Doc.: IEEE 802.11-08/1265r0 Submission November 2008 Liwen Chu, et al.Slide 1 STA Communication Inside a BSS and Outside the Context of a BSS Date: 2008-11-04.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0527r0 Submission March 2010 Slide 1 A Periodic 5 MHz Measurement Pilot for Channel Scan Date: Authors:
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0156r0 Submission January 2010 Ashish Shukla, MarvellSlide 1 Reorganizing Mesh Channel Switch Announcement Text Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1267r0 Submission November 2008 L. Chu Etc.Slide 1 Multiple Radio MP Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0342r0 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 Power Efficient PS Poll Date: Authors: Date: March, 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /2897r3 Submission May 2008 Qi Wang, Broadcom CorporationSlide 1 Efficient TIM element supporting multiple BSSIDs Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1413r1 Submission November 2013 Edward Reuss, UnaffiliatedSlide 1 Real-Time Multicast Streams During Power Save – Part 2 Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1000r0 Submission July 2011 Jihyun Lee, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 TGai FILS Proposal Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0550 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Kiseon RyuLG Electronics10225 Willow Creek Rd, San Diego, CA, 92131, USA +1
Doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Submission March 2010 Slide 1 Slot Time Synchronization for Coexistence of 5 MHz, 10 MHz and 20 MHz Systems Date:
Doc.: IEEE /2901r06 Submission November 2007 Doug Kavner, RaytheonSlide 1 Use of BSSID in WAVE Date: Authors:
Wireless LANs Prof. F. Tobagi MAC Management 1.
Doc.: mes Submission 7 May 2004 Tricci SoSlide 1 Need Clarification on The Definition of ESS Mesh Prepared by Tricci So.
Doc.: IEEE /1207r1 Submission September 2013 Matthew Fischer et al (Broadcom)Slide 1 CID 205 BSSID Color Bits Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /195 Submission July 2000 Sunghyun Choi, Philips ResearchSlide 1 Dynamic Channel Selection (DCS) Scheme for G. Cervello, S.
Doc.: IEEE /0256r0 Submission March 2010 Zhou Lan NICTSlide 1 Proposal of Synchronized Quiet Period for Incumbent User Detection Date: 2010-March.
Doc.: IEEE /0897r0 SubmissionJae Seung Lee, ETRISlide 1 Active Scanning considering Operating Status of APs Date: July 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /1234r0 Submission October 2008 L. Chu Etc.Slide s Power Saving Issues Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1034r4 September 2012 Jeongki Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Enhanced scanning procedure for FILS Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1220r0 Submission November 2009 Jon Rosdahl, CSRSlide 1 WG11 Comments on PARs submitted Nov 2009 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1109r0 Submission Month Year Tom Siep, CSRSlide 1 Amendment Creation Process Date: YYYY-MM-DD Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1378r0 Submission November 2008 Darwin Engwer, Nortel NetworksSlide 1 Improving Multicast Reliability Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0562r0 Submission May 2009 L. Chu et alSlide 1 MCF Issues Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1000r1 Submission July 2011 Jihyun Lee, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 TGai FILS Proposal Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
September 2002 doc.: IEEE /568r0 David Skellern, Cisco SystemsSlide 1Submission RRM Architectural Framework David Skellern Wireless Networking.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0615r0 May 2012 Sudheer Grandhi, InterDigital CommunicationsSlide 1 Considerations for early NAV indication Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1086r0 SubmissionSlide 1 Date: Authors: Improved Virtual Carrier Sensing Mechanism for 45GHz Sep ZTE Corp.
Doc.: IEEE /0624r2 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 Scheduled Medium Access For Large Low Power BSS Date: Authors: Date: May, 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /2901r05 Submission November 2007 Doug Kavner, RaytheonSlide 1 Use of BSSID in WAVE Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0662r0 May, 2016 Jing Ma, NICTSlide 1 Further consideration on channel access rule to facilitate MU transmission opportunity.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1359r0 November 2015 Yu Wang, Ericsson et al.Slide 1 System Performance Evaluation of ae Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /2901r08 Submission March 2008 Doug Kavner, RaytheonSlide 1 Use of BSSID in WAVE Date: Authors:
Doc: IEEE /0395r2 Submission March 2009 R. Roy, ConnexisSlide 1 WAVE ITS Station Technical Capabilities Summary Date: Authors:
FILS Reduced Neighbor Report
BSS Management through WUR Wakeup Frame
Power Efficient PS Poll
Video Transport Streaming SG PAR Scope Statement Discussion
Multicast/Broadcast Communication With Acknowledge
OCT based 6 GHz AP Operation Discussion
EDCA and BlockAck Extensions for Reliable Multicast/Broadcast Services
WUR MAC Consideration Date: Authors: Nov 2016 Liwen Chu
WAVE ITS Station Technical Capabilities Summary
Resolutions to orphan comments
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
WAVE ITS Station Technical Capabilities Summary
WUR MAC and Wakeup Frame
WUR MAC and Wakeup Frame
RTS CTS Rule Amendment Date: Authors: Date: January 2011
WUR MAC and Wakeup Frame
WUR MAC and Wakeup Frame
Scheduled Medium Access For Large Low Power BSS
Slot-based Power Save Improvement
WUR MAC and Wakeup Frame
Power Efficient PS Poll
BSS parameters update notification
Use of BSSID in WAVE Date: Authors: November 2007
Use of BSSID in WAVE Date: Authors: November 2007
Efficient TIM element supporting multiple BSSIDs
VTS Robust Multicast/Broadcast Protocol
Synchronization of Quiet Periods for Incumbent User Detection
FILS Frame Content Date: Authors: February 2008
Use of BSSID in WAVE Date: Authors: November 2007
Efficient TIM element supporting multiple BSSIDs
Wakeup Frame Format Date: Authors: Sept 2017 Liwen Chu
WUR MAC and Wakeup Frame
Multiple Band Operation Discussion
On the Need for an ai Annex
Multiple Band Operation Discussion
Month Year doc.: IEEE /1081r0 May, 2016
Use of BSSID in WAVE Date: Authors: November 2007
Multiple Band Operation Discussion
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /1265r0 Submission November 2008 Liwen Chu, et al.Slide 1 STA Communication Inside a BSS and Outside the Context of a BSS Date: Authors:

doc.: IEEE /1265r0 Submission November 2008 Liwen Chu, et al.Slide p allows 3 Types of transmissions (1) Baseline BSS transmissions (2) p “outside the context of a BSS” transmissions, which allow for two additional types of transmission: –(2a) p “outside the context of a BSS” broadcast safety transmissions on the 1609 control channel –(2b) p “outside the context of a BSS” broadcast & unicast transmissions between STAs and RSUs on 1609 service channels

doc.: IEEE /1265r0 Submission November 2008 Liwen Chu, et al.Slide 3 Case 2: STA Communicating Outside the Context of a BSS An p STA communicating outside the context of a BSS may transmit and receive frames without scanning or without MAC sublayer authentication or association procedures. An p STA may be a member of a BSS (Case 1) and/or communicate outside the context of a BSS (Cases 2a and 2b). –This implies that p may require multiple EDCA parameter sets--one for inside BSS communication (only one is allowed by the baseline in Case 1) and one or more for outside BSS communications (i.e. safety may use the default parameters in Case 2a, and multiple RSUs in Case 2b may have different EDCA parameter sets, as well). –It is not clear in subclause of [3] whether these transmission types are active simultaneously. This ambiguity needs to be removed. –The intended use of 1609 is to use one transmission type at a time.

doc.: IEEE /1265r0 Submission November 2008 Liwen Chu, et al.Slide 4 Problems: Multiple Active EDCA Parameter Sets in a STA (1) Multiple active EDCA parameter sets in a STA violate basic architecture assumptions. –In the baseline standard [1], a product can have multiple STAs in it: dot11StationConfigTable includes multiple dot11StationConfigEntry (c.f. Annex D page 987), each dot11StationConfigEntry has its unique MAC address, EDCA parameter set… (c.f. Annex D page ) –A STA only has one MAC/PHY pair [2]. Note: If a product has both an 11a/b/g STA and a WAVE STA, the issues that arise when both a/b/g STA and WAVE STA are active simultaneously or when one STA is active are beyond the scope of our discussion and 11P standard. –MAC state information for transmissions within a BSS would have to be maintained during “outside the context of a BSS” communication (e.g. Block ACK).

doc.: IEEE /1265r0 Submission November 2008 Liwen Chu, et al.Slide 5 Problems: Multiple Active EDCA Parameter Sets in a STA (Cont’d) (2) A STA with multiple active EDCA parameter sets would have more chances to access the medium than a STA with one active EDCA parameter set. This is a fairness issue. –A STA with 2 active EDCA parameter sets will have 8 counters to count down to 0 to access medium. –A STA with 1 active EDCA parameter set will have 4 counters to count down to 0 to access medium. (3) A STA with multiple active EDCA parameter sets would need to scale its MAC state to communicate with an indefinite number of RSUs. This is an extensibility with hardware complexity implications. –A STA with 1 active EDCA parameter set needs 4 transmission queues. –A STA communicating on the control channel and with N RSUs, would need N+1 active EDCA parameter sets which implies 4×(N+1) transmission queues.

doc.: IEEE /1265r0 Submission November 2008 Liwen Chu, et al.Slide 6 One Active EDCA Parameter Sets in a STA p allows for the EDCA parameter set to be updated when a STA changes from control channel to a service channel or conversely. Both cases are communication outside a BSS, but the latter case has a 1609 application-layer association to the RSU. –In a STA, only one EDCA parameter set is active at any time. –Changing channels (and EDCA parameter sets) is decided by the SME (IEEE 1609 specifies this using a time division method). After the MLME receives the appropriate MIB variable set primitive(s), the MLME: (a) operates either within a BSS or outside the context of a BSS; (b) changes channel; and/or (c) updates its EDCA parameters. Control Channel Service Channel1 Service Channel2 SME sends 11P channel switch primitive to indicate the switched channel and EDCA parameters

doc.: IEEE /1265r0 Submission November 2008 Liwen Chu, et al.Slide 7 References [1] IEEE STD TM 2007, “IEEE Standard for Information technology – Telecommunications and information exchange between systems – Local and metropolitan area networks – Specific requirements – Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) specifications”. [2] Jon Rosdahl, 11-08/0930r0, “3 Responses to Interpretations for July 2008”. [3] IEEE STD p TM /4.02, “Draft Standard for Information Technology – Telecommunications and information exchange between systems – Local and metropolitan are networks – Specific requirements – Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) specifications – Amendment 7: Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments”.