The Risk and Extent of Neurological Events Are Equivalent for High-Risk Patients Treated With Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Thomas.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New England Journal of Medicine October 18;367: Relapse Risk after Discontinuation of Risperidone in Alzheimer’s disease Molly Moncrieff.
Advertisements

STS 2015 John V. Conte, MD Professor of Surgery Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine On Behalf of the CoreValve US Investigators Transcatheter Aortic.
Three-year clinical and echocardiographic follow-up of aortic stenosis patients implanted with a self-expending bioprosthesis Sabine Bleiziffer German.
ACC 2015 Jae K. Oh, MD On Behalf of the US CoreValve Investigators Remodeling of Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Is Responsible for Regression.
ACC 2015 Michael J Reardon, MD, FACC On Behalf of the CoreValve US Investigators A Randomized Comparison of Self-expanding Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic.
Lessons from TAVR Randomized Trials and Registries E Murat Tuzcu, MD Professor of Medicine Cleveland Clinic Financial disclosures: None PARTNER Executive.
Cost-Effectiveness of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with a Self-Expanding Prosthesis Compared with Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in High Risk.
Long-Term Outcomes Using a Self- Expanding Bioprosthesis in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Deemed Extreme Risk for Surgery: Two-Year Results From.
Use of Psoas Muscle Size as a Frailty Assessment Tool for Open and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Raghavendra Paknikar BS Jeffrey Friedman BS David.
TOTAL Stroke in the TOTAL trial: Randomized trial of manual aspiration Thrombectomy in STEMI TOTAL Trial Investigators.
One Year Outcomes in Real World Patients Treated with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation The ADVANCE Study Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart.
INTERNATIONAL. CAUTION: For distribution only in markets where CoreValve® is approved. Not for distribution in U.S., Canada or Japan. Medtronic, Inc
University Heart Center Hamburg
AATS Annual Meeting 2015 | Seattle, WA | April 27, 2015 Appropriate Patient Selection or Healthcare Rationing? Lessons from Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.
1 Investigational Device only in the U.S. Not available for sale in the U.S. ACCESS EU – ESC 2012 European Society of Cardiology Congress 2012 Munich,
PARTNER Objective To compare surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in high-risk patients with severe.
10 May 2005 CASES - Original article available at CASES (Canadian Alteplase for Stroke Effectiveness Study) The CASES Investigators.
Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch in High Risk Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis in a Randomized Trial of a Self-Expanding Prosthesis George L. Zorn, III.
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Self-Expanding Prosthesis David H. Adams et al (U.S. CoreValve Clinical Investigators) Journal Club November.
Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany Sabine Bleiziffer German Heart Center, Munich, Germany Johan Bosmans University Hospital.
Transcather Aortic Valve Replacement Using the Self-Expanding Bioprosthesis: First Report Using STS/ACC Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry CoreValve.
Postoperative Delirium is Associated with Increased Operative and One Year Mortality in Patients Treated with Surgical and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
Disclosure Statement of Financial Interest Saibal Kar, MD, FACC
TCT 2015 | San Francisco | October 15, 2015 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Failed Surgical Bioprostheses Danny Dvir, MD John G. Webb, MD and.
TCT 2015 | San Francisco | October 15, 2015 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Failed Surgical Bioprostheses Danny Dvir, MD John G. Webb, MD and.
ADAPT-DES One-Year Results Assessment of Dual AntiPlatelet Therapy with Drug-Eluting Stents A Large-Scale, Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Study.
The Impact of Prior Stroke on the Outcome of Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Romain Didier, MD;
GENDER DISPARITIES AMONG PATIENTS UNDERGOING TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT Michael A. Gaglia, Jr.; Michael J. Lipinski; Rebecca Torguson; Jiaxiang.
UC c EN. Through Medtronic sponsored research, the Transcatheter Aortic Valves clinical portfolio is studying over 11,000 subjects at over 125.
INTERNATIONAL. CAUTION: For distribution only in markets where CoreValve® is approved. Not for distribution in U.S., Canada or Japan. Medtronic, Inc
TCT 2015 | San Francisco | October 15, 2015 Howard C. Herrmann, MD on behalf of The PARTNER II Trial Investigators SAPIEN 3: Evaluation of a Balloon- Expandable.
INTERNATIONAL. CAUTION: For distribution only in markets where CoreValve® is approved. Not for distribution in U.S., Canada or Japan. Medtronic, Inc
G. Michael Deeb, MD On Behalf of the US Pivotal Trial Investigators 3-Year Results From the US Pivotal High Risk Randomized Trial Comparing Self-Expanding.
Incidence and Outcomes of Valve Hemodynamic Deterioration in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in U.S. Clinical Practice: A Report from the Society.
Longest Follow-up After Implantation of a Self-Expanding Repositionable Transcatheter Aortic Valve: Final Follow-up of the Evolut R CE Study Stephen Brecker,
G. Michael Deeb, MD On Behalf of the CoreValve US Investigators
The Impact of Preoperative Renal Dysfunction on the Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Andres M. Pineda MD, J. Kevin.
Outcomes in the CoreValve US High-Risk Pivotal Trial in Patients with a Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality Less than or Equal to.
Highlights From the SAPIEN 3 Experience in Intermediate-Risk Patients Vinod H. Thourani, MD on behalf of the PARTNER Trial Investigators Professor.
Eric Van Belle MD-PhD, Nicolas Debry MD et al. Heart Institute
Costs of Periprocedural Complications in Patients Treated with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Results from The PARTNER Trial Suzanne V. Arnold,
Raj R. Makkar, MD On behalf of The PARTNER Trial Investigators
Table 1: Table 2: Non Therapeutic Angiograms in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Being Considered for Endovascular Treatment Does not Adversely Affect Patient.
Are we ready to perform TAVI in Intermediate Risk Patients?
Updates From NOTION: The First All-Comer TAVR Trial
Predictors of Rehospitalization Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Results from the CoreValve US Trial Program James B. Hermiller Jr, MD,
Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Intermediate Risk Patients with Aortic Stenosis Description: The goal of the trial was to assess.
MedStar Washington Hospital Center Cardiac Catheterization Conference
Claret Cerebral Protection Device: Implications of the Sentinel Study
30-Day Safety and Echocardiographic Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with the Self-Expanding Repositionable Evolut PRO System.
First Report of Three-Year Outcomes With the Repositionable and Fully Retrievable Lotus™ Aortic Valve Replacement System: Results From the REPRISE I.
Early Outcomes with the Evolut R Repositionable Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve in the United States Mathew Williams, MD, For the Evolut R US.
Giuseppe Tarantini MD, PhD
Early Recovery of Left Ventricular Systolic Function After CoreValve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Harold L. Dauerman, MD; Michael J. Reardon,
Opportunities to Study Valve Iterations and Modifications in the US
Latest Data from Balloon Expendable Trials
Vinod H. Thourani, MD on behalf of The PARTNER Trial Investigators
CoreValve Continued Access Study Shows Continued Improvement in 1-Year Outcomes With Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Steven J. Yakubov,
Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany
One Year Outcomes in Real World Patients Treated with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation The ADVANCE Study Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart.
University Heart Center Hamburg
Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Valve System : OUS Data
TRANSCATHETER MITRAL VALVE IMPLANTATION FOR SEVERE MITRAL REGURGITATION: THE TENDYNE GLOBAL FEASIBILITY TRIAL 1 YEAR OUTCOMES David WM Muller, MBBS,
Late Follow-Up from the PARTNER Aortic Valve-in-Valve Registry
Samir R. Kapadia, MD On behalf of The PARTNER Trial Investigators
CoreValve US Pivotal Trial High-Risk Arm Device and Access Routes.
How to Optimize TAVR Outcomes
Five-Year Outcomes after Randomization to Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Final Results of The PARTNER 1 Trial Michael J. Mack, MD.
The risk and extent of neurologic events are equivalent for high-risk patients treated with transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement  Thomas.
Transcatheter versus medical treatment of symptomatic severe tricuspid regurgitation: a propensity score matched analysis Maurizio Taramasso MD, PhD from.
Presentation transcript:

The Risk and Extent of Neurological Events Are Equivalent for High-Risk Patients Treated With Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Thomas G. Gleason, MD On Behalf of the CoreValve US Clinical Investigators

Under direction from Dr. Gleason, Medtronic performed all statistical analyses and assisted in the graphical display of the data. Disclosure Statement of Financial Interest Within the past 1 year, I or my spouse/partner have had a financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with the organization(s) listed below. 2 AATS 2015 Affiliation/Financial RelationshipCompany Institutional GrantsMedtronic, Inc.

Background & Objectives Post-procedural strokes significantly affect both quality of life and survival. Rigorous neurologist-adjudicated stroke assessment has not been applied to most of the previously reported trials comparing TAVR and SAVR. Thus the extent and characteristics of stroke following AVR have not previously been well described. Neurological events from the CoreValve US Pivotal High Risk Trial and comprehensive cognitive assessments for a neurological substudy were carefully evaluated. AATS

Assessed neurological events through 2 years Assessed neurological events in detail through 1 year Patients TAVR N=391 CoreValve US Pivotal High Risk Trial SAVR N=359 TAVR N=111 SAVR N=88 Substudy Cohort N=199 Enrolled in Neurological Substudy* 4 AATS 2015 *Pivotal high-risk patients volunteered for additional testing

The CoreValve US Pivotal High Risk Trial: – Systematically collected National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) in all patients – Modified Rankin Scale (MRS), neurology consultation and neuroimaging triggered in any patient with neurologic abnormality and serially after any stroke Neurological substudy patients underwent comprehensive cognitive assessments by a neurologist: – Minimental State Examination – Visual fields testing – Gait & motor assessment – Writing & drawing evaluation Stroke was defined by VARC-1 criteria Stroke Assessment AATS

18F Delivery System 4 Valve Sizes (23, 26, 29, 31 mm) (18-29 mm Annular Range) Transfemoral Subclavian Direct Aortic Study Device and Access Routes AATS

Neurological Outcomes From the CoreValve Pivotal High Risk Trial AATS Days1 Year2 Years Event* TAVRSAVRPTAVRSAVRPTAVRSAVRP Stroke Major stroke Ischemic Hemorrhagic Undetermined Minor stroke TIA *Kaplan-Meier rates. 7

No. at Risk TAVR SAVR CoreValve High Risk Pivotal Trial Stroke or TIA 8 AATS 2015

CoreValve High Risk Pivotal Trial Major Stroke 9 AATS 2015 No. at Risk TAVR SAVR

Neurological Outcomes From the CoreValve Pivotal High Risk Trial By Access Route 10 AATS Days1 Year2 Years Iliofemoral Non- Iliofemoral Iliofemoral Non- Iliofemoral Iliofemoral Non- Iliofemoral Event* TAVRSAVRTAVRSAVRTAVRSAVRTAVRSAVRTAVRSAVRTAVRSAVR Any stroke or TIA Stroke Major stroke Minor stroke TIA *Kaplan-Meier rates. Yellow Text = P <0.05.

Timing of TIA, Major & Minor Strokes to 30 Days AATS Days from Implant to Event

Timing of TIA, Major & Minor Strokes to 2 Years AATS Time from Implant to Event

No. at Risk TAVR SAVR Mortality in Patients with Any Stroke Within 30 Days for TAVR & SAVR 13 AATS 2015

No. at Risk TAVR15952 SAVR11852 Mortality in Patients with Major Stroke Within 30 Days for TAVR & SAVR 14 AATS 2015

No. at Risk Major Stroke No Major Stroke Mortality in TAVR Patients with & without a Major Stroke Within 30 Days of Implant

No. at Risk Major Stroke11852 No Major Stroke Mortality in SAVR Patients with & without a Major Stroke Within 30 Days of Implant

Predictors of Early Stroke Predictors of Early (0-30 Days) Stroke Following TAVR* Kaplan Meier Rate [95% CI] no. Univariable AnalysisMultivariable HR95% CIP ValueHR95% CI P Value Peripheral vascular disease 8.3 [4.9, 13.9] , , Nocturnal bipap13.8 [5.4, 32.7] , Falls in past 6 months 9.9 [4.8, 19.6] , , AATS 2015 *There were no univariable or multivariable predictors of early stroke found for the SAVR group.

Predictors of Stroke at 1 Year Predictors of 1-Year Stroke Following TAVR* UnivariableMultivariable Kaplan Meier Rate [95% CI] no. HR95% CI P Value HR95% CI P Value Peripheral vascular disease 12.4 [8.1, 18.7] , Severe aortic calcification 17.7 [9.2, 32. 3] , , History of hypertension 7.8 [5.4, 11.1] , , Severe Charlson Comorbidity Score (≥5) 13.3 [9.3, 18.9] , , Predictors of 1-Year Stroke Following SAVR NYHA class III/IV 11.1 [7.9, 15.3] , Angina 6.0 [2.5, 13.9] , , AATS 2015

Characteristic, % or mean ± SD TAVR N=111 SAVR N=88 Age (years) 82.3 ± ± 7.3 Men STS Predicted Risk of Mortality (%) 7.0 ± ± 3.7 Logistic EuroSCORE (%) 17.2 ± ± 14.1 NYHA Class III/IV Atrial fibrillation/flutter Diabetes mellitus Prior stroke Modified Rankin 0 or Modified Rankin > NIH Stroke Scale NIH Stroke Scale Prior TIA Baseline Demographics for Patients in the Neurological Substudy 19 AATS 2015

Assessment, % or mean ± SD TAVR N=111 SAVR N=88 Home oxygen 9.1 Anemia Albumin < 3.3mg/dL Severe (≥5) Charlson comorbidity Falls in past 6 months Meter gait speed >6 seconds Katz ≥2 ADLs deficits Mini-Mental State Examination 26.7 ± ± 2.8 Non-STS Comorbidity, Frailty, Disability for the Neurological Substudy 20 AATS 2015

Neurological Assessment Changes from Baseline to Discharge in Substudy Patients 21 AATS 2015 AssessmentTAVRSAVRP Value NIH Stroke Scale – Increase by ≥ 23.5 (3/85)12.7 (8/63)0.05 Mini-Mental State Examination Decreased by > 42.5 (2/79)10.9 (6/55)0.06 New Gait Abnormality7.8 (6/77)15.5 (9/58)0.16 Weakness in Left Hand Motor Function7.2 (5/69)6.5 (3/46)>0.99 Weakness in Right Hand Motor Function7.2 (5/69)10.4 (5/48)0.74 Failed Writing Evaluation5.1 (4/79)8.5 (5/59)0.50 Failed Drawing Evaluation23.5 (12/51)25.6 (10/39)0.82

22 AATS 2015 Assessment TAVRSAVRP Value NIH Stroke Scale – Increase by ≥ 21.5 (1/65)4.9 (2/41)0.56 Mini-Mental State Examination Decreased by > 48.1 (5/62)2.5 (1/40)0.40 New Gait Abnormality6.8 (4/59)7.7 (3/39)>0.99 Weakness in Left Hand Motor Function0.0 (0/56)5.7 (2/35)0.15 Weakness in Right Hand Motor Function0.0 (0/55)5.4 (2/37)0.16 Failed Writing Evaluation1.6 (1/61)10.0 (4/40)0.08 Failed Drawing Evaluation10.9 (5/46)11.1 (3/27)>0.99 Neurological Assessment Changes from Baseline to 1 Year in Substudy Patients

This study demonstrates equivalent post-procedural, neurologist- adjudicated stroke risk and extent of neurological injury following TAVR or SAVR in a high risk population. Vascular disease, fall history, severe aortic calcification, and a severe Charlson Score appear to be predictors of stroke after TAVR. Two-year mortality rate after an early TAVR- or SAVR-associated stroke is very high. Conclusions AATS