Mobile phone adherence support for antiretroviral therapy: What would it cost the National AIDS Control Program in India? Rodrigues R, Shet A, Swaroop N, Shastri S, Bogg L, De Costa A St. John’s National Academy of Health Sciences, National AIDS Control Organisation Bangalore, India Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden WEAE0303
2/17 HIV prevalence : 0.3%* People with HIV: 2.5 million HIV patients on treatment: 0.4million # Study Setting INDIA *UNAIDS. Global Report 2010, # NACO March 2012 Bangalore Private teaching hospital with Government ART center Mysore Government teaching hospital and ART center
3/17 Introduction Good adherence defers failure to 1 st line ART optimizes healthcare outcomes - reduces healthcare costs * Interventions involving mobile telephones – found suitable for improving adherence – could reduce healthcare costs *World Health Organisation (2003) Adherence to Long-term Therapies # Weltel Prompting medication reminders- Cameroon
4/17 Objective To assess the cost of weekly mobile phone reminders* for adherence support in the context of the Indian National AIDS control Program * HIVIND trial
5/17 The Mobile Phone Intervention Patient with mobile phone On Ry + Interactive Voice Response Call (IVR) Pictorial SMS Weekly
6/17 Assumptions This costing was from the program perspective: Hence, Expenses in relation to the trial implementation were not considered The technical providers of the intervention - considered most economical
7/17 Costing Methodology The sequential procedure for costing was used: 1. Identifying the resource used in natural units (minutes/any other units) 2. Measuring resource use 3. Pricing the resource Sensitivity analysis for intervention scale up: 1. Varying the number of patients (IVR+SMS) 2. Varying the components of intervention ie; (i) SMS alone (ii) IVR alone and
8/17 Costs One time costs: Costs incurred for Intervention development Recurrent Costs: Fixed costs: Annual maintenance fee for equipment, staff cost, overheads Variable cost: IVR and SMS cost/ patient, staff cost- intervention related Total Costs: One time cost + Fixed costs + n (variable costs)
9/17 Results One-time costs Costs (USD) Annualised cost (USD) Development of the intervention452.99/5yrs90.60 Development of the web interface201.33/5yrs40.27 Equipment costs [1 computer (10% time) and 1 mobile phone)664.38/5yrs13.29 Total one time costs One time costs
10/17 Fixed costs Cost (USD) Annualised cost (USD) Service maintenance603.99/year Equipment maintenance28.19/3years9.40 Program manager (10% of annual time, USD/mth salary) Overheads201.33/year Data manager (15min/week, USD/mth salary)10.63 Total fixed cost Fixed Cost
11/17 Variable Costs Costs (USD) Annual Cost/patient (USD) IVR cost0.030/IVR1.57 SMS cost0.004/SMS0.21 Counselor (20min/patient/year, 24.16USD/mth salary)0.11 Total variable cost 1.89 Total costs Annual Cost (USD) One-time cost + Fixed costs + n (variable costs) Total Cost/patient (number of patients 1600) 2.82 Variable and Total costs/ patient
12/17 Sensitivity analysis: Total and variable costs intervention scale up
13/17 Sensitivity analysis: Cost for intervention scale-up (IVR+SMS) Costs USD One time cost Fixed cost Variable cost/patient Total cost Total cost/patient Patients Total cost of Intervention scale-up for 0.8 million patients: 0.16% of the 5year NACP VI budget
14/17 Sensitivity analysis: Cost for IVR / SMS Scale-up RegionKarnatakaIndia Languages532 ART centers44313 Patients InterventionIVRSMSIVRSMSIVRSMS Onetime+ fixed cost (USD) Variable cost/pt Total cost (USD)* Total cost/pt (USD) *Total cost = One time + fixed cost + n (variable cost)
15/17 Conclusion The Indian National AIDS Control Program would incur an overall cost of 0.16% of its current 5year budget for mobile phone adherence support of ART Given the current implementation costs, the intervention has the potential to improve health system effectiveness and enable the achievement of program goals in the Indian context
16/17 The authors declare that they have no competing interests
17/17 Thank you!!!