Drive beam magnets powering strategy Serge Pittet, Daniel Siemaszko CERN, Electronic Power Converter Group (TE-EPC) 20.10.2010 OUTLINE : Suggestion of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PETS components and waveguide connections CLIC Workshop 2007 David Carrillo.
Advertisements

Magnets for the ESRF upgrade phase II
LHC UPS Systems and Configurations: Changes during the LS1 V. Chareyre / EN-EL LHC Beam Operation Committee 11 February 2014 EDMS No /02/2014.
CLIC Workshop 2009 Power Converters implications for CLIC machine protection 25/05/2015TE-EPC / S. Pittet1.
Beam Loss Analysis Tool for the CTF3 PETS Tank M. Velasco, T. Lefevre, R. Scheidegger, M. Wood, J. Hebden, G. Simpson Northwestern University, Evanston,
Design of Standing-Wave Accelerator Structure
RF Systems and Stability Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
Power System for Ocean Bottom Observatories Taken from the Cabled Observatory Presentation School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology February 2006.
Crab Cavities in IR1 and IR5 Some considerations on tunnel integration What will be the situation in the tunnel after the LHC IR Phase-1 Upgrade. What.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Abstract Magnetic Specifications and Tolerances Weiming Guo, NSLS-II Project In this presentation I briefly introduced the.
Powering the main linac implications Daniel Siemaszko, Serge Pittet OUTLINE : Cost impact of power converters, power consumption and powering.
Drive Beam and CTF 3 International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010 October 22, 2010 Erik Adli, Department of Physics, University of Oslo and CERN Bernard.
Power converters implications for Booster Energy Upgrade Jean-Paul Burnet, Serge Pittet LIU day, TEEPC.
Powered Magnets, DB Formation and Decelerator Alexey Vorozhtsov (JINR) International Workshop on Linear Colliders October 2010.
New proposed BU circuit and control logic design University of Washington.
Gek 16/6/041 ITRP Comments on Question 19 GEK 9/06/04 19) For the X-band (warm) technology, detail the status of the tests of the full rf delivery system.
Permanent Magnet Quadrupoles for the CLIC Drive Beam Jim Clarke, Norbert Collomb, Neil Marks, James Richmond, and Ben Shepherd STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
1Matthias LiepeAugust 2, 2007 LLRF for the ERL Matthias Liepe.
H.H. Braun, Structure WG, Permissible Trip Rates for 12 GHz structures in CLIC  Type of break downs  Permissible rate for type I RF breakdown.
Reliability and availability considerations for CLIC modulators Daniel Siemaszko OUTLINE : Give a specification on the availability of the powering.
Optimization of Field Error Tolerances for Triplet Quadrupoles of the HL-LHC Lattice V3.01 Option 4444 Yuri Nosochkov Y. Cai, M-H. Wang (SLAC) S. Fartoukh,
CLIC08 workshop CLIC module layout and main requirements G. Riddone, on behalf of the CMWG Home page of the TBM WG:
Simulation results for powering serial connected magnets Daniel Siemaszko, Serge Pittet OUTLINE : Serial configuration of full rated converters.
TE EPC Safe by Design CLIC Powering Daniel Siemaszko, Serge Pittet, David Nisbet CERN, Technology Department (TE) Electrical Power Converter Group (EPC)
ESS RF System Design Stephen Molloy RF Group ESS Accelerator Division SLHiPP2 4-May-2012.
CLIC09 Workshop October 2009Drive beam BPM’sLars Søby 1 Drive Beam BPM’s CLIC 09 work shop, CERN, of October 2009, Lars Søby.
COOLING & VENTILATION FOR THE DRIVE BEAM TUNNEL M Nonis – EN/CV – 16/9/2009 CLIC TWO BEAM MODULES REVIEW
CLIC Workshop th -17 th October 2008 Thomas Zickler AT/MCS/MNC 1 CLIC Main Linac Quadrupoles Preliminary design of a quadrupole for the stabilization.
A common 400 Hz AC Power Supply Distribution System for CMS FEE. Authors C. Rivetta– Fermilab. F. Arteche, F. Szoncso, - CERN.
Modulators for DB klystrons: requirements and plans for developments Serge Pittet, David Nisbet TE EPC.
J. Pfingstner Imperfections tolerances for on-line DFS Improved imperfection tolerances for an on-line dispersion free steering algorithm Jürgen Pfingstner.
CLIC Stabilisation Day’08 18 th March 2008 Thomas Zickler AT/MCS/MNC/tz 1 CLIC Quadrupoles Th. Zickler CERN.
Drive Beam Quadrupoles Jim Clarke, Norbert Collomb, Ben Shepherd, Graham Stokes STFC Daresbury Laboratory, UK Antonio Bartalesi, Michele Modena, and Mike.
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
CLIC requirements on Warm Magnets (for CLIC Modules mainly) 1 M. Modena, CERN TE-MSC 13 April 2011 CERN-UK Collaboration Kick-off Meeting.
Artwork: S. Kimball. The CLIC Drive Beam The drive beam decelerates from 2.4 GeV to 0.24 GeV transferring energy to the main beam As the electrons decelerate,
Beam losses in the CLIC drive beam: specification of acceptable level and how to handle them ACE Michael Jonker.
Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk IWLC2010, CERN October 21, 2010 A FEL pumped solid state laser system for the photon collider at CLIC.
Power Supply & Electrical Engineering for sustainable science
Jan Low Energy 10 Hz Operation in DRFS (Fukuda) (Fukuda) 1 Low Energy 10Hz Operation in DRFS S. Fukuda KEK.
Powering the damping rings wigglers Daniel Siemaszko, Serge Pittet OUTLINE : Powering superconductive magnets, Powering wigglers strategy, Existing.
Lecture 4 Longitudinal Dynamics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
TECHNICAL PAPER ON SIMULTANEOUS AC-DC POWER TRANSMISSION
CLIC Drive beam BPM Requirements and cost estimate.
COOLING & VENTILATION PLANTS M. Nonis – CERN EN Department / CV Group Annual Meeting of the FCC study – Rome 14 th April 2016.
5-2-3 Analogue to Digital Converters (ADC). Analogue to Digital Conversion The process is now the opposite of that studied in Topic Now we wish.
High-efficiency L-band klystron development for the CLIC Drive Beam High-efficiency L-band klystron development for the CLIC Drive Beam CLIC workshop,
Pulsed Magnet Power Supply Feasibility Study
The Survey of the Power Supply Reliability at SSRF
CLIC Civil Engineering & Infrastructure Working Group Meeting
Warm magnets for LHeC / Test Facility arcs
MPE-PE Section Meeting
RELIABILITY OF 600 A ENERGY EXTRACTION SYSTEMS
CLIC Rebaselining at 380 GeV and Staging Considerations
CHEN, Fusan KANG, Wen November 5, 2017
Magnets for the ESRF upgrade phase II
Main magnets for PERLE Test Facility
CLIC Workshop 2016, CERN 20th January 2016
Powering CLIC Strategies and Technical Issues
Circuits description and requirements - Closed Session-
COOLING & VENTILATION INFRASTRUCTURE
10th Feb 2017, CLIC Implementation Meeting
CLIC Drive Beam Klystron Modulators
PERMANENT MAGNET QUADRUPOLE FOR THE LINAC 4 CCDTL
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Laser Heater Integration into XFEL. Update.
Maximum Credible Beam Event Paul Emma et al
DTL M. Comunian M. Eshraqi.
ERL Director’s Review Main Linac
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
Presentation transcript:

Drive beam magnets powering strategy Serge Pittet, Daniel Siemaszko CERN, Electronic Power Converter Group (TE-EPC) OUTLINE : Suggestion of a powering strategy for the drive beam quadrupoles in the main Linac, Calculation of the power losses in the cables, Estimation of the costs of the cabling and converters with possible reductions. TE EPC

CLIC context The main two-beam Linac accelerator will be a composition of RF accelerating and decelerating modules of several types. The drive beam flows through more than 40’000 decelerating quadrupoles (860 per decelerating sectors). Currents are in the range of A and linearly distributed along each sector. Overall power dissipation in cables does NOT allow individual powering. The high number of converters implies 2-3 failures per day. A ‘fault tolerant’ operation strategy is therefore needed. 20/10/2010Serge Pittet, Daniel Siemaszko - IWLC Drive beam quads Main beam quads TE EPC

Magnet field profiles The field profile in nominal operation is in the range of 69 downto 6.9 T/m, linearly distributed along each sector within the 860 magnets. Low energy operation, tune up and phase advance control require some gradient flexibility. 20/10/2010Serge Pittet, Daniel Siemaszko - IWLC TE EPC Erik Adli, “Failure tolerant operation and powering strategy of the drive beam quadrupoles in the main linac”, September 2010, EDMS

Current profiles The Current profile in operation is in the range of 7A to 124A (assuming 52 turns per pole) distributed along each sector within the 860 magnets. Non linear distribution of currents in magnets due to field saturation effect. The flexibility at high fields (60-82T/m) is altered. A constant field profile with a slope of 0.1% corresponds to a difference in currents of 0.1A between two consecutive magnets. 20/10/2010Serge Pittet, Daniel Siemaszko - IWLC TE EPC Alexey Vorozhtsov, “CLIC Drive Beam Quadrupole”, May 2010, EDMS

Fault tolerance A failure tolerant powering strategy is needed in order to avoid intervention at each failure within the 41’280 converters. Failure tolerant scenarios must keep the beam envelope within a range defined by physics. More than 10 failures can be tolerated in the whole sector if the current in magnets does not drop under 98%. 20/10/2010Serge Pittet, Daniel Siemaszko - IWLC TE EPC Erik Adli, “The CLIC Decelerator - Beam dynamics and failure modes”, February 2010.

Serial trimmers proposal A string of magnet is powered by one big converter with serial connection of active trimmers. The main converter ratings depend on the number N of trimmers in series. This strategy allows a serious reduction on cabling costs and power consumption. Flexibility in magnet currents profile is guaranteed with only 0.3% variation of the trim currents. A negative slope in current profile is achievable with dissipative trimmers. 20/10/2010Serge Pittet, Daniel Siemaszko - IWLC TE EPC

Fault tolerant operation Trimming cables are implemented with serial diodes (only dissipative trimming). When a trimmer fails in short-circuit, the diode forces an identical current in two consecutive magnets. Open circuit case affects all previous magnets. A few seconds are needed to stabilise the currents in the remaining magnets. Failure tolerant operation with two magnets sharing same current. 20/10/2010Serge Pittet, Daniel Siemaszko - IWLC TE EPC I mag4 = I mag5 after trimmer 4 failure

Flexibility Requirement For machine development purpose, it might be desirable to be able to reduce the current in one isolated magnet. It has an impact on the cabling price if desired local variation is higher than 2%. Impact on the trimmers price and reliability if the trimming voltage has to become negative. Impact on the failure tolerant mode since diodes cannot be inserted anymore. 20/10/2010Serge Pittet, Daniel Siemaszko - IWLC TE EPC

Alternative trimmers control RAD-HARD Trimmers placed close to the magnets with limited precision to 1% (still insuring a current precision of 100ppm in the magnet). FEAS (CLIC Front End Acq. Sys.) provides AD/DA conversions. Need for 4 analogue and 4 digital signals per CLIC module with a 100Hz rate. The Control Unit manages and distributes references between mains and trimmers. 20/10/2010Serge Pittet, Daniel Siemaszko - IWLC TE EPC

Main converters reliability The reliability of solutions using trimmers depends on the reliability of the main converter. (N+1) redundancy is achieved using a modular solution. When one module fails, the remaining converters can go on operating. Failed converter must be  bypassed in serial approach.  opened in parallel approach. Power profile along the tunnel is divided into powering regions defining converter families. Within one region and depending on the current level, the number of magnets connected in series can be adapted to fit to the converter rating. 20/10/2010Serge Pittet, Daniel Siemaszko - IWLC TE EPC

Comment on converters SolutionNb of convertersratingsNb of trimmers ratingsSpace allocation (incl. trimmers) Individual powering41’4000.5kW-3kW m 2 /conv magnets strings 1’104 (4’992 modules) 20kW- 120kW 40’00050W2.5 m 2 /conv 20/10/2010Serge Pittet, Daniel Siemaszko - IWLC If trimming and serial connection of 60 magnets is considered instead of individual powering, the total price is reduced by a factor 3. The required space for power converters in the underground areas is 300m 2 with individual powering and 40 m 2 with serial connection solution. To avoid excessive price and complexity, a low level of radiations is needed in the allocated spaces for power converters. TE EPC

Comment on MTBF With individual powering: MTBF of 3·10 5 h x 40’000 power converters  one individual failure every 7 hours. With a very optimistic repair time of 4 hours, the whole complex will be down most of the time. With the trimmers solution, as one can accept several failures in one sector without affecting the beam physics, the principle of the maintenance day once a month keeps almost 90% machine availability. 20/10/2010Serge Pittet, Daniel Siemaszko - IWLC TE EPC Expected down tine of the decelerator due to power converters

Dissipated power in cables The power consumption in cables is related to the number of magnets in each ‘powering string’. Cables are powered from each side of the section. The cables are distributed in order to minimize the peak linear power dissipation. 20/10/2010Serge Pittet, Daniel Siemaszko - IWLC TE EPC Linear Power dissipation in the tunnel of less than 20W/m is achieved using groups of 30 magnets with current trimming up to 0.1A. Higher gradient variations implies thicker cables (1.5mm 2 for 6A and 10mm 2 for 30A).

Power consumption The total power consumption of the drive beam quadrupoles of the main Linac decreases with the number of magnets in the strings. Because of the huge impact of the cables on the power dissipation, a cable sharing strategy reduces the power consumption with a factor 1.5, down to 32MW. 20/10/2010Serge Pittet, Daniel Siemaszko - IWLC TE EPC

Comment on cabling The mean cable length value between a Power Converter and its Magnet is 215m. Reduction of the price by a factor up to 20 by using small cables (difference between two consecutive magnets < 6%) and cable sharing. Total length reduction by a factor of three if the trimmers are located in tunnel instead of the caverns. 20/10/2010Serge Pittet, Daniel Siemaszko - IWLC Type of poweringNb of cablesTotal Length Individual powering82800 (1x95mm 2 )17’800km Cable sharing (full trimming flexibility)41400 (1x95mm 2 )8’900km 60 trimmers series in caverns 1380 (1x95mm 2 ) 3334 (12x2.5mm 2 ) 1’012km 60 trimmers in series close to magnet 1380 (1x95mm 2 )296km TE EPC

Conclusions A powering strategy has been suggested to fit the current profiles requirements and to reduce the power dissipation in cables. A fault tolerant operation has been suggested, respecting beam physics requirements. The price of the powering (incl. cabling) as well as the space reservation is reduced by the use of powering magnets strings with one big converter and the use of active trimmers. A flexibility of 2% in the current of one isolated magnet can be achieved without additional cost, higher flexibility has consequent cost impact on the cabling. Overall machine availability will strongly depend on the radiation level on main power converters. 20/10/2010Serge Pittet, Daniel Siemaszko - IWLC TE EPC