Utilization of Accuracy Profiles as a Tool for the Validation of Analytical Methods A. Ceccato, P. Jacobs, A. Flament, M. Gibella and W. Dewé Lilly Development.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dr. Birgit Schmauser, BfArM, Bonn
Advertisements

Quantitative Gas Chromatography
Gas Chromatography 427 PHC.
Analytical Method Development and Validation
GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY.
Mobile phase is a gas! Stationary phase could be anything but a gas
Charles Y. Tan, PhD USP Statistics Expert Committee
Week 3 Collection and Analysis of Biodiesel
COMPARATIVE OF THE ADSORPTION PERFORMANCE OF A MULTI-SORBENT BED (CARBOTRAP, CARBOPACK X, CARBOXEN 569) AND A TENAX TA ADSORBENT TUBE FOR THE ANALYSIS.
CHEMISTRY ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY Fall
Qualification of Capillary Electrophoresis Instrument M. Koupparis.
PRODUCTS for PETROCHEMISTRY Detailed Hydrocarbon Analysis of the primary petrol, refinery compounds and final products Detailed Hydrocarbon.
Today: Conclusion of Distillation/GC Introduction to Exp
PHARM 462 PART / /31 Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) VALIDATION of ANALYTICAL TEST METHODS.
World Health Organization
Figure 1. Influence of sample solvent on peak shape. The sample is dissolved in buffer with (a) 0%, (b) 30%, (c) 50%, and (d) 70% acetonitrile. Sample.
TOWARDS A RISK BASED METHODOLOGY TO ASSESS THE ACCEPTABILITY OF AN ANALYTICAL METHOD TRANSFER: COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT APPROACHES. E. Rozet 1, W. Dewe²,
The geometry of capillary columns is fairly simple, consisting of length, internal diameter, and stationary phase thickness. Nevertheless, there are endless.
Comparative Analysis of Arbutin and Tranexamic Acid in Skin Whitening Products Chuxin Chen
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE ADSORPTION PERFORMANCE OF A MULTI- SORBENT BED (CARBOTRAP, CARBOPACK X, CARBOXEN 569) AND A RADIELLO ® ADSORBENT TUBE FOR THE.
Monitoring the desorption of analytes from nonpolar SPME fibers using high speed gas chromatography Authors: Kimberly Jasch, Tony Borgerding* Department.
QUALITY CONTROL OF PHYSICO-Chemical METHODS Introduction :Validation توثيق المصدوقية.
Kyiv, TRAINING WORKSHOP ON PHARMACEUTICAL QUALITY, GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE & BIOEQUIVALENCE Validation of Analytical Methods Used For Bioequivalence.
Validation of Analytical Method
WELCOME. UV Spectrophotometric Method Development And Estimation of Bicalutamide in Pharmaceutical Dosage Form.
B. Neidhart, W. Wegscheider (Eds.): Quality in Chemical Measurements © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000 P. HoulgateAssessment of Test Kits in Terms.
Comparison and classification of methamphetamine seized in Japan and Thailand using gas chromatography with liquid-liquid extraction and solid-phase microextraction.
Gas Chromatography Carrier Gas Flow Control Injector Port Column Column Oven Detector Recorder The GC system consists of gas supplies for the mobile phase.
Analytical considerations
Method conditions Excellent resolution and fast run times 2 x OligoPore, 4.6 x 250 mm columns gave excellent oligomeric resolution for the PS 580 sample.
PORTABLE HIGH-SPEED GAS CHROMATOGRAPH
* CORRESPONDING AUTHOR Use of High Resolution Mass Spectrometry (HRMS) to Solve Severe Issues Due to Isotopic Distribution in Regulated Bioanalysis Richard.
Simple Scale-up on a 940-LC Analytical to Preparative HPLC
DEVELOPMENT OF A RP-HPLC METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF METFORMIN IN HUMAN PLASMA.
Uncertainty profile; a global strategy for validation and estimation of uncertainty: Application to a high-performance thin-layer chromatographic method.
TRANSFER OF A MULTIDIMENSIONAL ON-LINE SPE-LC-ECD METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF THREE MAJOR CATECHOLAMINES IN NATIVE HUMAN URINE. E. Rozet 1, R. Morello.
USE OF ACCURACY PROFILE FOR THE VALIDATION OF THE DIRECT QUANTITATION OF TAGITININ C IN TITHONIA DIVERSIFOLIA LEAVES BY ON-LINE COUPLING OF SUPERCRITICAL.
© 2006 MSA VaporLab™ 700 Gas Analyzer. © 2006 MSA Product Description  Rack mount, turn-key gas analyzer  Analyzes a complex matrix for trace quantities.
1 Exercise 7: Accuracy and precision. 2 Origin of the error : Accuracy and precision Systematic (not random) –bias –impossible to be corrected  accuracy.
HPLC – High Performance Liquid Chromatography
B. Neidhart, W. Wegscheider (Eds.): Quality in Chemical Measurements © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000 H. Albus Basic Course Experiments to Demonstrate.
Validation Defination Establishing documentary evidence which provides a high degree of assurance that specification process will consistently produce.
B. Neidhart, W. Wegscheider (Eds.): Quality in Chemical Measurements © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000 W. WegscheiderValidation: an Example 1 Learning.
Lecture 10 ANALYTICAL METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION IN HPLC AND GC. Lecture 10 – Chromatography, Dr. Rasha Hanafi 1© Dr. Rasha Hanafi, GUC.
Implementing principles of Quality by Design (QbD) in validation context Cédric Hubert a, Pierre Lebrun a,b, Eric Rozet a,b and Philippe Hubert a a Laboratory.
Validation of the AOAC method for pesticides residues analysis in oranges and mandarins in LATU Marina Torres (1) 1, Lucía Alcarraz 1 (2) 1 Laboratorio.
SEMINAR ON PRESENTED BY BRAHMABHATT BANSARI K. M. PHARM PART DEPARTMENT OF PHARMACEUTICS AND PHARMACEUTICAL TECHNOLGY L. M. COLLEGE OF PHARMACY.
EQUIPMENT and METHOD VALIDATION
Evolution GC-MS/MS: Pesticide analysis in canola oil Evolution GC-MS/MS: Pesticide analysis in canola oil Vivian Watts 1, Ingo Christ 1, Mark Misunis 2.
means to “TO CHECK OR PROVE THE VALIDITY OF” According to FDA – “ The goal of validation is to establish a documented evidence which provides a high degree.
이 장 우. 1. Introduction  HPLC-MS/MS methodology achieved its preferred status -Highly selective and effectively eliminated interference -Without.
Multi-Analyte LC-MS/MS Methods – Best Practice.
Optimization of 1,4-Dioxane and Ethanol Detection
Introduction Results Aim of the study Methods Conclusion References
1/06/2018 Development and validation of a HPLC Assay for the Determination of Temocillin in Serum of Haemodialysis Patients A.Bastos1,2, S.Vandecasteele3,
World Health Organization
HEROIN PROFILING – methodology development and first impressions
Dr. Birgit Schmauser, BfArM, Bonn
524.3 Purge Flow Study Anne Jurek – Sr. Applications Chemist
Analytical Method Validation
METHOD VALIDATION: AN ESSENTIAL COMPONENT OF THE MEASUREMENT PROCESS
Retention and phase distribution
ICHS5 – 2013 September, Brussels, Belgium | ID161
ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION
World Health Organization
Liquid Chromatography - Method Development and Validation
How to quantify substances in a mixture using gas chromatography
Levofloxacin structural formula
Selvadurai Muralidharan, Jayaraja kumar, Venugopal Vijayan
Triadimenol CIPAC /R Stereospecific Identity Test for Triadimenol – report Gerhard Krautstrunk, Silke Wagner, Dieter Strassburg, Martin Feyerabend.
Presentation transcript:

Utilization of Accuracy Profiles as a Tool for the Validation of Analytical Methods A. Ceccato, P. Jacobs, A. Flament, M. Gibella and W. Dewé Lilly Development Centre, B-1348 Mont-Saint-Guibert, Belgium 1. Introduction The objective of the validation is to demonstrate that the method is suitable for its intended use. The validation presented here is based on the strategy presented by Hubert et al. [1,2] and consists in 2 steps : prevalidation and validation. Prevalidation –Selection of the most suitable calibration model using an accuracy profile as a selection tool. Validation –Evaluation of the selectivity of the method. –Assessment of precision, trueness and accuracy at different concentration levels. –Evaluation of the linearity. –Determination of the limits of detection and quantification. The GC method was developed in order to determine impurities around the 0.1 % level in methanol, acetone, toluene and dichloromethane. 2. Analytical Conditions Column : CP-Sil-8CB Low/MS (30mx0.32mmx1.00 µm) Carrier gas : Helium Inlet Pressure : 10.0 psi (constant pressure mode) Injector T° : 280°C Detector T° : 320°C H2 Flow : 30 ml/min Air flow : 400 ml/min Make up flow : 25 ml/min Injection volume : 0.2 µl Split ratio : 50/1 T° program :35°C for 10 min, then raised to 120°C at 40°C/min, then 120°C for 8 min then to 300°C at 20°C/min. Concentration range, from 0.01 % to 2.0 % V/V Chromatographic separation of all compounds investigated. (1) methanol – (2) ethanol – (3) acetone – (4) isopropanol – (5) dichloromethane – (6) proprionitrile (IS) – (7) MEK – (8) ethyl acetate – (9) chloroform – (10) benzene – (11) toluene – (x) endogenous compound from ethylacetate 4. Pre-validation The accuracy profile is used as a tool to decide the capability of the method to give results inside the acceptance limits : it is obtained by linking on one hand the lower and on the other hand the upper bounds of the  -expectaton tolerance tolerance limits at each concentration level. The regression model can be used if the  -expectation tolerance interval (blue) stays within a predefined acceptance criteria (i.e. 10 %, black dotted lines) since it guarantees that the method will be able to give a result within the  -expectation tolerance interval 95 times out 100 experiments. All calculations were perfromed on Benzene using the e-noval ® software from Arlenda. 3. Selectivity Weighted Linear Regression Quadratic Regression Linear Regression Weighted Linear Regression after logarithm transformation Linear Regression Through 0 Fitted using the highest level only Weighted Quadratic Regression Weighted Linear Regression after square root transformation Linear Regression after square root transformation Linear Regression after logarithm transformation Linear Regression Through 0 Fitted using the level (3) only 5. Validation The response functions are determined using the selected model : linear regression through 0 using one calibration level. The precision of the method is evaluated by measuring repeatability and intermediate precision. The trueness is evaluated by calculating the relative bias (%) at each concentration level. Accuracy is assessed from the accuracy profiles. The accuracy profiles of benzene and ethanol show that the determination of benzene is accurate over the whole concentration range while the determination of ethanol is only accurate between 0.05 and 2.0 % (50 and 2000 µl/100 ml). The linearity is established by fitting the regression line between the back-calculated concentrations versus the introduced concentrations. The Lower (LLOQ) and Upper Limits of Quantitation (ULOQ) are obtained by calculating the smallest and the highest concentrations beyond which the  -expectation tolerance limits (dotted blue lines) go outside the acceptance limits (dotted black lines). 7. References Ph. Hubert et al., STP Pharma Pratiques 13, 101 (2003) Ph. Hubert et al., J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 36, 579 (2004) 6. Conclusion A GC method for the determination of impurities in methanol, acetone, toluene and dichloromethane was validated using a new approach based on the accuracy profile determination and was found to meet the requirements for a further investigation of traces impurities in solvents. The accuracy profiles are used as a tool to select the best regression model. A graphic visualization is constructed in order to help the operator to decide if the method is suitable to do what it is supposed to do. The accuracy prodiles are also used to determine the accuracy of the method : if the lines corresponding to the  -expectation tolerance interval stay within the predefined acceptance limits, the method can be declared as valid. Ethanol Benzene