Considerations for Technical Assistance School Improvement Grant 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School Improvement Grants Webinar – Tier I and II Schools April 21, 2010.
Advertisements

School Improvement Grants Tier I and Tier II Schools March, 2010.
April 15, Through the SIG program, the United States Education Department (USED) requires state educational agencies (SEAs) to use three tiers to.
Restructuring Plans Glenbrook Middle School Bel Air Elementary School Rio Vista Elementary School Shore Acres Elementary School Mt. Diablo Unified School.
Presented by : Delaware Department of Education March 15, 2011.
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION APRIL 27, 2010 VANDERBILT MARRIOTT NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT APPLICATION ROLLOUT 1.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Integration of State Planning and Reporting Functions Using Indistar® Indistar® Summit March 24-25, 2014 Office of School Improvement Virginia Department.
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
FY 2012 SIG 1003G LEAD PARTNER REQUEST FOR SEALED PROPOSAL (RFSP) BIDDERS’ CONFERENCE February 7, 2011.
1 SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT COHORT 2 LODI UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION APRIL 5, 2011.
1 PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT UPDATE PART I: PERSISTENTLY LOWEST-ACHIEVING SCHOOLS PART II: DELTA SIERRA MIDDLE SCHOOL AND THE DISTRICT/SCHOOL LEADERSHIP PROCESS.
Nebraska Department of Education Focus on Effective Instruction and Student Learning Revised Standards and NeSA Nebraska’s P-16 Effort Federal Agenda Fiscal.
Support for the Change, Challenge, and Commitment All Maryland Students College and Career Ready.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: RENEWAL PROCESS November 20, 2014.
School Improvement Grants. Over 13,000 schools are currently under some form of improvement status schools = 5% of schools in some form of restructuring.
1 Tier 1 Education: Review Participant Training January AmeriCorps External Reviewer Training.
MONITORING INDISTAR® STATE-DETERMINED IMPROVEMENT PLANNING TOOL.
Subtitle 1003(g) School Improvement Grants April 2, 2012.
Funding Opportunities for Newly Identified Priority Schools ESEA Directors InstituteESEA Directors Institute October 2014October 2014.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Federal Program Monitoring and Support Division Charlotte Hughes, Director Donna Brown, Section Chief.
School Improvement Grants (SIG) Overview Adapted from LACOE Intervention for for Persistently Lowest- Achieving Schools 1.
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANTS (SIG): A New Opportunity for Turning Around Low-Performing High Schools January 29, 2010.
School Improvement Grants March, Overview American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Goals and purpose of SIG grants Definition of “persistently lowest-
Priority, Focus and SIG School Requirements and Implementation Strategies Virginia Baker Regional Coordinator.
Mississippi Department of Education Office of School Recovery November 18, :30-4:30 Committee of Practitioners Meeting School Improvement Grant 1003(g)
IMPLEMENTING THE SIG REQUIREMENTS 1.  Students who attend a State’s persistently lowest- achieving schools deserve better options and can’t afford to.
FLDOE Title I Update FASFEPA Technical Assistance Forum September 16, 2009.
Race to the Top (RTTT) Overview of Grant Competition Goals and Requirements 1.
School Improvement Grant Update Fall Grant Purpose School Improvement Grants (SIG), authorized under section 1003(g) of Title I of the Elementary.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction March 17, 2011 Presented by: California Department of Education.
HEE Hui For Excellence in Education June 6, 2012
Mississippi Department of Education Office of Innovative Support February 17, 2010 Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting.
QUESTIONS MAY BE ED DURING THIS SESSION, OR AFTERWARD TO: Welcome to the SIG Cohort III Webinar Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
Slide 1 Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of.
REVIEW PROCESS District Capacity Determination:. Review Team Selection Teams will contain geographically balanced representation. Each review team will.
Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement Office of Program Administration and Accountability April 19, 2011.
Title I 2010 Spring Admin. Meeting Spring Title I Administrative Meeting Maryland State Department of Education April 13-14, 2010 Presented by: Maria E.
ESEA Flexibility: Overview Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 1 of 8.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: AN OVERVIEW September 26, 2011.
Choosing a Reform Model District Wide Stakeholder Meeting 1.
School Improvement Overview September 17-18, 2015 Tyson Carter School Improvement Coordinator Idaho State Department of Education
Learning More About Oregon’s ESEA Waiver Plan January 23, 2013.
AB Miller High School Community Meeting April 13, 2010.
Principal – Adriene Stephenson. Enrollment – 371 General Education – 83% SPED – 17% LEP – Less than 1% African American – 75% White – 22% Asian, Hispanic,
New Hampshire Title I 1003(g) School Improvement Grant (SIG) Overview Webinar Presented by: New Hampshire Department of Education & New England Comprehensive.
Title I 1003(g) School Improvement Grants Presented by: WVDE Title I Staff March 9, 2010.
Center on School Turnaround at WestEd. 2 3 Race to the Top School Improvement Grants Alignment of Existing Federal Resources ESEA Flexibility Lowest-
1 Restructuring Webinar Dr. Zollie Stevenson, Jr., Ph.D. Director Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs Office of Elementary and Secondary.
Indiana ESEA Flexibility Waiver. Background -Indiana was a part of cohort 1 -Why cohort 1? -USED Approval February Approval through School.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
S CHOOL I MPROVEMENT G RANTS An Overview of Fiscal Year (FY) DRAFT.
Virginia Department of Education March 5,  The Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) was informed that on March 3, 2010, USED posted the states’
Texas Title I Priority Schools (TTIPS) Grant Cycle 3 Grant Overview & Applicant Conference 1© Texas Education Agency, 2014.
Texas Title I Priority Schools (TTIPS) Grant Cycle 3 Grant Overview & Applicant Conference 1© Texas Education Agency, 2014.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVERS December 2, 2011 House Education Committee Bob Harmon, Assistant Superintendent
February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.
School Improvement Grants (SIG) Title I §1003(g) West Virginia Department of Education Division of Educator Quality & System Support Office of Federal.
TTIPS Model Overview.
ESEA Flexibility: An overview
Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting
West Virginia Department of Education
January 2010 Marilyn Peterson Data and Federal Programs
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT
Filling Your Buckets: Aligning it ALL!
The CSP Grant in North Carolina
Maryland State Board of Education October 25, 2011
School Improvement Grants
ESEA Flexibility: An overview
Presentation transcript:

Considerations for Technical Assistance School Improvement Grant 1

TurnaroundRestart ClosureTransformation F OUR SIG S CHOOL I NTERVENTION M ODELS 2

Teachers and Leaders Replace principal Use locally adopted “turnaround” competencies to review and select staff for school (rehire no more than 50% of existing staff) Implement strategies to recruit, place and retain staff Instructional and Support Strategies Select and implement an instructional model based on student needs Provide job- embedded PD designed to build capacity and support staff Ensure continuous use of data to inform and differentiate instruction Time and Support Provide increased learning time Staff and students Social-emotional and community- oriented services and supports Governance New governance structure Grant operating flexibility to school leader Turnaround Model Overview May also implement any of the required or permissible strategies under the Transformation Model 3

Restart model is one in which an LEA converts a school or closes and reopens a school under a charter school operator, a charter management organization (CMO), or an education management organization (EMO) that has been selected through a rigorous review process.  A restart model must enroll, within the grades it serves, any former student who wishes to attend the school.  A rigorous review process could take such things into consideration as an applicant’s team, track record, instructional program, model’s theory of action, sustainability.  As part of this model, a State must review the process the LEA will use/has used to select the partner. Restart Model Overview 4

School closure occurs when an LEA closes a school and enrolls the students who attended that school in other schools in the LEA that are higher achieving. These other schools should be within reasonable proximity to the closed school and may include, but are not limited to, charter schools or new schools for which achievement data are not yet available. Office for Civil Rights Technical Assistance Module-- Struggling Schools and School Closure Issues: An Overview of Civil Rights Considerations School Closure Model Overview 5

Teachers and Leaders Replace principal Implement new evaluation system Developed with staff Uses student growth as a significant factor Identify and reward staff who are increasing student outcomes; support and then remove those who are not Implement strategies to recruit, place and retain staff Instructional and Support Strategies Select and implement an instructional model based on student needs Provide job- embedded professional development designed to build capacity and support staff Ensure continuous use of data to inform and differentiate instruction Time and Support Provide increased learning time Staff and students Provide ongoing mechanism for community and family engagement Partner to provide social-emotional and community- oriented services and supports Governance Provide sufficient operating flexibility to implement reform Ensure ongoing technical assistance Transformation Model Overview An LEA with nine or more Tier I and Tier II schools may not implement the Transformation Model in more than 50% of those schools. 6

An LEA is required to: 1)Serve each of its Tier I schools, unless the LEA demonstrates that it lacks sufficient capacity or sufficient funds. 2)Implement one of the four models in each Tier I and Tier II school the LEA has the capacity to serve. – An LEA with nine or more Tier I and Tier II schools may not implement the transformation model in more than 50% of those schools. 3)Provide adequate resources to each Tier I and Tier II school it commits to serve in order to implement fully one of the four school intervention models. – An LEA’s proposed budget must cover the full period of availability of SIG funds, which may be three years if the SEA or LEA has applied for and received a waiver to extend the period of availability. – The budget for each Tier I and Tier II school the LEA commits to serve must be of sufficient size and scope to support full and effective implementation of the selected intervention. – The LEA may request funding for LEA-level activities that will support the implementation of a school intervention model in Tier I and Tier II schools. 4)Establish three-year student achievement goals in reading/language arts and mathematics and hold each Tier I, II and III school accountable annually for meeting, or being on track to meet, those goals. 7 LEA R OLE

StateDistrict Eligible Schools Identify list of eligible schools in the State (i.e., Tier I, II and III) Applies to serve all or subset of eligible schools in its district Review Criteria Develops, disseminates and implements criteria it will use to review and evaluate LEA applications 4 modelsReview and approves LEA’s capacity to implement proposed model in eligible school Applies to implement one of the four required models in eligible schools. LEA selects model after an analysis of local data, resources and capacity. PrioritizationMust give priority to LEAs that apply to serve Tier I or Tier II schools. Must serve Tier I schools it has the capacity to serve. May not apply to serve any Tier III school if it has not served all of its Tier I and IIs BudgetReviews, adjusts and approves LEA budget by school Submits 3 year budget (or period of availability) for each school it applies to serve ($50K-$2m per year) GoalsApproves and monitors achievement goals Proposes achievement goals for each Tier I, II and III school 8

Feb ’10 Feb 8, 2010 SEAs’ SIG applications due to ED ED awards SIG grants to States March-April ’10 LEA application process May ’10 SEA awards grants to LEAs LEAs begin implementation Fall ’10 SIG schools open/reopen T IMELINE 9

Questions? 10 Dr. Carlas McCauley Education Program Specialist Student Achievement & School Accountability Programs (SASA) Office of Elementary and Secondary Education (OESE) U.S. Department of Education 400 Maryland Ave., SW LBJ Building, Rm 3C116 Washington, DC Tel: Fax: