Experimental Economics: Short Course Universidad del Desarrollo Santiago, Chile December 15-17, 2009 Dr. Jonathan E. Alevy Department of Economics University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measuring and Estimating Risk Preferences February 21, 2013 Younjun Kim.
Advertisements

Fall 2008 Version Professor Dan C. Jones FINA 4355 Class Problem.
Experimental Research Designs
Chapter 2 Thinking Like an Economist
Strand 1 Economic Decision Making
Experimental Economics (and bounded rationality) Sotiris Georganas Lecture 1.
Validity, Sampling & Experimental Control Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology.
Validity, Sampling & Experimental Control Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology.
Writing with APA style (cont.) & Experiment Basics: Variables Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology.
January 18, 2005 Experimental Economics 1 Outline  Introduction: Objectives and Course Expectation  Double Oral Auction Experiment: Observations  Foundations.
The Art and Science of Economic Analysis
Descriptive Methods & Ethical Research Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology.
Writing with APA style (cont.) & Experiment Basics: Variables
The Methods of Social Psychology
6th Form: June 27, HOW ECONOMICS CHANGED THE WAY WE VIEW THE WORLD: Evidence from the Nobel Laureates Daniel M. Bernhofen School of Economics and.
PSYC512: Research Methods PSYC512: Research Methods Lecture 11 Brian P. Dyre University of Idaho.
Experimental Economics Professor Avi Weiss. Introduction Six Steps (Charles R. Plott) Step 1 - We learned how to pose a question –At first, economic questions.
AGEC 608 Lecture 14, p. 1 AGEC 608: Lecture 14 Objective: Provide overview of contingent valuation method (CVM) and review strengths and weaknesses of.
Ethics cont. Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology.
Chapter 2 – Tools of Positive Analysis
Basic Methodologies cont. Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology.
Basic methods cont. Psych 231: Research Methods in Psychology.
January 29, 2004 Experimental Economics 1 Outline  In-class experiment on IPV First-Price Auctions  Data from Cox, Robertson, and Smith (1982)  Glenn.
BCOR 1020 Business Statistics
Chapter One of Your Thesis
Methodology: How Social Psychologists Do Research
Experimental Design The Gold Standard?.
The Characteristics of an Experimental Hypothesis
Chapter 4 Hypothesis Testing, Power, and Control: A Review of the Basics.
Group Discussion Explain the difference between assignment bias and selection bias. Which one is a threat to internal validity and which is a threat to.
Consumer Preference Test Level 1- “h” potato chip vs Level 2 - “g” potato chip 1. How would you rate chip “h” from 1 - 7? Don’t Delicious like.
Experimental Economics Methodological Paradigm “Microeconomic Systems as an Experimental Sceince,” Smith ’82 AER.
1. DEFINING ECONOMICS Learning Objectives 1.Define economics. 2.Explain the concepts of scarcity and opportunity cost and how they relate to the definition.
Do incentive payments encourage innovation? A meta-analysis study Presented by: Zahra Lotfi Friedrich Schiller University MAER-NET
On visible choice set and scope sensitivity: - Dealing with the impact of study design on the scope sensitivity Improving the Practice of Benefit Transfer:
Experimental Economics: Short Course Universidad del Desarrollo Santiago, Chile December 17, 2009 Dr. Jonathan E. Alevy Department of Economics University.
Between groups designs (2) – outline 1.Block randomization 2.Natural groups designs 3.Subject loss 4.Some unsatisfactory alternatives to true experiments.
Experimental Economics: Short Course Universidad del Desarrollo Santiago, Chile December 16, 2009 Dr. Jonathan E. Alevy Department of Economics University.
WTP and WTA in a competitive environment Shosh Shahrabani 1, Tal Shavit 2, Uri Benzion 1,3 1. The Max Stern Academic College of Emek Yezreel, Israel 2.
1 The Determinants of Managerial Decisions Under Risk Martin G. Kocher University of Innsbruck Ganna Pogrebna Columbia University Matthias Sutter University.
Methodology Matters: Doing Research in the Behavioral and Social Sciences ICS 205 Ha Nguyen Chad Ata.
LECTURE 1 - SCOPE, OBJECTIVES AND METHODS OF DISCIPLINE "ECONOMETRICS"
Tests of Revenue Equivalence in Internet Magic Auctions David Lucking-Reiley “I have never considered the lab to be a substitute for field empirical work.”
NAREA Workshop Burlington, VT June 10, 2009 Yohei Mitani 1 Yohei Mitani Institute of Behavioral Science University of Colorado, Boulder Nicholas.
Data Analysis Econ 176, Fall Populations When we run an experiment, we are always measuring an outcome, x. We say that an outcome belongs to some.
Introduction section of article
 Descriptive Methods ◦ Observation ◦ Survey Research  Experimental Methods ◦ Independent Groups Designs ◦ Repeated Measures Designs ◦ Complex Designs.
©2010 John Wiley and Sons Chapter 2 Research Methods in Human-Computer Interaction Chapter 2- Experimental Research.
INTRODUCTION TO STATISTICS. Anthony J Greene2 Lecture Outline I.The Idea of Science II.Experimental Designs A.Variables 1.Independent Variables 2.Dependent.
Chapter 8 – Lecture 6. Hypothesis Question Initial Idea (0ften Vague) Initial ObservationsSearch Existing Lit. Statement of the problem Operational definition.
Reasoning in Psychology Using Statistics Psychology
EXPERIMENTS AND EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
 Research Design Part 2 Variability, Validity, Reliability.
Experimental Control Definition Is a predictable change in behavior (dependent variable) that can be reliably produced by the systematic manipulation.
Experimental Control. Part 1 Experimental Control.
 Economics as a social Science  Applying the scientific method in economics ◦ Observation, Theory, and Testing ◦ Assumptions and ceteris paribus  Controls.
Methodology: How Social Psychologists Do Research
Double Coordination in Small Groups Luigi Mittone, Matteo Ploner, Ivan Soraperra Computable and Experimental Economics Laboratory – University of Trento,
Yu-Hsuan Lin Catholic University of Korea, Korea University of York, U.K. 5 th Congress of EAAERE, Taipei, 06 th – 07 th August 2015.
Behavioral Issues in Multiple Criteria Decision Making Jyrki Wallenius, Aalto University School of Business Summer School on Behavioral Operational Research:
Chapter 6 Conducting Research in Clinical Psychology.
Experimental Methodology
Experimental Methodology
Economics 430/530 EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS Spring 2012
Economics 430/530 EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS Fall 2009
THE FIELD OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
Question 1: What is the baseline of high power?
Unit 4 SOCIAL INTERACTIONS.
Introduction to Experimental Design
Statistical Data Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Experimental Economics: Short Course Universidad del Desarrollo Santiago, Chile December 15-17, 2009 Dr. Jonathan E. Alevy Department of Economics University of Alaska Anchorage

Handbook of Experimental Economics: Table of Contents Handbook 1995 Public Goods Industrial Organization Auctions Coordination Problems Experimental Asset Markets Bargaining Experiments Individual Decision Making New in 2010 Social preferences Neuroeconomics Political economy Gender, discrimination, and culture Learning Field Experiments Market Design

Why Experiment? Experimental economics has been the protagonist of one of the most stunning methodological revolutions in the history of science. – Francesco Guala, New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics Core of the methodological advance – Making the unobservable (latent variables) observable

Example: Inducing Supply and Demand The study of…suitably motivated individuals in laboratory settings has important application to the … verification of theories of the economic system – Vernon Smith, 1976, AER Application of induced values to supply and demand  Vernon Smith, Nobel prize 2002 “Just do it” – Vernon Smith Rasmuson Chair Emeritus University of Alaska Anchorage

Let’s do it Go to Join session apr1

Double Auction Results Contrast to textbook treatment – Competitive market assumptions not met Small number of buyers & sellers Price makers Limited information – Teaching and research tool

Course Outline 1.Methods and Methodology – Controlling and/or measuring preferences – Treatment design & analysis – Lab & field experiments 2.Substantive areas – Individual choice – Auction & Asset Markets – Entrepreneurship 3.Purposes – Testing theory, looking for facts, policy 4.Resources for experimentalists – Research – Teaching

Methods and Methodology I: Fundamentals Treatment and Control – Comparison allows identification of causal effect Comparison either to theory or baseline experiment What motivates behavior? – “homegrown values” subjects bring to experiment May need to measure Relevant in lab and field settings – Induced values: created by researcher For example, the value of a fictitious good. Researcher knows the value for each subject.

Precepts for induced values 1.Non-satiation more of the reward is better 2.Salience payoff depends on actions difference between alternatives are significant 3.Dominance rewards dominate any subjective costs of participation 4.Privacy information only about own payoff

Conclusion on Induced values Compensation can be a treatment variable – Real versus hypothetical payments However: Standard practice for publication – Pay your subjects! Payment differences must depend on behavior – Differences large enough to focus attention Amount must exceed opportunity cost of time – At least “in expectation” Economists view contrasts with some psychologists – More evidence on this below

Methods and Methodology II Randomization of subjects to treatment & role – Equalize distribution of observable & unobservable characteristics across treatments Fundamental to valid statistical inference – All causes model – Example: Let equal market efficiency, information condition – Randomization and design choices  held constant

Methods and Methodology III Replication – Support or dispute previous results – Extend previous results Knowledge accumulates – A strength of laboratory experiments Literatures we will examine – Risk elicitation – Asset markets Can be a challenge for field experiments – But extremely important contributions » Especially in combination & contrast with lab results

Methods and Methodology IV: Experimental Design Choices Within vs. Between subject design – Within design has subjects participating in more than one treatment. Confound treatment effect with learning. – Between subject design has subjects participating in only one treatment. Clean comparison Other issues – No deception!! Loss of control. Contamination of subject pool. Unable to publish

Control: Elicitation of homegrown values Elicitation – What’s in there? Risk attitudes, time preferences, belief, valuation (WTP & WTA) – Psychologists question preference stability and other aspects of economic rationality Anchoring, preference reversals

Summary: Clean design What practices reduce (not eliminate), so that we can plausibly say we have controlled environment – Randomization to treatment – Clear instructions – Control for experience & order effects – Ceteris Paribus: Change one thing only

Risk Elicitation “Risk attitudes are confounding unobservables that have remained latent in a wide range of experiments.” – Cox and Harrison, 2008 – E.g. auction theory for risk neutral bidders, but bidders risk preferences are unknown. Risk Elicitation methods – Multiple Price List (MPL) Holt & Laury 2002 – BDM Becker DeGroot & Marschak 1963 – Tradeoff method Wakker & Deneffe, 1996

Let’s do it Google veconlab & find participant login Group is split across two sessions, jev3 and jev4 – If your participant number is odd join jev3 – If your particpant number is even join jev4

Risk Elicitation Risk Aversion & Incentive Effects – Holt Laury, AER, 2002 Research Question – Impact of hypothetical vs. salient payments on risk attitudes – Tversky & Kahneman: hypothetical payments are ok. People know how they would behave in actual situations Have no reason to disguise their true preferences

Holt & Laury Elicitation Results Hypothetical payments Real payments

Critique HL Treatment Design Holt Laury protocol, within subjects TreatmentElicitation Protocol FirstSecond Third T1Real 1Hypo 20Real 20 Harrison et al. critique. Scale is correlated with order. – Requires between subjects design (T1 and T2) TreatmentElicitation Protocol First Second T1Real 1 Real 10 T2Real 10

Harrision et al. result: order matters

Importance Holt and Laury – Confound order & scale effect – Result: Overstate the importance of scale Stastical note: – Harrison et al. use ordered probit Choices are naturally ordered (1-10) – However, choices are not independent (within subjects) Use error components model to control for repeated choices.

Alternative Elicitation BDM: See handout

Resources – Working paper listserv distributed by Dan Houser – Software cites – Teaching materials – Charlie Holt’s webpage to run experiments and get impression of different instructions: