Primary target field: industrial organization Secondary target field: financial economics, game theory Paper: Exit in duopoly under uncertainty Thesis:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Headlines III. Elasticity What does elasticity measure? Know how to measure the elasticity of demand for a good wrt its price from a graph or table Interpret.
Advertisements

Introduction Market power and tariffs The non-equivalence of tariffs and quota's Strategic trade policy The nature of competition Evaluation of strategic.
ASPECTS OF EXTERNAL MARKET ENVIRONMENT Product Demand—how price sensitive, can demand be segmented, advertising, etc. Competition—how many firms, product.
Lecture #11: Introduction to the New Empirical Industrial Organization (NEIO) - What is the old empirical IO? The old empirical IO refers to studies that.
© 2009 Pearson Education Canada 16/1 Chapter 16 Game Theory and Oligopoly.
Beyond the Reach of the Invisible Hand: Impediments to Economic Activity, Market Failures, and Profitability Dennis A. Yao Strategic Management Journal,
Game Theory Asia Burrill, Marc Relford, Bridgette Mallet.
MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION, OLIGOPOLY, & GAME THEORY
OLIGOPOLY Oligopoly is a market with few sellers selling similar or identical products. “Few” means more than one, but not so many that each firm doesn’t.
ECON 201 OLIGOPOLIES & GAME THEORY 1. FIGURE 12.4 DUOPOLY EQUILIBRIUM IN A CENTRALIZED CARTEL 2.
FINA 522: Project Finance and Risk Analysis Lecture 12 Updated: 19 May 2007.
PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook Gordon Walker McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2004 McGraw Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 6 Vertical.
© 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc Chapter 16 Game Theory and Oligopoly.
Basic Oligopoly Models
Strategic Management/ Business Policy
Good Research Questions. A paradigm consists of – a set of fundamental theoretical assumptions that the members of the scientific community accept as.
CHAPTER 9 Basic Oligopoly Models Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written.
ANNOUNCEMENTS Review class: Monday, December 13 4:15-5:15, LC6 Final Exam: Friday, December 17 10:30-12:30, LC1 80 multiple choice choice questions Chapts.
Gianpaolo Rossini University of Bologna 1 Vertical integration, disintegration and ability to export Gianpaolo Rossini and Laura Vici Department of Economics,
Competitive Industry Equilibrium and Response to Changes in its Environment.
Introduction to Game Theory and Strategic Interactions.
Economics: Principles and Applications, 2e by Robert E. Hall & Marc Lieberman.
Type author names here © Oxford University Press, All rights reserved. Operations Management Chapter 2 Winning Customers and Competing Effectively.
1 Monopolistic Competition & Oligopoly ©2005 South-Western College Publishing Key Concepts Key Concepts Summary.
Monopolistic Competition Monopoly –one firm –faces downward sloping demand curve Competition –many firms –face flat demand curve –free entry and exit.
External Analysis Industry Structure The Porter 5-Forces Model Success Factors.
Resolving the Commitment Versus Flexibility Trade-off : The role of Resource Accumulation Lags Goncalso Pacheco-de-Almeida James E. Henderson Karel O.
Maximizing the Probability of Journal Article Acceptance By Ron C. Mittelhammer.
Competing For Advantage
Oligopolies & Game Theory
Chapter 6 Analyzing the Industry and Market. Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.6 | 2 Learning Objectives Explain the industry.
10 | Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly Monopolistic Competition Oligopoly.
February 9, 2008 GLOPE-TCER Joint Junior Workshop 1 Interregional Mixed Duopoly, Location and Welfare Tomohiro Inoue*, Yoshio Kamijo and Yoshihiro Tomaru.
Monopolistic competition and Oligopoly
Pricing of Competing Products BI Solutions December
Firms Overview  Perfect Competition and Monopoly= Extremes  Oligopolies and Monopolistically Competitive Firms= Dominate U.S. economy  Monopolistically.
BAB 12 : ECONOMICS OF PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter 9: Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
For more course tutorials visit ECO 365 Final Exam Guide (New) 1Because you can only obtain more of one good by giving up some of another.
Monopolistic Competition & Oligopoly. Unit Objectives Describe the characteristics of monopolistic competition and oligopoly Discover how monopolistic.
ECO 365 Entire Course For more classes visit ECO 365 Week 1 Discussion Question 1 ECO 365 Week 1 Discussion Question 2 ECO 365 Week.
Welcome to the Department of Economics Chandidas Mahavidyalaya -Prof. Subhalakshmi Paul.
Monopolistic Competition & Oligopoly
Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition
Strategic Management/ Business Policy
MARKET STRUCTURE 2: MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION AND OLIGOPOLY
Power Point Set 9b: Competitive Dynamics: Real Options
Oligopolies & Game Theory
Module 67: Introduction to Monopolisitic Competition
Today Oligopoly Theory Economic Experiment in Class.
ECO 365 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com.
ECO 365 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
ECO 365 GUIDE Education for Service-- eco365guide.com.
Chapter 12: Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition
Power Point Set 9b: Competitive Dynamics: Real Options
Oligopolies & Game Theory
MARKET STRUCTURE 2: MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION AND OLIGOPOLY
Perfect Competition (part 1)
Technical Change, Competition and Vertical Integration
Strategic Management/ Business Policy
Economics Market Structures.
Introduction to Monopolistic Competition
Strategic Management/ Business Policy
Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly
Competition and Market Structure
Power Point Set 9b: Competitive Dynamics: Real Options
Less competition Perfect Competition Monopolistic Competition
MANAGERIAL ECONOMICS By Alex Barkers-Okwan
Microeconomics ECON 2302 Spring 2011
Strategic Management/ Business Policy
Presentation transcript:

Primary target field: industrial organization Secondary target field: financial economics, game theory Paper: Exit in duopoly under uncertainty Thesis: On investment, uncertainty, and strategic interaction with applications in energy markets Pauli Murto

Problem analyzed: There is uncertainty on the developments of industries; markets fluctuate: demand shifts, technological expectations fail, etc. When the market declines, it may become optimal for a firm to exit The problem is related but opposite to the optimal investment problem When considered in isolation from competition, the optimal timing of exit is straight-forward to solve using the same methodology as investment However, when there are many firms in the industry, the exit of a given firm affects the profitability of the remaining ones This results in a strategic interaction, where the firms would typically like to see their competitors exit as early as possible What is their Nash-equilibrium exit pattern? When do they exit and who exits first? How does uncertainty affect the equilibrium?

Background literature: Literature on real options: –Exit without strategic interaction: uncertainty increases reluctancy to exit –Some new literature on entry games with uncertainty: opposite strategic interaction to exit Industrial organization literature: –Exit with the focus on strategic interaction, but no uncertainty –Unique sub-game perfect equilibrium exit pattern with asymmetric firms: the large firm exits before the small firm Stopping game literature: –Some results on specific classes of continuous time stopping games exist, but none directly applicable to the present case This paper combines these literatures to consider exit under both uncertainty and strategic interaction

Results: The incorporation of uncertainty requires a refined definition of strategies compared to the deterministic IO models: Markov strategies Some results from the IO literature carry over to the stochastic market: e.g.: unique sub-game perfect equilibrium exit pattern with low degree of uncertainty However, subgame perfectness criterion may suddenly lose its effect when uncertainty is increased beyond some point! The contribution can be seen from two angles: –Extension of the real options theory to consider abandonment options in oligopoly –Extension of the theory of industrial organization to consider market stability as one of the factors explaining the firms’ behavior Also a new result in the theory of stopping games

Publication plan : Under review in the RAND Journal of Economics since 1/2002 First answer in 5/2002: –Too long and technical for the journal –One of the referees doubts some results –Contribution considered important by both referees and the editor –Thorough and qualified reports Revision submitted in 8/2002: –Considerably shortened –Presentation of the results simplified –All referees’ comments addressed Report from the thesis examinors in 11/2002: –Significance of the questions analyzed should be better justified and interpretation of the results should be strengthened Current plan: –Minor revisions according to the comments of the thesis examinors –Waiting for the answer from the journal