Streamlined Environmental Requirements for Distributed Antenna Systems (DAS) and Small Cells.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
January 8, 2014 Webinar Co-sponsored by AWC and AT&T Presenter: Shane Hope, City of Mountlake Terrace Wireless Telecommunication Facilities: Preparing.
Advertisements

What: Bringing the Latest Technology to Consumers in Washington 1 © 2014 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. AT&T, Globe logo and other marks.
Technician License Course Chapter 9 Lesson Module 22 Mechanical Safety.
1 Broadcaster Relocation Fund Workshop Expanded Presentation June 25, 2012 Presented by: Jay Adrick, Vice President Broadcast Technology.
NEPA and Property Acquisition May 19, 2014 Elizabeth Patel Environmental Protection Specialist FTA Office of Planning and Environment.
March 2, 2006Connecticut Siting Council Symposium Wireless Telecommunications Facilities Siting: The Federal Framework and the FCC’s Role Jeffrey Steinberg.
Planning for Wireless Telecommunications Facilities Ready or Not, Here they Come! Jack Butler, Comprehensive Planner, Chatham County- Savannah MPC Anthony.
Small Cell 101: Building wireless in the public right of way
UCSC Microcell Network July 2005 Ed Titus Telecom Manager Ed retired in June Questions can be sent to Matt McKenna,
Improving Capacity in Cellular Systems
Hanford Site Land Transfer
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
City Council Meeting January 18, Background  Staff receiving increasing number of inquiries regarding installation of wireless telecommunications.
Confidential and Proprietary Proposal for optical fiber repeater based Wireless Network. (Wired Cell)
BILL WILKES, NCDOR GREG WOOD, NCDOR MICHAEL CONNOLLY, NCDOR Wireless/Cell Towers Centrally Assessed by NCDOR.
Small Cells: The Next Wireless Frontier Wisconsin DOT Annual Utility Conference Jeff Roznowski President – Wisconsin Wireless Association January 22, 2015.
August 21, Mobile Computing COE 446 Network Planning Tarek Sheltami KFUPM CCSE COE Principles of.
Sacred Sites. Documentation Documentation: Forest Supervisor or Ranger District Offices may document Sacred site (s) information in a variety of ways.
Driving Indiana’s Economic Growth. Management and Preservation of Indiana's Historic Bridges: A Programmatic Approach Thanks to Mead & Hunt & FHWA-IN.
Wireless Fundamentals Lesson 2: Implementing A New Wireless System Bellevue Community College Bob Young, Instructor.
Distributed antenna system
Antenna Structure Registration Environmental Notice Process Form 854 Antenna Structure Registration Environmental Notice Process The Commission’s Antenna.
Moving Towards A Gigabit State May 4, 2015 Broadband Inventories.
Telecommunications Law 1. 2 Summary of Proposed Amendments To Scarsdale Zoning Code PRESENTED BY: Joseph Van Eaton.
Telecommunications Law. International Municipal Lawyers Association Annual Conference September 10, 2014 Baltimore, Maryland PRESENTED BY Matthew K. Schettenhelm.
1 Environmental Planning and Historic Preservation (EHP) Compliance (p ) EHP Compliance.
Introduction to Crown Castle When coverage or capacity gaps are identified by the wireless carriers, Crown Castle will either: – Provide a fix by easily.
Positive Train Control Infrastructure: Section 106 Review Process under the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation’s May 2014 Program Comment For More.
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N State.
Applicable Documents and KRS Statutes  FHWA Utility Relocation and Accommodation Guidelines  KRS  23CFR  23CFR  23CFR
Environmental Review Process for Responsible Entities 24 CFR Part 58 NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM.
Cellular Network Concepts and Design
CELLULAR CONCEPT SHUSHRUTHA K S “Provide additional radio capacity with no additional increase in radio spectrum”
Streamlining NEPA for Reusable Launch Vehicles Federal Aviation Administration Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation May 2004.
 Issues Facing Neutral Host DAS Speaker: John Coste Company: American Tower Corporation.
INTRODUCTION. Homogeneous Networks A homogeneous cellular system is a network of base stations in a planned layout and a collection of user terminals,
Small Cell & Distributed Antenna Systems License Agreements with the City of Dallas Quality of Life and Environment Committee September 28, 2015 Presented.
Cell Towers and Signs Peter McNally, The Grinnell Group Dustin Miller, Iowa League of Cities Gary Taylor, AICP, Iowa State University.
Department of Sustainable Development and Construction DCA Application to Amend Cell Tower Regulations – Temporary Towers and Height Restrictions.
Implementing the FCC Order on Mandatory Wireless Facilities Collocations; Model Ordinance and Application Form October 29, 2015 Ken Fellman, Esq. Kissinger.
Historic Preservation Memoranda of Agreement. What is an MOA? As part of the Section 106 review process, it is an agreement among an agency official,
71-95 GHz Registration A Streamlined Approach to Licensing.
National League of Cities Increasing Wireless Communications Services for Your Residents Congressional and FCC Action on Mandatory Wireless Facilities.
FTA Real Estate March 26, 2014 Christopher S. Van Wyk Director FTA Environmental Office.
South Dakota State Historic Preservation Office and the Nebraska National Forests and Grasslands July 24, 2013 National Grasslands Visitor Center.
Federal Aviation Administration ARP SOP No SOP for CATEX Determinations Effective Date: Oct. 01, 2014 February 2016.
Current Nodal OS Design 1.The NMMS database will have an OWNER and an OPERATOR designation for each piece of equipment in the model. The OWNER and OPERATOR.
Wireless Networking Devices. wireless LAN adapter cards wireless access Points wireless bridges wireless routers.
Suzanne Derrick Technical Director – Cultural Resources FCC Section 106 Process and the Archeology of Tower Siting Panelist Presentation May 4, 2016.
San Antonio: Striking the Balance FCC DAS/Small Cell Workshop May 3, 2016 Ron Nirenberg San Antonio City Councilmember Member, FCC-IAC.
Railroad Towers ISSUES AND UPDATES FOR TOWERS PROPOSED IN RAILROAD RIGHTS OF WAY.
May “In-kind” vs. Site Development Replacing 73.5-ft. wood utility pole with 88.5-ft steel monopole tower Attaching antenna array Re-grading the.
Broadband Deployment Catalysts One Congressional Perspective Matthew Hussey Telecommunications Legislative Assistant Senator Olympia Snowe.
Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.
FCC’s NEPA Process Overview of NEPA Overview of NEPA Overview of FCC’s NEPA rules and procedures Overview of FCC’s NEPA rules and procedures Nuts and bolts.
Presentation to the Association of Washington Cities Conference June 20, 2001 Keeping up with demand: Is your City ready to accommodate new Telecom Infrastructure?
August, 2012 MBANS FCC Rules Summary Information document for SRD/MG on the FCC adopted MBAN rules under part 95 MedRadio service on 24 May 2012.
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
The Wireless Infrastructure NPRM/NOI, WT Docket No
FCC’s NEPA Process Overview of NEPA
Wireless Telecommunication Facilities in the Public Road Right-of-Way
“Palm Coast 145, LLC” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning Planning and Land Development Regulation Board December 21, 2016.
Economic Development & Housing Committee August 21, 2017
Connecting the smart city February 2018
Infrastructure: Property and Tower Challenges
FCC Proposed Preemption of Local Authority for 5G TECHNOLOGY
Emergence of Wireless Pole Attachments in Chelan County Tri-Commission Presentation March 28, 2017.
Infrastructure: Property and Tower Challenges
AGL REGIONAL CONFERENCE 2012
Cellular Systems.
Presentation transcript:

Streamlined Environmental Requirements for Distributed Antenna Systems (DAS) and Small Cells

SMALL CELLS Small cells (picocells and femtocells) take traditional cellular architecture down to a more granular level.  Cell radius of hundreds of feet or less.  Suited both for outdoor and large indoor spaces.  Sometimes used to fill small gaps in coverage or supplement service in limited areas of high demand. Distributed Antenna Systems (DAS) take the concept a step further.

DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS Integrated system of many small antennas connected by fiber. One base station transceiver can serve several nodes. Neutral host technology lets multiple carriers share the same antennas and other facilities. Outdoor DAS commonly located on street lights or utility poles. Indoor DAS applications include stadiums, hotels, shopping malls, and office buildings.

ADVANTAGES OF SMALL CELLS & DAS Expands capacity by many multiples; obviates need to keep splitting cells as demand increases. Creates capacity for high-speed broadband data services. Improves indoor coverage. Opportunity to share infrastructure. BUT May not be economically reasonable in all circumstances. Typically supplements, and does not replace, existing macrocell network

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS OF WIRELESS INFRASTRUCTURE REPORT AND ORDER October 2014 infrastructure rules remove unnecessary obstacles to the siting of facilities needed for broadband. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Review New and expanded Categorical Exclusion National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) Review New exclusions Temporary Towers ASR Notification Exclusion

Infrastructure Report and Order Section IIIB NEPA Categorical Exclusions Collocations on structures other than buildings and towers are now considered Categorical Exclusions for NEPA (except for effects on historic properties and radio frequency [RF] emissions exposure) Definition of ‘Antenna’ Includes associated site equipment Wiring Cabling Cabinets Back-up Power Clarification that the existing NEPA categorical exclusion for mounting antennas “on” existing buildings applies to installations in the interior of existing buildings

Categorical Exclusion for collocations on towers and buildings broadened to apply to utility poles, water towers, and other man-made structures. CatEx includes equipment like power cabinets, cabling and wiring.

Infrastructure Report and Order Section IIIB NEPA Categorical Exclusions New Categorical Exclusion for deployment of wireless facilities on new or replacement poles within designated, active utility and communications rights of way if there is no substantial increase in size over existing uses.

REQUIREMENTS The facility will be located in a right-of-way that is designated by a Federal, State, local, or Tribal government for communications towers, above-ground utility transmission or distribution lines, or any associated structures and equipment; The right-of-way is in active use for such designated purposes; and The facility will not constitute a substantial increase in size over existing support structures that are located in the right-of-way within the vicinity of the proposed construction.

CONSIDERATIONS Does not exclude Section 106 review and associated Tribal participation Subject to (c) and (d) of FCC rules (i.e. Processing Bureau or public complaint could trigger Environmental Assessment (EA) requirement) EA required if RF emissions exposure exceeds specified levels No substantial increase in size over existing uses Substantial increase in size definition drawn from Collocation Programmatic Agreement –Can’t increase height by more than 10% or 20 feet –Standard number of cabinets, not to exceed 4 –No appurtenances that protrude more than 20’ (or beyond width of the structure at the level added if greater) –No excavation beyond the existing leased or owned property surrounding the structure or the right-of-way easement proximate to the structure

Infrastructure Report and Order Section IIIC NHPA Section 106 Exclusions Certain collocations on utility structures (including utility poles and electronic transmission towers) are considered excluded from Section 106 review To qualify as exempt, collocation must meet specified size and other limitations

REQUIREMENTS No new ground disturbance; Not within historic district or within 250’ of a historic district boundary; Not located on a designated National Historic Landmark or property that is listed or determined eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places; and Not subject of a pending complaint alleging adverse effects on historic properties.

Infrastructure Report and Order Section IIIC NHPA Section 106 Exclusions Collocation on buildings and non-tower structures over 45-years old are excluded from Section 106 review if an antenna exists at the proposed location. New antenna must: o Meet requirements related to visibility and proximity o Comply with any zoning and/or historic preservation conditions for the existing antenna

REQUIREMENTS No new ground disturbance; Not within historic district or within 250’ of a historic district boundary; Not located on a designated National Historic Landmark or property that is listed or determined eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places; and Not subject of a pending complaint alleging adverse effects on historic properties.

Infrastructure Report and Order Section IIIC NHPA Section 106 Exclusions Clarification: Existing exclusions for collocations on buildings under NPA and Collocation PA apply to collocations inside buildings.

Infrastructure Report and Order Section IV New ASR Notification Exemption for Temporary Towers New permanent exemption from local and national environmental notification requirements associated with application for Antenna Structure Registration provided: The tower will be in place for 60 days or less FAA Notice of Construction is required No FAA required marking or lighting Less than 200’ above ground level Either involves no excavation or excavation only where the depth of previous disturbance exceeds the proposed construction depth by at least two feet NOTE: This is not a Categorical Exclusion – If an EA is needed, public notice is required

Streamlined Environmental Reviews for Distributed Antenna Systems (DAS) and Small Cells Next Steps: Further consultation with CEQ, ACHP, State Historic Preservation Officers and Tribal Nations on additional, broader exclusions and efficiencies for environmental review of DAS networks and other small facilities. Goal: Program Alternative to further streamline Section 106 review of DAS and small-cell deployments. Schedule: months after the release of the Report and Order.

Streamlined Environmental Reviews for Distributed Antenna Systems (DAS) and Small Cells