado Operations DIA Control Tower Discussion August 21, 2014 Mt Evans Tornado.
2nd Workshop on Severe Weather Technology The Future of the HWT Experimental Warning Program (or “What happens next?”) Travis Smith OU / CIMMS / NSSL.
Aviation Weather Forecaster Training Plans LeRoy Spayd NWS Office of Meteorology Chief, Science & Training Core Aviation Weather Forum July 26, 2000.
National Weather Service Water Science and Services John J. Kelly, Jr. Director, National Weather Service NOAA Science Advisory Board November 6, 2001.
NOAA Hazardous Weather Test Bed (SPC, OUN, NSSL) Objectives – Advance the science of weather forecasting and prediction of severe convective weather –
TimeDays Outlooks Adapted from Dr. Heather Lazrus (SSWIM) and Lans Rothfusz FACETs: Forecasting A Continuum of Environmental Threats Space Regional State.
Greg Stumpf – CIMMS/NWS/NSSLSpring 2009EWP Spring Experiment - Orientation 1 CIMMS / University of Oklahoma 2 NWS MDL 3 NSSL 4 NWS WFO OUN Location: National.
The 1925 Tri-State Tornado What If It Happened Today? Pat Spoden NOAA/NWS WFO Paducah, Kentucky John Hart NOAA/NWS Storm Prediction Center Norman, Oklahoma.
Welcome to the 2012 Warn-on-Forecast and High Impact Weather Workshop!
Training Framework for Satellite User Readiness in NOAA AMS th Conference on Satellite Meteorology & Oceanography LeRoy Spayd & Anthony Mostek.
Jidong Gao, Kristin Kuhlman, Travis Smith, David Stensrud 3DVAR Storm-scale assimilation in real- time.
Travis Smith Hazardous Weather Forecasts & Warnings Nowcasting Applications.
The relationship between Science and DSS in the NWS – issues and discussion Mike Evans WFO Binghamton, NY.
Norman Weather Forecast Office Gabe Garfield 2/23/11.
R2O and O2R between NSSL and SPC: The benefits of Collocation Jack Kain, Steve Weiss, Mike Coniglio, Harold Brooks, Israel Jirak, and Adam Clark.
Travis Smith, Jidong Gao, Kristin Calhoun, Darrel Kingfield, Chenghao Fu, David Stensrud, Greg Stumpf & a cast of dozens NSSL / CIMMS Warn-on-Forecast.
1 KURT HONDL, NSSL MPAR PROJECT MANAGER OFCM MPAR WORKING GROUP MEETING 19 JUNE 2012 NOAA/NSSL Activities.
1 Symposium on the 50 th Anniversary of Operational Numerical Weather Prediction Dr. Jack Hayes Director, Office of Science and Technology NOAA National.
Advanced WAS*IS Workshop Norman, OK September 16, 2008 Melissa Tuttle Carr Manager, Weather Information Distribution The Weather Channel Kevin Barjenbruch.
*Special Webinar* Severe Storms Likely This Afternoon through Early Wednesday Tuesday February 23, 2016 Please MUTE Your Lines! *6 to Mute #6 to Unmute.
STORM-SCALE DATA ASSIMILATION AND ENSEMBLE FORECASTING WITH THE NSSL EXPERIMENTAL WARN-ON-FORECAST SYSTEM 40 th National Weather Association Annual Meeting.
The Performance of a Weather-Adaptive 3DVAR System for Convective-scale RUA and some suggestions for future GSI-based RUA Jidong Gao NOAA/National Severe.
HWT Experimental Warning Program: History & Successes Darrel Kingfield (CIMMS) February 25–27, 2015 National Weather Center Norman, Oklahoma.
Hazardous Weather and Flooding Preparedness Unit 7: Activity.
Hydrometeorological Predication Center
Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms (CAPS) Briefing by Ming Xue, Director CAPS is one of the 1st NSF Science and Technology Centers established.
Yuanfu Xie, Steve Albers, Hongli Jiang Paul Schultz and ZoltanToth
Presentation transcript:

Collaborating on the Development of Warn-On-Forecast Mike Foster / David Andra WFO Norman OK Feb. 18, 2010 Mike Foster / David Andra WFO Norman OK Feb. 18, 2010

Collaboration Science/Technology Operations JDOP Pre-STORM NEXRAD IOT&E II MAPS COPS QED VORTEX | | | | | | 20xx > Early algorithms DOPLIGHT Pre-AWIPS MARD Risk Reduction WDSS OK Mesonet AWIPS MAR NSSL/SPC WDSS II JPOL IHOP Joint HWT PAR CASA VFlo REFRACT VORTEX2 ProbWarn Warn-On- Forecast Storm Prediction Center National Severe Storms Laboratory Radar Operations Center Norman Forecast Office ESRL/GSD OU Warning Decision Training Branch

2008 EWP Participants Visiting Forecasters/Evaluators (26) –NWS Regions: Alaska, Central, Western, Southern, Western –Environment Canada –Hydrometeorological Service of Serbia Cognizant Scientists (30) –NSSL, OU, CIMMS, WDTB, WFO-OUN, U. Mass, U. VA –WAS*IS: Dr. Eve Gruntfest Weekly Coordinators IT Coordinator –Plus other IT help from NWC Operations Coordinator EWP Team Leaders Visiting Forecasters/Evaluators (26) –NWS Regions: Alaska, Central, Western, Southern, Western –Environment Canada –Hydrometeorological Service of Serbia Cognizant Scientists (30) –NSSL, OU, CIMMS, WDTB, WFO-OUN, U. Mass, U. VA –WAS*IS: Dr. Eve Gruntfest Weekly Coordinators IT Coordinator –Plus other IT help from NWC Operations Coordinator EWP Team Leaders

OUN WRF Convective initiation and mode 4 km grid – ARW core Initialize every hour – eight hour forecast LAPS initialization – hot start radar OUN WRF 20 km - boundary conditions Convective initiation and mode 4 km grid – ARW core Initialize every hour – eight hour forecast LAPS initialization – hot start radar OUN WRF 20 km - boundary conditions

LOCAL WRF MODEL 18Z April Forecast for 23Z

450 PM

Warn on Forecast in 2020: What might it look like? Forecast looks on track, storm circulation (hook echo) is tracking along centerline of highest tornadic probabilities Radar and Initial Forecast at 2100 CSTRadar at 2130 CST: Accurate Forecast Most Likely Tornado Path T=2120 CST T=2150 T=2130 T= % 50% 30% T=2200 CST Developing thunderstorm 2 of 5 NSSL Warn on Forecast Briefing March 5, 2007 Most Likely Tornado Path T=2120 CST T=2150 T=2130 T=2140 T=2200 CST An ensemble of storm-scale NWP models predict the path of a potentially tornadic supercell during the next 1 hour. The ensemble is used to create a probabilistic tornado hazard forecast grid. 70% 50% 30% Courtesy Lou Wicker, NSSL

Alternative Warning and Forecast Formats High temporal- and spatial-resolution probabilistic hazard grids

WoF Challenges best approaches to radar data qc and assimilation into models determining how WoF information will be used in NWS operations and communicated to the public storm-scale process understanding, predictability, and parameterization improvements WoF project priorities, timing, evaluation and implementation strategies best approaches to radar data qc and assimilation into models determining how WoF information will be used in NWS operations and communicated to the public storm-scale process understanding, predictability, and parameterization improvements WoF project priorities, timing, evaluation and implementation strategies

Some assumptions… WoF will evolve into operations –Not a turn key system –May be regional or local differences in implementation There will remain a detection component –An alert notification will inform of high impact phenomena Science and technology will continue to expand the number of observations, analyses and forecasts WoF will evolve into operations –Not a turn key system –May be regional or local differences in implementation There will remain a detection component –An alert notification will inform of high impact phenomena Science and technology will continue to expand the number of observations, analyses and forecasts

…and some more… Data volume and complexity will grow –Dual pol, Phased array, CASA –Ensemble regional, local and storm scale models New forecast and warning formats and dissemination –Hazard probability envelopes Graphical Text –More frequent updates possible –Techniques will require calibration –Techniques will require bias removal Data volume and complexity will grow –Dual pol, Phased array, CASA –Ensemble regional, local and storm scale models New forecast and warning formats and dissemination –Hazard probability envelopes Graphical Text –More frequent updates possible –Techniques will require calibration –Techniques will require bias removal

…and more Role of the human expert will change –Today’s warning forecaster processes inputs and makes warning decision –The same process tomorrow will mean many inputs not considered Manage the process –Review –Assess –Correct Many others… Role of the human expert will change –Today’s warning forecaster processes inputs and makes warning decision –The same process tomorrow will mean many inputs not considered Manage the process –Review –Assess –Correct Many others…

Things the WFO can do now…

Radar data quality control Review and assess radar data in real time Review and assess storm scale analysis in real time Review and assess radar data in real time Review and assess storm scale analysis in real time

Information use in operations and communication to users A proving ground for operations –Dedicated WFO position(s) during event operations –Post-event reviews of information and actions –HWT A proving ground for operations –Dedicated WFO position(s) during event operations –Post-event reviews of information and actions –HWT

Information use in operations and communication to users A proving ground for information –Graphicasts –Significant weather advisories –Warning decision updates Interact with users groups; EMs, Schools, medical groups, local decision makers, SSWIM A proving ground for information –Graphicasts –Significant weather advisories –Warning decision updates Interact with users groups; EMs, Schools, medical groups, local decision makers, SSWIM

Evaluation and implementation strategies Evaluate suitability of storm scale forecasts Risk reduction of phased implementation Evaluate suitability of storm scale forecasts Risk reduction of phased implementation