FDA’s Perspective on the “Pharmaceutical cGMPs for the 21st Century” Initiative David J. Horowitz, Esq. Director, CDER/FDA, Office of Compliance Advisory.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ICH Q4B Regulatory Acceptance of Analytical Procedures and/or Acceptance Criteria (RAAPAC) Overview and Update Robert H. King, Sr. Office of Pharmaceutical.
Advertisements

Strengthening the Medical Device Clinical Trial Enterprise
VALIDATION What is the new guidance?. What is a Compliance Policy Guide? Explain FDA policy on regulatory issues CGMP regulations and application commitments.
Integrating CMC Review & Inspection Industry Recommendations Joe Anisko April 24, 2003.
Rapid Microbiology Methods A Regulatory Viewpoint Bryan S. Riley, Ph.D. U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Office.
The Pharmaceutical Industry and ICH Q9
What’s New in the FDA’s Pharmaceutical Inspectorate and Risk Based Systems Inspection Rick Perlman Chair Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Division ASQ.
Perspectives on New Paradigms of Risk and Compliance in Pharmaceutical Development: Quality by Design, PAT, and Design Space David J. Cummings OPS Quality.
FSMA: Where We’ve Been and Where We’re Going Supplemental Notices of Proposed Rulemaking Public Meeting November 13, 2014 Roberta F. Wagner, B.S., M.S.
Produce Safety Rule Phase 2 Workgroup 1.
FDA’s Pharmaceutical Inspectorate Robert Coleman National Expert Drug Investigator Food and Drug Administration.
Manufacturing Subcommittee of the Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science July 20-21, 2004 Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy Director Office of Pharmaceutical.
ICH Q9: Quality Risk Management
Pilot Risk-Ranking Model to Prioritize Manufacturing Sites for GMP Inspections Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science Manufacturing Subcommittee.
Current Good Manufacturing Practice: Vaccines
Session 6: Data Integrity and Inspection of e-Clinical Computerized Systems May 15, 2011 | Beijing, China Kim Nitahara Principal Consultant and CEO META.
11/2/991 CDER’s 21 CFR Part 11 Implementation Study Greg Brolund Associate Director, Office of Information Technology, CDER/FDA.
ONDQA Perspective on Post Approval Changes Eric P. Duffy, PhD Director, Division of Post-Market Evaluation, ONDQA, CDER, FDA Public Meeting: Supplements.
1 Revisions to 21 CFR Supplements and Other Changes to an Approved Application PhRMA Perspective FDA Public Meeting – 7 Feb 2007.
Preventive Controls Phase 2 Workgroup 1.
FDA’s Perspective Continued - Where We Are ?. GMP Task Groups.
FDA Recalls Risk Communication Advisory Committee David K. Elder Director, Office of Enforcement.
Executive summary prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 1 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT.
Quality By Design - A Generic Industry Perspective
Regulatory Update Ellen Leinfuss SVP, Life Sciences.
Organizational Gaps in Reaching the “Desired State” Helen Winkle.
Industry Perspective on Challenges for Product Developers - Drugs Christine Allison, M.S., RAC Associate Regulatory Consultant, Global Regulatory Affairs.
1 Supplements and Other Changes to an Approved Application By: Richard J. Stec Jr., Ph.D. February 7, 2007.
Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy Director Office of Pharmaceutical Science, CDER, FDA ACPS Subcommittee on Manufacturing Science: Identification and Prioritization.
Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Office of Pharmaceutical Sciences CDER, FDA October 21, 2003 Welcome and Introduction to the Meeting.
1 PAT and Biological Products Tom Layloff FDA-SGE Management Sciences for Health The views expressed here are those of the author and not necessarily.
1 Regulatory Aspects of Pharmaceutical Excipients PQRI Workshop Nick Buhay Acting Director Division of Manufacturing and Product Quality Office of Compliance.
Office of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Focus on Phase 2 FSMA Implementation
FDA Public Meeting on Electronic Records and Signatures June 11, 2004 Presentation of the Industry Coalition on 21CFR Part 11 Alan Goldhammer, PhD Chair.
Quality by Design & Question-Based Review: Observations by the Generic Pharmaceutical Industry Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science October 5,
The FDA Regulatory and Compliance Symposium Preparing for the FDA’s Risk-Based Inspections Presented By: Martin Browning, EduQuest, Inc.
PhRMA Perspective on FDA Final Report FDA Advisory Committee on Pharmaceutical Sciences October 20, 2004 G.P. Migliaccio, Pfizer Inc.
Risk-Based CMC Review - OGD Perspective Gary J. Buehler, R.Ph. Director Office of Generic Drugs July 21, 2004 Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science.
COMPARABILITY PROTOCOLUPDATE ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCE Manufacturing Subcommittee July 20-21, 2004 Stephen Moore, Ph.D. Chemistry Team.
Draft Guidance for Industry: CGMPs for Phase 1 INDs Joseph C. Famulare, Director Division of Manufacturing & Product Quality Office of Compliance, CDER,
REGULATION OF COMBINATION PRODUCTS Mark A. Heller Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP MassMEDIC Combination Product Program, March 28, 2006.
Progress in FDA’s Drug Product Quality Initiative Janet Woodcock, M.D. November 13, 2003.
General Aspects of Quality assessment of multisource interchangeable medicines Rutendo Kuwana Technical Officer, WHO, Geneva Training workshop: Assessment.
FDA Regulation of Drug Quality: New Challenges Janet Woodcock, M.D. Director, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration November.
Research in the Office of Vaccines Research and Review: Vision and Overview Jesse Goodman, M.D., M.P.H. Director, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.
Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Subcommittee of the ACPS Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. ACPS Meeting October 22, 2002.
Law Seminars International Spectrum Management Conference NTIA: SPECTRUM POLICY FOR THE 21 st CENTURY The Federal Government Spectrum Management Perspective.
Research in the Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies: Vision and Overview Jesse Goodman, M.D., M.P.H. Director, Center for Biologics Evaluation.
ICH Quality Topics Update
CDER / Office of Compliance ACPS October 5, 2006 Joseph C. Famulare Acting Deputy Director Office of Compliance CDER / FDA.
Title Page Quality Mo Samimi, Ph.D. CMQ/OE Presented at the ASQ Biomedical Division Northern California Discussion Group. May 2011.
Comparability Protocols Nancy Sager Associate Director, QIS-Chemistry FDA/CDER/OPS.
Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, FDA Site Visit Introduction Kathryn M. Carbone, M.D. Associate Director for Research.
Drug Quality Regulations for the 21 st Century PhRMA Perspective Manufacturing Subcommittee Meeting – May 21, 2003 Gerry Migliaccio Pfizer Inc.
Use of Risk-based Approach for Regulating CMC Changes to Approved Applications FDA Public Meeting February 7, 2007.
Examining Drug Quality Regulation Douglas C. Throckmorton, MD Deputy Director Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Public Meeting on 21 CFR February,
FDA Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science and Clinical Pharmacology July 22-23, 2008 Introduction and Update Helen N. Winkle Director, Office of.
FDA Facility Evaluation Douglas Stearn Deputy Director for Policy and Analysis Office of Compliance Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CENTER FOR BIOLOGICS AND HUMAN SERVICESEVALUATION and RESEARCH AND HUMAN SERVICES EVALUATION and RESEARCH Update on OCTGT Guidance.
2010 James Fitzgerald Senior Advisor, Medicines and Health Technologies PAHO/WHO rd St Washington DC USA International Cooperation in Quality.
The Benefits of VICH to VICH Member Countries and Regions DONALD A. PRATER, DVM Director, U.S. FDA Europe Office Office of International Programs Office.
Establishment of Medical Device GMP Requirements Hsiau-Wen Huang, Ph. D. Senior Researcher Bureau of Pharmaceutical Affairs Department of Health.
Pharmaceutical Quality in the 21st Century
CDRH 2010 Strategic Priorities
American Society for Quality Region 5 Quality Conference
Quality System.
ICH Q9: Quality Risk Management
ICH Q9: Quality Risk Management
GMP Inspection Process
Presentation transcript:

FDA’s Perspective on the “Pharmaceutical cGMPs for the 21st Century” Initiative David J. Horowitz, Esq. Director, CDER/FDA, Office of Compliance Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science, Manufacturing Subcommittee May 21, 2003

2 Overview Why did FDA undertake this initiative? –Challenges –Opportunities What is the scope of the initiative? What are the goals of the initiative? –External goals –Internal goals –Other guiding principles

3 Why Did FDA Undertake this Initiative? The last major changes to FDA’s system for regulating drug quality occurred 25 years ago, when FDA substantially changed its cGMP regulations. Other incremental shifts since that time include the approach to manufacturing changes and application submission review under FDAMA and SUPAC.

4 Why Did FDA Undertake this Initiative? (cont’d) Significant changes in the environment of pharmaceutical regulation have occurred over the last 25 years--including challenges and opportunities. Challenges: –Larger role for pharmaceuticals in health care and increased number of products Greater number, and wider range, of drugs being manufactured

5 Number of Domestic Drug cGMP Inspections (excluding pre-approval inspections)

6 Why Did FDA Undertake this Initiative? (cont’d) –Globalization of the pharmaceutical industry Increase in foreign manufacturing sites –Dramatic advances in pharmaceutical science, including the application of biotechnology to drug discovery and manufacturing More complex and diverse manufacturing Large number of manufacturing supplements submitted for Agency review

7 Why Did FDA Undertake this Initiative? (cont’d) Opportunities: –Major advances in manufacturing science and technology Adoption of these advances less prevalent in pharmaceutical sector –Significant advances in the science of quality management, including quality systems approaches

8 Why Did FDA Undertake this Initiative? (cont’d) Explicitly incorporated into FDA’s device regulations; implicit in HACCP Systems-based drug inspection program –Advances in application of risk analysis and risk management (including IT revolution) More systematically applied outside pharmaceutical sector Risk management approaches to regulatory compliance gaining wider acceptance: EPA, Customs, OSHA, & IRS

9 What is the Scope of the Initiative? Involves all aspects of FDA’s regulation of product quality, not just GMPs –Submission review-CMC –Inspection –Standard setting Directly involves CDER, CBER, CVM, and ORA

10 What is the Scope of the Initiative? (Cont’d) Applies to human and veterinary pharmaceuticals and human biological drugs. Two-year initiative: announced August 2002; Six month progress report issued February 2003.

11 What are the Goals of the Initiative? External Goals: –Facilitate and encourage the adoption in pharmaceutical manufacturing of the latest advances and innovations in: Manufacturing science and technology Quality management, including quality systems approaches Risk management approaches –Facilitate innovation and availability of safe/effective drugs

Task Groups

13 What are the Goals of the Initiative? (cont’d) Primary Internal Goals (for FDA): –Implementing internal quality systems approach to the regulation of drug quality Achieve greater coordination and synergy from better integration of the submission review and facility inspection components Enhance coordination between Field and Centers, and among Centers

14 What are the Goals of the Initiative? (cont’d) Enhance consistency in applying science-based standards for both the submission review and facility inspection programs. –FDA workgroup on internal quality systems –Implementing systematic risk management approaches to all aspects of drug quality regulation, including standard-setting, review, and inspection (including work-planning)

15 What are the Goals of the Initiative? (cont’d) Identify parameters and processes that are critical for drug quality, as well as those that are insignificant for drug quality. Ensure that FDA resources are used most effectively and efficiently to address the most significant public health risks. Adjust the level of regulatory scrutiny commensurate with risk –Work-planning: prioritizing sites for inspection; compliance program revision –Comparability protocols –Clarifying Part 11(electronic records) requirements

16 What are the Goals of the Initiative? (cont’d) –Enhancing the scientific underpinnings of all aspects of the Agency’s regulation of drug quality More science and risk-based manufacturing guidance Learn from “process knowledge” gained in the design/development phase Greater opportunities for specialization, training, and cross-cutting teams

17 What are the Goals of the Initiative? (cont’d) –Pharmaceutical inspectorate –Product specialists on inspections –PAT initiative Other internal guiding principles: –Improved internal and external communications Scientific workshops, advisory committees Dispute resolution process 483 clarification Center review of GMP warning letters

18 What are the Goals of the Initiative? (cont’d) –Greater emphasis on international harmonization Presented to ICH Steering Committee in September Topic for July ICH meeting –Strong public health protection Initiative will not interfere with strong enforcement or existing standards, even as we are examining and revising our approaches