ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Meeting the Civil Rights Obligations to Students (Call 1) January 14, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RIDE – Office of Special Populations
Advertisements

Who Put “Instructional Monitoring” On My To Do List? Suggestions for Principals M. Ann Levett, Ed.D.
1 Workshop Part I: Federal Monitoring Basics Victoria Rankin, Greta Colombi, and Alexandra Woods NDTAC.
Staff Development Workshop Feb. 17, 2012 *Annotated from Region 4.
Toolkit Series from the Office of Migrant Education Webinar: SDP Toolkit August 16, 2012.
Data Collection An overview of how data are collected and used in Washington state.
Southern Regional Education Board The will to succeed is only overshadowed by the will to prepare to succeed!
1 Gold ND Community Call October 7, Agenda “That Time of Year”: Data Team Updates A Closer Look: Subgrantee Monitoring Review of Recent TA Requests.
Resources and Beyond FfT Facilitator Training January 8, 2013.
Workshop Part II: Subgrantee Monitoring Basics Victoria Rankin, Greta Colombi, and Alexandra Woods NDTAC.
Introduction & Background Laurene Christensen National Center on Educational Outcomes National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO)
CIVIL RIGHTS DATA COLLECTION National Forum: PPI Committee: 2011 MIS Meeting.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
UNDERSTANDING, PLANNING AND PREPARING FOR THE SCHOOL-WIDE EVALUATION TOOL (SET)
Toolkit Series from the Office of Migrant Education Webinar: CNA Toolkit August 21, 2012.
1 Monitoring Review: What Every New Coordinator Should Know Victoria Rankin and Greta Colombi, NDTAC.
1 Classroom-Based Research: How to Be a Researcher in Your Classroom Basic Skills Initiative Teaching and Learning Workshop October 2009 Darla M. Cooper.
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Support School-wide Evaluation Tool January 2007.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Implementing High Quality Student Learning Objectives: The Promise and the Challenge Maryland Association of Secondary School.
Are We making a Difference
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
Parental Involvement Requirements A Focused Look at Compliance Spring 2009.
LCSD APPR: Overview Review and Focus on the 60 points December 3, 2012.
Martha Thurlow and Laurene Christensen National Center on Educational Outcomes CEC Preconvention Workshop #4 April 21, 2010.
Meeting the Educational Needs of Diverse Learners DeAngela Milligan and Sarah Bardack.
The Savvy Cyber Teacher ® Using the Internet Effectively in the K-12 Classroom 1 Savvy Cyber Teacher ® Using the Internet Effectively in the K-12 Classroom.
Reflect and Revise: Evaluative Thinking for Program Success Tom DeCaigny and Leah Goldstein Moses.
Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Evolving Oregon Educational Policy Courtesy of Pat Burk, Ph.D. Department of Educational.
ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Conditions for Learning and Special Populations (Call 2) September 9, 2015.
Monica Ballay Data Triangulation: Measuring Implementation of SPDG Focus Areas.
1 ND Topical Call Series: NDTAC Resources to Meet Technical Assistance Needs (Call 3) 22 September 2015 – Katie Deal.
Timberlane Regional School District
Professional Practice Required Elements Self-Reflection, Professional Growth Planning To be completed by all principals and assistant principals annually.
The Center on Innovations in Learning (CIL ) A National Content Center Content Center Presentation January 31, 2014.
OCM BOCES SLOs Workshop. Race To The Top: Standards Data Professional Practice Culture APPR.
The Power of Monitoring: Building Strengths While Ensuring Compliance Greta Colombi and Simon Gonsoulin, NDTAC.
Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs
Making the Most of Your Data: Strategies for Evaluating Your Program Greta Colombi, NDTAC; and John McLaughlin, ED.
Program Evaluation NCLB. Training Objectives No Child Left Behind Program Series: Program Evaluation To provide consistency across the State regarding.
Las Cruces Public Schools Principal Evaluation Overview Stan Rounds Superintendent Stan Rounds Superintendent.
Evaluating a Cultural Competency Curriculum for Disaster Preparedness and Crisis Response Guadalupe Pacheco, MSW HHS Office of Minority Health Eileen Hanrahan.
STARTALK: Our mission, accomplishments and direction ILR November 12, 2010.
Martha Thurlow Laurene Christensen Courtney Foster April 22, :15-2:15 MONITORING ACCOMMODATIONS FOR INSTRUCTION AND ASSESSMENT.
Title III Desk Monitoring Oregon Department of Education September 24,
1 Support Provider Workshop # East Bay BTSA Induction Consortium.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
1 New Coordinator Orientation Lauren Amos, Katie Deal, and Liann Seiter.
Springfield Effective Educator Development System (SEEDS)
1 ND Community Call Teal Community 27 October 2015.
Age Appropriate Assessments: A Necessary Component to Transition.
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
WHAT A GREAT IDEA!! Focusing on Results and Using IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act) Part D Investments to Support Improved Outcomes for.
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
1 ND Community Call Gold Community 22 October 2015.
APR 2014 Report: Data, Analysis and Action Plan for Full Accreditation.
Council for the Accreditationof EducatorPreparation Standard 1: CONTENT AND PEDAGOGICAL KNOWLEDGE 2014 CAEP –Conference Nashville, TN March 26-28, 2014.
OSEP-Funded TA and Data Centers David Guardino, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
1 Effectively Addressing Administrative Challenges of Implementing Title I, Part D Katie Deal, Rob Mayo, Liann Seiter, and Jake Sokolsky.
1 Welcome! Choose a photo from the table that appeals to you or represents you in some way. Write the answers to the following questions on a 3×5 notecard.
Parental Involvement Requirements
School-Parent Compact
School-Parent Compact
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
Georgia Department of Education
LIEPing to Excellence for ELs
2019 Spring & Fall Timeline May 10, 2019
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
Phillipsburg Middle School Identification as a School in Need of  Comprehensive Support and Improvement: Starting Community Conversations March.
Presentation transcript:

ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Meeting the Civil Rights Obligations to Students (Call 1) January 14, 2015

2 Agenda 1.Overview of the Subgrantee Monitoring Topical Call Series 2.Effective Monitoring 3.Sample Subgrantee Monitoring Tools 4.Activity 5.Resources

3 Series Overview  Develop familiarity with subgrantee monitoring tools  Practice administering the tools using fictional data, scenarios and videos of classroom practice  Practice analyzing the data collected by the tools  Discuss how to adapt the tool to local contexts

4 Series Overview: Call 1  Meeting Civil Rights Obligations (Activity: Program Performance Data)  Teacher equity  College and career readiness  School discipline

5 Series Overview: Call 2  Special populations (Activity: Documentation (instructional artifacts) and Focus Group Data)  Cultural and linguistic competence (e.g., racial and ethnic minorities, limited English proficient students)  Students with disabilities  Gender-specific programming  Youth of transition age

6 Series Overview: Call 3  Conditions for Learning (Activity: Observation Data)  Safety  Support  Social and Emotional Learning  Engagement and Challenge

7 Effective Monitoring  Ensures accountability and compliance with applicable State and Federal laws and improve outcomes  Offers support and technical assistance to programs and facilities  Supports improved outcomes for youth who are system- involved  ED typically monitors SEAs every 3 to 5 years  SEAs are encouraged to monitor subgrantees at least once every 3 years  Monitoring visits are often scheduled in advance; Unannounced visits are not prohibited and generally occur in reaction to issues raised during onsite or desk audits

8 Poll: How frequently do you monitor your subgrantees (desk and/or on-site)?  Annually  Every two years  Every three years  Every four to five years  Rarely/Never

9 Poll: How often do you conduct site visits?  Annually  Every two years  Every three years  Every four to five years  Rarely/Never

10 Poll: In a given year, do you typically monitor:  All of your subgrantees?  Some of your subgrantees?

11 Effective Monitoring: Language of Cooperation  Tell me about…  Help me understand how…  What are your greatest challenges?  What are you most proud of?  How can I help? What support such as training and technical assistance can I offer?  What questions do you have?  Here’s what I learned. Did I get it right?  Are there questions I should have asked but didn’t?

12 Sample Subgrantee Monitoring Tools  Minimally address compliance with statute  Vary across states in:  Rigor  Content  Data sources  Depth

13 Poll: Which data sources do you use when monitoring?  Interviews  Focus groups  Surveys  Observations  Documentation  Program Performance Data (e.g., course passage rates, grades, attendance, pre-post test scores)  Other

14 Meeting the Civil Rights Obligations to Students: The Tool  Modular (pick and choose dimensions that suit you)  Formative, staff-centered instrument  Quantitative and qualitative measures  Dimensions  Teacher equity  College and career readiness  School Discipline

15 Using the Tool  Collect performance data  Collect supporting evidence  What questions arise from the performance data?  What data sources can help you answer those questions?

16 Using the Tool  Jointly analyze quantitative and qualitative data  How has the subgrantee/facility performed over time? Any significant changes?  How does the subgrantee/facility compare to national averages?  How does the subgrantee/facility compare to its peers in the State?  Jointly rate the subgrantee/facility and discuss next steps

17 QUESTIONS?

18 Resources  Tip Sheet: Tip Sheet: Subgrantee MonitoringTip Sheet: Subgrantee Monitoring  2012 NDTAC Conference Presentation: Monitoring & Evaluation: Best Practices (Dr. Peter Leone)Monitoring & Evaluation: Best Practices  Office of Civil Rights (OCR), U.S. Department of Education Office of Civil Rights (OCR), U.S. Department of Education  Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC) Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC)  CRDC Data Snapshot: Teacher Equity CRDC Data Snapshot: Teacher Equity  CRDC Data Snapshot: College and Career Readiness CRDC Data Snapshot: College and Career Readiness  CRDC Data Snapshot: School Discipline CRDC Data Snapshot: School Discipline

19 Resources  Great Teachers & Leaders Great Teachers & Leaders  Guide to Evaluation Products Guide to Evaluation Products  Online Database of State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Systems Online Database of State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Systems