Q/.r NSRZKLA4-P1 Capacity planning for railway systems Leo Kroon Jan 17, 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Capacity Studies on Transportation Network Presented by Rakesh Ambre ( ) Under Guidance Of Prof. Narayan Rangaraj.
Advertisements

RELATION BETWEEN DEMAND AFTER TRAIN PATHS AND CAPACITY OF RAILWAY TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE Ing. Josef Bulíček, Ph.D. Ing. Lukáš Fiala University of Pardubice,
Real Time Train SNCF. 1 Agenda Essentials Basic Model Applications Traffic density is getting very high in several networks and management.
Line Balancing Problem A B C 4.1mins D 1.7mins E 2.7 mins F 3.3 mins G 2.6 mins 2.2 mins 3.4 mins.
L’Infra, une activité au cœur de la SNCF INFRASTRUCTURE French Highspeed on South East TGV line: 25 years of evolution Jean-Paul BALENSI Vice-president.
IRSC DUBLIN OCTOBER 2006 vue n°1 INTERNATIONAL RAILWAY SAFETY CONFERENCE Dublin 23 – 25 october 2006 CIRCULATION OF TRAM-TRAINS ON THE FRENCH NATIONAL.
Train platforming problem Ľudmila Jánošíková Michal Krempl University of Žilina, VŠB-Technical University of Ostrava, Slovak Republic Czech Republic.
Railway competitiveness Hinne Groot, Netherlands ministry 25th November 2014 UN ECE SC.2 workshop 25 November 2014.
10 December J/ESD.204J Lecture 13 Outline Real Time Control Strategies for Rail Transit Prior Research Shen/Wilson Model Formulation Model Application.
Reinventing Crew Scheduling At Netherlands Railways Erwin Abbink, NS Reizigers bv, The Netherlands (NL) Matteo Fischetti, University of Padua, Italy Double.
1 The crew scheduling problem Matteo Fischetti DEI, University of Padova Double-Click sas, Padova Utrecht, 29 August 2008.
Stochastic optimization of a timetable M.E. van Kooten Niekerk.
Maintenance Routing Gábor Maróti CWI, Amsterdam and NS Reizigers, Utrecht Models for Maintenance Routing 2nd AMORE Seminar, Partas, 30.
Erasmus Center for Optimization in Public Transport 1 Shunting passenger train units: Practical planning aspects Ramon Lentink, Pieter-Jan Fioole, Dennis.
Operation-driven Scheduling Approach for Fast, Frequent and Reliable Railway Services Alfons A.M. Schaafsma, Vincent A. Weeda ProRail, Department of Traffic.
Transportation Engineering Higher Technical School of Engineering, University of Sevilla, Spain Fall School on Robust Network Design and Delay Management,
The Potential BRT in Asia
Rail Zürich, Train scheduling based on speed profiles © ETH Zürich | M. Fuchsberger Martin Fuchsberger, ETH Zurich RailZurich, 11. February 2009.
Erasmus Center for Optimization in Public Transport Bus Scheduling & Delays Dennis Huisman Joint work with: Richard Freling and.
Passenger travel behavior model in railway network simulation Ting Li Eric van Heck Peter Vervest Jasper Voskuilen Dept. Of decision and information sciences.
Optimal Design of Timetables to maximize schedule reliability and minimize energy consumption, rolling stock and crew deployment.
Decision for the location of Intermodal terminals in a rail-road network Anupam Kulshreshtha IIM - Lucknow.
CE 515 Railroad Engineering
Luis Cadarso(1), Vikrant Vaze(2), Cynthia Barnhart(3), Ángel Marín(1)
Rail Related Research at IIT Madras
RAILWAY INDUSTRY TRAIN PLANNING LEVEL 2 TRAINING Module 9 - The TOCs and Network Rail.
Evaluating Robustness of Signal Timings for Conditions of Varying Traffic Flows 2013 Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium – August 16, 2013.
TeNeT Group1IRSTE Seminar Information and Communication Technology (ICT) and Indian Railways Ashok Jhunjhunwala, TeNeT group, IIT Madras
RAIL TRANSPORT SEMINAR: RAILWAY INFRASTRUCTURE – KEY TO ACHIEVE SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT Operation on the Bulgarian railway market – current situation and.
1 utdallas.edu/~metin Managing Transportation in a Supply Chain Chapter 13.
Computational Experiments Algorithm run on a Pentium IV 2.4 GHz Instances from “Rete Ferroviaria Italiana” For each station: - minimum interval between.
Rail Reform – Czech Experience Zdeněk Tomeš – Martin Kvizda – Tomáš Nigrin – Daniel Seidenglanz – Monika Jandová – Václav Rederer.
Anders Peterson Fahimeh Khoshniyat Dept. of Science and Technology Linköping University, Norrköping, Sweden 6 th May 2014 Effects of Travel Time Dependent.
Lecture 2 Chapter 10 continued…. Last Lecture Summary: Covered Sec and most part of Sec Basic concepts of Linear Programming Problem and.
First Regional Conference Energy Efficiency of Railways in terms of Sustainable Development November Belgrade, Serbia Mr. Saša Živković, B.Sc.Eng.
BRT in India Delhi Case study. What is Delhi HCBS Delhi HCBS is not a BRT system. It is primarily a road infrastructure project. It was not conceived.
Prague Integrated Transport (PID).  Prague - area 496 km 2 population 1.2 mil. distance of the city boundary from the centre is 10 km to the north, 18.
Railway Operations: Issues and Objectives Capacity management Infrastructure planning Timetable preparation Management of day-to-day movement of trains.
HŽ Passenger Transport – overviewBUCHAREST HŽ PASSENGER TRANSPORT.
1. Variety of modes (types) of transport (public and private) 2. Density of transport networks more nodes and.
V. Cacchiani, ATMOS 2007, Seville1 Solving a Real-World Train Unit Assignment Problem V. Cacchiani, A. Caprara, P. Toth University of Bologna (Italy) European.
V. Cacchiani, A. Caprara and P. Toth DEIS, University of Bologna TIMETABLING FOR CONGESTED CORRIDORS.
INOC 2013 May 2013, Tenerife, Spain Train unit scheduling with bi-level capacity requirements Zhiyuan Lin, Eva Barrena, Raymond Kwan School of Computing,
Q/.r NSRZKLA4-P1 EUR team: Leo Kroon (EUR / NS)Timetable, rolling stock, crew Gabor Maroti (EUR / ARRIVAL)Timetable, rolling stock Ph.D. student (EUR /
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Frequency Determination Unit 5: Staff & Fleet Scheduling.
Railway Infrastructure Financing and PPPs November 2015.
Summary and Wrap-up Discussion 8 July 2015
Q/.r NSRZKLA4-P1 Timetable planning Leo Kroon Sept 9, 2003.
Gridlock? – Transport in 2030 Solving Congestion in South East England 14 th November, 2007 Adrian Shooter Chairman, ATOC.
CEE 320 Fall 2008 Route Choice CEE 320 Steve Muench.
CE2303 Railway Engineering
© 2010 IBM Corporation IBM Container Transport Optimization Dr. Juergen Koehl, IBM Research and Development, Boeblingen Juergen Koehl, IBM Container Logistics.
Initial proposals for the promotion of eco-mobility in the Austro-Hungarian border region EMAH project Álmos VIRÁG, project leader.
Managing Demand and Supply A Service Perspective.
Transportation System Engineering 1 , 61360
Erasmus Center for Optimization in Public Transport ECOPT – workshop February 19, 2004 Michiel Vromans, Rommert Dekker, Leo Kroon Erasmus University, NS.
Public Conference December
A Multi-Airport Dynamic Network Flow Model with Capacity Uncertainty
Introduction to Linear Programs
Dutch railway quantities
Feasibility study on infrastructural interventions in Port of Split
Alfons A. M. Schaafsma, Vincent A
Train scheduling based on speed profiles
Service Routes and Community Transit Hubs: Right Sizing Transit
JSC “UKRAINIAN RAILWAY” (UZ) DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY FOR
Gautrain System from An Operator’s Perspective
GEOP 4355 Transportation Routing Models
Variability 8/24/04 Paul A. Jensen
Mr. Ashok Agarwal : CEO - New Initiatives
Kent Route Study – Draft for Consultation
Presentation transcript:

q/.r NSRZKLA4-P1 Capacity planning for railway systems Leo Kroon Jan 17, 2002

q/.r NSRZKLA4-P2 Conclusions Capacity planning at several levels Relevant resources are: ¶ Infrastructure ¶ Rolling stock ¶ Personnel ¶... All relevant resources are scarce Effective utilization of resources is required OR models can provide useful support

q/.r NSRZKLA4-P3 Dutch railway quantities passengers per workday passenger kilometers per year 5000timetabled trains per workday 2800 kilometers of tracks 380stations 2650wagons 3000train drivers 4000conductors (and assistants)

q/.r NSRZKLA4-P Ut Hmla WdGd Cps Nwk Rta Rtn Rtd Vtn MdaGdg Hourly Pattern for the track Rotterdam - Utrecht 2800

q/.r NSRZKLA4-P5 Platform Occupation Chart for Utrecht Central

q/.r NSRZKLA4-P6 Utilization of the infrastructure (%) Price per pkm in cents (Dfl) Dispunctuality (%) Source: Koppeling Dec 16, 2000

q/.r NSRZKLA4-P7 Capacity aspects (infrastructure) Passengers vs. Cargo vs. Maintenance Significant increase in demand is expected Stations are a major bottle-neck # Trains or # Passengers/Tons? Utilization vs. Robustness Different kinds of capacity (OptiRail) Theoretical capacity Practical capacity Planned capacity

q/.r NSRZKLA4-P8 Capacity aspects (infrastructure: tracks) # Parallel tracks Heterogeneity of traffic # Take-over facilities Safety system (length of blocks) Energy system (diesel/electric) Rolling stock characteristics Rolling stock capacity (per wagon/unit) Environment (noise)....

q/.r NSRZKLA4-P9 Capacity aspects (infrastructure: stations) # Platforms # Parallel/simultaneous routes Platform occupation times (length of return times) # Shunting movements # (Cross-platform) connections Length of platforms Rail-side vs. City-side....

q/.r NSRZKLA4-P10 Traditional system time A BCDE F 5 trains

q/.r NSRZKLA4-P11 Clustered time 7 trains A BCDE F

q/.r NSRZKLA4-P12 A BCDE F Take-over time 9 trains

q/.r NSRZKLA4-P13 Homogeneous system time A BCDE F 8 trains

q/.r NSRZKLA4-P14 A BCDE F 2 tracks per direction time 15 trains

q/.r NSRZKLA4-P15 Capacity analysis and utilization DONS/SIMONE:Feasibility and robustness (dependent on timetable) Model Huisman: Network of queuing systems (independent of timetable) OptiRail: Network flow model with discrete resources (independent of timetable) B & B:Benutten & Bouwen (Utilize & Expand)

q/.r NSRZKLA4-P16 Rolling stock In rush hours:Allocation of scarce capacity Outside rush hours:Efficiency

q/.r NSRZKLA4-P17 q/.r Mat’64 with 2 or 4 wagons Koploper with 3 or 4 wagons Double decker with 3 or 4 wagons

q/.r NSRZKLA4-P18 Capacity aspects ( Rolling stock) Increasing demand during last years Additional wagons (units) will be available soon Rolling stock capacity mainly determined by - available # of wagons (units) - capacity per wagon (unit) - speed of the trains Available operational rolling stock capacity = (rolling stock capacity) - (maintenance reservation)

q/.r NSRZKLA4-P19 Capacity aspects ( Rolling stock) Required operational capacity mainly determined during the morning rush hours Allocated capacity per trip => minimally required capacity - shortage Allocated capacity per trip = # wagons (units) * capacity per wagon (unit) Maximum train length <= minimum platform length

q/.r NSRZKLA4-P20 Minimally required capacity per trip Based on counts by conductors

q/.r NSRZKLA4-P line 1 line 2 Eight o’clock cross section

q/.r NSRZKLA4-P22 Rolling stock allocation model Applied to 8 o’clock cross section of all stoptrains Implemented in ILOG OPL Studio Solved by CPLEX 7.0 on PC (900 MHz, 256 Mb) # variables: 3700 # constraints:9600 Manual solution: Total shortages (2nd class)4869 # trains with shortages 75 (of 188) Scenarios based on max. # types and subtypes per line: Best solution found:3958 # trains with shortages 71 (of 188)

q/.r NSRZKLA4-P23 01 Utilization Waiting time Waiting time vs. Utilization

q/.r NSRZKLA4-P24 Conclusions Capacity planning at several levels Relevant resources are: ¶ Infrastructure ¶ Rolling stock ¶ Personnel ¶... All relevant resources are scarce Effective utilization of resources is required OR models can provide useful support

q/.r NSRZKLA4-P25 Conference on Optimization in Public Transport May 23, 2002, Erasmus University Rotterdam Airline session: Jacques Desrosiers GERAD and École des Hautes Études Commericales, Montréal Gerrit Timmer; ORTEC Consultants and Free University Amsterdam Railway session: Paolo Toth; DEIS, University of Bologna, Italy Leo Kroon; NS Reizigers and ECOPT, Erasmus University Rotterdam Bus session: Matteo Fischetti; DEI, University of Padua and Double-Click sas, Italy Dennis Huisman; ECOPT, Erasmus University Rotterdam