November 2006 Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education 1 Where are We? Where do we want to be?

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Common Core Aligned Report Card Report Card

Advertisements

Alabama’s New Testing Plan: What’s Happening? practice.

January 22, /25/ STAAR: A New Assessment Model STAAR is a clearly articulated assessment program. Assessments are vertically aligned within.

Technology Integration and the Common Core Linda Jones, Coordinator/Instructor, The Eighth Floor Technology and Learning Center.

CCCS = California Common Core Standards.  Common Core standards corresponds with the original NCLB timeline of 2014  Students need real world skills.

The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR)

Multnomah County Student Achievement Presented to the Leaders Roundtable November 25, 2008 Source: Oregon Department of Education, Dr. Patrick.

Milford High School Guidance, Career & Academic Enhancement Office Educational Proficiency Plans EPP November 2008.

STAAR Overview Desert Hills Elementary School

 State-led and developed common core standards for K-12 in English/language arts and mathematics  Initiative led by the Council of Chief State School.

COMMON CORE Standards and Strategies Flip Chart

College-Ready Determination Policy and Performance Level Descriptors July

Getting to Know the PARCC Assessment: A Workshop for Parents January, 2015.

COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS INITIATIVE March 2011.

COLLEGE AND CAREER READY Mathematics - English Language Arts and Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects 1.

C. “Changing the conversation…” Instructional Change –  Align to standards  Set higher expectations  Rigorous coursework  Assess  Data driven intervention.

STAAR Overview Parent Information January 23, 2014.

Metairie Academy for Advanced Studies WELCOME LEAP Information February 18, 2014.

EHS and EMS Presentation 11/12/10 With thanks to Lucille E. Davy, Senior Advisor, James B. Hunt, Jr. Institute.

Achievethecore.org 1 Setting the Context for the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.

Challenging Curriculum and Organizational Structures Oct. 23, 2013 Jesse White.

Integrating Success The Transition of All Students From High School to College November 2007 Iowa Educational Research & Evaluation Association Annual.

Release of PARCC Student Results. By the end of this presentation, parents will be able to: Identify components of the PARCC English.

PREPARING [DISTRICT NAME] STUDENTS FOR COLLEGE & CAREER Setting a New Baseline for Success.

Southern Regional Education Board HSTW Measuring High School Students’ College and Career Readiness Race to the Top Assessment Public Meeting United States.

Dr. Nancy S. Grasmick July 26,2012.  Maryland is proud to be the top-ranked state in U.S. growth as reported in this study, and judged by Education Week.

Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE.

Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Instructional Materials Criteria Facilitator:

Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE ORANGE BOARD OF EDUCATION DECEMBER 8, 2015.

Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE River Edge School District December 16, 2015.

Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE HARDING TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DECEMBER 21, 2015.

Part I Academic Achievement ACT Participation and Performance Five-Year Trends Racial/Ethnic Groups Minimum Core vs.

Supporting Your Child Through the Transition to Common Core Mathematics What Parents Need to Know.

Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE ESSEX FELLS SCHOOL DISTRICT DECEMBER 16, 2016.

California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) 1 California Department of Education, September 2015.

2009 Report Card and TVAAS Update Recalibration 2009 October 26, 2009.

RESULTS Spring 2015 End-Of-Course tests Student Score Interpretation Guide.

DSHS IMPROVING COLLEGE READINESS. COLLEGE READINESS ACROSS THE NATION Source: ACT, 2010, The Condition of College and Career Readiness : National.

Understanding AzMERIT Results and Score Reporting An Overview.

What is the Advanced Placement Program? The Advanced Placement Program are courses taught at local high schools, which allow students to participate in.

Standardized Testing EDUC 307. Standardized test a test in which all the questions, format, instructions, scoring, and reporting of scores are the same.

Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE JEFFERSON TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS DECEMBER 16, 2015.

Dr. Leslie David Burns, Associate Professor Department of Curriculum and Instruction UK College of Education

Common Core State Standards Back to School Night August 29, 2013.

GRADE 10 CAPT ACT ADVANCED PLACEMENT SAT “HARTFORD MAGAZINE RECOGNIZED GMHS AS THE SIXTH RANKING HIGH SCHOOL IN HARTFORD COUNTY.” 2011 High School Testing.

Huntsville City Schools School Year School Instructional Targets October 3,

Defining 21st Century Skills: A Frameworks for Norfolk Public Schools NORFOLK BOARD OF EDUCATION Fall 2009.

Understanding the Common Core Standards Adopted by Nevada in 2010 Our State. Our Students. Our Success.

Milestones Results August 2016 Bibb County School District P-1.

State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness

Measuring College and Career Readiness

Paulsboro School District

Understanding the Next-Generation MCAS

Understanding the Next-Generation MCAS

Release of PARCC Student Results

California Common Core Standards

CHESTER SCHOOL DISTRICT

2015 PARCC Results for R.I: Work to do, focus on teaching and learning

Understanding the Next-Generation MCAS and 2017 Accountability Results

Updates on the Next-Generation MCAS

MCAS Parent Presentation

Understanding the Next-Generation MCAS

Understanding the Next-Generation MCAS

Smarter Balanced Assessments

California Common Core Standards

California Common Core Standards

Paulsboro School District

Measuring College and Career Readiness

California Common Core Standards

Presentation transcript:

November 2006 Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education 1 Where are We? Where do we want to be?

Gain = 2 points Gain = 5 points Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education

1 point decrease No Gain Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education

Gain = 25 points Gain = 18 points Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education

Gain = 16 points Gain = 11 points Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education

NAEP Proficiency Levels Proficiency Level Description AdvancedSuperior performance. Proficient Solid academic performance for each grade assessed. Students reaching this level have demonstrated competency over challenging subject matter, including subject-matter knowledge, application of such knowledge to real- world situations, and analytical skills appropriate to the subject matter. Basic Partial mastery of prerequisite knowledge and skills that are fundamental for proficient work at each grade. MinimalBelow Basic.

November 2006 Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education 7 Comparing MCT to NAEP MCT Advanced Proficient Basic Minimal NAEP Advanced Proficient Basic Minimal Most comparable to

Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education

NAEP Grade 4 Science *Not significantly different. * * * Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education

NAEP Grade 4 Science *Not significantly different. * * * Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education

*Not significantly different. * * * NAEP Grade 8 Science Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education

NAEP Grade 8 Science *Not significantly different. * * * Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education

November 2006 Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education 16 How many of our students are college ready?

November 2006 Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education 17 ACT College Readiness Indicators A student has a 50% chance of earning a B or higher grade, or an 80% chance of earning a C or higher grade in the corresponding entry-level, credit-bearing college course if the student score on the ACT is at least: –English – 18 –Mathematics – 22 –Science – 24

Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education

November 2006 Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education 26 There is a gap between where our students are and where we want them to be.

November 2006 Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education 27 Where do we want to be?

November 2006 Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education 28 Reaching the National Average At our current rate of improvement, when would we reach the national average? Grade 4 Reading – 2069 Grade 4 Math – 2021 Grade 8 Reading – 2091 Grade 8 Math – 2029

Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education

November 2006 Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education 33 How will we get there?

November 2006 Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education 34 How will we get there? Improved alignment between curriculum, assessment, and instruction Increase expectations for student learning

November 2006 Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education 35 Improving Alignment Grade 2-3Grades 4-8 English II / Algebra I Language Arts 11 Competencies 14 Competencies 10 Competencies Mathematics 8-9 Competencies 5-10 Competencies 8 Competencies Curriculum Frameworks 2000

November 2006 Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education 36 Grade 2-3Grades 4-8Grade 10 Language Arts 4 Competencies (2 Reading & 2 Writing) 4 Competencies (2 Reading & 2 Writing) 4 Competencies (2 Reading & 2 Writing) Mathematics 5 Competencies Improving Alignment Curriculum Frameworks 2006

November 2006 Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education 37 Improving Alignment Relationship between Curriculum and Assessment: Now Curriculum Framework -Competencies -Objectives -Suggested teaching strategies Instructional Intervention Supplements - Benchmarks Mississippi Curriculum Test Results reported in Reporting Categories

November 2006 Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education 38 Improving Alignment Relationship between Curriculum and Assessment: Future Curriculum Framework -Competencies -Objectives/ Benchmarks -Suggested teaching strategies Mississippi Curriculum Test Results reported by Competency

November 2006 Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education 39 Increasing Expectations How do you define “rigorous” academic experience?  Higher level courses  More challenging, complex, “real-world” content

November 2006 Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education 40 Increasing Expectations What makes the content more challenging?  A focus on conceptual understanding (beyond the basic facts and simple procedures) – Why learn about this content?  A focus on critical thinking skills, problem- solving, and understanding connections between present learning and previous learning or experience

November 2006 Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education 41 Reaching the National Average It will take everyone—the state, school districts, schools, teachers, administrators, and students giving their best every year to accomplish this goal.