1 Critical Path Research: Getting New Technology from Bench to Bedside A Device Perspective FDA Science Board November 5, 2004 Dan Schultz Director, CDRH.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Elizabeth Mansfield, PhD OIVD Public meeting July 19, 2010
Advertisements

Challenges in Using a Formal Decision Analysis Approach to Medical Device Approval Larry Kessler, Sc.D. Director, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration Notice: Archived Document The content in this document is provided on the FDAs website for reference purposes only. It.
BME-IDEA Workshop, September 28, 2005
November 20, 2014 FY2015 Q2 Review. Safe Harbor Statement 2 This presentation includes forward‐looking statements. Forward‐looking statements may be identified.
AXENDIA  Bringing Medical Devices to the Market Bringing Medical Devices to the Market Paths and Pitfalls By Daniel R. Matlis and David J. Lennard February.
The Statisticians Role in Pharmaceutical Development
Strengthening the Medical Device Clinical Trial Enterprise
1 FDA Update - CDRH Markham C. Luke, MD PhD Deputy Director for Clinical Office of Device Evaluation, CDRH, FDA May 15, 2012 NORD Corporate Council.
FDA’s Critical Path to New Medical Product Development Opportunities from the Center for Devices and Radiological Health Larry Kessler, Sc.D., Director.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH Working with FDA: Biological Products and Clinical Development Critical Path.
Cancer Nanotechnology: New Opportunities for Targeted Therapies FDA Public Meeting October 10, 2006 Piotr Grodzinski, Ph.D. Director, Nanotechnology for.
Premarket Review Performance Goals Donna-Bea Tillman Director, Office of Device Evaluation Director, Office of Device Evaluation Don St. Pierre Deputy.
CBER Managed Review Process Sheryl A. Kochman Deputy Director, DBA, OBRR, CBER September 15, 2009.
The FDA Landscape AdvaMed September 2008 Judith K. Meritz
+ Medical Devices Approval Process. + Objectives Define a medical device Be familiar with the classification system for medical devices Understand the.
Research & Innovation Horizon societal challenge 1 Open Info Day Funding Opportunities for SMEs Horizon 2020 "Health, demographic change and wellbeing"
Classification of HLA Devices FDA Introduction & Background Sheryl A. Kochman CBER/OBRR/DBA.
GLOBAL REGULATORY STRATEGY CONSIDERATIONS SCIENTIFIC SARAH POWELL EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, REGULATORY STRATEGIES SEPTEMBER 14-17, 2008 BOSTON, MA.
FDA Recalls Risk Communication Advisory Committee David K. Elder Director, Office of Enforcement.
Office of Combination Products: Current Initiatives
Therapeutic Goods Administration An introduction to the work of Australia’s regulator of therapeutic goods.
Regulatory Update Ellen Leinfuss SVP, Life Sciences.
1 THE UNIQUE ROLES OF IRB IN MEDICAL DEVICE CLINICALL TRIAL Chiu Lin, Ph.D. CITI, May, 2009 CITI, May, 2009.
POSTMARKETING ADVERSE DRUG EXPERIENCE INSPECTIONAL PROGRAM CDR Thomas R. Berry, RPh FDA, Investigator RAL-RP / ATL-DO.
FDA Regulatory review in Minutes: What Product Development Executives Need-to-Know. Specifically, frequent causes of recalls and related areas that investigators.
What Makes a Good Medical Device Adverse Event Report?
Patient Safety and Medical Devices Sonia Swayze, RN, MA, C and Suzanne Rich, RN, MA, CT.
The Medical Device Pathway as a Legal Onramp for Futuristic Persons THE FUTURE T HE M EDICAL D EVICE P ATHWAY AS A L EGAL.
Industry Perspective on Challenges for Product Developers - Drugs Christine Allison, M.S., RAC Associate Regulatory Consultant, Global Regulatory Affairs.
NCI Review of the Clinical Trials Process 6 th Annual National Forum on Biomedical Imaging in Oncology James H. Doroshow M.D. April 7, 2005 Bethesda, Maryland.
INTRODUCTION TO RA.
Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy Director Office of Pharmaceutical Science, CDER, FDA ACPS Subcommittee on Manufacturing Science: Identification and Prioritization.
Understanding the Pre-IDE Program: FDA Perspective
New Draft Guidance for Multiplex Tests Elizabeth Mansfield and Michele Schoonmaker Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety (OIVD) CDRH/FDA.
1 Medical Device User Fee and Modernization Act (MDUFMA II) Legislative Recommendations April 30, 2007.
1 CDRH: Minimizing Risk of TSE Agents in Medical Devices CDR Martha O’Lone, RN, BSN CDRH TSE Working Group Chair Infection Control Devices Branch DAGID.
Molecule-to-Market-Place Quality
Clinical Writing for Interventional Cardiologists.
The FDA: Basic Facts It takes 12 to 15 years to develop a single drug Only 1 in 10,000 potential medications makes it completely through the process Only.
REGULATION OF COMBINATION PRODUCTS Mark A. Heller Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP MassMEDIC Combination Product Program, March 28, 2006.
Current Plan for Critical Path Initiative Janet Woodcock, M.D. Acting Deputy Commissioner For Operations November 5, 2004.
Regulatory Decision Making D. Kathleen Wright, Reviewer Division of Microbiology Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation & Safety ( OIVD ) Food.
1 Operation of the Prescription Drug User Fee Program Janet Woodcock, M.D. Deputy Commissioner for Operations November 14, 2005.
FDA Science Board CDER Drug Safety Update November 6, 2005 Rockville, MD Steven Galson, MD, MPH Director, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Food.
What HIT Policy Changes Will Mean for MedTech October 22, 2004 Blair Childs Executive Vice President, Strategic Planning & Implementation.
Research in the Office of Vaccines Research and Review: Vision and Overview Jesse Goodman, M.D., M.P.H. Director, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.
FDA job description  Regulates about 25% of all consumer purchases  Mission summary: protect and advance public health  Products: food, cosmetics, drugs,
1 Drug Safety Oversight Board: Recent Activities FDA Science Board Advisory Committee Meeting March 31 st, 2006 Douglas C. Throckmorton, MD Deputy Director.
Critical Path Initiative Sousan S. Altaie, Ph.D. Scientific Policy Advisor OIVD/CDRH.
Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, FDA Site Visit Introduction Kathryn M. Carbone, M.D. Associate Director for Research.
COPYRIGHT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. LEGAL DISCLOSURE. November 25, 2002 PRESENTATION TO: Public Hearing: FDA Regulation of Combination Products November.
Medical Device Regulations in Canada; Key Challenges and International Initiatives.
Device Updates in FDASIA MDUFA III RA SAIC – 9 th April 2013 Karen Jaffe, MS, MBA, RAC or
Strengthening the Medical Device Clinical Trial Enterprise

U.S. FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health Update
Premarket Notification 510(k) process
Jeff Shuren, MD, JD Center for Devices and Radiological Health U. S
FDA Perspective on Cardiovascular Device Development
BME-IDEA Workshop, September 28, 2005
Balancing Regulation and Innovation: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division of Cardiovascular.
Reasonable Assurance of Safety and Effectiveness: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division.
The Current PMA Requirements
CDRH 2010 Strategic Priorities
Introduction of New Technology: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division of Cardiovascular.
Medical Device Regulatory Essentials: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division of Cardiovascular.
FDA-CDRH in the Next Decade A Vision for Change
Combination products The paradigm shift
Implantable Medical Devices: Accelerating Standards Development to Streamline Regulation Joshua Price | August 2,
Presentation transcript:

1 Critical Path Research: Getting New Technology from Bench to Bedside A Device Perspective FDA Science Board November 5, 2004 Dan Schultz Director, CDRH

Role of FDA Establish reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of medical devices marketed in the U.S.

3 HHS/FDA/CDRH What is a “Device”?

4 A Computer You Can Swallow

5 A Computer That Helps You Hear

6 Devices that Measure Glucose Levels and Deliver Insulin to “Communicate”

7 Miniaturized Electrical Stimulators Pacemakers

8 Drug-Eluting Stents Components Stent Platform & Delivery System Carrier(s)Drug

9 New Technology Important Trends Important Trends –Miniaturization –Intelligent Devices –Designed for Consumer Use –Minimally invasive –Biotechnology Revolution Genomics, Proteomics Biological Medical Devices –New Materials –Combination Products –Disruptive Technologies That change how we do business That change how medical devices deliver value

10 CDRH Vision – Total Product Life Cycle

11 Devices are Different Drugs Drugs –Pure molecules –Toxicology –Short half-life –Long market life –Drug interactions –Wrong Drug / Dose –Clinically studied –Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP) Devices Devices –Complex components –Biocompatibility –Durable Equipment –Rapid product cycles –Malfunction –User Error –Bench studied –Quality Systems (ISO 9000)

12 Critical Path is Different for Devices Device Regulation –Least Burdensome Provision of FDAMA –Quality Systems and Design Controls Device Innovation Process –Biocompatibility –Iterative Process –User learning curve –Performance and durability Device Industry is Represented by Small Manufacturers

13 Dun & Bradstreet Medical Device Firm Data Medical Device Industry Growth Number of Manufacturers by Year

14 Sales Volume Growth (Billions of Dollars) Note: No Economic Adjustment to Dollar Value

15 Device Industry Continues to Grow in FY 04 Dun and Bradstreet FY 04 data shows the device industry grew from 13,579 to 14,937 firms with about $320 billion in sales. Innovation is alive and well! 20% annual turnover in individual device firms. FDA-industry interaction is more important than ever. FDA needs to keep guidances and reviewers up to date.

16 Innovative Science-based Strategies at Work Leveraging –Breast Cancer (DMIST): Screening and Digital Mammography –Medical Device Fellowship Program Objective Performance Criteria –Heart valves –Hip implants Novel Trial Designs –Bayesian Statistics –ROC Curves Guidance Development

17 Days *Based on all 510(k)s (1,644) with SE decisions during FY 2002 that were for Class II devices eligible for third party review, excluding special and 3 rd party 510(k)s (n = 1,021)(n = 623) Comparison of 510(k) Average Review Times for Devices With and Without Guidance * E Rechen, 5/03

18 Original PMA Milestones: 2-cycle Scenario Filing Rev Scientific Review Panel Planning Closeout Review PMA Received Panel Go/NoGo Panel Meeting Filing Letter Final Decision 320 days Major Def. Letter Scientific Review Clock Stops Status Letter Interactive Review Consults Complete

19 Original PMA Milestones: 1-cycle Scenario Filing Review Scientific Review Panel Planning Closeout Review PMA Received Panel Go/No Go Panel Meeting Filing Letter Final Decision 180 days Status Letter Consults Complete Interactive Review

20 The rest of the story…

21 Boston Scientific Stent Recall Grows to 96K Units FDA Is Reviewing Reports of Trouble With Taxus Stent Boston Scientific's Older Stents Draw Scrutiny of FDA Boston Scientific Expands Recall of Troubled Stent FDA won't expand recall of stents FDA Temperature up over Cordis Drug-coated stents may face additional FDA scrutiny FDA Advises Physicians of Adverse Events Associated with Cordis Cypher Coronary Stents

22 Goal: Prioritize Actions on GMP Risks Correlating to Patient Risks RISK  Processes Inspection Risk RISK  Quality (Patient) Factors GMPPatient

23 Postmarket Questions of Interest Long Term Safety Performance in Community Practice Change in User Setting Rare/Unexpected Events Rates of Anticipated Adverse Events Human Factors Issues – Use Error Off-Label Use

24 Achieving Pre/Postmarket Balance

25 Why Balance Works Speeds Product to Market by Moving Some Premarket Requirements to Postmarket Offers Added Assurance to FDA and Advisory Panel Free Up ODE Staff for Premarket Review Generates Data for Next Generation Generates Data for Enhanced Labeling

26 Postmarket Studies - Present Ill-Conceived Not Initiated Not Completed Not Tracked Not Enforced

27 Postmarket Studies - Future Better Designs Standardized Reporting System Better Tracking Make Status of Studies Public

28 Life Sciences Laboratory Awards 2004, GSA Construction Excellence, Projects Over $25 Million 2004, Washington Building Council, Craftsmanship Award (Mechanical / HVAC- Sheet Metal, Mechanical / Plumbing, Mechanical / HVAC-Piping)

29 Critical Path Projects Being Developed Establishing a pedigreed and credentialed blood panel that could be used for assessing the sensitivity/specificity of new hepatitis assays Developing computer models of human physiology that allow testing and soft failure of peripheral vascular stents before animal and human studies are ever considered Developing a clear regulatory path with consensus from the Obstetrics community for intrapartum fetal diagnostic devices

30 Critical Path Projects Being Developed Establishing agreed pathways for the statistical validation of surrogate markers Working with Medical Specialty Organizations to develop practice guidelines for appropriate monitoring of permanently implanted devices Obtaining consensus on the extent of neurotoxicity testing for neural tissue contacting materials

31 Summary Steady progress towards meeting review performance goals and TPLC strategic goals Success is achievable but highly resource-intensive CDRH continues to seek innovative methods and partnerships for evaluating new technology based on sound science in a least burdensome manner Critical path will further our existing efforts to achieve the right regulatory balance and ensure the safety and effectiveness of medical devices

32 CDRH Vision – Total Product Life Cycle