Measuring Parameters for Microlensing Planetary Systems. Scott Gaudi Matthew Penny (OSU)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EUCLID : From Dark Energy to Earth mass planets and beyond Jean-Philippe Beaulieu Institut dAstrophysique de Paris Dave Bennett University of Notre Dame.
Advertisements

Microlensing Surveys for Finding Planets Kem Cook LLNL/NOAO With thanks to Dave Bennett for most of these slides.
General Astrophysics with TPF-C David Spergel Princeton.
P.Tisserand Rencontres du Vietnam Final results on galactic dark matter from the EROS-2 microlensing survey ~ images processed - 55 million.
Dark Matter in Dwarf Galaxies
Analysis of a New Gravitational Lens FLS Yoon Chan Taak Feb Survey Science Group Workshop
Chapter 5 – Microlensing PHY6795O – Chapitres Choisis en Astrophysique Naines Brunes et Exoplanètes.
Astrophysical applications of gravitational microlensing By Shude Mao Ziang Yan Department of Physics,Tsinghua.
The Milky Way PHYS390 Astrophysics Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 19.
Science Team Management Claire Max Sept 14, 2006 NGAO Team Meeting.
Other Science from Microlensing Surveys I or Microlenses as Stellar Probes By Jonathan Devor.
The Gravitational Microlensing Planet Search Technique from Space David Bennett & Sun Hong Rhie (University of Notre Dame) Gravitational Lensing Time Series.
Ge/Ay133 What (exo)-planetary science can be done with microlensing?
Extra-Solar Planets Astronomy 311 Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 24.
Planetary Microlensing for dummies Nick Cowan April 2006.
The Galactic Exoplanet Survey Telescope (GEST) D. Bennett (Notre Dame), J. Bally (Colorado), I. Bond (Auckland), E. Cheng (GSFC), K. Cook (LLNL), D. Deming,
Detection of Terrestrial Extra-Solar Planets via Gravitational Microlensing David Bennett University of Notre Dame.
Layers of the Solar Atmosphere Corona Chromosphere Photosphere Details of solar activity can be seen more easily in the hotter outer layers, which are.
Exploring Black Hole Demographics with Microlensing
Exoplanet Detection Techniques II GUASA 12/10/2013 Prof. Sara Seager MIT.
Dark Matter in our Galactic Halo. The rotation curve of the disk of our galaxies implies that our Galaxy contains more mass than just the visible stars.
What stellar properties can be learnt from planetary transits Adriana Válio Roque da Silva CRAAM/Mackenzie.
Adriana V. R. Silva CRAAM/Mackenzie COROT /11/2005.
DRM1 & Exoplanet Microlensing David Bennett University of Notre Dame.
Jian-Yang Li, University of Maryland Marc Kuchner, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Ron Allen, Space Telescope Science Institute Scott Sheppard, Carnegie.
Extrasolar planets. Detection methods 1.Pulsar timing 2.Astrometric wobble 3.Radial velocities 4.Gravitational lensing 5.Transits 6.Dust disks 7.Direct.
Eric V. Linder (arXiv: v1). Contents I. Introduction II. Measuring time delay distances III. Optimizing Spectroscopic followup IV. Influence.
Searches for exoplanets
OGLE-2003-BLG-235/MOA-2003-BLG-53: A Definitive Planetary Microlensing Event David Bennett University of Notre Dame.
The Microlensing Event Rate and Optical Depth Toward the Galactic Bulge from MOA-II Takahiro Sumi (Osaka University)
Studying cool planets around distant low-mass stars Planet detection by gravitational microlensing Martin Dominik Royal Society University Research Fellow.
A Short Talk on… Gravitational Lensing Presented by: Anthony L, James J, and Vince V.
Microlensing Planets from the Ground and Space David Bennett University of Notre Dame.
More Pixels for WFIRST ? David Bennett University of Notre Dame.
The Search for Extrasolar Planets Since it appears the conditions for planet formation are common, we’d like to know how many solar systems there are,
AST 443/PHY 517 : Observational Techniques November 6, 2007 ASTROMETRY By: Jackie Faherty.
Dark Matter. Zwicky’s Coma In 1933 Fred Zwicky measured the speed of Coma cluster galaxies. –Too fast for the visible stars –Cluster would fly apart Either.
Jenam 2010 Exoplanet Targets for Upcoming Cosmic Visions Space Missions James Frith September 8 th 2010 University of Hertfordshire.
Towards Earth mass planets via microlensing. Jean-Philippe Beaulieu, et al. HOLMES & PLANET Collaboration Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris Europlanet.
Diversity of Data in the Search for Exoplanets Rachel Akeson NASA Exoplanet Science Institute California Institute of Technology.
Gravitational Lensing
16th Microlensing Season of the Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment A. Udalski Warsaw University Observatory.
Explorations of the Outer Solar System B. Scott Gaudi Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
EXTRASOLAR PLANETS FROM DOME -C Jean-Philippe Beaulieu Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris Marc Swain JPL, Pasadena Detecting extrasolar planets Transit.
Exoplanets with WFIRST: Science Questions, Goals, and a FOM Scott Gaudi With input from David Bennett and the ExoSubCommitee Jay Anderson, JP Beaulieu,
Korean Astronomical Society Meeting, April 22, 2005 Scott Gaudi Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics & Topics in the Search for Extrasolar Planets.
Extrasolar Planet Search OGLE-2005-BLG-390Lb The Age of Miniaturization: Smaller is Better OGLE-2005-BLG-390Lb is believed to be the smallest exoplanet.
Detection of Extrasolar Planets through Gravitational Microlensing and Timing Method Technique & Results Timing Method.
Extra Solar Planets ASTR 1420 Lecture 17 Sections 11.2.
Chinese- international collaboration solved the central question: ”How common are planets like the Earth”
The WFIRST Microlensing Exoplanet Survey: Figure of Merit David Bennett University of Notre Dame WFIRST.
Studying cool planets around distant low-mass stars Planet detection by gravitational microlensing Martin Dominik Royal Society University Research Fellow.
Exoplanet Science with WFIRST (and why the success of K2C9 is essential for WFIRST) K2SciCon November 5, 2015 Scott Gaudi The Ohio State University.
Eva Meyer MPIA-Student-Workshop, Italy Various information from different detection methods.
20 th Microlensing Workshop Spitzer Microlens Detection of a Massive Remnant in a Well-separated Binary Yossi Shvartzvald Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California.
MOA-II microlensing exoplanet survey
FIRST LIGHT A selection of future facilities relevant to the formation and evolution of galaxies Wavelength Sensitivity Spatial resolution.
William Peterson & Robert Mutel University of Iowa Miller Goss NRAO M. Gudel ETH, Zurich 1.
Constraining the masses of OGLE microlenses with astrometric microlensing Noé Kains (STScI) with Kailash Sahu, Jay Anderson, Andrzej Udalski, Annalisa.
Completing the Census of Exoplanetary Systems with WFIRST
Observing the parallax effect due to gravitational lensing with OSIRIS
Interpretation of two microlensing events
Microlensing with CCDs
What (exo)-planetary science can be done with microlensing?
EXPLORING FREE FLOATING PLANETS WITH MICROLENSING
Extra Solar Planets - Worlds around Other Stars
(National Astronomical Observatory of Japan)
Know Thy Starrrrr (and not-thy-starrrrr), Know Thy Planet
What is an Exoplanet? Why is their search important?
A Closer Look at Microlensing
Presentation transcript:

Measuring Parameters for Microlensing Planetary Systems. Scott Gaudi Matthew Penny (OSU)

WFIRST Microlensing Survey.

Microlensing Survey Dataset. Properties. ~3 sq. deg. ~432 days. ~80% of the area will have 2 million seconds of integration time. ~100 million stars down to J<22, with ~40,000 measurements per star (~10% in bluer filter), N -1/2 = 1/200 ~20 billion photons detected for a J=20 star. Deepest IR image ever?

Extraordinarily rich dataset. Measure parallaxes to <10% and proper motions to <300 m/s (<0.3%) for 10 8 bulge and disk stars. – Larger than GAIA. Detect dark companions to disk and bulge stars. Find >10 5 transiting planets (Bennett & Rhie 2002). Detect 5000 KBOs down to 10km, with 1% uncertainties on the orbital parameters (Gould 2014). Exquisite characterization of the detector. ??

Microlensing Basics. Source Lens DlDl DsDs Image

Lens mass Relative Lens-Source Parallax Constant Angular Einstein Ring.

Rings vs. Images.

Microlensing Events. (t 0, u 0, t E ) tEtE t0t0 ~1/u 0 u0u0

Detecting Planets.

Basic Measurements. Primary Event: (t 0, u 0, t E ) Planetary Deviation: (t p, t c, ΔA)

t E, q, s All events: θEθE πEπE FlFl timescale, mass ratio, dimensionless projected separation Angular Einstein Ring Radius Microlens Parallax Lens Flux =f(M,D l ) combine any two m=qM, r perp = sθ E D l M l, D l

Angular Einstein Ring Radius. Need an angular ruler. – Finite size of source star ρ * =  * /  E –  * from source flux + color – Most planetary events. – Need measurements in two filters during the event. O SL rErE EE **

Lens Flux. Need to measure the lens flux. – Have to resolve out unrelated stars blended with lens and source. – Subtract source flux from sum of lens+source. – Remaining flux is due to the lens. – Need angular resolution better than ~0.3”. SpaceGround The field of microlensing event MACHO 96-BLG-5 (Bennett & Rhie 2002)

Microlens Parallax. Use the Earth’s orbit as a ruler. – Microlens parallax is a vector. – Direction of relative lens-source proper motion. – Measure deviations from a rectilinear, uniform trajectory. – Parallax asymmetry gives one component. – Precise lightcurves for most events give one component of parallax. (Gould & Horne 2013)

Other possible measurements. Additional parallax measurements. Directly measuring relative lens-source proper motion. Astrometric microlensing. Orbital motion.

Parallax, continued. Long timescale events. – Both components. Geosynchronous parallax (Gould 2013) – High magnification events. L2-Earth parallax (Yee 2013). – JWST+WFIRST Geo, or Earth+WFIRST L2 – Both components. – High-magnification events. – Requires alerts or dedicated surveys. (Gould 2013)

Directly measuring μ rel. For luminous lenses: Direct resolution of lens and source. – High μ rel events. – Precursor observations now! Image elongation. Color-dependent centroid shift. Useful for: Testing for companions to lens or source. Events where the finite source size is not measured.

Astrometric microlensing. Centroid shift of source. – Size is proportional to  E – Orientation is in the direction of μ rel and π E – Combined with parallax asymmetry, get complete solution. Can be used to measure masses of isolated remnants and brown dwarfs. Very small shift. – Worry about systematics. – Can be vetted using direct measurement of μ rel from precursor observations.

Summary. For planetary deviations with luminous lenses, will get (model dependent) masses. – Need two filters during the event. – Need high resolution. For planetary deviations with non-luminous lenses, will get partial information. – Need two filters during the event. – Need precise light curves. There are a variety of additional measurements we can make for a subset of events. – Additional information (orbits). – Redundancy to check solutions. – Strict control of systematics (photometry + astrometry). – ToO and/or Alerts. – Precursor observations.

Implications? Potentially very rich dataset, for microlensing and non-microlensing science, as well as for calibration of the detector. In order to extract the maximum amount of science from this dataset, we need to: – Think about what else can be done with this dataset. – Understand how and how well it can be used to calibrate the detector. – Figure out what additional measurements we might need to make now to maximally leverage this dataset for these purposes.

HST Precursor Survey. With HST imaging of (a subset of?) the WFIRST fields in several bluer filters: – Can measure metallicities, ages, distances, and foreground extinction for all the bulge and disk stars that will have WFIRST parallaxes and proper motions. – Can test proper motion and astrometric microlensing measurements by resolving the lenses and sources of future microlensing events. – Can identify and map out unusual stellar populations (blue stragglers, etc.) – Can identify the locations and colors of all of the stars in the microlensing fields with higher resolution and fidelity than WFIRST or Euclid.