Section 3 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades 6–12: Focus on Sustaining Change.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Inquiry-Based Instruction
Advertisements

A Framework for Instruction
Year 2 Formative Progress Review
+ Leading like a Coach Collaborative Norms in Action picture © 2009 SCCMSwww.sccoalition.org Science Education Leadership Fellows ~ Houston ~ December.
Department of Mathematics and Science
Good Spirit School Division
Implementing the CCSS Through Coaching Atomic Conference December 2, 2014.
PBL Post-Project Review. 1. Student Engagement2. Project Idea3. Student Learning4. Authenticity of Project Tasks and Products5. Quality and Use of Driving.
Dream, Design, Deliver Elementary PD Plan Courtney Bitar Tonya Cox Jay Nocco Barb Walker Suzanne Whaley.
Activity 3a Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades 6–12: Focus on Deepening Implementation.
Cape Flattery TWSSP Workshop September 14, Pausing Paraphrasing Posing Questions Putting ideas on the table Paying attention to self and others.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning.
Developing Professional Mathematics Learning Communities Formative Assessment: Focus on Re- Engagement Lessons.
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
Leadership: Session #1. When we move on, people do not remember us for what we do for ourselves. They remember us for what we do for them. They are the.
Hiring Practices “Getting it Right” Brenda Hammons- Assistant Superintendent Dave Cox – Director of Academic Programs.
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
Section 1 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Sustaining Change.
Coaching. “Thoughts are our way of connecting things up for ourselves. If somebody else tells us about the connections she/he has made, we can only understand.
Making Group Work Productive PowerPoints available at Click on “Resources”
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
5 E’s Lesson Model.
Livingston School District Livingston School District - Module #3.
The 5 E’s Science Lesson Inquiry-Based Instruction.
Inquiry and the IB. Stuents do not learn by doing. on what they have done. Rather, they learn by and.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
Activity 4 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Deepening Implementation.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus.
LESSON PLANNING What? Why? And How?. Goals of this session Participants will be able to identify and explain: 1.What is a lesson plan and how to develop.
Project Based Learning Protect the Environment and Live Well Denise Tallakson June 2014.
Shelly Rider AMSTI-USA Director.  To understand the effects of the Common Core State Standards on mathematical classroom instruction  To recognize the.
Coaching for Math GAINS Professional Learning Day 2 April, 2009.
EngageNY.org Overview of the 3-8 ELA Curriculum Modules Session 1A, February 2014 NTI.
© 2015 Core Knowledge Foundation. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Focused Conversations with Critical Friends Connecting four pillars of CAMPPP Selecting area of personal inquiry Reflecting on your experience, personal.
Supervisor Training PEER Centers April/May
Activity 2a Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades 6–12: Focus on Deepening Implementation.
Connections and Actions Utilizing coaching skills to enhance mathematics instruction Astrid FossumLee Ann Pruske Laura MalyCynthia Rodriguez MTL Sessions,
Activity 1 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Deepening Implementation.
How to Teach Science using an Inquiry Approach (ESCI 215 – Chapter 1)
Building Effective Content Literacy Tasks. The Cycle of Assessment Teach: Does the instruction and the tasks align to the identified learning target(s)?
Network Rounds Oviatt Elementary School Norwalk School District April 10, 2015.
Coaching for Math GAINS Professional Learning Day 1 AM Irene McEvoy David Zimmer September 16, 2009.
Implementing Formative Assessment Processes: What's Working in Schools and Why it is Working Sophie Snell & Mary Jenatscheck.
Creating Student Success through the Data Team Process Mason City Community School District Kathryn Schladweiler TJ.
Inquiry-Based Instruction
Classroom Video Observation
Math Leadership Network
Collaborative Literacy
3 R's: Revolution, Reaction and Reform
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Saskatchewan Reads for Middle Years
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Saskatchewan Reads for Middle Years
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Reading Closely For Textual Details
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
PCMI 2010: Reflecting on Teaching
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Presentation transcript:

Section 3 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades 6–12: Focus on Sustaining Change

Section 3 Page 16

Section 3 Advocate vs. Evaluator Being a cheerleader – celebrating gains Effectively listening to and paraphrasing worries/concerns Empowering teachers to try new things 33 Page 16

Section 3 Partner/Collaborator vs. Expert Peer/Co-Learner Asking questions vs. giving answers 34

Section 3 Advisor vs. Director Providing suggestions for refinement of a lesson or classroom practice Keeping the focus on student learning 35

Section 3 A coach asks questions to: Stimulate reflection Promote a spirit of inquiry (expand thinking and possibilities) 36

Section 3 What are some connections between this learning target and what your students have learned before? What formative assessment strategies could you use to see if students are understanding the concept? How did the lesson go compared to how you had planned it? 37 Page 17

Section 3 Use plurals in your questions Embed tentative language (“might,” “some”) Ask open-ended questions Use verbs to elicit higher-order thinking (“compare,” “predict,” “evaluate”) Presume positive intentions in your questions Use an approachable voice to signal inquiry vs. interrogation (Bay-Williams, J., McGatha, M., 2014) 38 Pages 17-18

Section 3 39 The coach will take ten minutes to look over the coachee’s lesson design and consider a couple of questions that could be asked about the lesson design and the implementation of the lesson. When forming questions, consider: The EQuIP Rubric (copies on table) UDL Principles (page 19)

Section 3 40 Ask your questions of the “coachee” and listen to the responses provided. Switch roles. Page 18

Section 3 Think back to the tips for well-crafted questions as you evaluate the quality of your questions. What are some challenges you had? Forming questions is an art – again, the purpose is to move the “coachee” forward in his or her thinking. 41 Page 20

Section 3 What “lenses” could be used for data collection in a classroom observation as a Core Standards Coach? 42 Page 21

Section 3 43 Page 22 Teaching Channel video ‒ Probability of Dependent and Independent Events

Section 3 With your tablemates and based on your observation lens record: One commendation (a celebration) One question that would engage the teacher in critical reflection One suggestion to move the teacher’s thinking forward 44 Page 23

Section 3 45 Page 8