Evidence-Based Observations Training for Observers of Teachers Module 5 Dr. Marijo Pearson Dr. Mike Doughty Mr. John Schiess Spring 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

RTTT Teacher Evaluator Training
Day 2: Learning and Teaching Session 2: Recording Evidence NYSED Principal Evaluation Training Program.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research & Literature From Session 1 Homework Video Exercise Summative Conferences.
OCM BOCES APPR Regulations As of % Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures APPR.
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation
New York State District-wide Growth Goal Setting Process: Student Learning Objectives Webinar 2 (REVISED FEBRUARY 2012)
Teacher Effectiveness
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research & Literature From Session 1 Homework Video Exercise Mid-Year Conferences.
Day 3. Agenda [always] Aligning RTTT Growth and Value-Added Update 21 st Century Readiness and APPR Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement.
Lead Evaluator Training
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation Module 2: Selecting Appropriate Assessments 1.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Day 9. Agenda Research Update Evidence Collection SLO Summative Help Summative Evaluation Growth-Producing Feedback The Start of the Second.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.
March 28, What does the new law require?  20% State student growth data (increases to 25% upon implementation of value0added growth model)  20%
RTTT Teacher Evaluator Training Day 8 Based on the Training of Teaching Learning Solutions (TLS) and Community Training and Assistance Center (CTAC)
Lead Evaluator Training
Ongoing Training Day 1. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
School Improvement Improving what’s happening in the classroom for students with disabilities: instruction & its impact on student learning Systems that.
New York State District-wide Growth Goal Setting Process: Student Learning Objectives Webinar 1: December 2011.
Teacher Lead Evaluator Training Module 3 Presenters: Dr. Regina Cohn Dr. Robert Greenberg January 2013.
Day 8. Agenda Aligning RTTT Growth and Value-Added Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement and reliability Growth-Producing Feedback.
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013 This presentation contains.
Regents Reform Agenda Update as of November 2012 C-A Teachers' Resource Center-- J. Robinson, director 1 A special thank you to Jill Robinson, Director.
Creating a Student Learning Objective (SLO). Training Objectives Understand how Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) fit into the APPR System Understand.
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 9, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Caveat: These training materials include some items from the anticipated changes from enactment of amendments to Education Law 3012-c.
Ongoing Training Day 4. Agenda Growth and Value-Added Update 21 st Century Readiness and APPR Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement and.
Teacher Effectiveness Day 5. Housekeeping Parking Breaks and lunch Emergencies.
OCM BOCES Day 7 Lead Evaluator Training 1. 2 Day Seven Agenda.
August 28, 2015 Long Island Independent and Peer Evaluation: Making the Work Matter.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review SLOs: Lessons Learned A Look at Some Evidence Planning School Visits Supporting Principals Closure.
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 17, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
OCM BOCES SLOs Workshop. Race To The Top: Standards Data Professional Practice Culture APPR.
Ongoing Training Day 3. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Background Agenda Review.
Ongoing Training Day 2. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
Ongoing Training Day 2. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
Day 3. Here We Are: 9 Components 1.New York State Teaching Standards and Leadership Standards 2.Evidence-based observation 3.Application and.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Principal Evaluation: Different? One Year Later Coaching Principals Collect evidence Support your local.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Messaging Research & Literature Article Read Planning Visits (and HW) Artifact Review Support your local.
Winter, 2012 Teacher Effectivensss Day 5. To download powerpoint:
EVALUATIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL GROWTH Ohio TIF and OTES.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
March 23, NYSCSS Annual Conference Crossroads of Change: The Common Core in Social Studies.
Student Learning Objectives. Introductions Training Norms Be present Actively participate in activities Respect time boundaries Use electronics respectfully.
A brief introduction to
New Work January 28, 2015 Yukon Koyukuk School District.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
APPR: Ready or Not Joan Townley & Andy Greene October 20 and 21, 2011.
Day 9. Agenda Research Update Evidence Collection SLO Summative Help Summative Evaluation Growth-Producing Feedback The Start of the Second.
Race to the Top (RTTT) and the New York State Regents Reform Agenda Dr. Timothy T. Eagen Assistant Superintendent for Instruction & Curriculum South Huntington.
Student Learning Objectives 1 SCEE Summit Student Learning Objectives District Professional Development is the Key 2.
Creating a Student Learning Objective (SLO). Training Objectives Understand how Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) fit into the APPR System Understand.
Day 4. Here We Are: 9 Components 1.New York State Teaching Standards and Leadership Standards 2.Evidence-based observation 3.Application and.
CLASSROOM OBSERVATION PRIORITIES PREPARED & PRESENTED S. SUPERVISOR HELENA MOHAMMAD Ministry of Education ELT General Supervision
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
CCRS Quarterly Meeting CCRS Quarterly Meeting English Language Arts
1 Far West Teacher Center Network - NYS Teaching Standards: Your Path to Highly Effective Teaching 2013 Far West Teacher Center Network Teaching is the.
NYSED Network Team and Teacher and Principal Evaluator Training Kate Gerson -Senior Fellow Ken Slentz -Associate Commissioner June 2,
© 2012, Community Training and Assistance Center © 2012, Teaching Learning Solutions Linking ISLLC and your Principal Rubrics to a Case.
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Lead Evaluator for Principals Part I, Series 1
Common Core State Standards
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Roadmap November 2011 Revised March 2012
Presentation transcript:

Evidence-Based Observations Training for Observers of Teachers Module 5 Dr. Marijo Pearson Dr. Mike Doughty Mr. John Schiess Spring 2012

9 Required Elements of for Lead Evaluator Certification: 1.NYS Teaching Standards and the ISLLC, 2008 Leadership Standards 2.Evidence-based observation techniques 3.Application and use of the student growth and value-added growth model 4.Application and use of State-approved teacher/principal rubrics 5.Application and use of any assessment tools you intend to use (e.g., portfolios, surveys, goals) 6.Application and use of any State-approved locally developed measures of student achievement you intend to use 7.Use of the Statewide Instructional Reporting System 8.The scoring methodology used by the department and/or your district 9.Specific considerations in evaluating teachers and principals of English language learners and students with disabilities. *** Other: While not listed as a training component, districts will need to ensure inter-rater reliability for both their teacher and principal evaluation systems.

Agenda for Teacher Evaluation Training Module 5 Continuation of SLO Work Specific considerations in evaluating teachers and principals of English language learners and students with disabilities.

Working Agreement Be present: minds and hands on all day Respect time boundaries Recognize the need for quiet while working Use electronics respectfully and appropriately when prompted Return to large group attention when signaled

Key Messages for Student Learning Objectives SLOs name what students need to know and be able to do by the end of the year. SLOs place student learning at the center of the conversation. SLOs are a critical part of all great educators’ practice. SLOs are an opportunity to document the impact educators make with students.

Key Messages for SLOs continued… SLOs provide principals with critical information that can be used to manage performance, differentiate and target professional development, and focus supports for teachers. The SLO process encourages collaboration within school buildings. School leaders are accountable for ensuring all teachers have SLOs that will support their district and school goals.

Detailed Agenda Continuation of SLO Work Examples and Criteria Writing a SLO 1.Lingering questions about SLOs? 2.Examine the example SLO for Spanish II. 3.Decide on a course that would require an SLO (not 4-8 ELA or math). 4.In small groups, write a SLO for that course using the template and the rubric as guides. 5.When you are done, exchange SLOs with another group and “evaluate” each SLO using the rubric. 6.Be prepared to share your experiences.

Break

Detailed Agenda, Part 2 Specific considerations in evaluating teachers and principals of English language learners and students with disabilities. Ground our work in best practices for students with disabilities and English language learners. How do these practices line up with the rubrics? Examine evidence specific to students with disabilities and English language learners.

Students with Disabilities and English Language Learners – Best Practices Read and jigsaw articles about strategies for working with students with disabilities and English language learners. 1.Instruction for Diverse Groups of English Language Learners 2.Realizing Opportunities for English Language Learners in the Common Core Language Arts and Disciplinary Literacy Standards 3.Exploring the Foundations of Explicit Instruction (pp. 1-10) 4.Exploring the Foundations of Explicit Instruction (pp ) Identify similarities and differences. Be prepared to share.

Students with Disabilities and English Language Learners – Best Practices Specific considerations in evaluating teachers and principals of English language learners and students with disabilities. 1.Review Specially Designed Instruction Walk Through tool  How does this compare with the articles you read?  How does this and what you read fit in the context of the rubric? 2.Crosswalk the tool with either NYSUT or Danielson Rubric  Where do the strategies fall in the rubric?  How would you determine HEDI ratings based on the use of these strategies?

Evidence is a Factual Reporting of Events Element 2 It includes teacher and student actions and/or behaviors Teacher presented the content from the front of room. It includes statements made and questions posed by the teacher and the students “Bring your white boards, markers and erasers to the carpet and sit on your square.” It includes artifacts prepared by the teacher, students, or others. Task cards, journals, lesson plans, etc.] It includes quantifiable information about time, student participation, resource use, etc. 9:14 – 9:29- Warm-up. 8 of 22 Ss finished at 9:20, sat still until 9:29 It includes an observed aspect of the environment Desks were arranged in groups of four

Students with Disabilities and English Language Learners – Best Practices Specific considerations in evaluating teachers and principals of English language learners and students with disabilities. 1.Watch ELL video and script. classroom 2.Check script for EVIDENCE. 3.Align evidence to the rubric.

Next Steps from NYSED 14 February 2012 – April 2012 Webinar 3: Key District Decisions: 4 and 5 Further Guidance State provided training on Principal evaluation, including SLOs Ongoing pilot May 2012 – June 2012 Webinar 4: Discussion on Questions from the Field Additional tools, resources, exemplars in response to field needs Further Guidance State provided training Ongoing pilot Summer 2012 Continued State provided training Additional tools, resources, exemplars in response to field needs Further Guidance

+ ∆