9-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop Exercise C – Session #9.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
4-1 Application Workshop. 4-2 Module Objectives Apply the concepts learned to a freeway lane closure Case 1. Without a back up Case 2. With a back up.
Advertisements

Flashing Yellow Arrow Jerry Kotzenmacher Minnesota Department of Transportation.
Traffic Crash Characteristics for Jackson Area Transportation Study Wayne State University Transportation Research Group November 26, 2007.
Tracy Lovell, PE A FOCUSED APPROACH TO SAFETY. Provide a Transportation System  Safe  Efficient  Environmentally Sound  Fiscally Responsible.
Revisions to Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates.
Engineering Measures for Improved Pedestrian Safety Tamara Redmon FHWA Office of Safety April 29, 2008.
F IRST C APITAL E NGINEERING 48 S. Richland Ave. York PA | Phone: | Fax: | TRAFFIC REPORT Kingston Road &
May 13 th, 2014 City of Akron, Ohio Intersection Safety Study State Route 59 / Main Street / Howard Street.
Module 7 Exercise Intersection & Interchange Geometrics (IIG) Innovative Design Considerations for All Users.
2009 MUTCD Revisions Part 4 – Traffic Signals Revisions to the 2009 MUTCD.
Traffic Controls Lesson 1 Understanding Traffic Signs and Signals
“ Pavement markings can enhance safety since centerlines have been shown to cut crash frequency by 29% compared to roads without them ” Wisconsin Transportation.
Pedestrian Safety Master Plan. This Presentation Similarities and Differences with Other Areas No Magic Bullet Site, Corridor Specific Multiple, Complementary.
38 th Street to Kessler Boulevard Traffic Engineering Review Summary For Historic Midtown Initiative (HARMONI) By HNTB Corporation June, 2010.
Florida Department of Transportation, November 2009
9-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop Exercise C – Session #9.
LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop The Tools – Traffic Signals – Session #7.
Red-Light Running. 2 Traffic Signals Red-Light Running 3 Intersection Fatalities There were 8,657 intersection fatalities in 2007.
5/19/20151 Segoe Road Proposed Remarking Plan Scott Langer Traffic Engineer City of Madison Traffic Engineering Division Madison, Wisconsin.
2009 MUTCD (Final Rule) Revisions Incorporated into the 2009 MUTCD Revisions to Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates.
1 Austin Transportation Department Ali Mozdbar, P.E., PTOE Division Manager, Traffic Signals Traffic Signal Features for Pedestrians & Bicyclists.
Data Analysis and Use 3-1 NLTAPA Joint Safety Work Group Webinar November 18, 2013.
Virginia Learner’s Permit
Murray Boulevard and Farmington Road Intersection Sirisha Kothuri Wei Feng Ping Guo Meead Saberi CEE 550 Transportation Safety Analysis.
Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology Chapter 9 New Technologies Traffic Signs 101 November 20, 2014.
Revisions to Chapter 2C – Warning Signs and Object Markers.
8-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS The Tools – Traffic Signals – Session #8.
Safety and Design National Technical Services Team 1 Systematic Approach to Intersection Safety May 11, st Annual Missouri Traffic and Safety Conference.
1-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop Introduction – Session #1.
Traffic Engineering Division Traffic Operations Traffic Administration Construction and maintenance of traffic control devices. Engineering design Signal.
2-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS The Tools – Identification of High Crash Locations – Session #2.
Desktop RSA Activity Desktop RSA Activity 4-53 Step 1: Identify project or existing road to be reviewed. Step 2: Select an independent, multi-disciplinary.
Patrick Hasson Federal Highway Administration Midwestern Resource Center Engineering Safer Intersections.
Low Cost Safety Improvements Pooled Fund Study Advanced Street Name Signs Dr. James Jenness, Westat.
N. Hancock Road Traffic Signals October 14 th, 2014 Presentation Prepared By Lake County Public Works Department.
Revisions to Chapter 2C – Warning Signs and Object Markers
2009 MUTCD -- Compliance Dates NPA Notice of Proposed Amendments to MUTCD: Changes in Compliance Dates Table I-2.
6-Answers-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop Exercise – Part A – Session #6.
Public Safety Committee September 28, 2015 David O. Brown Chief Of Police Pedestrian Safety.
Traffic Engineering Survey City of Rancho Palos Verdes DISTANCE ALIGNMENT PARKING RESTRICTIONS STREET WIDTH NO. OF LANES AND MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS (SW, C.
Tracy Lovell, PE HSIP PROJECT PROCESS. HSIP Process  Identify the location – RD Corridor, Emphasis Area, etc.  Conduct Road Safety Audit with multi-disciplinary.
5/8/02FHWA Office of Safety1 FHWA Safety Core Business Unit Office-Level Structure Develops and manages programs for the safe operation of roadways, bicycle.
Slower vehicle speeds (under 30 mph) means less severe crashes 90% reduction in fatalities, 76% reduction in injury crashes 75% fewer vehicle conflict.
LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop Introduction – Session #1.
SHSP INTERSECTION EMPHASIS AREA. Emphasis Area Definition  The term intersection crash is defined as a crash which occurs just before, just after or.
Signal timing CTC-340. Key Elements Development of safe and effective phase plan and sequence Determination of vehicle signal needs –Timing of yellow.
6-1 Module 6: Group Activity Wright County Safety Review Identifying Opportunities for Making Roads Safer 6-1.
LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop The Tools – Identification of High Crash Locations – Session #2.
LT 4 SIGNS, SIGNALS & TRAFFIC CONTROLS 1 Signs Understanding Traffic Signs and Signals.
6-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop Exercise IX – Session #6.
Bicycle Safety Countermeasures Module 4.
Chapter 3 Regulatory, Warning & Guide Signs Overview
UNIT 3 Foundations of Effective Driving
Chapter 3 Regulatory, Warning & Guide Signs Overview
Project Management Team Meeting #3
HSM Applications to Multilane Rural Highways and Urban Suburban Streets Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural.
Revisions to Part 7 – Traffic Control for School Areas
CTDOT Traffic Safety Engineering
Chapter 3 Regulatory, Warning & Guide Signs Overview
Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations
Beachside Traffic/Crosswalk Update
Highway Safety Team Staff Meeting SMART Portal HSIP Application Demonstration Systemic Safety Improvement (SSI) November 21,2017.
9th & Colorado Redevelopment Impacts Denver Public Works - Traffic Safety recommendations Community feedback Survey Results Conducted by: Colorado.
Safety Effects of Marked vs
Signs, Signals, and Roadway Markings
HSM Applications to Multilane Rural Highways and Urban Suburban Streets Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural.
HSM Applications to Multilane Urban Suburban Multilane Intersections
HSM Applications to Multilane Urban Suburban Multilane Intersections
HSM Applications to Multilane Urban Suburban Multilane Intersections
Metropolitan District | mndot.gov
Presentation transcript:

9-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop Exercise C – Session #9

9-2 Exercise Learning Objectives: 1.Analyze traffic crash crash and other engineering information 2.Select appropriate low cost safety and engineering Countermeasures

9-3 Traffic Signals – Exercise XII: Naper Blvd and Plank Rd Remedy of Naper Blvd & Plank Road Traffic Signal Northbound Naper Blvd at Plank Road

9-4 Traffic Signals – Exercise XII: Naper Blvd and Plank Rd Remedy of Naper Blvd & Plank Road Traffic Signal Southbound Naper Blvd approaching Plank Road At 280 feet back from Stop Bar

9-5 Traffic Signals – Exercise XII: Naper Blvd and Plank Rd Remedy of Naper Blvd & Plank Road Traffic Signal At 450 feet back MUTCD Requires 460 feet of visibility Southbound Naper Blvd approaching Plank Road

9-6 Traffic Signals – Exercise XII: Naper Blvd and Plank Rd Remedy of Naper Blvd & Plank Road Traffic Signal Southbound Naper Blvd at Ogden Av toward Plank Road

9-7 Traffic Signals – Exercise XII: Naper Blvd and Plank Rd Remedy of Naper Blvd & Plank Road Traffic Signal  The intersection of Naper Blvd with Plank Road was improved to traffic signal control in 1985 with the construction of Naper Blvd, a new 4 lane major arterial connecting south portions of Naperville, IL to the Illinois Tollway interchange to the north.  Plank Road is collector street with 5,500 ADT  Traffic crash experience averaged 15 per year with 6 to 8 serious injury crashes for the years 1985 thru 1991  Traffic volumes on Naper Blvd started at 12,000 ADT in 1985 and grew to 28,000 ADT by 1991

9-8 Traffic Signals – Exercise XII: Naper Blvd and Plank Rd  Speed limit on Naper Blvd is 40 mph; 85 th percentile speeds are 48 mph; speed limit on Plank Road is 35 mph.  Traffic signals were added to the north of this signal and a closed loop signal system was installed in late  Traffic volumes on Naper Blvd started at 12,000 ADT in 1985 and grew to 28,000 ADT by  Traffic crash experience averaged 15 per year with 6 to 8 serious injury crashes for the years 1985 thru 1991  In early 1992, a multi-vehicle crash with fatalities was followed by two fatal crashes; 1993 had 4 fatalities, 9 serious injury crashes out of a total of 28

9-9 Traffic Signals – Exercise XII: Naper Blvd and Plank Rd  Visibility of the signals was a significant issue; southbound traffic could not see the far side indications until a point 280 feet from the stop bar; visibility of the northbound signals was slightly better at 350 feet.  Review of the engineering plans identified that the signal design was for tangent approaches; the actual conditions in the field were a reverse 35 mph 6 degree curve.  Signal heads were far side only with 12” sections and backplates  Review of Clearance Intervals (Yellow and Red) was carried out for 45 mph approach speeds and found to be consistent with ITE practice.

9-10 Traffic Signals – Exercise XII: Naper Blvd and Plank Road  What low cost safety countermeasures would you consider?  What is the safety effect (CRF) for each? Discussion

9-11 Traffic Signals – Exercise XII: Naper Blvd and Plank Rd Case Study J: Remedy of Naper Blvd & Plank Road Traffic Signal Signal Timing /Coordination and Visibility Improvement Additional Supplemental Near-Side Signal Northbound Naper Blvd at Plank Road

9-12 Traffic Signals – Exercise XII: Naper Blvd and Plank Rd Case Study J: Remedy of Naper Blvd & Plank Road Traffic Signal Signal Timing /Coordination Visibility Improvement Advance Warning Sign with Yellow Flasher Southbound Naper Blvd approaching Plank Road

9-13 Traffic Signals – Exercise XII: Naper Blvd and Plank Rd Case Study J: Remedy of Naper Blvd & Plank Road Traffic Signal Signal Timing /Coordination and Visibility Improvement Additional Supplemental Near-Side Signal Southbound Naper Blvd at Plank Road

9-14 Traffic Signals – Exercise XII: Naper Blvd and Plank Rd Case Study J: Remedy of Naper Blvd & Plank Road Traffic Signal Signal Timing /Coordination Visibility Improvement Additional Supplemental Near-Side Signal Southbound Naper Blvd approaching Plank Road At 450 feet back from Stop Bar

9-15 Traffic Signals – Exercise XII: Naper Blvd and Plank Rd Case Study J: Remedy of Naper Blvd & Plank Road Traffic Signal Signal Timing /Coordination Visibility Improvement Additional Supplemental Near-Side Signal Southbound Naper Blvd at Ogden Av toward Plank Road

9-16 Traffic Signals – Exercise XII: Naper Blvd and Plank Rd Case Study J: Remedy of Naper Blvd & Plank Road Traffic Signal Signal Timing /Coordination Visibility Improvement Advance Warning Sign “Be Prepared to Stop” with “When Flashing” Plaque with Flasher tied to Controller Northbound Naper Blvd approaching Plank Road “After” Crash experience is 8 crashes per year or less for with no serious injury or fatals

9-17 Exercise Learning Objectives: 1.Analyzed traffic crash crash and other engineering information 2.Selected appropriate low cost safety and engineering Countermeasures

9-18 Questions? Exercise