Hopkins PSMG Oct 20051 An Incomplete Model for Trial Designs for Moving to Scale: The Whole Day Program C Hendricks Brown Sheppard Kellam Jeanne Poduska.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Vs. Attending a Different Training as a Site Team.
Advertisements

Visit Our Website at earlychildhoodohio.org Ohio’s Early Childhood Comprehensive Assessment System 1.
Academy 2: Using Data to Assess Student Progress and Inform Educational Decisions in Culturally Responsive RTI Models Academy 2: Culturally Responsive.
1 Organizational, Time Management, and Planning Treatment for Children with ADHD (OTMP Study) NIMH-funded R01 New York University – Howard Abikoff, PI.
Maximizing Effectiveness Using Positive Behavior Support Methods in the Classroom: Monitor and Evaluation.
Extending RTI to School-wide Behavior Support Rob Horner University of Oregon
Use of Behavior Management Strategies by Teachers: Fidelity and Implementation of the ABC Program Greta M. Massetti, Daniel A. Waschbusch, & William E.
Response to Intervention (RTI) Lindenhurst Schools
Early Literary Success: Effective Intervention for Kindergarten Students at Risk for Reading Difficulties Washington Education Research Association 22nd.
PRESENTED BY: MARY SAGAR CHERYL BECKER BECCA BRITT Read to Succeed! Tutoring Program Chandler Public Library November 14, 2013 AzLA Conference.
Intervention as Theory Testing: An Example from Early Literacy Frederick J. Morrison University of Michigan Carol McDonald Connor Florida State University.
John Carter Project Coordinator PBIS Idaho: Menu button: Idaho PBIS Presentations and Webinars.
Early Reading First Project Professional Development Model Mary Abbott Juniper Gardens Children’s Project-University of Kansas Amy Herring Project.
1 National Reading First Impact Study: Critique in the Context of Oregon Reading First Oregon Reading First Center May 13, 2008 Scott K. Baker, Ph.D. Hank.
Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports: School-based Prevention George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Reading First Assessment Faculty Presentation. Fundamental Discoveries About How Children Learn to Read 1.Children who enter first grade weak in phonemic.
Rob Horner University of Oregon Implementation of Evidence-based practices School-wide behavior support Scaling evidence-based practices.
Cohort 5 Elementary School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY EARLY IDENTIFICATION AND INTERVENTION PROGRAM (JHU EIIP)
Lessons Learned in Building A Continuum of Positive Behavior Support Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Intervention.
Evidence based research in education Cathy Gunn University of Auckland.
School’s Cool in Kindergarten for the Kindergarten Teacher School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
Evaluating a Literacy Curriculum for Adolescents: Results from Three Sites of the First Year of Striving Readers Eastern Evaluation Research Society Conference.
What is Reading First This “program” focuses on putting proven methods of early reading instruction in classrooms. Through Reading First, states and districts.
Blending Academics and Behavior Dawn Miller Shawnee Mission School District Steve Goodman Michigan’s Integrated Behavior and Learning.
Young Adult Outcomes from the Good Behavior Game: a classroom behavior management program applied in 1 st and 2 nd Grades Sheppard G. Kellam, M.D. AIR.
By Jo Ann Vertetis and Karin Moe. Self-Assessment Can you define RTI? What is its purpose? Rate your understanding of RTI and how to implement it on a.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
Community Partnerships to Support Education Research from Development through Implementation Jeanne Poduska American Institutes for Research Mary Jane.
What Was Learned from a Second Year of Implementation IES Research Conference Washington, DC June 8, 2009 William Corrin, Senior Research Associate MDRC.
RTI: Response to Intervention An Evidence-Based Practice.
Scaling up and sustaining an integrated behavior and reading schoolwide model of supports November 18, 2008.
Youth Forum Cities Implementation of School-wide PBIS Rob Horner, University of Oregon Rebecca Mendiola, Santa Clara County Office of Education.
Whole Day First Grade Program: Effectiveness, Sustaining, & Building a Base for Going to Scale Jeanne Poduska, ScD Center for Integrating Education and.
Pr Early Literacy and Transition Kindergarten November, 2011.
Project CLASS “Children Learning Academic Success Skills” This work was supported by IES Grant# R305H to David Rabiner Computerized Attention Training.
Improving the Implementation of Evidence-based Programs That Respond to Community and Research Needs C Hendricks Brown, U Miami Patti Chamberlain, Ctr.
MiBLSi Schools’ Implementation Process and Student Outcomes Anna L. Harms Michigan State University MiBLSi State Conference
Effects of a Universal Prevention Program in First and Second Grade Classrooms on Young Adult Problem Outcomes: Implications for Research, Prevention and.
Programme Information Incredible Years (IY)Triple P (TP) – Level 4 GroupPromoting Alternative Thinking Strategies (PATHS) IY consists of 12 weekly (2-hour)
From Screening to Verification: The RTI Process at Westside Jolene Johnson, Ed.S. Monica McKevitt, Ed.S.
Using Anchor Activities. One premise in a differentiated classroom: “ In this class we are never finished--- Learning is a process that never ends.”
DIBELS Data: From Dabbling to Digging Interpreting data for instructional decision-making.
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
VDOE NPDC Model Site Updates. Belmont Station Elementary School, Loudoun County Model Site Site Composition 3 students Preschool/Elementary Self-contained.
Reading First Overview of 2004 Site Visits Jane Granger, M.S.
Reading Recovery—Does it work?-Staff Presentation Patti Lapham January 15, 2011 Classroom Reading and Writing-
Data-based Decisions: A year in review Sharon Walpole University of Delaware.
Florida Charter School Conference Orlando, Florida November, 2009 Clark Dorman Project Leader Florida Statewide Problem-Solving/RtI Project University.
Chapter 7: High Leverage Practice 2: Techniques to Teach Students with Learning Disabilities.
Where Do You Stand? Using Data to Size Up Your School’s Progress Michael C. McKenna University of Virginia.
Evaluating a PreK-3 rd Grade Approach. Evaluation is not a one-size-fits-all undertaking. Because PreK-3 rd reforms look different in different places,
Effectiveness of Selected Supplemental Reading Comprehension Interventions: Impacts on a First Cohort of Fifth-Grade Students June 8, 2009 IES Annual Research.
A Multi-Level Framework to Understand Factors Influencing Program Implementation in Schools Celene E. Domitrovich, Ph.D. Penn State Prevention Research.
1 Oregon Reading First Institute on Beginning Reading: Evaluating and Planning Spring, 2006 Cohort A (C) 2006 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center.
+ Response to Intervention Ann Morrison Ph.D.. + Two Parts of Response to Intervention To ensure that all students will meet state and district standards.
Interboro School District Keystones to Opportunity Grant Four Year Overview School Years.
Clayton R. Cook Diana Browning Wright. Purposes of Assessment Screening Who needs help? Diagnosis Why is the problem occurring? Progress Monitoring Is.
Knowledge-Building and Instructional Practice in Georgia Reading First.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
TCAI: Lessons from first Endline TCAI Development Partners Feb 27, 2013.
COMBINING EVIDENCE- BASED PRACTICES AND COMMON CORE REQUIREMENTS: A DESIGN EXPERIMENT LRA, Dallas, December 2013.
Comprehensive Evaluation Concept & Design Analysis Process Evaluation Outcome Assessment.
RPDC’s Help Improve Student Achievement
Using Observation to Enhance Supervision CIMH Symposium Supervisor Track Oakland, California April 27, 2012.
Interboro School District Keystones to Opportunity Grant
Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment Summit Massachusetts Tiered System of Support MTSS – Non Academic.
Extending RTI to School-wide Behavior Support
Russ Brock Coordinator of Programs
Presentation transcript:

Hopkins PSMG Oct An Incomplete Model for Trial Designs for Moving to Scale: The Whole Day Program C Hendricks Brown Sheppard Kellam Jeanne Poduska Amy Windham John Reid Carla Ford Natalie Keegan Supported by R01 DA PI: Kellam Ro1 MH PI: Brown Baltimore City Public School System

Hopkins PSMG Oct Premise The Whole Day Program is where the school would want to be in 5 years, systemwide. What specific steps should be examined along the way?

Hopkins PSMG Oct Primary Question Effective? Who benefits, for how long? Who doesn’t benefit, who is harmed? Efficacy Trial 12 Schools 24 Classrooms 600 Students 3 Time Periods

Hopkins PSMG Oct Differential impact on spring of first grade reading achievement by baseline reading (fall of first grade): control against two interventions Control Classroom / Parent Interventions Brown: Statistical Power

Hopkins PSMG Oct Presuming Effectiveness Sustainabililty Do WD teachers continue to sustain the same effects on children that they have in following years? 12 WD Teachers vs Themselves & 12 Wait- Listed Controls Scalability Can program be successfully implemented outside the original 12 schools throughout the school system?

Hopkins PSMG Oct Scale to What? From 2 To all 4 of the School Areas From 12 To 20 To 135 Schools From 24 To 40 To 400 First-Grade Classrooms

Hopkins PSMG Oct An Evidence-Based Decision Tree Efficacious especially w/ High-Risk Youth? Sustainable? Feasible to Scale? Y Y Go to Scale! Y N N N

Hopkins PSMG Oct The Real Decision Tree for BCPSS Something Different

Hopkins PSMG Oct Person, Place, and Time Child Classroom / Teacher (1 st Grade) School Area (Region of Baltimore) Time – Scale(s): 10 Secs, Min, Quarter, Year Child : Track from 1 st through 3 rd Grade Teacher: Track over 3 years (cohorts)

Hopkins PSMG Oct Randomization 20 Schools in 2 Areas randomly assigned to One of 12 schools where trial begins One of 8 schools that are “wait-listed” Children randomly assigned to classes within school Teachers/Classes randomly assigned to WD or wait-list

Hopkins PSMG Oct Baltimore Whole Day Trial Assignment of Classrooms/Teachers in First Year Half the Teachers are Wait-Listed for WD to 3 rd Year Replicate Same Design w/ SC and and WD BOTH in 12 Different Schools Brown: Statistical Power

Hopkins PSMG Oct Effectiveness Evaluation Compare 3 years of Outcomes for Children in the 12 WD classes to those in 12 Standard classes -- 1 st Cohort Examine Level of Program Implementation in the 12 WD and 12 Standard Classrooms in 1 st Cohort

Hopkins PSMG Oct Classroom Observations by Independent Observers 3 times per year WD and SC classrooms AM-Reading Instruction PM-Other subjects Teacher Practices Timed Observations Checklist Global Ratings of Quality Student Behavior On-Task/Off-task Ratings of Disruptive, Aggressive, and Shy Behavior

Hopkins PSMG Oct Classroom Observation Data Collection Form Teacher Practices and Student Behavior Actual Form

Hopkins PSMG Oct Domains of Reading Instruction Word Work – phonemic awareness, alphabetic instruction, letter recognition, work work Reading Comprehension – reading comprehension, previewing a book, reading books Language – oral language, vocabulary, reading own writing, writing, grammar Non-reading Instruction – interruptions, teacher out of classroom Giving instructionally related reading directions Feedback in response to behavior Feedback in response to a reading relevant comment or event

Hopkins PSMG Oct Classroom Observations Baseline Data Overview 12 schools 24 teachers (12 Whole Day, 12 Standard setting) Each teacher observed 3 times per year, at each time point: –1 reading instruction (am observation) –1 non-reading instruction (pm observation) Length of observations at each time point: Teacher: mean = 164 minutes Each student: mean = 9 min/student

Hopkins PSMG Oct Given Teacher Instructional Practices, Classroom Behavior (Standard Practice Classrooms during Reading Instruction at Baseline) Well behaved v Fairly well behaved: X 2 =36.83 p<10 -7 Word WorkReading Comprehension Language Well behaved % % % Fairly well behaved % % % Poorly behaved 1.3% 7 2.3% % Chaotic5 1.6% 00

Hopkins PSMG Oct Student behavior: Reading v Other subjects (Standard Practice Classrooms at Baseline) Never off-task v Ever off-task: X 2 =29.80 p<10 -8 AM-ReadingPM-Other subjects Never off task % % Off task-1 interval13 1.1% % Off task-2 intervals5.4% % Off task-3 intervals42 3.5% %

Hopkins PSMG Oct Effectiveness Results for Cohort 1 (1 of 2) At Baseline Level of Off-Task Behavior is Well Balanced across Intervention Condition Reduction in Off-task Behavior Control 21% WD 9% 50% Reduction in Aggressive Behavior for Males in Less Structured Settings

Hopkins PSMG Oct Graphical Comparison for Off-Task Behavior

Hopkins PSMG Oct Comparison of Teachers

Hopkins PSMG Oct Unsolved Multilevel Modeling Issues Child Gender, Baseline Off-Task Classroom Intervention, Classroom Baseline Aggr School Time-Varying Classroom Context Binary Outcomes

Hopkins PSMG Oct Sustainability Evaluation (Funded) Multilevel Support Compare Teacher Implementation (and Child Outcomes) for 12 WD Teachers in 1 st through 3 rd Year for First Grade Classes

Hopkins PSMG Oct Sustainability Hypotheses and N’s & Years Teacher practices over time will be related to the quality of WD integration at the level of the School Building Team. 12  20  Teacher practices over time will be related to the quality of WD integration at the level of the School Area over time. 2  4

Hopkins PSMG Oct Scalability Design Change in fidelity (Teacher practices) and impact (Child Outcomes) in succeeding years after initial training 12  24  135

Hopkins PSMG Oct Combined RCT and Implementation Trial Trial After a Trial Design

Hopkins PSMG Oct How to Go From 24 to 400 Classes? A Dynamic Wait-Listed type of design Randomly Assign WHEN schools and classes obtain training, coaching, and full implementation Continue to assess intervention fidelity Paired-down measure of Teacher Practices Random Assign Children to Classes?

Hopkins PSMG Oct Classes Schools Waiting Active School Trained Wait Listed Sustained TrainedSustained

Hopkins PSMG Oct Plausible Time Scale # Classes (Schools) Time Period/Cohort New WDSustainabilityComparisonWait-Listed Effectiveness12 (12)012 (Same 12)376 (123) Sustain012 (12)12 (Same 12)376 (123) Scalability12 (12)12 (Same 12)20 (8)356 (115) Full Scalability Yr 1 90 (30)44 (20)40 (30)230 (85) Yr 290 (25)130 (50)40 (25)140 (60) Yr 390 (30)220 (70)40 (30)50 (35) Yr 490 (35)310 (100)0 (0)