Hypernuclear Physics in Hall A E07-012 Status John J. LeRose December 16, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GEANT Simulation of RCS Vahe Mamyan Hall A Analysis Workshop December 10, 2003.
Advertisements

Robert Michaels PREX at Trento PREX Workshop 09 Physics Interpretation of PREX 208 Pb E = 1 GeV, electrons on lead Elastic Scattering Parity Violating.
Robert Michaels HAMC Hall A Analysis Workshop 09 C HAMC = Hall A Monte Carlo ROOT / C++ Design Somewhat like SAMC & genercone For HRS only. Uses LeRose.
Measuring the Neutron and 3 He Spin Structure at Low Q 2 Vincent Sulkosky College of William and Mary, Williamsburg VA Experimental Overview The.
NDVCS measurement with BoNuS RTPC M. Osipenko December 2, 2009, CLAS12 Central Detector Collaboration meeting.
Jixie Zhang Javier Gomez Oleksandr Glamazdin Roman Pomatsalyuk Vadym Vereshchaka Hall A Collabortion Meeting, Dec 2012 Hall A Moller Polarimeter 12 GeV.
Monte Carlo Studies of the HERMES RICH in SBS—progress report Andrew Puckett 11/10/2010.
Study of the Elementary Reaction Pete Markowitz Florida International University 28/05/2014.
E : HRS Cross Section Analyses Vincent Sulkosky Massachusetts Institute of Technology GMp Collaboration Meeting September 24 th, 2012.
Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization A. Somov, Jefferson Lab GlueX Collaboration Meeting September
Hall D Photon Beam Simulation and Rates Part 1: photon beam line Part 2: tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Beam Line and Tagger Review.
Experimental requirements for GPD measurements at JLab energies. Detector that ensures exclusivity of process, measurement of complete final state Measure.
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design. Outline. Design considerations. Stresses and deformations. Mechanical assembly.
The Tagger Microscope Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Tagger - Photon Beamline ReviewJan , 2005, Newport News presented by GlueX.
Richard MilnerDESY April 6, OLYMPUS Overview Motivation for the experiment Progress to date on the experiment The path forward.
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design. Outline. Design considerations. Stresses and deformations. Mechanical assembly.
USING A MICRO FABRICATED UNDULATOR TO BRIDGE THE FOUR DECADE GAP BETWEEN REGULAR PURE PERMANENT MAGNET UNDULATORS AND INVERSE COMPTON SCATTERING SOURCES.
Bogdan Wojtsekhowski, Jefferson Lab Experimental search for A’ for APEX collaboration 1.
Min Huang Duke University, TUNL On Behalf of the E g2p collaboration Hall A Analysis Workshop, 12/12/12.
Internal target option for RHIC Drell-Yan experiment Wolfram Fischer and Dejan Trbojevic 31 October 2010 Santa Fe Polarized Drell-Yan Physics Workshop.
HYP03 Future Hypernuclear Program at Jlab Hall C Satoshi N. Nakamura Tohoku University 18 th Oct 2003, JLab.
The angular dependence of the 16 O(e,e’K + ) 16  N and H(e,e’K + )  F. Garibaldi – Jlab December WATERFALL The WATERFALL target: reactions on.
ハイパー核ガンマ線分光用 磁気スペクトロメータ -SksMinus- 東北大学 大学院理学研究科 白鳥昂太郎 ATAMI.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 IPR October 18-20, 2011 John J. LeRose Independent Project Review of 12 GeV Upgrade Jefferson Lab.
Hall C Meeting SHMS Magnets and Support Structure Design and Procurement Status Paul Brindza January 26, 2009.
Question and Answer 1) A weighted Monte-Carlo ray trace of particles exiting the target/magnet assembly for all primary beam energies showing: a) Where.
Vincent Sulkosky Massachusetts Institute of Technology Spokespeople: J.-P. Chen, A. Deur, F. Garibaldi Hall A Collaboration Meeting December 10 th, 2012.
Hypernuclear spectroscopy using (K - stop,  0 ) and (e,e’K + ) reactions Doc. dr. sc. Darko Androić University of Zagreb Physics Department.
PV-DIS Toroid Detector: outline and costs Paul E. Reimer 12 GeV PV-DIS detector meeting August 1.Introduction to Toroid Concept (presenting work.
Magnetism1 Review on Magnetism Chapter 28 Magnetism2 Refrigerators are attracted to magnets!
Extraction from the Delivery Ring November 19, 2013 J. Morgan.
GlueX Collaboration Meeting. Jefferson Lab. September 9 – 11, Review of Tagger System.
SBS Magnet John J. LeRose. Assembly drawing of 48D48 magnet as used at BNL (vertical field)
APEX Septum Analysis G.M. Urciuoli. Comparison between PREX septum field (from SNAKE input), and APEX septum field (from TOSCA simulations). Y axis.
GlueX Two Magnet Tagger G. Yang University of Glasgow Part 1, 3 D Tosca analysis. Part 2, Preliminary Drawings. Part 3, Proposed Assembly Procedures (i)
SksMinus status Hyperball collaboration meeting 2009/3/11 K. Shirotori.
Lecture 9: Inelastic Scattering and Excited States 2/10/2003 Inelastic scattering refers to the process in which energy is transferred to the target,
SLAC, September 25, 2009 Searching for a U -boson with a positron beam Bogdan Wojtsekhowski Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility  The light.
Calorimetry for Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering in Hall A Alexandre Camsonne Hall A Jefferson Laboratory Workshop on General Purpose High Resolution.
SHMS Spectrometer Update Hall C 2008 Users Meeting Paul Brindza January 18, 2008.
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
PREX Mtg, July 2008R. Michaels, JLAB Warm Septum : Status Septum Team: Kees deJager, Paul Brindza, Javier Gomez, John Lerose, Al Gavalya, & me New Design.
E97-110: Small Angle GDH Experimental Status Report E97-110: Small Angle GDH Experimental Status Report Vincent Sulkosky Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
J-PARC でのハイパー核ガンマ線分光実験用 散乱粒子磁気スペクトロメータ検出器の準備 状況 東北大理, 岐阜大教 A, KEK B 白鳥昂太郎, 田村裕和, 鵜養美冬 A, 石元茂 B, 大谷友和, 小池武志, 佐藤美沙子, 千賀信幸, 細見健二, 馬越, 三輪浩司, 山本剛史, 他 Hyperball-J.
SBS Magnet John J. LeRose. Magnet: 48D cm gap, 2-3 Tesla*m Solid angle is 70 msr at 15 ° GEM chambers with 70 μm resolution Momentum resolution.
Hall C - 12 GeV pCDR Max. Central Momentum 11 GeV/c 9 GeV/c Min. Scattering Angle 5.5 deg 10 deg Momentum Resolution.15% -.2% Solid Angle 2.1 msr 4.4 msr.
Septum Magnets in Hall A Hall A Collaboration Meeting 6/10-11/2010 John J. LeRose.
Vincent Sulkosky Massachusetts Institute of Technology Spokespeople: J.-P. Chen, A. Deur, F. Garibaldi Hall A Collaboration Meeting June 13 th, 2013 E97-110:
MEIC Detector and IR Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Spectrometer optics studies and target development for the 208Pb(e,e’p) experiment in Hall A at Jefferson Lab, GUIDO M. URCIUOLI, INFN, Roma, Italy, JUAN.
Interaction Region Design and Detector Integration V.S. Morozov for EIC Study Group at JLAB 2 nd Mini-Workshop on MEIC Interaction Region Design JLab,
Detector / Interaction Region Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski Joint CASA/Accelerator and Nuclear Physics MEIC/ELIC Meeting.
Jin Huang Brookhaven National Lab ● Optics General ● Test Run Calibration ● Comment on Full Runs Trying to collect materials from three years ago. May.
HES-HKS analysis meeting 30 Aug 2013 Toshiyuki Gogami.
Min Huang g2p/GEp Collaboration Meeting April 18, 2011.
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design Jim Kellie Glasgow University.
Pb-Parity and Septum Update Presented by: Luis Mercado UMass - Amherst 12/05/2008 Thanks to Robert Michaels, Kent Pachke, Krishna Kumar, Dustin McNulty.
Yingshun Zhu Design of Small Aperture Quadrupole Magnet for HEPS-TF
JLEIC MDI Update Michael Sullivan Apr 4, 2017.
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Why Consider a Toroid Spectrometer Built Around Existing Hardware?
Polarized WACS Experiment (E ) Using Compact Photon Source (CPS)
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
HRS at small angles for e+/ e- pair for APEX
Hall A Infrastructure and the Moller Parity Experiment “AMPEX”
Physics Interpretation of PREX
Wei Luo Lanzhou University 2011 Hall C User Meeting January 14, 2011
Hall “12 GeV” May 27, 2003 NAPP 2003: J.J. LeRose.
NKS2 Meeting with Bydzovsky NKS2 Experiment / Analysis Status
Feasibility of Recuperation of Magnets in Decommissioned Storage Rings
Presentation transcript:

Hypernuclear Physics in Hall A E Status John J. LeRose December 16, 2009

Proposal E to study the angular dependence of p(e,e’K + ) Λ and 16 O(e,e’K + ) 16 Λ N at Low Q 2 Approved PAC January, 2007 Scheduled to run April 19-May 14, 2012 The last 6 GeV era experiment in Hall A

The kinematics of the proposed experiment. Incident Electron Energy3.65 GeV Virtual photon energy2.2 GeV Q2Q (GeV/c) 2 Electron scattering angle, θ e 6° Kaon scattering angle, θ Ke 8.5° & 11° Kaon momentum, |p K |~1.96 GeV/c Electron Momentum, |p e |~1.45 GeV/c

E expected Data

Electroproduction on 16 O - angular distribution hypernuclear physics AND discriminate Simultaneously measuring the electroproduction cross section on oxygen and hydrogen at a few kaon scattering angles will shed new light on problems of hypernuclear physics AND discriminate between groups of elementary models

Good News / Bad News Qweak will run  Qweak wants all the cryogens it can get – Must build a room temperature septum pair à la PREX Runs in parallel with Qweak

Re Room Temperature Septa Two not quite identical RT septa will work Same iron but different coils – RT light : for 6 ° electron side (B=0.737 T) Reduced coil allows close proximity to the beam line – RT std : for 8.5 ° & 11 ° Kaons (B=1.215 & 1.51 T) Beefier coil, but doesn’t have to get as close to the beam line Benefits from the PREX experience – But there’s work to do.

PREX Magnet Status and Capabilities John J. LeRose with much help from Paul Brindza

PREX Magnet assembled in the Physics storage Building

General Charateristics Design is a twin dipole RT septum fields can be anti-parallel or parallel RT anti parallel has a quadrupole on axis RT parallel has net dipole on axis Iron beam filter works for PREX fields (0.5 T) but is saturated for hi field(1.2 T) running “PREX” uses 2 of 3 coils and iron fillers for better field uniformity “Hi field” uses all 3 coils and reaches 1.2 T at expense of uniformity

RT septum geometry Iron gap 24 cm high x cm wide x 75 cm long “PREX” coil have cm^2 “PREX” J is 600 Amp/cm^2 “PREX” can run w/o a booster LCW water pump “Hi field” coil is cm^2 “Hi field” J is 850 Amps/cm^2 “Hi Field” requires a LCW water booster pump

Magnetic performance “PREX” NI = 96,768 “PREX” By(23.7, 0,0) = T “PREX” ∫By(23.7,0,z)dz= T.M – G(1,0,0)=8.2 g/cm ∫G.dZ = 1739 (g/cm)cm “Hi Field” NI = 274,992 “Hi Field” By(23.7,0,0)= 1.21 T “Hi Field” ∫By(23.7,0,z)= 1.21 T.M – G(1,0,0)=658 g/cm, ∫G.dz = 50,624 (g/cm)cm

5° PREX configurationrightleft phi min phi max theta ±0.043 P0 max (GeV/c)1.11GeV/c PREX ∫Bdl0.485T∙m Hi Field ∫Bd1.21T∙m Hi Field P0 max (GeV/c)2.77GeV/c

  l1l1 l2l2 l3l3 γ target to 5°1054mm Bend 5° (α)7.5deg HRS 5° (γ)12.5deg target to 9°506mm Bend 9° (α)6.5deg HRS 9° (γ)15.5deg

Left axis, ΔΩ1, assumes rectangular acceptance i.e. neglects acceptance loss from rounded corners, a slight overestimate. Right axis, ΔΩ2, just calculates the relative number of trajectories for each case. “PREX” at 5°. Just move the target upstream and downstream.

Summary “PREX” magnet adds lots of small angle capability – 5°< central angle < 12° – Either polarity in either arm – High current with thick targets BUT: – Momentum range is limited 1.11 GeV/c or 2.77 GeV/c at 5° – Must have the same angle on both sides

Backup Slides

“PREX” at 5°. Just move the target upstream and downstream.