Public Market Surveillance Panel Consultation on CMSC Issues Related to Constrained off Payments to Generators and Imports Market Operations Standing Committee.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
Advertisements

RIIO-T1 impact on allowed revenues and network charges 6 September 2012.
Ramping and CMSC (Congestion Management Settlement Credit) payments.
Return of Value 2007 Update on current trading and prospects and proposed Return of Value to Shareholders 14 March 2007.
EIM DISALLOWANCE CASE: PROGRESS IN THE SOUTHWEST Aka: Continued Assault.
Economic Criteria for Transmission Planning in the ERCOT Region Public Utility Law Seminar DeAnn Walker August 3, 2012.
Western States Energy & Environment Symposium October 27, 2009.
Reliable Power Reliable Markets Reliable People ISO Rules Update – – Outage Cancellation – Long Lead Time Energy Dispatch Compliance.
3 Dec 2003Market Operations Standing Committee1 Market Rule and Change Management Consultation Process John MacKenzie / Darren Finkbeiner / Ella Kokotsis,
Special Protection Systems - Market Rule Amendment Submission Presentation to: Market Operations Standing Committee Barbara Reuber, Regulatory Affairs.
Valuing Economic Benefits from Transmission Planning ERCOT System Planning March 22, 2006.
1 Non-Transmission Alternatives to Reduce Local Congestion Costs Bill Bojorquez June 3, 2004.
1 Adjusting the “Dispatch Instructions” to the Defined Metering Point (DMP). “Functional Deferral 6 (FD-06)” Market Operations Standing Committee (MOSC)
Pensions Board Submission to the Commission on Taxation Yvonne White The Pensions Board Monday 26 th May
Prepared by Opinion Dynamics Corporation May 2004.
SO Incentives from April 2010 John Perkins. 2 Gas System Operator (SO) Incentives National Grid operates the high pressure Gas Transmission System in.
October 8, 2003Ontario Energy Board1 Ontario Energy Board Update E.A. Mills Director – Regulatory Affairs Market Advisory Committee October 8, 2003.
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
National Petroleum Council Study Balancing Natural Gas Policy: Fueling the Demands of a Growing Economy September 2003.
Better Regulation: Expenditure assessment and incentives 29 April 2013.
Reactive Power Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Open Meeting December 15, 2004.
CMSC Rules Changes under Consideration Market Operations Standing Committee December 3, 2003 PUBLIC.
FERC’s Role in Demand Response David Kathan ABA Teleconference December 14, 2005.
Proposed CMSC Amendments - Imports & Exports Intertie Trading Sub-committee November 24, 2003 PUBLIC.
Demand Response: Keeping the Power Flowing in Southwest Connecticut Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September 30,
1 Independent Market Monitoring in the Midwest ISO Presented to: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission David B. Patton, Ph.D. Independent Market Monitor.
2014 Reports to the Minister Markets Team Ken Michael Room, 25 September 2014 Ensuring quality services for a reasonable price 1 Workshop.
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Demand Response Workshop September 15, Definitions are important Demand response –“Changes in electricity usage by end-use customers from their.
1 of 27 How to invest in Information for Development An Introduction Introduction This question is the focus of our examination of the information management.
A Strawman for Discussion by Dottie Stockstill & Greg Ramon Special ERCOT Board Meeting June 24, 2003.
Treatment of Intertie Failures Intertie Trading Subcommittee November 24, 2003.
Clean and Diversified Energy Initiative Rich Halvey Western Governors’ Association Legislative Forum Monterrey, N.L., Mexico.
Hour Ahead Dispatchable Loads Applicable Updates to Procedures Presentation to the Market Operations Standing Committee April 23, 2003
Market Operations Standing Committee of the IMO Market Operations Standing Committee April 23, 2003.
Industry and market monitoring at the Electricity Authority Phil Bishop, Electricity Commission and Ramu Naidoo, PSC 26 October 2010.
An update on the Market Development Program Phil Bishop New Zealand Electricity Commission Presentation to the EPOC Winter Workshop 3 September 2009.
1 Market Evolution Program Long-Term Resource Adequacy Regulatory Affairs Standing Committee Meeting May 14, 2003.
Addressing Constrained-Off Payments for Intertie Transactions Darren Matsugu, Supervisor - Markets, IESO Presentation to Technical Panel: June 2, 2015.
Reliable Power Reliable Markets Reliable People RAS Guideline Initiative March 23, 2009.
Draft 2 – Staff Discussion Paper “Regulatory Options for Setting Payments for the Output from OPG’s Prescribed Assets” Presentation to Interested Parties.
Reliable Power Reliable Markets Reliable People AESO Integrated Market Roadmap March 2009 Stakeholder Session.
DAM Design Issues - Participants & Obligations May 12, 2003 Market Evolution Program.
GTA Rate Review Chairman’s Recommendation. The Chairman has opined… 2.
Sep 22, 2003Market Operations Standing Committee of the IMO1 Change Management: Market Rules Update John MacKenzie, IMO.
Draft Rev Corporate Performance Targets Management Recommendation Presentation to the Regulatory Affairs Standing Committee November 28, 2003 Don.
Outage Planning Subcommittee Mark Wilson. Outage Planning Subcommittee Created to address Market Participant concerns with existing rules and procedures.
Smart and Advanced Metering in the UK – an overview
GVC Group Update Andy Pace 6 October | Energy Networks Association - DCMF.
Revisions to the Information Confidentiality Catalogue Presentation to the Market Operations Standing Committee April 23, 2003.
2004/06/0 2 Market Operations Standing Committee of the IMO1 Small Facilities - Technical Requirements Rhonda Wright.
Market Operations Standing Committee March 5, 2003.
Role Of ERC in the WESM To enforce the rules and regulations governing the operations of the WESM and monitors the activities of the Market Operator and.
Market Operations Standing Committee MOSC October 19, 2005 Pat Doran.
NPRR 649 Board Appeal Koch Ag & Energy Solutions February 9,
Market Evolution Program. 2 Topics Overview of the Market Evolution Program Consultation Plan for Phase 1 Overview of the Market Evolution Program Consultation.
1 Market Evolution Program Day Ahead Market Project Regulatory Affairs Standing Committee Meeting May 14, 2003.
Jul 23, 2003Market Operations Standing Committee of the IMO1 Market Pricing Issues Update John MacKenzie.
Transmission Pricing Webinar 12 October Agenda for Webinar Introductions Purpose Potential Areas of Change – Overview –Revenue Proposal –Business.
3 Dec 2003Market Operations Standing Committee1 Change Management: Market Rules Update John MacKenzie.
Draft Decision on the Reset of Prices for Electricity Distribution Businesses Presentation to Market Analysts 19 July 2011.
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK AUGUST 24, 2017 REQUEST FOR DIRECTION REGARDING POTENTIAL AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY CHARTER THAT MAY BE NECESSARY TO COMPLY WITH.
Pilot Project Concept 30-Minute Emergency Response Service (ERS)
Briefing on 2017 CAISO Policy Initiatives Roadmap
GMD Data Request NERC Rules of Procedure Section 1600
Benefits of New England’s Proposed Capacity Market
FERC Order in Devon Power LLC, et al. ER
Development Modification Proposal 0337: Introduction of a Inter-day Linepack Product – OPEN LETTER Review Group August th November 2010.
Options for the Development of a Demand Side Response Mechanism
Market Pricing Issues: Update
Presentation transcript:

Public Market Surveillance Panel Consultation on CMSC Issues Related to Constrained off Payments to Generators and Imports Market Operations Standing Committee March 5, 2003

Public Contents Purpose & Context of Consultation CMSC Payments - Background Constrained off Payments –Various Rationale Noted Implications of Retaining Constrained off Payments Issues for Discussion Request for Additional Comments

Public Purpose & Context of Consultation Ongoing issue for MSP signaled earlier –constrained off payments do not seem necessary or appropriate and have the potential for abuse MSP Report: May-August 2002 MSP Backgrounder paper April, 2002 –experience from the operation of the market MSP invites input –to focus discussion, reconsider constrained off payments for energy to generators and imports –if not eliminated, may need additional safeguards against abuse

Public Purpose & Context of Consultation (cont.) Timetable –Feb 21: Posting of discussion paper –Mar 31: Final date for submission of comments –early May: MSP conclusions and recommendations to IMO Board MOSC Consultation –to introduce issues –to promote some initial discussion of issues –to encourage subsequent written comments

Public CMSC Payments - Background Design alternative to locational pricing –CMSC payments based on difference between offers (bids) and MCP –intended for transmission / reliability limits –but also induced by non-transmission causes Mitigation framework limited to transmission Weight of the recent evidence in other markets –constrained-off payments are not regarded as necessary in spot markets

Public CMSC Payments for Energy - May to Dec 2002

Public Constrained off Payments - Various Rationale Noted Keep wholesale prices lower than otherwise Enhance reliability –by maintaining critical plant in the marketplace Information about transmission bottlenecks –helpful in identifying areas for investment Operational benefits to the marketplace –encourages compliance; selection rule Compensates for departures from optimality –existing generation and transmission endowment

Public Implications of Retaining Constrained off Payments Constrained off payments may interfere with appropriate signaling in the market –no incentive for generators to seek enhancements –siting of new generation is indifferent to transmission conditions Potential to affect CMSC with offer price –treatment of negative offer prices –some aspects of the local market power mitigation framework need to be reviewed

Public Issues for Discussion Primary Discussion Issues –Implications for efficiency –Implications for reliability –Implications for coordinating transmission & generation Additional or Optional issues (selected subset) –Implications for local market power mitigation –Implications for investment decisions –Audience identified issues –Discussion of one or two issues as time permits

Public Implications for Efficiency What are the implications of keeping or removing constrained off payments? –Impact on market price –Total payments –Signals for suppliers or consumers –Etc.

Public Implications for Reliability What are the implications of keeping or removing constrained off payments? –Is it necessary or desirable to compensate a market participant to comply with a dispatch instruction? –Do payments help maintain critical plant in the market place? Are constrained off payments the right vehicle? –etc.

Public Implications for Coordinating Transmission & Generation What are the implications of keeping or removing constrained off payments? –Are CMSC payments providing good transmission investment signals? Are there other more effective drivers or signals? What else is needed for transmission investment? –Are generator siting signals being blunted? –Is there a basis for treating new generation differently from earlier existing generation? –etc.

Public Additional Issues for Discussion To be determined –local market power mitigation framework? –investment decisions? –other identified issues?

Public Request for Additional Comments See Consultation page and Discussion Paper Provide written comments for posting on web site –send to For background information on CMSC –see links from Consultation page