January 10, 2007M. Woodley (SLAC)1 ILC Beam Delivery System “Interim Working Assumption” 2006e Release European LC Workshop, January 8-11 2007, Daresbury.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ideas and Speculations for the Headon Extraction Line L. Keller Oct. 19, Give up the 3.5 m Separation between the Charged Dump and the Incoming.
Advertisements

Update of RTML, Status of FNAL L-band and CLIC X-band BPM, Split SC Quadrupole Nikolay Solyak Fermilab (On behalf of RTML team) LCWS2010 / ILC 10, March.
ILC Accelerator School Kyungpook National University
Zero Degree Extraction using an Electrostatic Separator Take another look at using an electrostatic separator and a weak dipole to allow a zero degree.
Overview of Beam Delivery System Final Focus Optics Collimator Final Doublet Extraction/Dump Others S.Kuroda ( KEK ) MDI meeting at SLAC 1/6/2005.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC IR Layout and Background Estimates Jeff Gronberg/LLNL For the Beam Delivery Group LCWS - October 25, 2000.
IPBI 6 April 05Ken Moffeit Polarimetry Design Updates - Dispersion in upstream chicane - 20mrad extraction line 0.75 mrad beam stay clear location of Synchrotron.
27 June 2006Ken Moffeit1 Comparison of 2mrad and 14/20 mrad extraction lines Ken Moffeit ILC BDS 27 June 06.
November 2005M. Woodley1 ILC Beam Delivery System layout with end-of-linac undulator.
LCWS ’05 Machine Detector Interface Design Updates Tom Markiewicz SLAC 22 March 2005.
K. Moffeit 6 Jan 2005 WORKSHOP Machine-Detector Interface at the International Linear Collider SLAC January 6-8, 2005 Polarimetry at the ILC Design issues.
20 March 2005Ken Moffeit LCWS1 Highlights from the MDI workshop Spin Rotation System for 2 IR’s Downstream polarimetry Ken Moffeit.
2 February 2005Ken Moffeit Spin Rotation scheme for two IRs Ken Moffeit SLAC.
Beam Delivery System Review of RDR(draft) 1.Overview 2.Beam parameters 3.System description 3.1 diagnostic, tune-up dump, machine protection MPS.
November 07, 2006 Global Design Effort 1 Beam Delivery System updates BDS Area leaders Deepa Angal-Kalinin, Hitoshi Yamamoto, Andrei Seryi Valencia GDE.
Overview of Extraction Line Designs and Issues
ILC RTML Lattice Design A.Vivoli, N. Solyak, V. Kapin Fermilab.
ATF2 optics … 1 3 rd Mini-Workshop on Nano Project at ATF ATF2 optics, tuning method and tolerances of initial alignment, magnets, power supplies etc.
October 31, BDS Group1 ILC Beam Delivery System “Hybrid” Layout 2006e Release Preliminary M. Woodley.
The Overview of the ILC RTML Bunch Compressor Design Sergei Seletskiy LCWS 13 November, 2012.
Status of ILC BDS Design Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC/Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury Laboratory Andrei Seryi SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory ILC-CLIC.
ILC Beam Delivery System / MDI Issues for LCC-phase (~
11th December 2007 LET workshop, SLAC 1 Beam dynamics issues in Beam Delivery System Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory.
1 Overview of Polarimetry Outline of Talk Polarized Physics Machine-Detector Interface Issues Upstream Polarimeter Downstream Polarimeter Ken Moffeit,
Global Design Effort ILC Crab Cavity Overview and requirements Andrei Seryi SLAC on behalf of ILC Beam Delivery and Crab-Cavity design teams Joint BNL/US-LARP/CARE-HHH.
Design status 2 mrad IR Current plan for finalization in 2008 Philip Bambade LAL-Orsay On behalf of: D.Angal-Kalinin, R.Appleby, F.Jackson, D.Toprek (Cockcroft)
11-13th October 2007 BDS KOM, SLAC 1 Accelerator and detector requirements specification and optimisation on example of interaction Region Deepa Angal-Kalinin.
17 th November, 2008 LCWS08/ILC08 1 BDS optics and minimal machine study Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC & The Cockcroft Institute Daresbury Laboratory.
1 O. Napoly ECFA-DESY Amsterdam, April 2003 Machine – Detector Interface : what is new since the TDR ? O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre POST-LINAC BEAM TRANSPORT AND COLLIMATION FOR THE UK’S NEW LIGHT SOURCE PROJECT D. Angal-Kalinin,
ILC-GDE Meeting Beijing Feb Effect of MDI Design on BDS Collimation Depth Frank Jackson ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory Cockcroft Institute.
Mark Woodley, SLACATF2 Project March 20-21, Next version of MAD decks (v3.7): what needs to be added/deleted?
Kiyoshi Kubo Electron beam in undulators of e+ source - Emittance and orbit angle with quad misalignment and corrections - Effect of beam pipe.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Tor Raubenheimer Beam Delivery System Design Differences American Linear Collider Physics Meeting SLAC January 8.
BDS Lattice Design : EDR plans GWP03 Meeting 04/12/2007.
L. Keller 3/18/02 Beam-Gas-Bremsstrahlung and Coulomb Scattering in the NLC Beam Delivery System Conditions for Calculation: 1. Program is DECAY TURTLE.
Summary of Tuning, Corrections, and Commissioning ( Short summary of ATF2 meeting at SLAC in March 2007 ) and Hardware Issues for beam Tuning Toshiyuki.
COMPENSATION OF DETECTOR SOLENOID FIELD WITH L*=4.1M Glen White, SLAC April 20, 2015 ALCW2015, KEK, Japan.
MEIC Detector and IR Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Interaction Region Design and Detector Integration V.S. Morozov for EIC Study Group at JLAB 2 nd Mini-Workshop on MEIC Interaction Region Design JLab,
Detector / Interaction Region Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski Joint CASA/Accelerator and Nuclear Physics MEIC/ELIC Meeting.
IWLC10, 18 th -22 nd October10, CERN/CICG 1 Global Design Effort Updates to ILC RDR Beam Delivery System Deepa Angal-Kalinin & James Jones ASTeC, STFC.
BDS/MDI Deepa Angal-Kalinin Andrei Seryi AD&I Meeting, DESY, May 29, 2009.
1 O. Napoly ECFA-DESY Amsterdam, April 2003 Machine – Detector Interface : what is new since the TDR ? O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
2nd ATF2 Project Meeting (May 30, 2006)M. Woodley [SLAC]1 ATF2 Layout/Optics (v3.3) nBPM (SLAC) nBPM (KEK) FONT Compton / laserwire ODR Existing ATF Extraction.
ILC BDS Commissioning Glen White, SLAC AWLC 2014, Fermilab May 14 th 2014.
MAIN DUMP LINE: BEAM LOSS SIMULATIONS WITH THE TDR PARAMETERS Y. Nosochkov E. Marin, G. White (SLAC) LCWS14 Workshop, Belgrade, October 7, 2014.
Baseline BDS Design Updates Glen White, SLAC Sept. 4, 2014 Ichinoseki, MDI/CFS Meeting.
Design challenges for head-on scheme Deepa Angal-Kalinin Orsay, 19 th October 2006.
The design of the 2mrad extraction line Rob Appleby Daresbury Laboratory On behalf of the SLAC-BNL-UK-France task force ILC European Regional Meeting and.
1 April 1 st, 2003 O. Napoly, ECFA-DESY Amsterdam Design of a new Final Focus System with l* = 4,5 m J. Payet, O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
Re-design of extraction line for single stage BC
Emittance Diagnostics
M. Sullivan for the SLAC SuperB Workshop Jan , 2009
The Interaction Region
M. Boscolo, K. Bertsche, E. Paoloni, S. Bettoni,
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Alternate Lattice for LCLS-II LTU Y
The small crossing angle layout - where are we and what do we do now?
AD & I : BDS Lattice Design Changes
ILC BDS Emittance Diagnostics: Design and Requirements
Updates on IR and FF for super-B factory
The 2mrad horizontal crossing angle IR layout for the ILC
01SEP17.
Emittance Diagnostics
NLC 2001 Beam Delivery Layout
IR Lattice with Detector Solenoid
Y. Nosochkov and M. Woodley (SLAC)
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
ILC Beam Switchyard: Issues and Plans
Presentation transcript:

January 10, 2007M. Woodley (SLAC)1 ILC Beam Delivery System “Interim Working Assumption” 2006e Release European LC Workshop, January , Daresbury

January 10, 2007M. Woodley (SLAC)2 IWA Design Criteria single interaction region, 14 mrad crossing angle (saves ~ 300 m of tunnel) … “push-pull” detectors start with design for 1 TeV cm (500 GeV beam) modify design for initial operation at (up to) 250 GeV; upgrade to 500 GeV to be accomplished by adding magnets only (no layout/geometry changes) decimate dipoles … reduce ∫Bdl for 250 GeV operation by reducing lengths (i.e. number of dipoles); reserve space for additional dipoles, keeping layout fixed quadrupoles & sextupoles unchanged …reduce ∫Gdl for 250 GeV operation by reducing strengths Final Doublet magnets will have to be replaced for upgrade to 500 GeV

January 10, 2007M. Woodley (SLAC)3 Design Criteria (2) remove dedicated energy / emittance diagnostic chicane (saves ~ 100 m) –use polarimeter chicane (there are some issues here … ) BSY kickers: length and strength of individual kicker modules unchanged –start with 9 kickers –space reserved for additional 16 kickers for 500 GeV BSY septa: lengths and strengths of individual magnets unchanged –start with three 2 m septa 5 kG + 10 kG) –space reserved for two additional septa for 500 GeV 5 kG + 10 kG) large bore BSY extraction magnets: unchanged rastering dipoles (BSY and post-IP): strength unchanged –start with 10 (5 horizontal and 5 vertical) for R sweep = 3 cm –space reserved for additional 10 dipoles for 500 GeV spot size on BSY dump window unchanged (round; 1 σ area = 2π mm 2 ) BSY length is ~644 m (~482 m in “minimal” 250 GeV system) BSY tuneup/extraction line length is ~467 m (~318 m in “minimal” 250 GeV system) Final Focus: 12 m “soft” bends divided into 5 × 2.4 m pieces –start with center piece only at each location –space reserved for remaining 4 pieces at each location for 500 GeV post-IP dump line: Yuri Nosochkov’s “push-pull” design (October 2006) –5.5 m L* –break point between QF1 and SD0

January 10, 2007M. Woodley (SLAC)4 Synchrotron Radiation Emittance Growth (DIMAD tracking; SYNC option 2) 250 GeV, emit/emit0 = GeV, emit/emit0 = (emit0 = 1e-5 m) 250 GeV, emit/emit0 = GeV, emit/emit0 = (emit0 = 1e-5 m) Laserwire Spot Size "worst case" laserwire spot size: DR extracted emittance (2e-8 m), 500 GeV "nominal" laserwire spot size: BSY budgeted emittance (3.4e-8 m), 500 GeV emittance diagnostic FODO cell length: "worst case" spot > 1.0 um AND "nominal" spot > 1.5 um - L45 = 16.2 m (45° FODO cell drift length) - BETY(WS) = m - "nominal" vertical spot size = um - "worst case" vertical spot size = um - skew/emit length = m (1st skew quad to 4th wire scanner) Polarimeter Chicane peak dispersion = GeV, GeV... constant B-field dipoles minimum center dipole separation = 8 m m (for MPS energy collimator) energy detection resolution: for dE/E = 1%, dX > 10*sigmaX (BSY budgeted emittance) Extraction septum aperture: R = 15 mm (+-10% dE/E acceptance) required offset at septum entrance: dX = 35 mm 9 kickers (9 × 2 m × kG) - 1 TeV upgrade: 25 kickers (25 × 2 m × kG ; Lkick/(Lkick+Ldrift) = 2/3) 3 septa (2 × 2 m × 5 kG + 1 × 2 m × 10 kG) - 1 TeV upgrade: 5 septa (3 × 2 m × 5 kG + 2 × 2 m × 10 kG) transverse clearance for IRT "Type B" quads: 135 mm * 171 mm (quad half-width) + 40 mm (extraction line beam pipe radius) + 10 mm (clearance) transverse clearance for extraction line 8 cm bore quad QFSM1: 220 mm * 16 inches (quad half-width) + 6 mm (IRT beam pipe radius) + 10 mm (clearance) 10 rastering kickers for 3 cm radius (10 × 0.8 m × 0.54 kG) - 1 TeV upgrade: 20 rastering kickers for 3 cm radius (20 × 0.8 m × 0.54 kG) required offset at dump: dX > 3 m Additional Design Data

January 10, 2007M. Woodley (SLAC)5 500 GeV (beam) capable BSY: 250 GeV max; FF: upgradable to 500 GeV (hybrid) upgradable to 500 GeV ΔZ = +488 m ΔZ = +163 m

January 10, 2007M. Woodley (SLAC)6 IR 14 mrad 14 mrad ILC FF9 hybrid (x 2) 14 mrad (L* = 5.5 m) dump lines detector pit: 25 m (Z) × 110 m (X) e-e+ hybrid “BSY” (x 2) 2226 m ΔZ ~ -650 m w.r.t. ILC2006c

January 10, 2007M. Woodley (SLAC)7 polarimeter skew correction / emittance diagnostic MPS coll betatron collimation fast sweepers tuneup dump septa fast kickers energy collimation β-match energy spectrometer final transformer final doublet IP energy spectrometer polarimeter fast sweepers primary dump Main Linac ILC2006e electron BDS schematic energy collimation

January 10, 2007M. Woodley (SLAC)8

January 10, 2007M. Woodley (SLAC)9 s (km) Main Linac MPS collimation skew correction / emittance diagnostic

January 10, 2007M. Woodley (SLAC)10 polarimeter skew correction / emittance diagnostic MPS coll β-match Main Linac betatron collimation extraction

January 10, 2007M. Woodley (SLAC)11 MPS / skew correction / emittance diagnostic SQ WS 90°180°90° 45° 90° 45° worst case (500 GeV) ; nominal (250 GeV) ; phase advance Main Linac polarimeter chicane MPS collimationskew correctionemittance diagnostic

January 10, 2007M. Woodley (SLAC)12 Original Upstream Polarimeter Chicane 60.2 m 2 m

January 10, 2007M. Woodley (SLAC)13 angle = mrad L B =2.4 m (×3) ΔL BB = 0.3 m Compton IP 250 GeV x = 20 mm 76.9 m MPS Ecoll ±10% 8 m 3 m laserwire detector 16.1 m 35 GeV 25 GeV Cerenkov detector 2 m 12.3 cm 18.0 cm New Upstream Polarimeter Chicane constant integrated strength dipoles (B = 0.97 kG) dispersion = GeV, GeV dispersion scales inversely with energy (= GeV) transverse space for laserwire 500 GeV? (< 5 mm) magnet and vacuum chamber engineering issues? ΔE/E BPM

January 10, 2007M. Woodley (SLAC)14 polarimeter chicane skew correction / emittance diagnostic MPS coll betatron collimation fast sweepers tuneup dump septa fast kickers ILC e- BSY (250 GeV beam) ILC e- BSY (500 GeV beam) restore missing magnets

January 10, 2007M. Woodley (SLAC)15 QFSM1 moves ~0.5 m polarimeter chicane septa fast kickers “Type B” (×4) ILC e- BSY (250 GeV beam) ILC e- BSY (500 GeV beam) ΔE/E = ±10% trajectories

January 10, 2007M. Woodley (SLAC)16 polarimeter chicane dipoles (12) –L = 2.4 m, B = 0.97 kG –total chicane SR emittance growth < 1 TeV cm (DIMAD) fast extraction kickers 500 GeV cm; 1 TeV cm –in-vacuum stripline devices –L = 2 m, B = TeV cm –100 ns rise-time –reference Tom Mattison for “tuneup” mode, assume large gap DC dipoles wrapped around (some of) the fast extraction kickers septa 500 GeV cm; 1 TeV cm –current-sheet devices, 10 mm thick blade –L = 2 m, B = 0.5 T (3), 1.0 T 1 TeV cm –reference Tom Mattison rastering kickers –5 horizontal, GeV cm; 10 horizontal, 10 1 TeV cm –L = 0.8 m, B = TeV cm –3 cm sweep radius (1.4 mm × 1.4 mm beam size at dump window) … factor of ≈ 25 reduction in energy deposition –reference TESLA Report (Maslov) Some BSY Magnet Details TESLA “Type B” quadrupole

January 10, 2007M. Woodley (SLAC)17 fast kickers fast sweepers tuneup dump septa energy acceptance ±10% beam area (1σ) = 2π mm 2

January 10, 2007M. Woodley (SLAC)18 see Frank Jackson’s talk (Collimation Simulations and Optimisation) BSY β-match energy collimation

January 10, 2007M. Woodley (SLAC)19 betatron collimation FF β-match

January 10, 2007M. Woodley (SLAC)20 energy spectrometer energy collimation final transformer final doublet IP tail fold

January 10, 2007M. Woodley (SLAC)21 1 TeV cm 500 GeV cm

January 10, 2007M. Woodley (SLAC)22

January 10, 2007M. Woodley (SLAC)23 warm detector common cryostat (outer) incoming outgoing QF1 SF1 SD0 QD0 QDEX1 QFEX2 common cryostat (inner)

January 10, 2007M. Woodley (SLAC)24

January 10, 2007M. Woodley (SLAC)25 Y. Nosochkov’s 14 mrad L*= 5.5 m push-pull design missing magnets

January 10, 2007M. Woodley (SLAC)26 Summary ILC2006e system upgrade to 1 TeV cm involves adding magnets only … no geometry changes –no expansion into linac tunnel –dumps don’t move –upstream polarimeters don’t move –add m “soft” bends, 32 extraction kicker modules, 4 septa, 4 tuneup/extraction bends, and 40 rastering kickers (and replace the Final Doublets) and you’re there! total BDS Z-length is 4452 m –ILC2006c (2 IRs, 1 TeV cm capable) was 5100 m –ILC2006d (1 IR, hybrid FF, non-upgradable BSY) was 4125 m –ILC2006s (1 IR, non-upgradable, never released) was 3060 m can the polarimeter chicane be used by the laserwires and the ΔE/E detection system as envisioned over the full energy range? –transverse space for laserwire detector at high energy –maintaining ±10% energy acceptance at low energy –magnet, vacuum chamber, and diagnostics engineering issues bandwidth and collimation efficiency of Final Focus system can be further optimized (Frank Jackson)