Usability. User-Based Practices Questions Questions Organization Organization Sign Posting Sign Posting Background Background Anderson, Chapter 4.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Copyright 1999 all rights reserved The HCI Design Process n User Interfaces are not just built by sitting down and drawing up designs for them n Just like.
Advertisements

AN OVERVIEW BY JAMIE STARKE The Role of Prototyping.
ACTIVELY ENGAGING THE STAKEHOLDER IN DEFINING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE BUSINESS, THE STAKEHOLDER, SOLUTION OR TRANSITION Requirements Elicitation.
CHAPTER 10, qualitative field research
Semester in review. The Final May 7, 6:30pm – 9:45 pm Closed book, ONE PAGE OF NOTES Cumulative Similar format to midterm (probably about 25% longer)
Usability presented by the OSU Libraries’ u-team.
1 Overview of Usability Testing CSSE 376, Software Quality Assurance Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology April 19, 2007.
Usability Inspection n Usability inspection is a generic name for a set of methods based on having evaluators inspect or examine usability-related issues.
Evaluation Methodologies
Part 4: Evaluation Chapter 20: Why evaluate? Chapter 21: Deciding on what to evaluate: the strategy Chapter 22: Planning who, what, where, and when Chapter.
Design and Evaluation of Iterative Systems n For most interactive systems, the ‘design it right first’ approach is not useful. n The 3 basic steps in the.
These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by.
Evaluation How do we test the interaction design? Several Dimensions
HCI revision lecture. Main points Understanding Applying knowledge Knowing key points Knowing relationship between things If you’ve done the group project.
Web 2.0 Testing and Marketing E-engagement capacity enhancement for NGOs HKU ExCEL3.
Web Design Process CMPT 281. Outline How do we know good sites from bad sites? Web design process Class design exercise.
1. Learning Outcomes At the end of this lecture, you should be able to: –Define the term “Usability Engineering” –Describe the various steps involved.
Sofia Carlander Kinoshita Laboratory 2004/2005
Chapter 10 Conducting & Reading Research Baumgartner et al Chapter 10 Qualitative Research.
Introduction to Usability By : Sumathie Sundaresan.
Product Development & User Testing
Predictive Evaluation
Usability By: Sharett Wooten and Gwen Payne. What is Usability Usability addresses the relationship between tools and their users. In order for a tool.
Chapter 11: An Evaluation Framework Group 4: Tony Masi, Sam Esswein, Brian Rood, & Chris Troisi.
ITEC224 Database Programming
Dobrin / Keller / Weisser : Technical Communication in the Twenty-First Century. © 2008 Pearson Education. Upper Saddle River, NJ, All Rights Reserved.
Merja & Pauli Rapid prototyping & other stuff.
Multimedia Specification Design and Production 2013 / Semester 1 / week 9 Lecturer: Dr. Nikos Gazepidis
3461P Crash Course Lesson on Usability Testing The extreme, extreme basics...
Human Computer Interaction
What about Chapter 7?. What is the usability process? Tyldesley’s 22 possible Measurement Criteria Let’s focus on usability–A usability initiative needs.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley The Resonant Interface HCI Foundations for Interaction Design First Edition.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley Lecturer – Prof Jim Warren Lecture 4 - Usability Testing Based on Heim, Chapter.
Usability Testing CS774 Human Computer Interaction Spring 2004.
Usability Testing & Web Design by Alex Andujar. What is Usability? Usability measures the quality of a user's experience when interacting with a Web site,
New Media Research Methods- Part 1 Planning stage: Using Methods, Data and Tools to explore User’s Experience. How methods relate to research questions?
Designing & Testing Information Systems Notes Information Systems Design & Development: Purpose, features functionality, users & Testing.
Chapter 7 Interactive Design and Prototyping Human Performance Engineering Robert W. Bailey, Ph.D. Third Edition.
Chapter 9 Prototyping. Objectives  Describe the basic terminology of prototyping  Describe the role and techniques of prototyping  Enable you to produce.
User Interface Design & Usability for the Web Card Sorting You should now have a basic idea as to content requirements, functional requirements and user.
Chapter 3 Managing Design Processes. 3.1 Introduction Design should be based on: –User observation Analysis of task frequency and sequences –Prototypes,
Usability Engineering Dr. Dania Bilal IS 582 Spring 2006.
System Construction System Construction is the development, installation and testing of system components.
Strategic Research. 6-2 Chapter Outline I.Chapter Key Points II.Research: The Quest for Intelligence and Insight III.The Uses of Research IV.Research.
Usability Evaluation, part 2. REVIEW: A Test Plan Checklist, 1 Goal of the test? Specific questions you want to answer? Who will be the experimenter?
EVALUATION PROfessional network of Master’s degrees in Informatics as a Second Competence – PROMIS ( TEMPUS FR-TEMPUS-JPCR)
Evaluation and Designing
Introduction to Usability By : Sumathie Sundaresan.
June 5, 2007Mohamad Eid Usability Testing Chapter 8.
Usability Testing TECM 4180 Dr. Lam. What is Usability? A quality attribute that assesses how easy user interfaces are to use Learnability – Ease of use.
Cognitive Walkthrough More evaluating with experts.
Introduction to Evaluation without Users. Where are you at with readings? Should have read –TCUID, Chapter 4 For Next Week –Two Papers on Heuristics from.
1 Technical Communication A Reader-Centred Approach First Canadian Edition Paul V. Anderson Kerry Surman
Usability Evaluation or, “I can’t figure this out...do I still get the donuts?”
Evaluation / Usability. ImplementDesignAnalysisEvaluateDevelop ADDIE.
Usability Testing By: Abeera Saeed Abira Abid Bhutta Submitted to: Ma’am Maryam Akhtar BESE-19B.
Day 8 Usability testing.
1 User testing approaches: Practical techniques toward a more usable website Arc Worldwide 1.
Generating data with enacted methods
Asking Users and Experts
Task-Centered Walkthrough
Testing Multimedia Products
Usability Evaluation, part 2
CS 321: Human-Computer Interaction Design
SY DE 542 User Testing March 7, 2005 R. Chow
CHAPTER 10, qualitative field research
Usability Techniques Lecture 13.
Chapter 19 Case study on requirements, design, and evaluation: NATS
Usability Testing CS 4501 / 6501 Software Testing
COMP444 Human Computer Interaction Usability Engineering
Presentation transcript:

Usability

User-Based Practices Questions Questions Organization Organization Sign Posting Sign Posting Background Background Anderson, Chapter 4

Usability is… Useful : Your content should be original and fulfill a need Usable : Site must be easy to use Desirable : Image, identity, brand, and other design elements are used to evoke emotion and appreciation Findable : Content needs to be navigable and locatable onsite and offsite Accessible : Content needs to be accessible to people with disabilities Credible : Users must trust and believe what you tell them

When to Work on Usability Usability plays a role in each stage of the design process. The resulting need for multiple studies is one reason I recommend making individual studies fast and cheap. Here are the main steps: Before starting the new design, test the old design to identify the good parts that you should keep or emphasize, and the bad parts that give users trouble. Unless you're working on an intranet, test your competitors' designs to get cheap data on a range of alternative interfaces that have similar features to your own. (If you work on an intranet, read the intranet design annual to learn from other designs.)intranet design annual Conduct a field study to see how users behave in their natural habitat. Make paper prototypes of one or more new design ideas and test them. The less time you invest in these design ideas the better, because you'll need to change them all based on the test results. paper prototypes Refine the design ideas that test best through multiple iterations, gradually moving from low- fidelity prototyping to high-fidelity representations that run on the computer. Test each iteration. Inspect the design relative to established usability guidelines whether from your own earlier studies or published research. established usability guidelines Once you decide on and implement the final design, test it again. Subtle usability problems always creep in during implementation.

“Usability refers to the quality of a user’s experience when interacting with products or systems, including websites, software, devices, or applications” Intuitive design : a nearly effortless understanding of the architecture and navigation of the site Ease of learning : how fast a user who has never seen the user interface before can accomplish basic tasks Efficiency of use : How fast an experienced user can accomplish tasks Memorability : after visiting the site, if a user can remember enough to use it effectively in future visits Error frequency and severity : how often users make errors while using the system, how serious the errors are, and how users recover from the errors Subjective satisfaction : If the user likes using the system

Usability Testing Planning Conducting Interpreting

Define your goalsDefine your goals Choose TestersChoose Testers Use the draft/deliverable as your target readers wouldUse the draft/deliverable as your target readers would Tasks, Location, Resources, Information GatheringTasks, Location, Resources, Information Gathering Post Task InterviewPost Task Interview

Test for Persuasiveness Likert-scale questionsLikert-scale questions Avoid BiasAvoid Bias Treatment of Test ReadersTreatment of Test Readers  Test’s purpose  Think they will do during the test  Time required  Where the test will occur  Risks  Right to Decline  Right to stop at anytime

Determine which type of usability test to implement Depending on where you are in the design process, there are three types of usability tests to choose from. These are the exploratory, assessment, and validation tests. A fourth type, the comparison test, can be used at any point in the design life cycle. Exploratory Test : The objective is to explore the user's mental model of the task you're trying to facilitate. When to use : This type of test is usually conducted during the initial phases of a design life-cycle. This test is effective when the designers are still grappling with what functionality to include in the final product. Objective : Evaluates whether the user can distinguish between the functional elements of an interface; whether the user values the functions presented; whether the overall structure enables a "walk up and use" product. The test seeks to establish the intuitiveness of the implementation. Methodology : This test involves a high degree of interaction between the monitor and the subject. The purpose of the test is to identify points of confusion encountered by the user and then to "walk through" what would help them out. Test Example : The user is shown an example of a mundane situation, i.e. a screen shot of a user-account management tool, and then asked to talk through their assumptions, expectations, wishes, etc.

Assessment Test : This is the most common test conducted. When to use : Normally conducted early or midway through the design of the product. Objective : This test assumes that the basic conceptual models are decided and determines how well they've been implemented. The test seeks to measure the effectiveness of the implementation. Methodology : The user performs tasks while the monitor largely stays out of the way. Quantitative measurements are gathered. Test Example : User is asked to accomplish a book renewal.

Validation Test : When to use : This test normally takes place close to the release of the product. Objective : The purpose of this test is to establish that the product performance meets or exceeds benchmark standards in time and effort required to accomplish a task. These standards are arrived at either through previous tests or educated guesses. This test also measures how well all the pieces of the design work together. Methodology : Benchmarks are first established for the tasks. The tasks are then given to users and the resulting completion efforts monitored. The resulting quantitative data is analyzed and timings over benchmark are identified as possible problem areas. Test Example : "Access your library account, identify if any books are due soon and then renew them if they are. Benchmark = 1 minute”

Comparison Test : This test compares the users reactions to multiple examples of a tool or implementation. When to use : This test can be used at any stage in the design process to compare radically different designs or implementations against each other. Objective : This test is used to determine which design is easiest to use and what are the advantages and disadvantages between designs. Methodology : This test can be an exploratory test where multiple designs are compared qualitatively. The usual result is an improved product which combines the best of many different ideas. The best results normally come from comparing examples of wildly differing implementations. Test Example : "Locate a tutorial on finding scholarly journals on the following library websites." Rubin, p

Types of Usability Testing Hallway TestingHallway Testing Remote Usability TestingRemote Usability Testing Expert ReviewExpert Review Paper Prototype TestingPaper Prototype Testing Questionnaires and ReviewsQuestionnaires and Reviews Do-It-Yourself Walk ThroughDo-It-Yourself Walk Through Controlled ExperimentsControlled Experiments Automated Usability TestingAutomated Usability Testing testing/ testing/

Other Testing Focus GroupFocus Group Tree TestingTree Testing Beta TestingBeta Testing User DiariesUser Diaries of-ux-professionals/ of-ux-professionals/

Role of Test Monitor Be a good listener Build a rapport with the participant Be flexible and open to changes in the usability plan Maintain a long attention span Try not to lead the participant--they need to find the answer themselves! Try not to act too knowledgeable--playing dumb can raise some interesting results. Try not to jump to conclusions--strive to pick out patterns while not allowing that knowledge to color your interaction with the participant. Rubin, p