Magnetic Correspondence between Moving Magnetic Features and Penumbral Magnetic Fields M. Kubo and T. Shimizu ISAS/JAXA - The 6th Solar-B Science Meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evolution of Magnetic Setting in Flare Productive Active Regions Yixuan Li Space Weather Research Lab New Jersey Institute of Technology.
Advertisements

Back Reaction on the Photospheric Magnetic field in Solar Eruptions Dandan Ye.
Study of Sunspot Motion Associated with the 2006 Dec. 13 X3.4 Flare Shuo Wang Advisor: Chang Liu Haimin Wang.
S.L. Guglielmino eHeroes 3 rd General Meeting Davos – March, 2014 High resolution spectro-polarimetric observations of a delta spot hosting eruptive.
Analysis of a C4.1 flare occurred in a δ spot using SDO and SST data
Study of Magnetic Helicity Injection in the Active Region NOAA Associated with the X-class Flare of 2011 February 15 Sung-Hong Park 1, K. Cho 1,
An overview of the cycle variations in the solar corona Louise Harra UCL Department of Space and Climate Physics Mullard Space Science.
IHY General Assembly, Paris, January 2006 Photospheric flows around sunspots and pores Michal Sobotka Astronomical Institute, Academy of Sciences.
A complete study of magnetic flux emergence, interaction, and diffusion should take into account some “anomalies” In the photosphere we can observe flux.
A complete study of magnetic flux emergence, interaction, and diffusion should take into account some “anomalies” In the photosphere we can observe flux.
Using Feature Tracking to Quantify Flux Cancellation Rates Evidence suggests that flux cancellation might play a central role in both formation and eruption.
Using HMI to Understand Flux Cancellation by Brian Welsch 1, George Fisher 1, Yan Li 1, and Xudong Sun 2 1 Space Sciences Lab, UC-Berkeley, 2 Stanford.
Modeling the Magnetic Field Evolution of the December Eruptive Flare Yuhong Fan High Altitude Observatory, National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Can We Determine Electric Fields and Poynting Fluxes from Vector Magnetograms and Doppler Shifts? by George Fisher, Brian Welsch, and Bill Abbett Space.
Simulation of Flux Emergence from the Convection Zone Fang Fang 1, Ward Manchester IV 1, William Abbett 2 and Bart van der Holst 1 1 Department of Atmospheric,
Changyi Tan et al. NJIT, April 2008 Evolution of Evershed and Shear Flows Associated with the X3.4 Flare of 2006 December 13 Evolution of Evershed and.
The Change of Magnetic Inclination Angles Associated with Flares Yixuan Li April 1,2008.
Physics 681: Solar Physics and Instrumentation – Lecture 23 Carsten Denker NJIT Physics Department Center for Solar–Terrestrial Research.
Using HMI to Understand Flux Cancellation by Brian Welsch 1, George Fisher 1, Yan Li 1, and Xudong Sun 2 1 Space Sciences Lab, UC-Berkeley, 2 Stanford.
Study of magnetic helicity in solar active regions: For a better understanding of solar flares Sung-Hong Park Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New.
Vector Spectropolarimetry of Dark-cored Penumbral Filaments with Hinode Bellot Rubio ApJL, 2007, in press.
Space Weather Forecast With HMI Magnetograms: Proposed data products Yang Liu, J. T. Hoeksema, and HMI Team.
Polar Network Index as a magnetic proxy for the solar cycle studies Priyal, Muthu, Karak, Bidya Binay, Munoz-Jaramillo, Andres, Ravindra, B., Choudhuri,
Flow and Magnetic Fields of Solar Active Regions in Photosphere and Chromosphere Na Deng Post-Doctoral Researcher California State University Northridge.
Multiheight Analysis of Asymmetric Stokes Profiles in a Solar Active Region Na Deng Post-Doctoral Researcher at California State University Northridge.
ELECTRICITY & MAGNETISM (Fall 2011) LECTURE # 4 BY MOEEN GHIYAS.
What stellar properties can be learnt from planetary transits Adriana Válio Roque da Silva CRAAM/Mackenzie.
Seething Horizontal Magnetic Fields in the Quiet Solar Photosphere J. Harvey, D. Branston, C. Henney, C. Keller, SOLIS and GONG Teams.
A complete study of magnetic flux emergence, interaction, and diffusion should take into account some “anomalies” In the solar photosphere we can observe.
Comparison on Calculated Helicity Parameters at Different Observing Sites Haiqing Xu (NAOC) Collaborators: Hongqi, Zhang, NAOC Kirill Kuzanyan, IZMIRAN,
Quick changes of photospheric magnetic field during flare-associated surges Leping Li, Huadong Chen, Suli Ma, Yunchun Jiang National Astronomical Observatory/Yunnan.
Modeling Magnetoconvection in Active Regions Neal Hurlburt, David Alexander, Marc DeRosa Lockheed Martin Solar & Astrophysics Laboratory Alastair Rucklidge.
Interdependence of solar plasma flows and magnetic fields E.J. Zita & C. Smith, The Evergreen State College, Olympia, WA 98505; N.E. Hurlburt, LMSAL, Palo.
Micro-Flare and High-Speed Down-Flow observed with VTT R. Kano(1), Y. Katsukawa(1), Y. Kitakoshi(2), T. Shimizu(3), S. Tsuneta(1) and V. Martinez Pillet(4)
1 Electric Field – Continuous Charge Distribution As the average separation between source charges is smaller than the distance between the charges and.
2005/11/086th Solar-B Science Supersonic downflows in the photosphere discovered in sunspot moat regions T. Shimizu (ISAS/JAXA, Japan),
The quantitative analysis of the spiral chirality of penumbral filament 1 Helicity Thinkshop on Solar Physics, Oct. 2013, Beijing Liu J.H., Su J.T. et.
19 Oct 2005SPW41 Penumbral MMFs S Jaeggli (UHawaii) C Henney (NSO) S Luszcz (Cornell) S Walton (CSUN/SFO)
Decay of a simulated bipolar field in the solar surface layers Alexander Vögler Robert H. Cameron Christoph U. Keller Manfred Schüssler Max-Planck-Institute.
Differences between central and peripheral umbral dots Michal Sobotka 1 Jan Jurcak 2,1 SXT seminar, 2008/10/10, NAOJ Astronomical Institute, Academy of.
Analysis Magnetic Reconnection in Solar Flares: the Importance of Spines and Separators Angela Des Jardins 1, Richard Canfield 1, Dana Longcope 1, Emily.
Invited speakers (afternoon): David Alexander (Rice University) Chip Manchester (University of Michigan) Brad Hindman (JILA/University of Colorado)
Spectral Signature of Emergent Magnetic Flux D1 神尾 精 Solar Seminar Balasubramaniam,K.S., 2001, ApJ, 557, 366. Chae, J. et al., 2000, ApJ, 528,
Moving dipolar features in an emerging flux region P.N. Bernasconi et al. 2002, Sol. Phys., 209, 119 Junko Kiyohara 2003 Dec 22.
1. Twist propagation in Hα surges Patricia Jibben and Richard C. Canfield 2004, ApJ, 610, Observation of the Molecular Zeeman Effect in the G Band.
Feb. 3-5, 20034th Solar-B science meeting1 Corona-Photosphere Connection with Spectropolarimeter Yukio Katsukawa (Univ. of Tokyo)
Is there any relationship between photospheric flows & flares? Coupling between magnetic fields in the solar photosphere and corona implies that flows.
Karen Meyer University of St Andrews Scotland 1 st year PhD student (3 months in)
Observation on Current Helicity and Subsurface Kinetic Helicity in Solar Active Regions Gao Yu Helicity Thinkshop Main Collaborators: Zhang, H.
High resolution images obtained with Solar Optical Telescope on Hinode
Physics 681: Solar Physics and Instrumentation – Lecture 22 Carsten Denker NJIT Physics Department Center for Solar–Terrestrial Research.
Evolutionary Characteristics of Magnetic Helicity Injection in Active Regions Hyewon Jeong and Jongchul Chae Seoul National University, Korea 2. Data and.
1 Yongliang Song & Mei Zhang (National Astronomical Observatory of China) The effect of non-radial magnetic field on measuring helicity transfer rate.
Moving Magnetic Features (MMFs) Jun Zhang National Astronomical Observatories Chinese Academy of Sciences Collaborators: Sami Solanki and Jingxiu Wang.
Moving Magnetic Features as Prolongation of Penumbral Filaments The Astrophysical Journal, 632: , 2005 October 20. Sainz Dalda 1 Telescope Heliographique.
Nov. 8-11, th Solar-B science meeting Observational Analysis of the Relation between Coronal Loop Heating and Photospheric Magnetic Fields Y. Katsukawa.
Horizontal Flows in the Photosphere and the Subphotosphere in Two Active Regions Yang Liu, Junwei Zhao, Peter W. Schuck.
Measurements of photospheric magnetic field within and around sunspots Rolf Schlichenmaier, Kiepenheuer-Institut für Sonnenphysik ENS, 29.Mai 2006 Image:
High Spatial Resolution Observations of Pores and the Formation of a Rudimentary Penumbra G. Yang, Y.Xu, H.Wangm and C.Denker 2003, ApJ, 597, 1190.
Helicity Thinkshop 2009, Beijing Asymmetry of helicity injection in emerging active regions L. Tian, D. Alexander Rice University, USA Y. Liu Yunnan Astronomical.
Chromospheric Evershed flow
Studies on Twisted Magnetic Flux Bundles
Structure and Flow Field of Sunspot
Magnetic Helicity in Emerging Active Regions: A Statistical Study
Magnetic Flux Ropes in the Solar Photosphere: The Vector Magnetic Field under Active Region Filaments B.W.Lites the Astrophysical Journal, 622: ,2005,
On the nature of moving magnetic feature pairs around sunspots
The Moat Flow Observed in Two Different TRACE-Filters
Observations of emerging and submerging regions with ASP and Solar-B
Magnetic Configuration and Non-potentiality of NOAA AR10486
Na Deng Post-Doctoral Researcher
Presentation transcript:

Magnetic Correspondence between Moving Magnetic Features and Penumbral Magnetic Fields M. Kubo and T. Shimizu ISAS/JAXA - The 6th Solar-B Science Meeting -

We investigate vector magnetic fields and motion of MMFs from a observation with the Advanced Stokes Polarimeter (ASP) and MDI. Moving magnetic features (MMFs) are small magnetic elements moving outward in the zone (moat region) surrounding sunspots. (Sheeley 1969, Vrabec 1971, Harvey & Harvey 1973) Properties of MMFs are examined by using only longitudinal magnetogram. - size: less than about 2” - horizontal velocity: 0.5 km/s. - life time: several minutes ~ ten hours (Ryutoba et al. 1998, Zhang et al. 2003) ⇒ Magnetic field structure of MMFs ? MMFs are important for understanding decaying process of sunspots. - MMFs visually carry away magnetic flux from sunspots in MDI movie. - Total magnetic flux of MMFs with polarity same as sunspots is 3-8 times larger than flux loss of sunspots (Martinez Pillet 2002). ⇒ Which MMFs are responsible for decaying the sunspot? We compare magnetic field properties of MMFs to sunspot penumbral fields. We estimate how much magnetic flux is carried away from sunspot by MMFs. Moving Magnetic Features (MMFs) Longitudinal magnetogram (MDI: high resolution mode)

15" moat region penumbral outer boundary ASP: continuum intensityASP: magnetic flux (z-direction) degree of polarization < 0.4% 180 ° (vertical) 90 ° (horizontal) 0 ° (vertical) ASP: inclination [degree] degree of polarization < 0.4% We identify magnetic elements isolated from their surroundings in the MDI movie by visual inspection (positive: 21, negative: 21). → isolated MMFs (referred to as MMFs by previous authors) Most of the moat region other than the isolated MMFs have magnetic fields with radial outward motion. → non-isolated MMFs Isolated MMFs and Non-isolated MMFs MDI : horizontal velocity ( local correlation tracking method applying for MDI magnetogram ) correlation coefficient < 0.9 We focus on all magnetic elements with horizontal motion in the moat region.

Difference between isolated and non-isolated MMFs Most of the non-isolated MMFs have nearly horizontal magnetic fields. There are both isolated MMFs with vertical and horizontal magnetic fields. Magnetic features can be identified as the isolated MMFs either when - they have polarity opposite to the surrounding non-isolated MMFs - they have inclination more than about 15˚ different from that of the surrounding non-isolated MMFs Difference of horizontal velocity is not large. vertical horizontal [%] non-isolated MMFs isolated MMFs (negative) isolated MMFs (positive) [%] ASP: inclination [degree]MDI: horizontal velocity [km/s]

ASP: inclination [degree] Uncombed structure at the penumbral outer boundary 180 ° (vertical) 90 ° (horizontal) 0 ° (vertical) along outer boundary of penumbra ASP: inclination [degree] Thomas et al. (2002) Horizontal magnetic fields and relatively vertical fields are alternately located at the outer boundary of penumbra. → uncombed structure (fluted structure or interlocking comb structure) vertical components position angle [degree] (counterclockwise from West ) horizontal

We find magnetic correspondence between penumbral uncombed structure and isolated MMFs. distance form penumbral edge [arcsec] 90 ° (horizontal) ASP: inclination [degree] Isolated MMFs inclinationpolarity Vertical componentsVerticalsame as sunspot Horizontal componentsHorizontalboth position angle [degree] (counterclockwise from West ) Penumbral uncombed structure outer boundary of penumbra 180 ° (vertical) outer boundary of moat region 0 ° (vertical) ◇ : positive MMFs, × : negative MMFs

Magnetic field structure of MMFs Our observation on magnetic correspondence shows magnetic fields structure of MMFs proposed by Thomas et al. (2002) and Weiss et al. (2004) is correct for the first time. penumbra moat region sunspot (positive) vertical component These MMFs are detached from the vertical components of the uncombed structure. ⇒ contribute to disintegration of the sunspot - Isolated MMFs with vertical fields and polarity same as the sunspot.

non-isolated MMFs Magnetic field structure of MMFs penumbra moat region - Isolated (and non-isolated) MMFs with nearly horizontal fields ・ These MMFs correspond to concave or convex parts of horizontal magnetic fields extended from the penumbra. Such structure can be interpreted as a sea serpent-like structure ( Harvey & Harvey 1973). ・ Contribution to the flux loss of the sunspot is not clear for these MMFs. - Horizontal fields are detached from the penumbra → contribute - Only concave or convex parts move along the horizontal fields → not contribute horizontal component sunspot (positive)

v r : radial component of horizontal velocity B: field strength f : filling factor (areal percentage of each pixel occupied by magnetic atmosphere)  : inclination Magnetic flux carried by MMFs Magnetic flux transport rate (  ) of MMFs is estimated by integrating magnetic flux that pass the line with same distance from the penumbral edge:  = (Bfcosγ)v r L sunspot L: length d d d d MDI ASP Flux loss rate of sunspot is determined from day-by-day change of its total flux.

Flux transport rate of MMFs vs. Flux loss rate of sunspot all the positive MMFs all the negative MMFs uncombed structure is extended up to 5" MMFs can carry away sufficient magnetic flux from the sunspot. Only limited part of the MMFs contributes to the flux loss of the sunspot. Flux transport rate of positive MMFs just outside of uncombed structure - much larger than that of negative MMFs - about 7 times larger than flux loss rate of the sunspot flux loss rate of the sunspot flux transport rate [10 16 Mx/sec] distance form penumbral edge [arcsec]

Which MMFs are responsible for decaying the sunspot? flux loss rate of the sunspot The isolated MMFs having vertical fields with polarity same as the sunspot carry about 1-3 times larger than the flux loss of the sunspot. Such MMFs alone can be responsible for decaying the sunspot. The isolated and non-isolated MMFs with nearly horizontal fields would not contribute to the flux loss of the sunspot. inclination < 45˚ flux transport rate [10 16 Mx/sec] distance form penumbral edge [arcsec]

Conclusions Only the vertical isolated MMFs with polarity same as the sunspot are responsible for the disintegration of the sunspot. We find that the isolated MMFs have magnetic correspondence to the uncombed structure of the sunspot penumbra. The isolated MMFs with vertical fields and polarity same as the sunspot carry away sufficient flux for the flux loss of the sunspot. Penumbral uncombed structureIsolated MMFs inclinationpolarity Vertical componentsVerticalsame as sunspot Horizontal componentsHorizontalboth

Solar-B Observation The magnetic correspondence between penumbra fields and MMFs is still investigated only for a regular decaying sunspot. Goal for the study of MMFs is to understand the decaying process of sunspots! Penumbra appears at very early phase of sunspots (pores) in general. → When disintegration of sunspot due to MMFs start ? We would like to obtain evolution of the magnetic field structure of penumbra and MMFs from pores to mature sunspots by using continuous vector magnetic field observations of sunspots and MMFs What is observed for the non-isolated MMFs with high spatial resolution? → The non-isolated MMFs correspond to small magnetic elements such as G-band bright points or not ? We find most of the moat region is occupied by the non-isolated MMFs.

Bipolar MMFs and Unipolar MMFs Such an imbalance of the magnetic flux of MMF pairs is frequently observed. (Ryutova et al. 1998,Yurchyshyn et al. 2001, Zhang et al.2003) bipolar MMF ambient magnetic fields with positive polarity (without horizontal motion) MMFs may be influenced by ambient magnetic fields due to the lack of spatial resolution. 1. When a pair of MMFs is mixed with the ambient magnetic fields, MMF with negative polarity has smaller magnetic flux. 2. When inclination of MMF is similar to that of the ambient magnetic fields, MMF with positive polarity may not be identified.