1Presentation Name Pre-Marketing Safety Assessment: The Safety Review Guidance Armando Oliva, M.D. Associate Director for Policy Office of New Drugs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Information Professionals Role in Product Safety Jack Leitmeyer Director, Adverse Experience Information Management Worldwide Product Safety Merck.
Advertisements

Safety Reporting IN Clinical Trials
Protocol Development.
Safety and Extrapolation Steven Hirschfeld, MD PhD Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapy Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research FDA.
TITLE OF PROJECT PROPOSAL NUMBER Principal Investigator PI’s Organization ESTCP Selection Meeting DATE.
Strengthening the Medical Device Clinical Trial Enterprise
1 Proposed Pharmacovigilance Plan for H5N1 Influenza Virus Vaccine Patrick Caubel, MD, PhD Head of Pharmacovigilance North America February 27, 2007.
Update: 21 CFR PART 312 FDA Safety Reporting Requirements for INDs
Safety Review for Plan B Daniel Davis, MD, MPH Division of Reproductive/Urologic Drugs.
Introduction to the State-Level Mitigation 20/20 TM Software for Management of State-Level Hazard Mitigation Planning and Programming A software program.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH Working with FDA: Biological Products and Clinical Development Critical Path.
Interpreting Adverse Signals in Diabetes Drug Development Programs Featured Article: Clifford J. Bailey, Ph.D. Diabetes Care Volume 36: 1-9 July, 2013.
Effectiveness Evaluation for Therapeutic Drugs for Non-Food Animals
Postmarketing Risk Assessment of Drug Products Division of Drug Risk Evaluation Office of Drug Safety Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
Training Workshop on Pharmaceutical Development with a Focus on Paediatric Medicines / October |1 | Regulatory Requirement on Dossier of Medicinal.
CDER IND/NDA Reviews Guidance, The Common Technical Document and Good Review Practice John K. Leighton, Ph.D., DABT CDER/FDA.
1 Alvimopan RiskMAP Joyce Weaver, Pharm.D., BCPS Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology.
FDA Recalls Risk Communication Advisory Committee David K. Elder Director, Office of Enforcement.
An Update on NSAID Labeling and Data Review DSaRM Advisory Committee February 10, 2006 Sharon Hertz, M.D. Deputy Director Division of Anesthesia, Analgesia,
H. Lundbeck A/S21-Sep-151 Pharmacovigilance during clinical development SAE reporting, ASUR and PSUR IFF Seminar, 21. February 2007.
DSaRM Advisory Committee May 19, 2005 Postmarketing Studies: OND Perspective Julie Beitz MD, Deputy Director, Office of Drug Evaluation III, Office of.
Overview of Issues for Psychopharmacological Drugs Advisory Committee June 16, 2003 WBC Monitoring for Clozapine Judith A. Racoosin, MD, MPH Safety Team.
ADVERSE EFFECTS OF DRUGS Phase II May Adverse Drug Reaction An adverse reaction to a drug is a harmful or unintended response. ADRs are claimed.
ICH V2 An FDA Update Susan Lu Office of Drug Safety Center for Drug Evaluation and Research FDA January 21, 2003.
Reproductive Health Drugs, Pregnancy Labeling Subcommittee Meeting March 28-29, 2000 Holli A. Hamilton, M.D., M.P.H. Pregnancy Labeling Team Office of.
MODULE B: Case Report Forms Jane Fendl & Denise Thwing April 7, Version: Final 07-Apr-2010.
Drug Submissions: Review Process Agnes V. Klein, MD Biologics and Genetic Therapies Directorate February, 2003 www/hc-sc.gc.ca/hpb-dgps/therapeut.
CTD, Safety Tanja Braakman Genzyme Europe BV Pharmacovigilance Department.
Chapter 6 CRISIS MANAGEMENT. Introduction - Crisis: ◦is a situation that specifically involves a pharmaceutical product, medical device or activity with.
Integrated Analyses of Safety Data needed! Marie Louise Valentin, MD Director of Corporate Drug Safety.
Joint Meeting of Anti-Infective Drugs & Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committees December 14-15, 2006 Ketek  (telithromycin) Regulatory History.
Risk Management in premarketing phase Anshu Vashishtha MD PhD (in individual capacity employer : Watson Pharmaceuticals)
Concept Paper #3: Risk Assessment of Observational Data Session 1: Good Pharmacovigilance Practices Linda S. Hostelley on behalf of PhRMA.
Deciding how much confidence to place in a systematic review What do we mean by confidence in a systematic review and in an estimate of effect? How should.
1 1 Zelnorm ® (tegaserod maleate) Advisory Committee Presentation Gastrointestinal Drugs July 14, 2004.
Summary of Findings Improving the System of Reporting and Interpreting Unexpected Serious Adverse Events to Investigators Conducting Research Under an.
Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committee May 18-19, Overview of Drug Safety Challenges Gerald J. Dal Pan, MD, MHS Director Division of.
DIVISION OF REPRODUCTIVE AND UROLOGIC PRODUCTS Physician Labeling Rule Lisa Soule, M.D.
The New Drug Development Process (www. fda. gov/cder/handbook/develop
Clinical Pharmacology Subcommittee of the Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science Meeting April Quantitative risk analysis using exposure-response.
Rules for Supporting Part 803 and Part 806 Decision Making Page 1 Establishing Rules for: Medical Device Reports (803) & Correction and Removal Reports.
(Slide 1 of 22) Response to the National Vaccine Advisory Committee Recommendations on the Immunization Safety Office Scientific Agenda Frank DeStefano,
SHOPS is funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development. Abt Associates leads the project in collaboration with Banyan Global Jhpiego Marie Stopes.
1 Optimal Strategies for Preparing Integrated and Clinical Summaries for a New Drug Application: Making it Work Under Any Circumstance Lisa A. Pierchala,
FDA Regulatory and Compliance Symposium
Good Pharmacovigilance Practices
FDA1 Overview of Postmarketing Safety Surveillance in FDA (For Drugs and Biologics) Min Chen, M.S., R.Ph. Min Chen, M.S., R.Ph. Associate Director Division.
General Regulatory Issues in the Development of Drugs Intended for Treatment of Chronic Illness Sharon Hertz, M.D. Medical Officer Division of Anesthetic,
July 15, Postmarketing Safety Evaluation of Approved Drugs and Risk Management Victor F. C. Raczkowski, MD, MS Director, Office of Drug Safety July.
October 28, F OOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION AMENDMENTS ACT OF 2007 (FDAAA) and Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS) Presented to the Ninth.
Postmarketing Pharmacovigilance Practice at FDA Lanh Green, Pharm.D., M.P.H. Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology June 21, 2006.
European Patients’ Academy on Therapeutic Innovation Introduction to pharmacovigilance Monitoring the safety of medicines.
Applying New Science to Drug Safety Janet Woodcock, M.D. Acting Deputy Commissioner for Operations April 15, 2005.
Methods We employ the UMLS Metathesaurus to annotate ICD-9 codes to MedDRA preferred terms (PTs) using the three-step process below. The mapping was applied.
27 June 2000Victor F. C. Raczkowski, M.D.1 Risk-Management Options Victor F. C. Raczkowski, M.D., M.S. Gastrointestinal Drugs Advisory Committee 27 June.
Pre-Investigational New Drug (pre-IND) Meeting with FDA
The Information Professional’s Role in Product Safety
8. Causality assessment:
11 viii. Develop capacity for signal detection and causality assessment Multi-partner training package on active TB drug safety monitoring and management.
Improving Adverse Drug Reaction Information in Product Labels
3. Key definitions Multi-partner training package on active TB drug safety monitoring and management (aDSM) July 2016.
FDA Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff Summary of Public Notification of Emerging Postmarket Medical Device Signals (“Emerging Signals”) Effective: December.
Pharmacovigilance in clinical trials
9. Introduction to signal detection
Combination products The paradigm shift
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
11 iii. Define management and supervision roles and responsibilities
Safety analysis of clinical trials in NDA submissions JSM 2018, Jul
Overview of FDA’s 2005 Risk Management Guidance
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Presentation transcript:

1Presentation Name Pre-Marketing Safety Assessment: The Safety Review Guidance Armando Oliva, M.D. Associate Director for Policy Office of New Drugs

2Presentation Name Reviewer Guidance: Conducting a Clinical Safety Review of a New Product Application and Preparing a Report on the Review Issued February 2005 Collaborative effort across CDER: OND, ODS, OMP OMP was the lead office in finalizing and issuing the guidance

3Presentation Name What is the guidance’s purpose? Assist reviewers conducting the clinical NDA/BLA safety review Describe Good Review Practices (GRP) for a premarketing safety review Provide Standardization and Consistency of format and content Ensure critical presentations and analyses of safety data are not omitted

4Presentation Name Safety Review Guidance and the Clinical Review Template Clinical Review Template MAPP Issued in July 2004 Headings for the safety review in the template are harmonized with the guidance Guidance provides an expansion of the annotations to Section 7 of the template: the Integrated Review of Safety

5Presentation Name Collaboration Guidance geared toward the clinical reviewer Recognizes the need for additional skill sets: analysis of event rates, subgroup differences, identification of risk factors Guidance stresses the need for collaboration with biostatistical colleagues when necessary

6Presentation Name What’s in the Guidance? Advice on how to conduct and organize the safety review Annotated Outline of the safety component of the clinical review of an NDA/BLA

7Presentation Name Safety Review : Four Principal Tasks 1.Identify serious AEs that could: Prevent use altogether Limit use Require special risk management efforts 2.Estimate frequency of common AEs 3.Evaluate adequacy of the data and the analyses (eg, was exposure at relevant doses adequate?) 4.Identify unresolved safety concerns that need further attention (either pre-approval, or post- marketing)

8Presentation Name Safety Review: Additional Tasks Identify factors that predict the occurrence of AEs (both intrinsic and extrinsic) Identify ways to avoid AEs (dosing, monitoring) and ways to manage them when they occur Provide comprehensive evaluation of risk information to support labeling

9Presentation Name Key Sources of Safety Information Integrated Summary/Analysis of Safety (ISS) AE tables in the NDA/BLA submission CRFs for SAEs and adverse dropouts (ADOs) AE data listings, laboratory listings, including baseline listings (often electronic) Narratives of deaths, other SAEs, ADOs Patient profiles (individual displays of safety data over time) Safety section of proposed labeling CTD safety-related sections (2.5.5, 2.7.4) Other: eg, data on related drugs, AE coding dictionaries

10Presentation Name Causality Determination Heavily dependent on comparisons of event rates between treatment groups Coding of AEs very important in order to get the correct numerator Emphasis on individual case review of deaths, SAEs, and ADOs

11Presentation Name The Safety Review: Organization 7.1 Methods and Findings 7.2 Adequacy of Patient Exposure and Safety Assessment 7.3 Summary of Selected Adverse Reactions, Important Limitations of Data And Conclusions 7.4 General Methodology

12Presentation Name 7.1 Methods and Findings How did the applicant assess safety, and what were the findings? Discusses the relevant data sources Safety assessments that were conducted Major safety findings Use of a systematic approach

13Presentation Name 7.1 Methods and Findings Deaths SAEs ADOs, other sign. AEs Other Search Strategies Common AEs Less Common AEs Laboratory Findings Vital Signs ECGs Immunogenicity Human Carcinogenicity Special Safety Studies Withdrawal / Abuse Repro / Pregnancy Effect on Growth Overdose Postmarketing Exper.

14Presentation Name 7.2 Adequacy of Patient Exposure and Safety Assessments Was patient exposure adequate? (e.g., overall numbers, duration, dose levels, in specific subgroups Quality and Completeness of the safety evaluation (animal tests, in vitro tests, long-term safety testing, specific assessments) Are additional safety testing needed, either pre-approval or post-marketing?

15Presentation Name 7.3 Summary of Selected AEs, Important Limitations of Data, and Conclusions Brief summary of the critical findings of the safety review Contains AEs that the review considers important and drug-related Summary of important limitations of the safety database Safety conclusions

16Presentation Name 7.4 General Methodology Describes analytical methods used in the safety review General discussion of methodological issues not discussed elsewhere What studies were pooled and why? How was exploration for predictive factors conducted? How was causality determined?

17Presentation Name Summary Final guidance on how to conduct a clinical NDA/BLA safety review Promotes Good Review Practices (GRP) Provides Standardization and Consistency of format and content of the safety review Ensure critical presentations and analyses of safety data are not omitted Harmonized with the Clinical Review Template