Avoiding Cardiovascular Events through COMbination Therapy in Patients LIving with Systolic Hypertension The First Outcomes Trial of Initial Therapy With.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accomplish Update: Fixed Dose RAAS Blocker and CCB in Prevention of Endpoints in the Treatment of Hypertension Prof. Sverre E. Kjeldsen, MD, PhD Past-President.
Advertisements

P Sever (Co-chair), B Dahlöf (Co-chair), N Poulter (Secretary), H Wedel (Statistician), G Beevers, M Caulfield, R Collins, SE Kjeldsen, A Kristinsson,
1 CAMELOT: Study Design A Morbidity and Mortality Study Patients with documented CAD on standard-of-care therapies* (n=1997) Clinical events (morbidity.
11/2/ Implications of ASCOT Results for ALLHAT Conclusions ALLHAT.
THE ACTION TO CONTROL CARDIOVASCULAR RISK IN DIABETES STUDY (ACCORD)
Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-Term Use Evaluation Results
The INSIGHT study - Reliable blood pressure control and additional benefits for hypertensive patients Anthony M Heagerty Department of Medicine Manchester.
TNT: Study Design Treating to New Targets 2 5 years 10,001 Patients Clinically evident CHD LDL-C 130  250 mg/dL following up to 8-week washout and 8-week.
The Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease (LIPID) The LIPID Study Group N Engl J Med 1998;339:
Cholesterol quintile (mg/dL)
Diabetes Trials Unit University of Oxford WebSite: Lipids in Diabetes Study.
1 The JNC 7 recommendations for initial or combination drug therapy are based on sound scientific evidence.
Did Type of Prior Antihypertensive Therapy Influence the Heart Failure Results in ALLHAT? Richard Grimm, Barry Davis, Linda Piller, Karen Margolis, Joshua.
CHARM-Alternative: Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity - Alternative Purpose To determine whether the angiotensin.
CHARM-Preserved: Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity - Preserved Purpose To determine whether the angiotensin.
BEAUTI f UL: morBidity-mortality EvAlUaTion of the I f inhibitor ivabradine in patients with coronary disease and left ventricULar dysfunction Purpose.
Results of Monotherapy in ALLHAT: On-treatment Analyses ALLHAT Outcomes for participants who received no step-up drugs.
The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial ALLHAT study overview Double-blind, randomized trial to determine whether.
1 The Study of Trandolapril- verapamil And insulin Resistance STAR determined whether glycaemic control was maintained to a greater degree by an RAS inhibitor/non-DHP.
Success and Predictors of Blood Pressure Control in Diverse North American Settings: The Antihypertensive and Lipid- lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart.
0902CZR01NL537SS0901 RENAAL Altering the Course of Renal Disease in Hypertensive Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy with the A II Antagonist.
Hypertension In elderly population. JNC VII BP Classification SBP mmHgDBP mmHg Normal
Systolic hypertension not an isolated problem Michael Weber, MD Professor of Medicine Associate Dean Downstate College of Medicine State University of.
Combination Therapy for Hypertension Summary and Comment by Harlan M. Krumholz, MD, SM Published in Journal Watch Cardiology December 3, 2008Journal Watch.
PPAR  activation Clinical evidence. Evolution of clinical evidence supporting PPAR  activation and beyond Surrogate outcomes studies Large.
1 Antihypertensive Trial Outcome Differences: Diuretic vs. Calcium Channel Blocker Compared to participants assigned to the diuretic, those assigned to.
Morbidity and Mortality in Contemporary CAD Patients With Hypertension Treated With Either a Verapamil/Trandolapril or Beta-Blocker/Diuretic Strategy (INVEST):
Prasugrel vs. Clopidogrel for Acute Coronary Syndromes Patients Managed without Revascularization — the TRILOGY ACS trial On behalf of the TRILOGY ACS.
Copyleft Clinical Trial Results. You Must Redistribute Slides HYVET Trial The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
Aim To determine the effects of a Coversyl- based blood pressure lowering regimen on the risk of recurrent stroke among patients with a history of stroke.
SPARCL Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels trial.
VBWG PROactive: Study design Dormandy JA et al. Lancet. 2005;366: Charbonnel B et al. Diabetes Care. 2004;27: Objective: Assess the effects.
HOPE: Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation study Purpose To evaluate whether the long-acting ACE inhibitor ramipril and/or vitamin E reduce the incidence.
ALLHAT Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial JAMA 2002;288:
7/27/2006 Outcomes in Hypertensive Black and Nonblack Patients Treated with Chlorthalidone, Amlodipine, and Lisinopril* * Wright JT, Dunn JK, Cutler JA.
ASCOT and Steno-2: Aggressive risk reduction benefits two different patient populations *Composite of CV death, nonfatal MI or stroke, revascularization,
Slide 1 Downloaded from Population Impact of Losartan Use on Stroke in the European Union (EU)
P Sever (Co-chair), B Dahlöf (Co-chair), N Poulter (Secretary), H Wedel (Statistician), G Beevers, M Caulfield, R Collins, SE Kjeldsen, A Kristinsson,
Baseline characteristics. Patient flow Completed Completed Perindopril Placebo Randomised Not randomised Registered.
ALLHAT 6/5/ CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE OUTCOMES IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS STRATIFIED BY BASELINE GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE (3 GROUPS by GFR)
Change in SBP (mmHg) OmapatrilatEnalapril HCTZ (n = 2476) Change in Systolic BP at Week 24 for Patients Receiving Adjuncts After Week 8 (All Randomized.
4S: Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study
Slide Source: Lipids Online Slide Library Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT) Design Sever PS et al. J Hypertens 2001;19:1139–1147.
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents FDA-Mandated CV Safety Trials 1.
1 ALLHAT Antihypertensive Trial Results by Baseline Diabetic Status January 28, 2004.
Long-term Cardiovascular Effects of 4.9 Years of Intensive Blood Pressure Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk.
6/5/ CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE OUTCOMES IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS STRATIFIED BY BASELINE GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE (4 GROUPS by GFR) ALLHAT.
The JUPITER Trial Reference Ridker PM. Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2195–2207.
Ten Year Outcome of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Versus Medical Therapy in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Results of the Surgical Treatment.
Results from ASCOT-BPLA: Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial–Blood Pressure Lowering Arm VBWG.
Date of download: 7/9/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Making Sense of Statistics in Clinical Trial Reports:
What should the Systolic BP treatment goal be in patients with CKD?
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents
Nephrology Journal Club The SPRINT Trial Parker Gregg
Title slide.
Health and Human Services National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
REVEAL: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of anacetrapib in 30,449 patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease Louise Bowman on behalf of the HPS.
The Anglo Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial
SPIRE Program: Studies of PCSK9 Inhibition and the Reduction of Vascular Events Unanticipated attenuation of LDL-c lowering response to humanized PCSK9.
The following slides highlight a presentation at the Hotline Session of the European Society of Cardiology Annual Congress, September 3-7, 2005 in Stockholm,
Avoiding Cardiovascular events through COMbination therapy in Patients LIving with Systolic Hypertension (ACCOMPLISH): Design Randomized, double-blind.
Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT)
The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
Insights from the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT)
Health and Human Services National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Avoiding Cardiovascular Events through COMbination Therapy in Patients LIving with Systolic Hypertension The First Outcomes Trial of Initial Therapy With.
Lipid-Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA): Results in the Subgroup of Patients with Diabetes Peter S. Sever, Bjorn Dahlöf, Neil Poulter, Hans Wedel, for the.
Table of Contents Why Do We Treat Hypertension? Recommendation 5
The following slides highlight a report by Dr
SPIRE Program: Studies of PCSK9 Inhibition and the Reduction of Vascular Events Unanticipated attenuation of LDL-c lowering response to humanized PCSK9.
Presentation transcript:

Avoiding Cardiovascular Events through COMbination Therapy in Patients LIving with Systolic Hypertension The First Outcomes Trial of Initial Therapy With Combination Antihypertensive Treatment

Jamerson KA et al. Am J Hypertens. 2003;16(part2)193A. Disclosures

Primary Study Objective To determine if amlodipine besylate / benazepril will confer a 15% reduction in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in high-risk hypertensive subjects when compared with the combination of benazepril and HCTZ

Study Overview Multinational, double-blind clinical trial –N = 11,508 subjects (550 centers) Designed to challenge current guidelines in defining the optimal therapeutic strategy for achieving blood pressure control and preventing CVD events in high- risk patients –First trial to randomize to initial antihypertensive combination therapy (amlodipine besylate / benazepril vs benazepril HCTZ) Event-driven trial of 5-year duration The DSMB recommended termination the trial in October LPLV January 24th 2008 Interim analysis with 95.3% of end points adjudicated Jamerson KA et al. Am J Hypertens. 2003;16(part2)193A.

ACCOMPLISH: Design Jamerson KA et al. Am J Hypertens. 2004;17:793–801. *Beta blockers; alpha blockers; clonidine; loop diuretics. 14 Days Day 1 Month 1 Month 2 Year 5 Screening Amlodipine/ benazepril 5/20 mg Randomization Benazepril 40 mg + HCTZ 12.5 mg Benazepril 40 mg + HCTZ 25 mg Free add-on antihypertensive agents* Month 3 Free add-on antihypertensive agents* Amlodipine/ benazepril 5/40 mg Amlodipine/ benazepril 10/40 mg Benazepril 20 mg + HCTZ 12.5 mg Titrated to achieve BP<140/90 mmHg; <130/80 mmHg in patients with diabetes or renal insufficiency

Inclusion Criteria Jamerson KA et al. Am J Hypertens. 2003;16(part2)193A. Inclusion Criteria High-risk men and women with hypertension Age ≥ 60 years with at least one or ≥ 55 years if two of the following criteria for “high-risk” are present: –History of diabetes –CHD (MI, coronary revascularization, or unstable angina) –Stroke –Peripheral arterial disease –LVH –Proteinuria –Chronic renal insufficiency (serum creatinine >1.6 in men or >1.8 mg/dL in women)

Primary Endpoint Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality, defined as: –Cardiovascular death –Fatal / Non-fatal myocardial infarction –Fatal / Non-fatal stroke –Hospitalization for unstable angina –Coronary revascularization procedure (PCI or CABG) Jamerson KA et al. Am J Hypertens. 2003;16(part2)193A.

Trial Profile (Patient Profile) 2265 screen failures: 762 criteria eligibility 393 withdrawn consent 470 abnormal lab values 640 other reasons patients randomized 44 excluded for GCP deficiencies patients assessed 114 lost to follow-up 21 Hurricane Katrina 21 due to closed sites 18 withdrawn consent available for Intention-to-treat analyses Data as of 26-Feb-08

Baseline Demographics Treatment X N=5741 (%) Treatment Y N=5721 (%) Gender Male Female 3506 (61.1) 2220 (38.7) 3430 (60.0) 2277 (39.8) Race Caucasian Black Asian Other 4783 (83.3) 696 (12.1) 27 (0.5) 220 (3.8) 4801 (38.9) 675 (11.8) 22 (0.4) 209 (3.7) Age Mean (years) < 70 ≥ 70 ≥ (59.2) 2326 (40.5) (58.7) 2349 (41.1) Region Nordic* United States 1676 (29.2) 4050 (70.5) 1677 (29.1) 4030 (70.4) *Denmark, Finland, Norway or Sweden

Baseline Risk Factors Treatment X N=5741 (%) Treatment Y N=5721 (%) Prior MI1361 (23.7)1329 (23.2) Diabetes mellitus3439 (59.9)3455 (60.4) History of Stroke730 (12.7)761 (13.3) Chronic Kidney Disease Systolic BP (mmHg ± SD)145.5 ± ± 18.5 Diastolic BP (mmHg ± SD)80.0 ± ± 10.8

ACCOMPLISH Participants Received Aggressive Medical Management Prior to Entry –78% of patients on ACE/ARB –67% of patients on lipid lowering agents –63% of patients on anti-platelet therapy –Mean LDL mg/dl

Baseline Traits of the ACCOMPLISH Cohort Patient enrollment completed. –50% of patients are obese –60% of patients have Diabetes Mellitus –97% of patients were treated previously for hypertension. –74% of patients were treated with > 2 Hypertensive Agents Only 37.5% of patients were controlled to <140/90 mmHg

Systolic Blood Pressure Over Time Table 5.1-1a Pages1-2 N=5723 N=5700 Month mm Hg

Fixed Dose Combinations Provided Exceptional BP Control N=5723 N=5700 % Between Treatment Comparison for Blood Pressure Control Rate* (Safety population) * Blood pressure control rate is defined as the proportion of patients with SBP/DBP < 140/90 mmHg. Table 5.3-1a 36 MonthsBaseline

Summary of Titration Status Table 6.1-1a (Page 7 of 10) Includes patients receiving beta blockers, alpha blockers, clonidine, loopdiuretics. The number of patients with free add-on antihypertensive agents only include those patients who has reached dose level 3. Treatment X N=5723 Treatment Y N=5700 Study Medication Only Study + 1 Add-on Study + ≥ 2 Add-on Study Medication Only Study + 1 Add-on Study + ≥ 2 Add-on

Kaplan Meier for Primary Endpoint Jamerson KA et al. Am J Hypertens. 2003;16(part2)193A. HR (95% CI): 0.80 (0.71, 0.90); p=0.0002

Kaplan Meier for Primary Endpoint Without Revasc Jamerson KA et al. Am J Hypertens. 2003;16(part2)193A. HR (95% CI): 0.79 (0.68, 0.92); p=0.0022

Primary Endpoint Primary Composite CV mortality/morbidity Cardiovascular mortality Non-fatal MI Non-fatal Stroke Hospitalization for unstable angina Coronary revascularization procedure Resuscitated sudden death Incidence of adjudicated primary endpoints, based upon cut-off analysis date 10/01/2007 (Intent-to-treat population) Risk Ratio (95%) 1.21 (1.06–1.37) 1.34 ( ) 1.09 ( ) 1.22 ( ) 1.36 ( ) 1.11 (0.95-(1.30) 0.27 ( ) Data as of 3/20/08

Primary and Other Endpoints Primary Composite CV mortality/morbidity Other Fatal / Non-fatal MI Fatal / Non-fatal Stroke Composite Hard Endpoints Incidence of adjudicated primary endpoints, based upon cut-off analysis date 10/01/2007 (Intent-to-treat population) Risk Ratio (95%) 1.21 (1.06–1.37) 0.00 (0.00–0.00) Data as of 3/20/08

Summary Jamerson KA et al. Am J Hypertens. 2003;16(part2)193A. The combination of an ace inhibitor and calcium channel blocker was superior to the combination of the diuretic and ace inhibitor by reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality by 20%, p < This is an interim analysis (the data base is not locked) based on adjudication of 95%of the end points

Conclusions Jamerson KA et al. Am J Hypertens. 2003;16(part2)193A. The results of ACCOMPLISH provide compelling evidence for initial combination therapy with ace/ccb and challenges current diuretic basedguidelines.