Bovine Genomics 101 - The Technology and its Applications Gerrit Kistemaker Chief Geneticist, Canadian Dairy Network (CDN) Many slides were created by.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reliable genomic evaluations across breeds and borders Sander de Roos CRV, the Netherlands.
Advertisements

Genomic imputation and evaluation using 1074 high density Holstein genotypes P. M. VanRaden 1, D. J. Null 1 *, G.R. Wiggans 1, T.S. Sonstegard 2, E.E.
John B. Cole Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 2008 Genetic trends.
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Select Sires’
2007 Paul VanRaden and Jeff O’Connell Animal Improvement Programs Lab, Beltsville, MD U MD College of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
Genetic Selection Tools in the Genomics Era Curt Van Tassell, PhD Bovine Functional Genomics Laboratory & Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Beltsville,
Bull selection based on QTL for specific environments Fabio Monteiro de Rezende Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) - Brazil.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2009 G.R. WiggansCroatian.
Wiggans, 2013RL meeting, Aug. 15 (1) Dr. George R. Wiggans, Acting Research Leader Bldg. 005, Room 306, BARC-West (main office);
How Genomics is changing Business and Services of Associations Dr. Josef Pott, Weser-Ems-Union eG, Germany.
But who will be the next GREAT one?. USA Bull Proofs * Bulls are ranked based upon their DAUGHTER’S (progeny) production and physical characteristics.
Introduction to Animal Breeding & Genomics Sinead McParland Teagasc, Moorepark, Ireland.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD Georgetown Ag Systems.
2007 Paul VanRaden 1, Curt Van Tassell 2, George Wiggans 1, Tad Sonstegard 2, Jeff O’Connell 1, Bob Schnabel 3, Jerry Taylor 3, and Flavio Schenkel 4,
Mating Programs Including Genomic Relationships and Dominance Effects Chuanyu Sun 1, Paul M. VanRaden 2, Jeff R. O'Connell 3 1 National Association of.
2007 Paul VanRaden 1, George Wiggans 1, Curt Van Tassell 2, Tad Sonstegard 2, Jeff O’Connell 1, Bob Schnabel 3, Jerry Taylor 3, and Flavio Schenkel 4,
WiggansARS Big Data Workshop – July 16, 2015 (1) George R. Wiggans Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
WiggansGenetics in the Age of Genomics, Scottsdale, AZ, March 4, 2015 (1) Dr. George R. Wiggans Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural.
Impacts of inclusion of foreign data in genomic evaluation of dairy cattle K. M. Olson 1, P. M. VanRaden 2, D. J. Null 2, and M. E. Tooker 2 1 National.
WiggansANSC UMD(1) 2013 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA
Wiggans, 2013China Emerging Markets Program Seminar Dr. George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD National Association.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD G.R. WiggansAg Discovery.
Wiggans, 2013SRUC Imputation (1) Dr. George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD ,
2007 Paul VanRaden, Curt Van Tassell, George Wiggans, Tad Sonstegard, and Jeff O’Connell Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory and Bovine Functional Genomics.
Wiggans, th WCGALP (1) G.R. Wiggans*, T.A. Cooper, D.J. Null, and P.M. VanRaden Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research.
WiggansBritish Cattle Conference 2015 (1) Dr. George R. Wiggans Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
AFGC Convention 2004 (1) 2004 Possibilities for Improving Dairy Cattle Performance Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
2007 Melvin Tooker and Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Lab, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA 2009 Happy Bulls, Happy Cows,
John B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD New Tools for.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2008 G.R. WiggansDHI-Provo.
John B. Cole, Ph.D. Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD, USA The U.S. genetic.
2005 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA Selection for.
T. A. Cooper and G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD Council.
Adjustment of selection index coefficients and polygenic variance to improve regressions and reliability of genomic evaluations P. M. VanRaden, J. R. Wright*,
Paul VanRaden, 1 Katie Olson, 2 Dan Null, 1 Mehdi Sargolzaei, 3 Marco Winters, 4 and Jan-Thijs van Kaam 5 1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, ARS,
2007 Melvin Tooker Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA
Dominant and Recessive Dominance Table 3. Alleles sequence of DNA any of several forms of a gene determine the genotype (genetic constitution of an organism.
WiggansCDCB industry meeting – Sept. 29, 2015 (1) George R. Wiggans Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
G.R. Wiggans* and P.M. VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD
2007 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA
WiggansARS Big Data Computing Workshop (1) 2013 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Select Sires’
April 2010 (1) Prediction of Breed Composition & Multibreed Genomic Evaluations K. M. Olson and P. M. VanRaden.
2007 Paul VanRaden and Melvin Tooker* Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory 2010 Gains in reliability from combining subsets.
2007 Paul VanRaden 1, Jeff O’Connell 2, George Wiggans 1, Kent Weigel 3 1 Animal Improvement Programs Lab, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA 2 University of Maryland.
WiggansARPAS-DC meeting, Beltsville, MD – Dec. 9, 2015 (1) George R. Wiggans Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service,
2007 Paul VanRaden 1, Jeff O’Connell 2, George Wiggans 1, Kent Weigel 3 1 Animal Improvement Programs Lab, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA 2 University of Maryland.
Multi-trait, multi-breed conception rate evaluations P. M. VanRaden 1, J. R. Wright 1 *, C. Sun 2, J. L. Hutchison 1 and M. E. Tooker 1 1 Animal Genomics.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD G.R. WiggansSelect Sire.
Multibreed Genomic Evaluation Using Purebred Dairy Cattle K. M. Olson* 1 and P. M. VanRaden 2 1 Department of Dairy Science Virginia Polytechnic and State.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD California Dairy Herd.
2007 Paul VanRaden, George Wiggans, Jeff O’Connell, John Cole, Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Tad Sonstegard, and Curt Van Tassell Bovine Functional.
2007 John Cole, Paul VanRaden, George Wiggans, and Melvin Kuhn Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD,
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD G.R. WiggansADSA 18.
G.R. Wiggans 1, T. A. Cooper 1 *, K.M. Olson 2 and P.M. VanRaden 1 1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
2007 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA 2008 New.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD Select Sires‘ Holstein.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2011 National Breeders.
CRI – Spanish update (1) 2010 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
2007 Paul VanRaden 1, Curt Van Tassell 2, George Wiggans 1, Tad Sonstegard 2, Bob Schnabel 3, Jerry Taylor 3, and Flavio Schenkel 4, Paul VanRaden 1, Curt.
Meori Rosen Past, Present, and Future Dairy Cattle Breeding in Israel.
G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD 2011 G.R. Wiggans DNA.
Validation of €uro-Star Replacement Index.
Genomic Evaluations.
Genomic Selection in Dairy Cattle
Increased reliability of genetic evaluations for dairy cattle in the United States from use of genomic information Abstr.
Using Haplotypes in Breeding Programs
Unit: Animals at the Cellular Level
Presentation transcript:

Bovine Genomics The Technology and its Applications Gerrit Kistemaker Chief Geneticist, Canadian Dairy Network (CDN) Many slides were created by Brian Van Doormaal CDN General Manager and Holstein Canada CEO

Genetic Evaluations in Canada  Production:  Yields of Milk, Fat and Protein  Fat and Protein deviations  Somatic Cell Score  Lactation Persistency  Each trait analyzed separately for lactations 1, 2 and 3 and then combined into an overall value  Conformation (29 traits)  Functional:  Herd Life, Milking Speed, Milking Temperament, Calving Ability (CA) and Daughter Calving Ability (DCA)  Daughter Fertility (DF), Semen Fertility

What is Genomics?  Genetics:  The science of genes, heredity and variation in living organisms  Study of the hereditary transmission of traits expressed by individuals  Genomics:  Discipline in genetics concerning the study of genomes of organisms  DNA sequencing  DNA is unique for each individual/animal  Can be used for genetic improvement

Genome

DNA Sequencing & SNPs SNP (“snip”) = Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Difference in a Single base pair Many SNPs have no effect on cell function

SNP panels  Thousands of SNPs are combined into Genotyping Chips:  BovineSNP50  54,609 SNPs  BovineLD (replaces 3k SNP chip)  6,909 SNPs –Imputed to 50k  BovineHD  777,962 SNPs

DNA Genotyping  The genotyping process identifies if the animal carries 0, 1 or 2 copies of a specific allele for each SNP  0 and 2 = homozygous  1 = heterozygous

Implementation History  Genotyping in North America since 2008  Started with 50K panel  3K in September 2010, replaced with LD panel  Agreement to share all USA and Canadian genotypes  Adding Italy and UK genotypes in 2011  Official genomic evaluations launched:  August 2009 for Holstein  April 2010 for Jersey  August 2011 for Brown Swiss  Progeny proven Ayrshires all HD genotyped

Genotyping Activity in North America >1,700 new 50K/mo >3,500 new 3K/mo Currently over 128,000 genotyped Holsteins in NA

Genotyped Females - October BreedGroup50K3KTotal% of Total HOHeifers16,15337,33053, % Cows13,1778,34721, % Total:29,33045,67775,007 Percentage:39.1%60.9% JEHeifers3395,7836, % Cows8893,3104, % Total:1,2289,09310,321 Percentage:11.9%88.1%

Genotyped Holstein Young Candidate Bulls * includes some bulls that are now progeny proven

Genomic Evaluation Services in Canada  Genotyping services are provided by Holstein Canada for all dairy breeds  All genotypes sent by labs to USDA for centralized quality assurance  All Genotypes are forwarded by USDA to CDN monthly  Genotypes are used to improve the accuracy of existing breeding values.

Gain in Reliability - Holstein, August

Genomics 101  Use genotypes to improve the accuracy of breeding values  Allows much more accurate selection of young animals  Improves genetic gain by improving selection of young bulls.  Can reduce rearing cost and/or increase genetic progress by selecting female replacement at a much younger age

Genomics 102 Other uses for genotypes  Individual verification  Used by IA studs to verify that the bull calf they bought is the one they received.  Parentage testing  Will most likely become the standard  Pedigree discovery  Use the animals genotype and match it against the complete database of genotypes to find its parents and/or grand parents  Traceability

Haplotypes affecting fertility Research at USDA  5 haplotypes (groups of SNP markers that are usually inherited together) that affect fertility.  3 in Holstein  1 each in Jersey and Brown Swiss  No homozygous animals have been genotyped and associated with lower fertility:  Failed conception, or  Embryonic loss