A Regional Climate Model Evaluation System: Facilitating the Use of Contemporary Satellite and Other Observations for Evaluating Regional Climate Model.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California Challenges of Analyzing.
Advertisements

Improved CanSIPS Initialization from Offline CLASS Simulation and Data Assimilation Aaron Berg CanSISE Workshop.
Matthew Hendrickson, and Pascal Storck
CHG Station Climatology Database (CSCD)
Development of Bias-Corrected Precipitation Database and Climatology for the Arctic Regions Daqing Yang, Principal Investigator Douglas L. Kane, Co-Investigator.
Enhancing vegetation productivity forecasting using remotely-sensed surface soil moisture retrievals Wade T. Crow USDA Hydrology and Remote Sensing Laboratory,
Scientific Applications of the Regional Climate Model Evaluation System (RCMES) Paul C. Loikith, Duane E. Waliser, Chris Mattmann, Jinwon Kim, Huikyo Lee,
Task: (ECSK06) Regional downscaling Regional modelling with HadGEM3-RA driven by HadGEM2-AO projections National Institute of Meteorological Research (NIMR)/KMA.
J. Kim 1, D. Waliser 2, C. Mattmann 2, P. Ramirez 2, H. Lee 2, P. Loikith 2, M. Bounstani 2, C. Goodale 2, A. Hart 2, J. Sanjay 3, M.V.S. Rama Rao 3, R.
Jinwon Kim and Paul Ramirez and RCMES Science and IT Teams led by Duane Waliser (JPL), Science Leader Chris Mattmann (JPL), IT Leader Regional Climate.
Some Discussion Points What metrics should be used for comparing observations? What distributional metrics could readily be used? Is anybody playing with.
Progress in Downscaling Climate Change Scenarios in Idaho Brandon C. Moore.
Princeton University Global Evaluation of a MODIS based Evapotranspiration Product Eric Wood Hongbo Su Matthew McCabe.
Assessment of Future Change in Temperature and Precipitation over Pakistan (Simulated by PRECIS RCM for A2 Scenario) Siraj Ul Islam, Nadia Rehman.
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to the NWS 1 Evaluation of WRF Using High-Resolution Soil Initial Conditions from the NASA Land.
RCMES team at Jet Propulsion Laboratory
CLIMATE SCIENTISTS’ BIG CHALLENGE: REPRODUCIBILITY USING BIG DATA Kyo Lee, Chris Mattmann, and RCMES team Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), Caltech.
The Regional Climate Model Evaluation System (RCMES): A Training Session Paul C. Loikith, Paul Ramirez, Huikyo Lee, and the RCMES Climate and Computer.
Duane Waliser Jet Propulsion Laboratory/Caltech & University of California, Los Angeles Chris Mattmann, Paul Loikith, Huikyo Lee, etc, JPL Jinwon Kim,
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling Division, Applied Modeling Research Branch October 8, 2008.
NARCCAP Users' Workshop April 2012 Boulder, Colorado J. Kim 1, Waliser 2, C. Mattmann 2, L. Mearns 3, C. Goodale 2 A. Hart 2. Crichton 2, S. Mcginnis.
NCPP – needs, process components, structure of scientific climate impacts study approach, etc.
International Conference on Regional Climate – CORDEX 2013, 4-8 November 2013, Brussels, Belgium Systematic Biases in the CORDEX-Africa and NARCCAP Multi-RCM.
Grigory Nikulin and Colin Jones Rossby Centre Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute and CORDEX-Africa modeling groups Simulated precipitation.
The Simulation and Analysis of Temperature and Precipitation of CAM on Sahel Drought Yi-Chih Huang.
Zhang Mingwei 1, Deng Hui 2,3, Ren Jianqiang 2,3, Fan Jinlong 1, Li Guicai 1, Chen Zhongxin 2,3 1. National satellite Meteorological Center, Beijing, China.
NARCCAP Users Meeting April 2011 Results from NCEP-driven RCMs Overview Based on Mearns et al. (BAMS, 2011) Results from NCEP-driven RCMs Overview Based.
Introduction to Hands On Training in CORDEX South Asia Data Analysis
C. Mattmann 1, C. Goodale 1, J. Kim 2, D.E. Waliser 1,2, D. Crichton 1, A. Hart 1, P. Zimdars 1 and Peter Lean* The International Workshop on CORDEX-East.
Experimental seasonal hydrologic forecasting for the Western U.S. Dennis P. Lettenmaier Andrew W. Wood, Alan F. Hamlet Climate Impacts Group University.
Verification Summit AMB verification: rapid feedback to guide model development decisions Patrick Hofmann, Bill Moninger, Steve Weygandt, Curtis Alexander,
Mathematics and Computer Science & Environmental Research Divisions ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY Regional Climate Simulation Analysis & Vizualization John.
Preliminary Results of Global Climate Simulations With a High- Resolution Atmospheric Model P. B. Duffy, B. Govindasamy, J. Milovich, K. Taylor, S. Thompson,
Inter-comparison and Validation Task Team Breakout discussion.
Dataset Development within the Surface Processes Group David I. Berry and Elizabeth C. Kent.
Quality control of daily data on example of Central European series of air temperature, relative humidity and precipitation P. Štěpánek (1), P. Zahradníček.
1 Climate Test Bed Seminar Series 24 June 2009 Bias Correction & Forecast Skill of NCEP GFS Ensemble Week 1 & Week 2 Precipitation & Soil Moisture Forecasts.
Meteorological Data Analysis Urban, Regional Modeling and Analysis Section Division of Air Resources New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.
The Regional Climate Model Evaluation System (RCMES): Introduction and Demonstration Paul C. Loikith, Duane E. Waliser, Chris Mattmann, Jinwon Kim, Huikyo.
Validation of NARCCAP climate products for forest resource applications in the southeast United States. Willis Shem 1, Thomas Mote 2, Marshall Shepherd.
1 Motivation Motivation SST analysis products at NCDC SST analysis products at NCDC  Extended Reconstruction SST (ERSST) v.3b  Daily Optimum Interpolation.
Understanding hydrologic changes: application of the VIC model Vimal Mishra Assistant Professor Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Gandhinagar
GEON2 and OpenEarth Framework (OEF) Bradley Wallet School of Geology and Geophysics, University of Oklahoma
Chris A. Mattmann Senior Computer Scientist Jet Propulsion Laboratory D. Waliser (JPL) C. Goodale (JPL) J. Kim (UCLA/JIFRESSE Many others ADSIMNOR-CORDEX.
Feng Zhang and Aris Georgakakos School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology Sample of Chart Subheading Goes Here Comparing.
Regional Climate Model Evaluation System based on satellite and other observations for application to CMIP/AR downscaling Peter Lean 1, Jinwon Kim 1,3,
Colorado Basin River Forecast Center and Drought Related Forecasts Kevin Werner.
Evapotranspiration Estimates over Canada based on Observed, GR2 and NARR forcings Korolevich, V., Fernandes, R., Wang, S., Simic, A., Gong, F. Natural.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer Studying.
Evaluating RCM Experiments PRECIS Workshop Tanzania Meteorological Agency, 29 th June – 3 rd July 2015.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California Part of the AIST Framework.
Diagnostic verification and extremes: 1 st Breakout Discussed the need for toolkit to build beyond current capabilities (e.g., NCEP) Identified (and began.
Implementing Probabilistic Climate Outlooks within a Seasonal Hydrologic Forecast System Andy Wood and Dennis P. Lettenmaier Department of Civil and Environmental.
Figure 3. Overview of system architecture for RCMES. A Regional Climate Model Evaluation System based on Satellite and other Observations Peter Lean 1.
DOWNSCALING GLOBAL MEDIUM RANGE METEOROLOGICAL PREDICTIONS FOR FLOOD PREDICTION Nathalie Voisin, Andy W. Wood, Dennis P. Lettenmaier University of Washington,
VERIFICATION OF A DOWNSCALING SEQUENCE APPLIED TO MEDIUM RANGE METEOROLOGICAL PREDICTIONS FOR GLOBAL FLOOD PREDICTION Nathalie Voisin, Andy W. Wood and.
1 Yun Fan, Huug van den Dool, Dag Lohmann, Ken Mitchell CPC/EMC/NCEP/NWS/NOAA Kunming, May, 2004.
Seasonal Climate Forecasting for Applied Use in the Western USA Katherine Hegewisch 1, Renaud Barbero 2, John Abatzoglou 1 1 University of Idaho, Department.
NOAA Northeast Regional Climate Center Dr. Lee Tryhorn NOAA Climate Literacy Workshop April 2010 NOAA Northeast Regional Climate.
New HR-DDS User Services David J. S. Poulter, National Oceanography Centre, UK
UERRA User Workshop Toulouse, 4 th Feb 2016 Questions to the users.
Kostas Andreadis and Dennis Lettenmaier
Nathalie Voisin, Andy W. Wood and Dennis P. Lettenmaier
Recent Climate Change Modeling Results
Kostas M. Andreadis1, Dennis P. Lettenmaier1
A. Wood, A.F. Hamlet, M. McGuire, S. Babu and Dennis P. Lettenmaier
University of Washington Center for Science in the Earth System
Status of the Regional OSSE for Space-Based LIDAR Winds – Feb01
Presentation transcript:

A Regional Climate Model Evaluation System: Facilitating the Use of Contemporary Satellite and Other Observations for Evaluating Regional Climate Model Fidelity D. E. Waliser 1,2, J. Kim 2, C. Mattmann 1,3, C. Goodale 1, A. Hart 1, P. Zimdars 1 and P. Lean 1 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California Copyright All rights reserved. Understand uncertainty in projections Figure 1. The role of model evaluation in the model development process and uncertainty estimations. Regional Climate Model Evaluation System (RCMES) : Provide a fast, flexible, comprehensive system to allow easy comparison of climate models with observations. Enable researchers to handle a large volume of data and reduce time taken for model evaluation studies from weeks to hours. Help model developers with cutting-edge observations and diagnostics to evaluate and improve their models. Help end-users understand the uncertainties in climate projections for the regions of interest. Efficient: Fast access to reference data and toolkit User Friendly: Intuitive and transferrable GUI Flexible: Cloud-based architecture Expandable: Easy to add new data/analysis tool Scalable storage solution Regional Climate Model Evaluation System (RCMES) : Provide a fast, flexible, comprehensive system to allow easy comparison of climate models with observations. Enable researchers to handle a large volume of data and reduce time taken for model evaluation studies from weeks to hours. Help model developers with cutting-edge observations and diagnostics to evaluate and improve their models. Help end-users understand the uncertainties in climate projections for the regions of interest. Efficient: Fast access to reference data and toolkit User Friendly: Intuitive and transferrable GUI Flexible: Cloud-based architecture Expandable: Easy to add new data/analysis tool Scalable storage solution Future works: 1.Add additional reference datasets (e.g., other reanalysis, satellite data, in-situ) 2.Examine remote sensing data for evaluating fine-scale (<10km) regional climate data. 3.Additional metrics calculations and visualizations 4.Improve GUI 5.Use the system to evaluate regional/global climate models associated with National Climate Assessment (NCA), NARCCAP, CMIP5 and CORDEX (Africa and Asia). Reference Hart, A.F., C.E. Goodale, C.A. Mattmann, P. Zimdars, D. Crichton, P. Lean, J. Kim, and D.E. Waliser, 2011: A cloud-enabled regional climate evaluation system. SECLOUD’11, May 22, 2011, Waikiki, Honolulu, HI, USA. Future works: 1.Add additional reference datasets (e.g., other reanalysis, satellite data, in-situ) 2.Examine remote sensing data for evaluating fine-scale (<10km) regional climate data. 3.Additional metrics calculations and visualizations 4.Improve GUI 5.Use the system to evaluate regional/global climate models associated with National Climate Assessment (NCA), NARCCAP, CMIP5 and CORDEX (Africa and Asia). Reference Hart, A.F., C.E. Goodale, C.A. Mattmann, P. Zimdars, D. Crichton, P. Lean, J. Kim, and D.E. Waliser, 2011: A cloud-enabled regional climate evaluation system. SECLOUD’11, May 22, 2011, Waikiki, Honolulu, HI, USA. RCMES overview: Large database (MySQL + Apache Hadoop): Multiple reference datasets from: Satellite remote sensing TRMM ( ) AIRS ( ) MODIS Cloudiness Analysis CPC precipitation, CRU precipitation, 2-m air temperatures Assimilation SWR (SNODAS; JPL&U. Colorado) Reanalysis ERA-Interim (e.g. U(p), V(p), q(p), T(p), SLP) Extractors: Process data from various data formats into a common database schema. Library of statistical metrics: Python routines with plug-ins in other languages (Fortran, c, idl) to calculate and plot standard metrics of model performance. (e.g. Bias, RMS error, Anomaly Correlation, Probability Distribution Functions). RCMES overview: Large database (MySQL + Apache Hadoop): Multiple reference datasets from: Satellite remote sensing TRMM ( ) AIRS ( ) MODIS Cloudiness Analysis CPC precipitation, CRU precipitation, 2-m air temperatures Assimilation SWR (SNODAS; JPL&U. Colorado) Reanalysis ERA-Interim (e.g. U(p), V(p), q(p), T(p), SLP) Extractors: Process data from various data formats into a common database schema. Library of statistical metrics: Python routines with plug-ins in other languages (Fortran, c, idl) to calculate and plot standard metrics of model performance. (e.g. Bias, RMS error, Anomaly Correlation, Probability Distribution Functions). 1 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology; 2 JIFRESSE, UCLA; 3 University of Southern California Background: Why model evaluation? Climate model projections play a crucial role in developing plans to mitigate and adapt to climate variations and change for sustainable developments. Assessing model performance is an important step in linking climate simulation quality to projection uncertainty and then to climate change impacts assessments. Uncertainties propagate according to model hierarchy Bias correction is based on model evaluation Determination of the weights in multi-model ensemble Model evaluation is also a fundamental part of model development and improvement (Figure 1). Background: Why model evaluation? Climate model projections play a crucial role in developing plans to mitigate and adapt to climate variations and change for sustainable developments. Assessing model performance is an important step in linking climate simulation quality to projection uncertainty and then to climate change impacts assessments. Uncertainties propagate according to model hierarchy Bias correction is based on model evaluation Determination of the weights in multi-model ensemble Model evaluation is also a fundamental part of model development and improvement (Figure 1). RCMES High-level technical architecture RCMED (Regional Climate Model Evaluation Database) A large scalable database to store data in a common format RCMET (Regional Climate Model Evaluation Toolkit) A library of codes for extracting data from RCMED and model and for calculating evaluation metrics Raw Data: Various Formats, Resolutions, Coverage Metadata Data Table Common Format, Native grid, Efficient architecture Common Format, Native grid, Efficient architecture MySQL Extractor TRMM MODIS AIRS SWE ETC Soil moisture Extract OBS data Extract RCM data RCM data user choice Regridder Put the OBS & RCM data on the same grid for comparison Regridder Put the OBS & RCM data on the same grid for comparison Metrics Calculator Calculate comparison metrics Metrics Calculator Calculate comparison metrics Visualizer Plot the metrics Visualizer Plot the metrics URL User’s own codes for ANAL and VIS. Data extractor (Fortran binary) Data extractor (Fortran binary) Sample Graphical User interface Select model data Select Variable 2-m temperature Precipitation OLR (TOA) Cloud fraction 10m wind speed Next > TRMM AIRS level III gridded ERA-Interim URD SNODAS Select Reference Dataset Next > Select data period Next > Select Data Timestep Daily Monthly Seasonal Annual Next > Select Spatial Grid Reference Data Model Next > Select Metrics Mean bias RMSE Pattern correlation PDF Similarity score Coeff. of Efficiency Next > Select Plots Map Time series Process > Evaluation of the Simulated Cold Season Hydrology in California WRF; Oct 2008 – Mar 2009; NCEP Final Analysis forcing Evaluation of the Simulated Cold Season Hydrology in California WRF; Oct 2008 – Mar 2009; NCEP Final Analysis forcing WRF T2 (K): 00UTCAIRS T2 (K): Ascending passes (1:30PM)Bias (K): WRF-AIRS Seasonal-mean 2-m Air Temperature Season-total Precipitation (mm): Multiple Reference Data Bias (mm): WRF-TRMM WRF TRMM CPC Bias (mm): WRF- CPC Issues: Remote sensing data: Satellite fly-over timing Sensor footprints Multiple REF data: Differences between REF datasets Reference data intercomparison Observational uncertainty Issues: Remote sensing data: Satellite fly-over timing Sensor footprints Multiple REF data: Differences between REF datasets Reference data intercomparison Observational uncertainty Evaluation of the CORDEX-Africa Multi-Model Ensemble Preliminary 20-year runs; 1989 –2008 Evaluation of the CORDEX-Africa Multi-Model Ensemble Preliminary 20-year runs; 1989 –2008 ENS Overland mean (mm/day) RMSE (mm/day) Spatial Variability of the Precipitation Climatology using Taylor diagram Precipitation Annual Cycle in 6 Regions using Portrait diagram RMSE Correlation Intuitive presentation schema can facilitate intercomparison of multiple models For more information, please