Warm Up Underline the hypothesis and circle the conclusion of each conditional. 1. A mapping that is a reflection is a type of transformation. 2. The quotient.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sec.2-3 Deductive Reasoning
Advertisements

Warm Up Identify the hypothesis and conclusion of each conditional.
Chapter 2 Geometric Reasoning
Warm Up Identify the hypothesis and conclusion of each conditional. 1. A mapping that is a reflection is a type of transformation. 2. The quotient of two.
Geometry Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Geometry 1.0 – Students demonstrate understanding by identifying and giving examples of inductive and deductive reasoning.
Warm Up Make a conjecture based on the following information.  For points A, B and C, AB = 2, BC = 3, and AC = 4. A, B, and C form an equilateral triangle.
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning. Objectives Use the Law of Detachment Use the Law of Detachment Use the Law of Syllogism Use the Law of Syllogism.
1 2-3 Deductive Reasoning Objectives: Define deductive reasoning Use the Law of Detachment Use the Law of Syllogism.
Holt McDougal Geometry 2-1 Using Inductive Reasoning to Make Conjectures 2-1 Using Inductive Reasoning to Make Conjectures Holt Geometry Warm Up Warm Up.
Chapter 2.3 Notes: Apply Deductive Reasoning Goal: You will use deductive reasoning to form a logical argument.
Holt McDougal Geometry 2-3 Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures Determine if each conjecture is true or false. If false, provide a counterexample.
Deductive Reasoning What can you D…D….D…. DEDUCE ?
Deductive Reasoning Chapter 2 Lesson 4.
2.2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning. What We Will Learn Use inductive reasoning Use deductive reasoning.
Holt McDougal Geometry 2-3 Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures Students will… Apply the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism in logical.
C HAPTER Using deductive reasoning. O BJECTIVES Students will be able to: Apply the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism in logical reasoning.
Warm-up - Sept 22 (Tuesday) 8. Which conditional and its converse form a true biconditional? a. Write the two conditional statements that make up this.
Holt Geometry 2-4 Biconditional Statements and Definitions Write and analyze biconditional statements. Objective.
CONFIDENTIAL 1 Grade 9 Algebra1 Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures.
Section 2.3: Deductive Reasoning
Geometry 2-3 Law of Syllogism The Law of Syllogism allows you to draw conclusions from two conditional statements. Law of Syllogism If p  q and q  r.
Geometry Chapter 2: Reasoning and Introduction to Proof We can do this dude!
LG 1: Logic A Closer Look at Reasoning
Holt Geometry 2-3 Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures Chapter 2.3 – Deductive Reasoning.
Objective Apply the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism in logical reasoning.
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
2-3 Apply Deductive Reasoning
2-3 Deductive Reasoning Warm Up Lesson Presentation Lesson Quiz
Drill: Tuesday, 10/14 2. Determine if the conditional “If x is a number then |x| > 0” is true. If false, give a counterexample. OBJ: SWBAT analyze.
Warm Up For this conditional statement: If a polygon has 3 sides, then it is a triangle. Write the converse, the inverse, the contrapositive, and the.
UNIT 2 Geometric Reasoning 2.1
2.2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning
Objective Apply the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism in logical reasoning.
Do Now: Name each point , line, and line segment, or ray
2.1: Patterns and Inductive Reasoning
02-2: Vocabulary inductive reasoning conjecture counterexample
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Sec. 2.3: Apply Deductive Reasoning
Warmup Definition: Perpendicular Lines—
Vocabulary inductive reasoning conjecture counterexample
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Drill: Tuesday, 10/18 2. Determine if the conditional “If x is a number then |x| > 0” is true. If false, give a counterexample. OBJ: SWBAT analyze.
1. Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of the conditional below and determine the truth value for each. “If the measure of an angle is less.
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Math Humor Q: How is a geometry classroom like the United Nations?
Objective Apply the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism in logical reasoning.
2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning
Concept 8 Inductive Reasoning.
Drill: Wednesday, 11/1 Determine if the conditional “If x is a number then |x| > 0” is true. If false, give a counterexample. Write the contrapositive.
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
2.3 Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures
Notes 2.3 Deductive Reasoning.
UNIT 2 Geometric Reasoning 2.1
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
Learning Target Students will be able to: Apply the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism in logical reasoning.
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
2-3 Apply Deductive Reasoning
Pearson Unit 1 Topic 2: Reasoning and Proof 2-4: Deductive Reasoning Pearson Texas Geometry ©2016 Holt Geometry Texas ©2007.
Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3
2-1: Logic with Inductive Reasoning
Chapter 2.3 Notes: Apply Deductive Reasoning
Consider the following TRUE conditional statement…
Presentation transcript:

Warm Up Underline the hypothesis and circle the conclusion of each conditional. 1. A mapping that is a reflection is a type of transformation. 2. The quotient of two negative numbers is positive. 3. Determine if the conditional “If x is a number then |x| > 0” is true. If false, give a counterexample. 2.3 Logic Laws

Objective Apply the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism in logical reasoning. 2.3 Logic Laws Deductive reasoning is the process of using __________to draw conclusions from given ________, ________________, and ___________________. logic facts definitions properties Inductive reasoning is the process of reasoning that a rule or statement is true because specific cases are true.

Example 1 Decide whether inductive or deductive reasoning is used to reach the conclusion. Explain your reasoning. a.At Reagan High School, students must pass Geometry before they take Algebra 2. Emily is in Algebra 2, so she must have passed Geometry. b.Sally is taking the bus to school. She notices that the next 5 people who get on the bus are wearing jeans. She concludes that the next person to get on the bus will also be wearing jeans. c.Kim knows she is younger than Jeff, but she is older than Phil. So Kim concludes that Jeff must be older than Phil.

Law of Detachment If p  q is a true statement and p is true, then q is true. There are two laws of deductive reasoning.

Example 2 Use the Law of Detachment to determine the conclusion. If a car is a corvette, then it is a Chevrolet. Suzie's car is a Corvette. Conclusion Suzie's car is a Chevrolet.

Example 3 Determine if the conjecture is valid by the Law of Detachment. Given: In the World Series, if a team wins four games, then the team wins the series. The Red Sox won four games in the 2004 World Series. Conjecture: The Red Sox won the 2004 World Series. In the World Series, if a team wins four games, then the team wins the series. The Red Sox won four games in the 2004 World Series hypothesis conclusion hypothesis conclusion The Red Sox won the 2004 World Series. The conjecture is valid.

If a student passes his classes, then the student is eligible to play sports. Example 4 Determine if the conjecture is valid by the Law of Detachment. Given: If a student passes his classes, the student is eligible to play sports. Ramon passed his classes. Conjecture: Ramon is eligible to play sports. The statement “Ramon passed his classes” matches the hypothesis of a true conditional. By the Law of Detachment, Ramon is eligible to play sports. The conjecture is valid.

Example 5 Determine if the conjecture is valid by the Law of Detachment. Given: If the side lengths of a triangle are 5 cm, 12 cm, and 13 cm, then the area of the triangle is 30 cm 2. The area of ∆PQR is 30 cm 2. Conjecture: The side lengths of ∆PQR are 5cm, 12 cm, and 13 cm. If the side lengths of a triangle are 5 cm, 12 cm, and 13 cm, then the area of the triangle is 30 cm 2. The given statement “The area of ∆PQR is 30 cm 2 ” matches the conclusion of a true conditional. But this does not mean the hypothesis is true. The dimensions of the triangle could be different. So the conjecture is not valid.

Law of Syllogism If p  q and q  r are true statements, then p  r is a true statement.

Example 6 Determine if the conjecture is valid by the Law of Syllogism. Given: If a figure is a kite, then it is a quadrilateral. If a figure is a quadrilateral, then it is a polygon. Conjecture: If a figure is a kite, then it is a polygon.

Example 7 Determine if the conjecture is valid by the Law of Syllogism. Given: If a number is divisible by 2, then it is even. If a number is even, then it is an integer. Conjecture: If a number is an integer, then it is divisible by 2.

Example 8 Put the following statements in order. Given: If an animal is a mammal, then it has hair. If an animal is a dog, then it is a mammal. Conclusion? __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ Law of logic? _________________________________________________ If an animal is a mammal, then it has hair. If an animal is a dog, then it is a mammal.

Example 9 Put the following statements in order. Then use the Law of Syllogism to draw a conclusion. a. If quompies plaun, then romples gleer. b. If homblers frain, then quompies plaun. c. If ruskers bleer, then homblers frain. a. If quompies plaun, then romples gleer. b. If homblers frain, then quompies plaun. c. If ruskers bleer, then homblers frain. Conclusion? ________________________________________ __________________________________________________

Example 10 Draw a conclusion from the given information. a.Given: If 2y = 4, then z = –1. If x + 3 = 12, then 2y = 4. x + 3 = 12 Conclusion? ______________________________________________________________________ b. Given: If a polygon is a triangle, then it has three sides. If a polygon has three sides, then it is not a quadrilateral. Polygon P is a triangle. Conclusion? _______________________________________________________________________

c. Given: If n is a natural number, then n is an integer. If n is an integer, then n is a rational number is a rational number. Conclusion? _______________________________________________________ ________________________