DACS Describing Archives: A Content Standard. The Background  Archives, Personal Papers & Manuscripts, 1980s –New Technologies with Web, XML, EAD –Revision.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A New International Standard for Describing Functions: ICA-ISDF
Advertisements

Future of Cataloging RDA and other innovations Pt. 2.
Integrated Archives and Manuscript System – IAMS Bill Stockting, S&C Cataloguing Systems and Processing Manager and Wieke Avis, IAMS Officer: UKAD Forum,
RDA Test Train the Trainer Module 2: Structure [Content as of Mar. 31, 2010]
Adapting Archives to EMu. Corporate Records Excavation Records Personal Papers Byzantine Research Fund Archive Art Collection Exhibitions.
Creating Finding Aids Sara Casper Government Records Archivist South Dakota State Archives.
RDA & Serials. RDA Toolkit CONSER RDA Cataloging Checklist for Textual Serials (DRAFT) CONSER RDA Core Elements Where’s that Tool? CONSER RDA Cataloging.
RDA Test at LC Module 1: Overview What RDA Is; Structure.
RDA: A New Standard Supporting Resource Discovery Presentation given at the CLA conference session The Future of Resource Discovery: Promoting Resource.
Teaching RDA Train-the-trainer course for RDA: Resource Description and Access Presented by the National Library of Australia September – November 2012.
Providing Online Access to the HKUST University Archives: EAD to INNOPAC Sintra Tsang and K.T. Lam The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology 7th.
EAD in A2A Bill Stockting, Senior Editor A2A and EAD Working Group: Central Archives of Historical Records, Warsaw, 26 April 2003.
1 Salvatore Vassallo Navigating through archives, libraries and museums: topic maps as a harmonizing instrument University of.
RDA: Resource Description and Access A New Cataloging Standard for a Digital Future Jennifer Bowen OLAC 2006 Conference October 27, 2006
RDA: Resource Description and Access A New Cataloging Standard for a Digital Future Jennifer Bowen Cornell University May 16, 2006
Descriptive Cataloging of Monographs 1. Introduction DRAFT.
RDA AND AUTHORITY CONTROL Name: Hester Marais Job Title: Authority Describer Tel: Your institution's logo.
The European Manuscript & Hand Press Book Heritage The role of the Consortium of European Research Libraries (CERL) Manuscript Collection in the National.
By Carrie Moran. To examine the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) metadata scheme to determine its utility based on structure, interoperability.
Archival Organization and Description Overview of DACS
Mark Sullivan University of Florida Libraries Digital Library of the Caribbean.
FRAD: Functional Requirements for Authority Data.
Society of American Archivists Research Forum 18 August 2015 A Deep Dive into the Archival MARC Records in WorldCat (and ArchiveGrid) Jackie Dooley Program.
CONSER RDA Bridge Training [date] Presenters : [names] 1.
Jan. 29, 2004OLA SuperConference Changes to AACR2 Problems and Solutions Pat Riva (McGill University) Maureen Killeen (A-G Canada Ltd.)
ARCHIVISTS’ TOOLKIT WORKSHOP March 13, 2008 Christine de Catanzaro Jody Thompson.
RDA Toolkit With thanks to Lori Robare (University of Oregon) and Robert Maxwell (Brigham Young University) for most of these slides.
389F/Description1 ARCHIVAL DESCRIPTION. 389F/Description2 INTRODUCTION Finding Aid Any descriptive medium that establishes physical, administrative and/or.
Archivists' Toolkit - CRADLE Presentation, 10 Feb The Archivists’ Toolkit CRADLE Presentation 10 Feb
From AACR2 to RDA: An Evolution Kathy Glennan University of Maryland.
RDA: Resource Description and Access A New Cataloging Standard for a Digital Future Jennifer Bowen RDA Forum ALA Annual Meeting, New Orleans, June 24,
RDA in NACO Module 6.a RDA Chapter 11: Identifying Corporate Bodies—Overview Recording the Attributes.
The Future of Cataloging Codes and Systems: IME ICC, FRBR, and RDA by Dr. Barbara B. Tillett Chief, Cataloging Policy & Support Office Library of Congress.
RDA in NACO Module 4.a Module 4.b Module 4.c RDA Chapter 9: Identifying Persons— Overview Recording the Attributes.
Introduction to Metadata Jenn Riley Metadata Librarian IU Digital Library Program.
DACS: Describing Archival Materials. ISAD(G)/DACS ISAD(G) only / DACS only Reference Code Name/Location of Repository Title Date(s) Level of Description.
PACSCL Consortial Survey Initiative Group Training Session February 12, 2008 at The Historical Society of Pennsylvania.
 Why do we catalog?  Why do we classify?  What aspects are important?  What aspects can we let go of?
Setting a new standard Resource Description and Access Deirdre Kiorgaard 18 September 2006.
AACR2 Pt. 1, Monographic Description LIS Session 2.
RDA Compared with AACR2 Presentation given at the ALA conference program session Look Before You Leap: taking RDA for a test-drive July 11, 2009 by Tom.
RDA DAY 1 – part 2 web version 1. 2 When you catalog a “book” in hand: You are working with a FRBR Group 1 Item The bibliographic record you create will.
Building blocks for RDA Theory behind RDA ALLUNY Annual Meeting September 28-30, 2012.
The physical parts of a computer are called hardware.
Intellectual Works and their Manifestations Representation of Information Objects IR Systems & Information objects Spring January, 2006 Bharat.
Unless otherwise noted, the content of this course material is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
How Do We Keep From Getting Further Behind? A Case Study in the Application of Minimal-Level Description in the OSU Archives Elizabeth Nielsen Northwest.
Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records The Changing Face of Cataloging William E. Moen Texas Center for Digital Knowledge School of Library.
AACR 2 –Rules for Descriptive Cataloguing
Metadata “Data about data” Describes various aspects of a digital file or group of files Identifies the parts of a digital object and documents their content,
OCLC Research Library Partnership Work-In-Progress webinar 3 December 2015 A Close Look at the Four Million Archival MARC Records in WorldCat Jackie Dooley.
Basic Encoded Archival Description METRO New York Library Council Workshop Presented by Lara Nicosia December 9, 2011 New York, NY.
LC Training for RDA: Resource Description & Access Module 5: Authorities I Part 4: RDA Toolkit Cooperative and Instructional Programs Division Library.
RDA: a new cataloging standard for a digital future RDA Update Forum ALA Midwinter Meeting Philadelphia, PA January 13, 2008 John Attig ALA Representative.
Teaching RDA Train-the-trainer course for RDA: Resource Description and Access Presented by the National Library of Australia September – November 2012.
RDA: history and background Ann Huthwaite Library Resource Services Manager, QUT ACOC Seminar, Sydney, 24 October 2008.
The British Library Guide to RDA Name Authority Records © The British Library Board 2014.
Presented by: Amy Carson, Trisha Hansen and Jonathan Sears.
The ___ is a global network of computer networks Internet.
Archivists' Toolkit - All Hands Meeting Scope Both multilevel and single-level description Accommodates description of collections, series, sub-series,
Some basic concepts Week 1 Lecture notes INF 384C: Organizing Information Spring 2016 Karen Wickett UT School of Information.
Information organization Week 2 Lecture notes INF 380E: Perspectives on Information Spring 2015 Karen Wickett UT School of Information.
Information organization Week 2 Lecture notes INF 380E: Perspectives on Information Spring 2015 Karen Wickett UT School of Information.
7th Annual Hong Kong Innovative Users Group Meeting
Describing Archives: A Content Standard
Innovative projects at the UA library
Metadata Standards - Types
FRAD: Functional Requirements for Authority Data
What It Is, and Why It Helps Christine de Catanzaro August 23, 2006
FRBR and FRAD as Implemented in RDA
Presentation transcript:

DACS Describing Archives: A Content Standard

The Background  Archives, Personal Papers & Manuscripts, 1980s –New Technologies with Web, XML, EAD –Revision to include rules for finding aids and catalog records –ISAD and ISAAR (CPF)  CUSTARD Project (Canadian-U.S. Task Force on Archival Description), 2001 –Replace APPM and RAD –Accommodate ISAD and ISAAR (CPF) –Apply to all types of archival material –Apply to all levels of description (MARC to finding aid) –Apply regardless of descriptive output (MARC, EAD, DB) –Too many differences between Canada and US

Relationship to APPM  APPM –Only for catalog records –APPM has 2 parts  I. Description  II. Headings & Uniform Titles  DACS –Applies to all levels of description –DACS has 3 parts  I. Describing Archival Materials  II. Describing Creators  III. Forms of Names –More guidance on content of the data element –DACS omits areas irrelevant to archival material (bibliographic series)

Structure of DACS  Statement of Principles –Basis for the rules in DACS –Explains the nature of Archival Material, the context in which they were created, and the need to reflect the relationship between records and the activities that generated them in the description.

Overview of Archival Description  Main Objective of Archival Description is to create Access Tools that aid users in discovering desired records.  Access Points –Natural language must be translated into a formal subject heading from standardized thesaurus (LCSH) –Permits faster and precise searching –Names (creator, title, S&C, Bio, Custodial History,Immediate Source of Acquisition) –Places (creator, title, S&C, Bio) –Subjects (Title, S&C, Bio) –Documentary forms (Title, Extent, S&C) –Occupations (S&C, Bio) –Functions (Title, S&C, Bio)

Part I:Describing Archival Materials  25 elements for describing archival material  Output neutral  No required order of elements  Levels of Description –Single-Level (describes material at one level only) and Multi-Level (must have a sublevel) –Description must meet minimum set of elements –Minimum, Optimum and Added Value

Multilevel Minimum  Reference Code  Name and Location of Repository  Title  Date  Extent  Name of Creator  Scope and Content (brief)  Conditions Governing Access  Language and Scripts of the Material  Identification of the whole-part relationship of top level to the next subsequent level.  Each subsequent level should include all above elements unless the information is the same as that of a higher level

Multilevel Optimum  All elements in Minimum  Administrative/Biographical History  Scope and Content (full)  Access Points  Each subsequent level should include all elements at higher levels, and identification of the whole-part relationship to next level

Multilevel Added Value  All elements in Multilevel optimum  Any other elements the repository wishes to use

Data Element Rules in DACS  Rules for each data element are numbered (2.5.1)  For each element DACS provides : –Purpose and scope –Commentary –Exclusions –Sources of Information –General Rules –Example in EAD and MARC 21

Part II: Describing Creators  3 Steps to create documentation that establishes archival context –1. Identifying Creators (Chapter 9) (2.6) –2. Administrative/Biographical History (Chapter 10) (2.7) –3. Authority Records (Chapter 11) –Put names in a standardized form to facilitate retrieval of information across descriptions, systems and institutions

Identifying Creators: Chapter 9  Rules for determining which entities need to be documented as creators  Names are also Access Points  Creating this Access Point links all records by a particular person, etc. together

Authority Records: Chapter 11  Based on ISAAR (CPF)  4 Types of Information: –Authoritative form of the name with reference to any variant forms (see Pt. 3) –History and Activities associated with the entity (see Chapter 10) –References to related persons, family, corporate bodies –Management information on the creation and status of the authority record

Part III: Forms of Names Rules for creating standardized forms of names Rules for creating standardized forms of names Form of Names for Persons and Families (Chapter 12) Form of Names for Persons and Families (Chapter 12) Form of Geographic Names (Chapter 13 Form of Geographic Names (Chapter 13 Form of Names for Corporate Bodies (Chapter 14) Form of Names for Corporate Bodies (Chapter 14) Follows AACR2 numbering in Chapters respectively Follows AACR2 numbering in Chapters respectively

Example EAD Template  UCLA-Clark Library  bin/oactools/template/oacead/ucla- bin/oactools/template/oacead/ucla- bin/oactools/template/oacead/ucla-  Template Guide  olkit/templates/help3-4.html olkit/templates/help3-4.html olkit/templates/help3-4.html