LCOGT: Where Are We? Where Are We Going? Tim Brown Mar 18, 2010 Eventful Universe, Tucson, AZ FTN, Rob Ratkowski.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dominik Stokłosa Pozna ń Supercomputing and Networking Center, Supercomputing Department INGRID 2008 Lacco Ameno, Island of Ischia, ITALY, April 9-11 Workflow.
Advertisements

Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope Network: Keeping Education in the Dark Rachel J. Ross Global Hands On Universe July 2007 Photo by: Rob Ratkowski,
Liverpool John Moores University & University of Exeter eScience Telescopes for Astronomical Research
Ho-Il KIM Contents K-GMT Project GMT : Off-Axis Primary #1 GMT1 Surface Maps Primary Mirror Covers 1 st Generation Instruments Instrument.
2012 March 22RIA Workshop - Science with ORM and CAHA in the next decade.
LAS CUMBRES OBSERVATORY GLOBAL TELESCOPE NETWORK We will always be able to keep you in the dark! 6740B Cortona Dr. Goleta, CA Phone:
Travis Metcalfe (SSI) Magnetic Activity Cycles and the Solar-Stellar Connection.
Southern HK project Metcalfe et al. (2009, arXiv: ) Small telescopes at CTIO run by SMARTS partners: Yale, GSU, STScI, et al. Service observing.
Solar-B FPP 1 Ted Tarbell, TRACE Operations 3 February 2003 MODA Mtg, ISAS The TRACE Model for Operations Ted Tarbell
Robotic Telescopes Bremen, T. Granzer, AIP Current Earth-bound projects.
CAMERA A Compact, Automated MEMs-based Rayleigh Adaptive Optics System Matthew Britton, Nick Law, Viswa Velur, Christoph Baranec.
Brian Schmidt, Paul Francis, Mike Bessell, Stefan Keller.
Expanding Fisheye Webcam Network Now Capable of Monitoring Most of the Night Sky Robert J. Nemiroff (Michigan Tech), Hugo.E. Schwarz (CTIO), The CONCAM.
The Faulkes Telescope Project Deep Impact & Bioastronomy Institute for Astronomy University of Hawaii K. Meech.
Compare and Contrast SONG and LCOGT Tim Brown Sep 17, 2011 Charleston College/SONG4 FTN, Rob Ratkowski.
KDUST Supernova Cosmology
Communications Infrastructure Committee Update for LAN Managers Friday, May 27, 2011.
March 7, 2006 Seminar in Physics 1 X-Raying the Hot Universe John P. Hughes Rutgers University Astrophysical Studies of Supernova Remnants and Clusters.
11 SERVER CLUSTERING Chapter 6. Chapter 6: SERVER CLUSTERING2 OVERVIEW  List the types of server clusters.  Determine which type of cluster to use for.
Socio-economic impact of African-European research infrastructure cooperation Pilar Gómez Policy Analyst ISC Intelligence in Science Rue du Trône,
The Faulkes Telescopes: A Robotic Telescope Network for School Science Students Dr David Frew Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Macquarie University.
The evolution of ARC/3.5m Current ARC Partner Institutions University of Washington New Mexico State University Princeton University (until June 2014)
NEO Research Project in Korea Wonyong Han 1, Yong-Ik Byun 2, Hong-Suh Yim 1, Young-Jun Choi 1, Hong-Kyu Moon 1 & NESS Team 1 Korea Astronomy and Space.
Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope Network 1 Mike Falarski VP of Operations ( Presentation for Microlensing Workshop November 13, 2008.
LSST Scheduler status Francisco Delgado Sr. Software Engineer Telescope & Site.
Scottish Universities Physics Alliance SUPA Astronomy & Space Physics Graham Woan University of Glasgow.
Ocean Observatories Initiative Common Execution Infrastructure (CEI) Overview Michael Meisinger September 29, 2009.
LSST Scheduler requirements
Astronomical Spectroscopy and the Virtual Observatory ESAC, March 2007 VO tools and cross-calibration Pedro García-Lario European Space Astronomy.
Implementing an Observational Grid Eric Saunders Alasdair Allan Tim Naylor University of Exeter Iain Steele Chris Mottram Liverpool John Moores University.
Telescope Network News Yerkes June 26, New Telescope Network: Based on RTML Perth/RAE is working! More can easily join -- HOU has either significant.
European small and medium sized telescopes Paul Murdin Particle Physics & Astronomy Research Council.
The Space Grant Internet Telescope Network: The Beginning Dr. Paul S. Hardersen Director, ND Space Grant Consortium National Space Grant Directors Meeting.
Dark Energy Probes with DES (focus on cosmology) Seokcheon Lee (KIAS) Feb Section : Survey Science III.
Suggested Subaru-NAOJ/Princeton Consortium: Overview Michael Strauss, Ed Turner, Jim Gunn January 25, 2007.
Scientific Strategic Plan The Process Fall 2008: SSC and Observatory Management began activities to revise the SSP Previous SSP from 2003, last.
1 R. D. Gehrz 67th International Symposium on Molecular Spectroscopy, Columbus, OH, June 21, 2012 The Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy.
The Discovery Channel Telescope: An Investment in Astronomical Science at Boston University.
Chinese- international collaboration solved the central question: ”How common are planets like the Earth”
LSST Scheduler construction plan Francisco Delgado Sr. Software Engineer Telescope & Site.
The Case for a New CONCAM3 Robert J. Nemiroff for the CONCAM Collaboration.
E-VLBI FP6 Proposal. Outline Background The Call Content of Proposal & Aim Possible Participants Overall preparation plan.
Magellan Associate Director Report Personnel Observing Statistics Commissioning of Instruments Existing instruments Future Instruments.
Advanced Technologies in Education Virtual Observatory 1 Virtual Observatory: D-Space Project Athens, 14 November 2004 Elena Tavlaki Head of Research Programs.
Surace Cal Summit III Jason Surace April 19, 2007 Spitzer-IRAC/Akari-IRC Cross-Calibration With figures by Ohyama, Wada, and Tanabe.
Selected Preliminary Results of the WIYN Survey Survey designed based on UW-Madison strategic planning. Adjusted for WIYN by Eileen Friel (Indiana) Analysis:
David R. Ciardi NExScI/IPAC/Caltech 2014 August 29.
From Pan-STARRS to PTF Wing-Huen Ip Institutes of Astronomy and Space Sciences National Central University Nov. 25, 2011 Sun-Moon Lake, Taiwan.
Gaia Science Alerts in Italy Bologna, Catania, Napoli, Teramo, … Padova Massimo Turatto INAF Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova L’Italia in Gaia - Roma.
Pan-STARRS UH-IfA Pan-STARRS PY2 EOC Review #1 1-2 March 2004 U NIVERSITY OF H AWAII I NSTITUTE FOR A STRONOMY Approved for Public Release - Distribution.
Ray Plante for the DES Collaboration BIRP Meeting August 12, 2004 Tucson Fermilab, U Illinois, U Chicago, LBNL, CTIO/NOAO DES Data Management Ray Plante.
ICALEPCS 2005 Geneva, Oct. 12 The ALMA Telescope Control SystemA. Farris The ALMA Telescope Control System Allen Farris Ralph Marson Jeff Kern National.
Early Human Migrations
Cosmology with ESO telescopes Bruno Leibundgut. Outline Past and current cosmology projects with ESO telescopes Future instrumentation capabilities (interferometry?)
 Career Connections  Graduate School Website  First Destination Survey.
CERN - IT Department CH-1211 Genève 23 Switzerland t A Quick Overview of ITIL John Shade CERN WLCG Collaboration Workshop April 2008.
Senior Review of NSF Facilities NOAO Users Committee October 4, 2005.
Frazer OwenNSF EVLA Mid-Project Review May 11-12, Transition to EVLA
SA1: second year overview Arpad Szomoru JIVE January 30EXPReS Board Meeting, Utrecht, the Netherlands: SA1Slide #2 Outline Accomplishments in 2007.
DESpec in the landscape of large spectrographic surveys Craig Hogan University of Chicago and Fermilab.
STELLA & RoboTel A prototype for a robotic telescope network? Exeter, 07/18/2005 T. Granzer, AIP.
The Faulkes Telescope Project Dr. Paul Roche and Dr. Sarah Roberts Cardiff University, UK.
Li, Ting Texas A&M University DePoy, Darren Texas A&M University Burke, David SLAC Kessler, Richard University of Chicago Marshall, Jennifer Texas A&M.
A Quick Overview of ITIL
From LSE-30: Observatory System Spec.
Community Science Updates
The Faulkes Telescope Project Deep Impact & Bioastronomy
Overview of the SONG project
Observatory Science Operations
Observatory Science Operations
Presentation transcript:

LCOGT: Where Are We? Where Are We Going? Tim Brown Mar 18, 2010 Eventful Universe, Tucson, AZ FTN, Rob Ratkowski

Outline LCOGT Purpose Hardware Telescopes Instruments Sites Software Overview Event Handling Summary

LCOGT Purpose and Scope LCOGT is a privately-funded observatory dedicated to optical and NIR time-domain astronomy. We interpret “time-domain” fairly broadly, including extrasolar planets, supernovae, stellar oscillations, and more. We employ about 50 FTEs, including 14 PhD astronomers. We concentrate on follow-up work, not wide-field surveys. For targets, we depend on connections with (or membership in) surveys such as PTF, PS1, WASP, Kepler, and LSST.

Hardware When complete, our network will consist of the following sizes and numbers of telescopes and sites (more or less): 2 x 2m telescopes at Haleakala and Siding Spring (now) Visible-light imagers (now) Low- and Medium-resolution spectrographs (soon) Lucky imagers (soon) IR imagers (someday) 15 x 1m telescopes at 6-8 sites (starting this year) Visible-light imagers Medium-Res spectrographs Lucky imagers 24 x 0.4m telescopes at 6-8 sites (starting now) Visible-light imagers Lucky imagers

2.0m Telescopes Two telescopes designed by TTL Acquired by LCOGT in 2005 Both telescopes operational Significant educational component Continuous improvement program Improve reliability Improve science output

1m Components and Testing Prototype being assembled now. Mounting has been under test for 4 months.

0.4m Telescopes

Instruments 2K x 2K imager = ‘Merope’ (now) Low-Res SG = ‘FLOYDS’ (Jan 2011) 4K x 4K imager = ‘Spectral’ (now) 4K x 4K imager = ‘Sinistro’ (Sept 2010) Med-Res SG ‘No Cute Name’ (Mar 2011)

Spectroscopy and RV with the Network Each cluster of 3 x 1m telescopes will feed a single cross-dispersed echelle spectrograph. (6 spectrographs) Each 2m telescope will support a 3-fiber multi-object feed to an identical spectrograph. (2 spectrographs) Spectrograph Central Control (Santa Barbara)

? ? Sites Northern Network – Maui: Haleakala – North America: SPM? Texas? – Canary Islands: IAC – Asia: ?? Southern Network – Chile: CTIO – South Africa: SAAO – Australia: SSO – West Australia ?? ?

1 st 1m Site: CTIO Artist’s rendering Preparing for 2 nd concrete pour, 10 Feb 2010

Software Overview Requirements: Network looks like one (distributed) telescope to users. Users can specify observing programs that are useful for time-domain astronomy (often pretty complicated). System can respond to ToOs in real time; users can update target lists in near real time. Telescopes respond to central scheduling, but do something sensible if communications fail. Observing schedule adapts to failed observations. Observing schedule is efficient (finishes projects, does most important things first, does not allow idle telescopes).

The Control Loop

Functional Block Diagram

Normal Planning vs ToO and Event Handling ToO Request POND Seasonal Planner Monthly Planner Adaptive Scheduler Site Agent Normal Request TAC Knows about rise & set times plus weather statistics….. Plus what past obs have failed/succeeded….. Plus current site conditions.

Summary LCOGT is dedicated to time-domain astronomy. It is primarily concerned with follow-up of time-varying objects. It is deploying a world-wide network of 2m, 1m, and 0.4m telescopes in small clusters at 6 to 8 sites. 2m telescopes are available now. 1m and 0.4m telescopes will start to come line in the next year. The network will be finished in 3-4 years. Eventually, each site will be capable of photometry, high-speed photometry, and spectroscopy. NIR imaging/photometry will follow. The network will appear to users as a single facility, geographically distributed, and capable of doing more than one thing at a time. The control system will support quick response to Targets of Opportunity. LCOGT grad student fellowship competition now open! See ad in April AAS Job Register.