4/28/15CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry1 CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry Spring 2015 Shape Matching Carola Wenk A B   (B,A)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NUS CS5247 Motion Planning for Car- like Robots using a Probabilistic Learning Approach --P. Svestka, M.H. Overmars. Int. J. Robotics Research, 16: ,
Advertisements

Advanced Iso-Surfacing Algorithms Jian Huang, CS594, Spring 2002 This set of slides are developed and used by Prof. Han-Wei Shen at Ohio State University.
Yingcai Xiao Chapter 6 Fundamental Algorithms. Types of Visualization Transformation Types 1.Data (Attribute Transformation) 2.Topology (Topological Transformation)
Fundamental tools: clustering
Approximations of points and polygonal chains
Motion Planning for Point Robots CS 659 Kris Hauser.
2/14/13CMPS 3120 Computational Geometry1 CMPS 3120: Computational Geometry Spring 2013 Planar Subdivisions and Point Location Carola Wenk Based on: Computational.
On Map-Matching Vehicle Tracking Data
CMPS 3120: Computational Geometry Spring 2013
2/3/15CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry1 CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry Spring 2015 Triangulations and Guarding Art Galleries II Carola Wenk.
Motion Planning CS 6160, Spring 2010 By Gene Peterson 5/4/2010.
The Divide-and-Conquer Strategy
Computing the Fréchet Distance Between Folded Polygons
Visibility Computations: Finding the Shortest Route for Motion Planning COMP Presentation Eric D. Baker Tuesday 1 December 1998.
Chapter 3 The Greedy Method 3.
GATE D Object Representations (GATE-540) Dr.Çağatay ÜNDEĞER Instructor Middle East Technical University, GameTechnologies & General Manager SimBT.
Praktikum zur Analyse von Formen - Abstandsmaße - Helmut Alt Freie Universität Berlin.
Motion Planning for Camera Movements in Virtual Environments Authors: D. Nieuwenhuisen, M. Overmars Presenter: David Camarillo.
Presented by David Stavens. Autonomous Inspection Compute a path such that every point on the boundary of the workspace can be inspected from some point.
Geometric Data Structures Computational Geometry, WS 2007/08 Lecture 13 Prof. Dr. Thomas Ottmann Algorithmen & Datenstrukturen, Institut für Informatik.
Chamfer Matching & Hausdorff Distance Presented by Ankur Datta Slides Courtesy Mark Bouts Arasanathan Thayananthan.
Tracking Moving Objects in Anonymized Trajectories Nikolay Vyahhi 1, Spiridon Bakiras 2, Panos Kalnis 3, and Gabriel Ghinita 3 1 St. Petersburg State University.
UNC Chapel Hill M. C. Lin Overview of Last Lecture About Final Course Project –presentation, demo, write-up More geometric data structures –Binary Space.
1 Matching Shapes with a Reference Point Volkan Çardak.
CS 326A: Motion Planning Basic Motion Planning for a Point Robot.
Lecture 11 : More Geometric Data Structures Computational Geometry Prof. Dr. Th. Ottmann 1 Geometric Data Structures 1.Rectangle Intersection 2.Segment.
On the ICP Algorithm Esther Ezra, Micha Sharir Alon Efrat.
A Global Geometric Framework for Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Vin de Silva, John C. Langford Presented by Napat Triroj.
On Map-Matching Vehicle Tracking Data. Outline Authors Errors in the data Incremental MM Algorithm Global MM Algorithm Quality Measures Performance Conclusion.
Introduction to Robot Motion Planning. Example A robot arm is to build an assembly from a set of parts. Tasks for the robot: Grasping: position gripper.
1 Single Robot Motion Planning Liang-Jun Zhang COMP Sep 22, 2008.
1 Theory I Algorithm Design and Analysis (11 - Edit distance and approximate string matching) Prof. Dr. Th. Ottmann.
GPS Navigation and Data Structures By Michael Cabassol and Augie Hill.
Robot Motion Planning Computational Geometry Lecture by Stephen A. Ehmann.
Curve Modeling Bézier Curves
Hubert CARDOTJY- RAMELRashid-Jalal QURESHI Université François Rabelais de Tours, Laboratoire d'Informatique 64, Avenue Jean Portalis, TOURS – France.
4/21/15CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry1 CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry Spring 2015 Motion Planning Carola Wenk.
Localisation & Navigation
© Manfred Huber Autonomous Robots Robot Path Planning.
CSIE in National Chi-Nan University1 Approximate Matching of Polygonal Shapes Speaker: Chuang-Chieh Lin Advisor: Professor R. C. T. Lee National Chi-Nan.
5 -1 Chapter 5 The Divide-and-Conquer Strategy A simple example finding the maximum of a set S of n numbers.
Path Planning for a Point Robot
Geometric Matching on Sequential Data Veli Mäkinen AG Genominformatik Technical Fakultät Bielefeld Universität.
CS B659: Principles of Intelligent Robot Motion Configuration Space.
1 Shortest Paths in Three Dimensions Speaker: Atlas F. Cook IV Advisor: Carola Wenk.
CSIS7101 – Advanced Database Technologies Spatio-Temporal Data (Part 1) On Indexing Mobile Objects Kwong Chi Ho Leo Wong Chi Kwong Simon Lui, Tak Sing.
4/23/13CMPS 3120 Computational Geometry1 CMPS 3120: Computational Geometry Spring 2013 Shape Matching II A B   (B,A)
Unit 4 – Flip, Slide & Turn Vocabulary. Unit 4 – Flip, Slide & Turn - Vocabulary Plane: One of the basic undefined terms of geometry. A plane goes on.
UNC Chapel Hill M. C. Lin Introduction to Motion Planning Applications Overview of the Problem Basics – Planning for Point Robot –Visibility Graphs –Roadmap.
CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry Spring 2015
Pictorial Structures and Distance Transforms Computer Vision CS 543 / ECE 549 University of Illinois Ian Endres 03/31/11.
Geodesic Fréchet Distance Inside a Simple Polygon Atlas F. Cook IV & Carola Wenk Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects.
Course14 Dynamic Vision. Biological vision can cope with changing world Moving and changing objects Change illumination Change View-point.
Robotics Chapter 5 – Path and Trajectory Planning
Dynamic Programming (DP), Shortest Paths (SP)
Common Intersection of Half-Planes in R 2 2 PROBLEM (Common Intersection of half- planes in R 2 ) Given n half-planes H 1, H 2,..., H n in R 2 compute.
2IMA20 Algorithms for Geographic Data Spring 2016 Lecture 2: Similarity.
4/9/13CMPS 3120 Computational Geometry1 CMPS 3120: Computational Geometry Spring 2013 Motion Planning Carola Wenk.
2IMA20 Algorithms for Geographic Data Spring 2016 Lecture 5: Simplification.
MIRA, SVM, k-NN Lirong Xia. MIRA, SVM, k-NN Lirong Xia.
VORONOI DIAGRAMS FOR PARALLEL HALFLINES IN 3D
CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry Spring 2017
Polygonal Curve Simplification
Investigating the Hausdorff Distance
Algorithms for Map Construction and Comparison:
2IMG15 Algorithms for Geographic Data
Chapter 4 . Trajectory planning and Inverse kinematics
MIRA, SVM, k-NN Lirong Xia. MIRA, SVM, k-NN Lirong Xia.
Spatial Databases - Distance
Planning.
Presentation transcript:

4/28/15CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry1 CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry Spring 2015 Shape Matching Carola Wenk A B   (B,A)

Are these shapes similar? Translate When are two shapes similar?

Are these shapes similar? Translate Translate & Rotate When are two shapes similar?

Are these shapes similar? Translate Translate & Rotate Translate & Scale When are two shapes similar?

Are these shapes similar? Translate Translate & Rotate Translate & Scale Translate & Reflect When are two shapes similar?

Are these shapes similar? Translate Translate & Rotate Translate & Scale Translate & Reflect Partial Matching When are two shapes similar?

Are these shapes similar? Translate Translate & Rotate Translate & Scale Translate & Reflect Partial Matching When are two shapes similar?

Two geometric shapes, each composed of a number of basic objects such as Given: An application dependant distance measure , e.g., the Hausdorff distance A set of transformations T, e.g., translations, rigid motions, or none Matching Task: Compute min  (T(A),B)  pointsline segmentstriangles Geometric Shape Matching 4/28/15CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry8

Hausdorff distance Directed Hausdorff distance   (A,B) = max min || a-b || Undirected Hausdorff-distance  (A,B) = max (   (A,B),   (B,A) ) If A, B are discrete point sets, |A|=m, |A|=n In d dimensions: Compute in O(mn) time brute-force In 2 dimensions: Compute in O((m+n) log (m+n) time Compute   (A,B) by computing VD(B) and performing nearest neighbor search for every point in A A B   (B,A)   (A,B) a  A b  B 4/28/15CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry9

Shape Matching - Applications Character Recognition Fingerprint Identification Molecule Docking, Drug Design Image Interpretation and Segmentation Quality Control of Workpieces Robotics Pose Determination of Satellites Puzzling... 4/28/15CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry10

Hausdorff distance  (m 2 n 2 ) lower bound construction for directed Hausdorff distance of line segments under translations 4/28/15CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry11

Comparing Curves and Trajectories 4/28/15CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry12

Polygonal Curves Let f,g:[0,1]  R d be two polygonal curves (i.e., piecewise linear curves) What are good distance measures for curves? –Hausdorff distance? –Fréchet distance? f g 4/28/15CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry13

When Are Two Curves „Similar“? Directed Hausdorff distance    (A,B) = max min || a-b || Undirected Hausdorff-distance   (A,B) = max (    (A,B),    (B,A) ) But: Small Hausdorff distance When considered as curves the distance should be large The Fréchet distance takes the continuity of the curves into account A B    (B,A)    (A,B) a  A b  B 4/28/15CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry14

 F (f,g) = inf max ||f(  (t))-g(  (t))||  :[0,1] [0,1] t  [0,1] where  and  range over continuous monotone increasing reparameterizations only. Man and dog walk on one curve each They hold each other at a leash They are only allowed to go forward  F is the minimal possible leash length f g Fréchet Distance for Curves [F06] M. Fréchet, Sur quelques points de calcul fonctionel, Rendiconti del Circolo Mathematico di Palermo 22: 1-74, /28/15CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry15

Free Space Diagram Let  > 0 fixed (eventually solve decision problem) F  (f,g) = { (s,t)  [0,1] 2 | || f(s) - g(t)||   } white points free space of f and g The free space in one cell is an ellipse. ε g f f 0 1 g  >> 4/28/15CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry16

Free Space Diagram Let  > 0 fixed (eventually solve decision problem) F  (f,g) = { (s,t)  [0,1] 2 | || f(s) - g(t)||   } white points free space of f and g The free space in one cell is an ellipse. g f f g 4/28/15CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry17

Free Space Diagram  Monotone path encodes reparametrizations of f  and g  F (f,g)   iff there is a monotone path in the free space from (0,0) to (1,1)   g f g f 4/28/15CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry18

Compute the Fréchet Distance  Solve the optimization problem  In practice in O(mn log b) time with binary search and b-bit precision  In O(mn log mn) time [AG95] using parametric search (using Cole‘s sorting trick)  In O(mn log 2 mn) expected time [CW09] with randomized red/blue intersections [AG95] H. Alt, M. Godau, Computing the Fréchet distance between two polygonal curves, IJCGA 5: 75-91, [CW10] A.F. Cook IV, C. Wenk, Geodesic Fréchet Distance Inside a Simple Polygon, ACM TALG 7(1), 19 pages,    Solve the decision problem  F (f,g)   in O(mn) time:  Find monotone path using DP:  On each cell boundary compute the interval of all points that are reachable by a monotone path from (0,0)  Compute a monotone path by backtracking f g /28/15CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry

 Navigation systems answer shortest path queries based on travel times on road segments  Usually based on static travel-time weights derived from speed limits  Goal: Develop a navigation system which answers routing queries based on the current traffic situation A B  Current traffic situation:  Database of current travel times per road segment  Use GPS trajectory data from vehicle fleets GPS Trajectories for Dynamic Routing 4/28/15CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry20

GPS Trajectories from Vehicles Road map of Athens GPS trajectoriy Corresponding path in the road map 1)Measurement error: GPS points generally do not lie on the road map 2)Sampling error: The GPS trajectory is a by-product and is usually sampled every 30s  The GPS trajectory does not lie on the road map Map matching: Find a path in the graph which corresponds to the GPS trajectory (curve). Find a path in the graph with minimal distance to the GPS curve (partial matching) 214/28/15CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry

Free Space Surface Glue the free space diagrams FD i,j together according to adjacency information in G Free space surface of f and G G [AERW03] H. Alt, A. Efrat, G. Rote, C. Wenk, Matching Planar Maps, J. of Algorithms 49: , [BPSW05] S. Brakatsoulas, D. Pfoser, R. Salas, C. Wenk, On Map-Matching Vehicle Tracking Data, VLDB , [WSP06] C. Wenk, R. Salas, D. Pfoser, Adressing the Need for Map-Matching Speed…, SSDBM: , /28/15CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry22

Free Space Surface Task: Find a monotone path in the free space surface that –starts in a lower left corner –and ends in an upper right corner G [AERW03] H. Alt, A. Efrat, G. Rote, C. Wenk, Matching Planar Maps, J. of Algorithms 49: , [BPSW05] S. Brakatsoulas, D. Pfoser, R. Salas, C. Wenk, On Map-Matching Vehicle Tracking Data, VLDB , [WSP06] C. Wenk, R. Salas, D. Pfoser, Adressing the Need for Map-Matching Speed…, SSDBM: , /28/15CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry23

Sweep G Sweep all FD i,j with a sweep line from left to right [AERW03] H. Alt, A. Efrat, G. Rote, C. Wenk, Matching Planar Maps, J. of Algorithms 49: , [BPSW05] S. Brakatsoulas, D. Pfoser, R. Salas, C. Wenk, On Map-Matching Vehicle Tracking Data, VLDB , [WSP06] C. Wenk, R. Salas, D. Pfoser, Adressing the Need for Map-Matching Speed…, SSDBM: , /28/15CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry24

G Sweep [AERW03] H. Alt, A. Efrat, G. Rote, C. Wenk, Matching Planar Maps, J. of Algorithms 49: , [BPSW05] S. Brakatsoulas, D. Pfoser, R. Salas, C. Wenk, On Map-Matching Vehicle Tracking Data, VLDB , [WSP06] C. Wenk, R. Salas, D. Pfoser, Adressing the Need for Map-Matching Speed…, SSDBM: , Sweep all FD i,j with a sweep line from left to right 4/28/15CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry25

G Sweep [AERW03] H. Alt, A. Efrat, G. Rote, C. Wenk, Matching Planar Maps, J. of Algorithms 49: , [BPSW05] S. Brakatsoulas, D. Pfoser, R. Salas, C. Wenk, On Map-Matching Vehicle Tracking Data, VLDB , [WSP06] C. Wenk, R. Salas, D. Pfoser, Adressing the Need for Map-Matching Speed…, SSDBM: , Sweep all FD i,j with a sweep line from left to right 4/28/15CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry26

G Sweep [AERW03] H. Alt, A. Efrat, G. Rote, C. Wenk, Matching Planar Maps, J. of Algorithms 49: , [BPSW05] S. Brakatsoulas, D. Pfoser, R. Salas, C. Wenk, On Map-Matching Vehicle Tracking Data, VLDB , [WSP06] C. Wenk, R. Salas, D. Pfoser, Adressing the Need for Map-Matching Speed…, SSDBM: , Sweep all FD i,j with a sweep line from left to right 4/28/15CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry27

G Sweep [AERW03] H. Alt, A. Efrat, G. Rote, C. Wenk, Matching Planar Maps, J. of Algorithms 49: , [BPSW05] S. Brakatsoulas, D. Pfoser, R. Salas, C. Wenk, On Map-Matching Vehicle Tracking Data, VLDB , [WSP06] C. Wenk, R. Salas, D. Pfoser, Adressing the Need for Map-Matching Speed…, SSDBM: , Sweep all FD i,j with a sweep line from left to right 4/28/15CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry28

G Sweep [AERW03] H. Alt, A. Efrat, G. Rote, C. Wenk, Matching Planar Maps, J. of Algorithms 49: , [BPSW05] S. Brakatsoulas, D. Pfoser, R. Salas, C. Wenk, On Map-Matching Vehicle Tracking Data, VLDB , [WSP06] C. Wenk, R. Salas, D. Pfoser, Adressing the Need for Map-Matching Speed…, SSDBM: , Sweep all FD i,j with a sweep line from left to right 4/28/15CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry29

G Sweep [AERW03] H. Alt, A. Efrat, G. Rote, C. Wenk, Matching Planar Maps, J. of Algorithms 49: , [BPSW05] S. Brakatsoulas, D. Pfoser, R. Salas, C. Wenk, On Map-Matching Vehicle Tracking Data, VLDB , [WSP06] C. Wenk, R. Salas, D. Pfoser, Adressing the Need for Map-Matching Speed…, SSDBM: , Sweep all FD i,j with a sweep line from left to right 4/28/15CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry30

Compute Reachable Points G During the sweep: Compute points on the free space surface, to the left of the sweep line, which are reachable by a monotone path from a lower left corner. [AERW03] H. Alt, A. Efrat, G. Rote, C. Wenk, Matching Planar Maps, J. of Algorithms 49: , [BPSW05] S. Brakatsoulas, D. Pfoser, R. Salas, C. Wenk, On Map-Matching Vehicle Tracking Data, VLDB , [WSP06] C. Wenk, R. Salas, D. Pfoser, Adressing the Need for Map-Matching Speed…, SSDBM: , /28/15CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry31

G [AERW03] H. Alt, A. Efrat, G. Rote, C. Wenk, Matching Planar Maps, J. of Algorithms 49: , [BPSW05] S. Brakatsoulas, D. Pfoser, R. Salas, C. Wenk, On Map-Matching Vehicle Tracking Data, VLDB , [WSP06] C. Wenk, R. Salas, D. Pfoser, Adressing the Need for Map-Matching Speed…, SSDBM: , Compute Reachable Points During the sweep: Compute points on the free space surface, to the left of the sweep line, which are reachable by a monotone path from a lower left corner. 4/28/15CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry32

G [AERW03] H. Alt, A. Efrat, G. Rote, C. Wenk, Matching Planar Maps, J. of Algorithms 49: , [BPSW05] S. Brakatsoulas, D. Pfoser, R. Salas, C. Wenk, On Map-Matching Vehicle Tracking Data, VLDB , [WSP06] C. Wenk, R. Salas, D. Pfoser, Adressing the Need for Map-Matching Speed…, SSDBM: , Compute Reachable Points During the sweep: Compute points on the free space surface, to the left of the sweep line, which are reachable by a monotone path from a lower left corner. 4/28/15CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry33

G [AERW03] H. Alt, A. Efrat, G. Rote, C. Wenk, Matching Planar Maps, J. of Algorithms 49: , [BPSW05] S. Brakatsoulas, D. Pfoser, R. Salas, C. Wenk, On Map-Matching Vehicle Tracking Data, VLDB , [WSP06] C. Wenk, R. Salas, D. Pfoser, Adressing the Need for Map-Matching Speed…, SSDBM: , Compute Reachable Points During the sweep: Compute points on the free space surface, to the left of the sweep line, which are reachable by a monotone path from a lower left corner. 4/28/15CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry34

Update Reachable Points During the sweep: –Update reachable points Dijkstra-style –Use a data structure which supports reachability queries in the free space surface [AERW03] H. Alt, A. Efrat, G. Rote, C. Wenk, Matching Planar Maps, J. of Algorithms 49: , [BPSW05] S. Brakatsoulas, D. Pfoser, R. Salas, C. Wenk, On Map-Matching Vehicle Tracking Data, VLDB , [WSP06] C. Wenk, R. Salas, D. Pfoser, Adressing the Need for Map-Matching Speed…, SSDBM: , G 4/28/15CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry35

[AERW03] H. Alt, A. Efrat, G. Rote, C. Wenk, Matching Planar Maps, J. of Algorithms 49: , [BPSW05] S. Brakatsoulas, D. Pfoser, R. Salas, C. Wenk, On Map-Matching Vehicle Tracking Data, VLDB , [WSP06] C. Wenk, R. Salas, D. Pfoser, Adressing the Need for Map-Matching Speed…, SSDBM: , G During the sweep: –Update reachable points Dijkstra-style –Use a data structure which supports reachability queries in the free space surface Update Reachable Points 4/28/15CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry36

[AERW03] H. Alt, A. Efrat, G. Rote, C. Wenk, Matching Planar Maps, J. of Algorithms 49: , [BPSW05] S. Brakatsoulas, D. Pfoser, R. Salas, C. Wenk, On Map-Matching Vehicle Tracking Data, VLDB , [WSP06] C. Wenk, R. Salas, D. Pfoser, Adressing the Need for Map-Matching Speed…, SSDBM: , G During the sweep: –Update reachable points Dijkstra-style –Use a data structure which supports reachability queries in the free space surface Update Reachable Points 4/28/15CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry37

[AERW03] H. Alt, A. Efrat, G. Rote, C. Wenk, Matching Planar Maps, J. of Algorithms 49: , [BPSW05] S. Brakatsoulas, D. Pfoser, R. Salas, C. Wenk, On Map-Matching Vehicle Tracking Data, VLDB , [WSP06] C. Wenk, R. Salas, D. Pfoser, Adressing the Need for Map-Matching Speed…, SSDBM: , G During the sweep: –Update reachable points Dijkstra-style –Use a data structure which supports reachability queries in the free space surface Update Reachable Points 4/28/15CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry38

[AERW03] H. Alt, A. Efrat, G. Rote, C. Wenk, Matching Planar Maps, J. of Algorithms 49: , [BPSW05] S. Brakatsoulas, D. Pfoser, R. Salas, C. Wenk, On Map-Matching Vehicle Tracking Data, VLDB , [WSP06] C. Wenk, R. Salas, D. Pfoser, Adressing the Need for Map-Matching Speed…, SSDBM: , G During the sweep: –Update reachable points Dijkstra-style –Use a data structure which supports reachability queries in the free space surface Update Reachable Points 4/28/15CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry39

G [AERW03] H. Alt, A. Efrat, G. Rote, C. Wenk, Matching Planar Maps, J. of Algorithms 49: , [BPSW05] S. Brakatsoulas, D. Pfoser, R. Salas, C. Wenk, On Map-Matching Vehicle Tracking Data, VLDB , [WSP06] C. Wenk, R. Salas, D. Pfoser, Adressing the Need for Map-Matching Speed…, SSDBM: , During the sweep: –Update reachable points Dijkstra-style –Use a data structure which supports reachability queries in the free space surface Update Reachable Points 4/28/15CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry40

G [AERW03] H. Alt, A. Efrat, G. Rote, C. Wenk, Matching Planar Maps, J. of Algorithms 49: , [BPSW05] S. Brakatsoulas, D. Pfoser, R. Salas, C. Wenk, On Map-Matching Vehicle Tracking Data, VLDB , [WSP06] C. Wenk, R. Salas, D. Pfoser, Adressing the Need for Map-Matching Speed…, SSDBM: , During the sweep: –Update reachable points Dijkstra-style –Use a data structure which supports reachability queries in the free space surface Update Reachable Points 4/28/15CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry41

G [AERW03] H. Alt, A. Efrat, G. Rote, C. Wenk, Matching Planar Maps, J. of Algorithms 49: , [BPSW05] S. Brakatsoulas, D. Pfoser, R. Salas, C. Wenk, On Map-Matching Vehicle Tracking Data, VLDB , [WSP06] C. Wenk, R. Salas, D. Pfoser, Adressing the Need for Map-Matching Speed…, SSDBM: , During the sweep: –Update reachable points Dijkstra-style –Use a data structure which supports reachability queries in the free space surface Update Reachable Points 4/28/15CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry42

G [AERW03] H. Alt, A. Efrat, G. Rote, C. Wenk, Matching Planar Maps, J. of Algorithms 49: , [BPSW05] S. Brakatsoulas, D. Pfoser, R. Salas, C. Wenk, On Map-Matching Vehicle Tracking Data, VLDB , [WSP06] C. Wenk, R. Salas, D. Pfoser, Adressing the Need for Map-Matching Speed…, SSDBM: , During the sweep: –Update reachable points Dijkstra-style –Use a data structure which supports reachability queries in the free space surface Update Reachable Points 4/28/15CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry43

G Backtracking After the sweep: –Construct a monotone path via backtracking [AERW03] H. Alt, A. Efrat, G. Rote, C. Wenk, Matching Planar Maps, J. of Algorithms 49: , [BPSW05] S. Brakatsoulas, D. Pfoser, R. Salas, C. Wenk, On Map-Matching Vehicle Tracking Data, VLDB , [WSP06] C. Wenk, R. Salas, D. Pfoser, Adressing the Need for Map-Matching Speed…, SSDBM: , /28/15CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry44

Map-Matching  Algorithm for decision problem takes O(mn log(mn)) time and O(mn) space.  Optimization problem with parametric search: O(mn log 2 (mn)) time [AERW03] H. Alt, A. Efrat, G. Rote, C. Wenk, Matching Planar Maps, J. of Algorithms 49: , [BPSW05] S. Brakatsoulas, D. Pfoser, R. Salas, C. Wenk, On Map-Matching Vehicle Tracking Data, VLDB , [WSP06] C. Wenk, R. Salas, D. Pfoser, Adressing the Need for Map-Matching Speed…, SSDBM: , /28/15CMPS 3130/6130 Computational Geometry45