Indian Penal Code Act, 1860 Neeraj Aarora Advocate FICWA, LLB, MBA (IT), PGD (Cyber Law, DLTA & ADR), CFE (USA), BCFE (USA) Empanelled Legal Expert with.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BRAHMAPUTRA VALLEY FERTILIZER CORPORATION LIMITED (A Govt. Of India Undertaking) ISO 9001:2000, APPROVED BY SWISO A PRESENTATION ON LAWS RELATED TO VIGILANCE.
Advertisements

Part IV Statutes of Frauds. R2 § 110. Classes of Contracts Covered (1) The following classes of contracts [may not be enforced] unless there is a written.
Law Enforcement : Lessons for Investigators & Prosecutors by Ahmer Bilal Soofi Consultant National Accountability Bureau Government of Pakistan.
THE BANKERS BOOK OF EVIDENCE ACT, 1891 It is applicable to the whole of India except J&K This is applicable to any company under section 3 of Companies.
§ Duties of the state's attorney The state's attorney is the public prosecutor, and shall:. State’s Attorney Duties.
Rohas Nagpal, Asian School of Cyber Laws.  Information Technology Act, 2000  Imprisonment upto 10 years  Compensation upto Rs 1 crore  Indian Penal.
INDIAN PENAL CODE – SPECIFIC OFFENCES.
ITA 2008: Law Enforcement & Incident Response -The way forward- By Talwant Singh Addl. Distt. & Sessions Judge Delhi
Payment Systems Risk of Loss in the Checking System: Special Rules.
Inquiry, Inspection & investigation, Compounding
–SPECIFIC OFFENCES- II
THE INDIAN PENAL CODE - GENERAL PRINCIPLES
PROSPECTUS AND COMMENCEMENT OF BUSINESS
Cyber Crime: Judicial Perspective By Talwant Singh Addl. Distt. & Sessions Judge Delhi
Cyber Crimes, Cyber Investigation and Cyber Evidence
I NFORMATION T ECHNOLOGY A CT B ACKGROUND 1. Drew inspiration from Model Law on Electronic Commerce adopted by the United Nations Commission of.
ARTICLE 1 - RESPONSIBILITY § Minimum age O.C.G.A (2010) Minimum age A person shall not be considered or found guilty of a crime.
Scott F. Johnson Maureen MacFarlane.  Attorneys have a myriad of ethical obligations  This presentation covers some of those obligations and considers.
Tampering With A Governmental Document Local Government Seminar January 29, 2015 Presented by: Akilah Mance, Associate.
GROUP 7 RAHUL JIMMY RONEY GEORGE SHABNAM EKKA SHEETHAL JOSEPH Cyber Laws in India- IT Act, 2000; 2004.
A PRESENTATION FOR POs OF RCTs
Minimum Wages Act History of Minimum Wages ILO Convention no26 in1928 Recommended Machinery for Fixation of minimum wages The Standing Labour Committee.
Unit 3- Criminal Code of Canada PP3 Property Crimes Other Crimes Offenses and Penalties.
CAN THE ESIC INSPECTOR INSIST ON PRODUCTION OF ACCOUNT BOOKS MAINTAINED BY THE EMPLOYER UNDER INCOME TAX ACT, 1961?
Cyber Laws in Pakistan. Cyber Crime Activity in which computers or networks are a tool, a target, or a place of criminal activity. Cyber crime also stated.
Chapter 12 Supply Law and Ethics McGraw-Hill/Irwin Purchasing and Supply Management, 13/e © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT. Connectivity via the Internet has greatly abridged geographical distances and made communication even more rapid. While activities.
Information Technology Act India is one of the few countries other than U.S.A, Singapore, Malaysia in the world that have Information Technology.
Civil Law Security Services. Copyright © Texas Education Agency, All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission.
PRELIMINARYPRELIMINARY An Act to provide for the protection and improvement of environment and for matters connected therewith: WHEREAS the decisions.
C OMPANIES ACT,2013 CA. Arun Saxena Saxena & Saxena Chartered Accountants 811, Ansal Bhawan 16, Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi – Mob.:
U.S. Copyright Enforcement Benjamin Hardman Attorney / Advisor Office of Intellectual Property Policy & Enforcement, USPTO.
ABSENTEE BALLOT CRIMES Don Wright N.C. State Board of Elections August 2005.
The AIRCRAFT SAFETY ACT of 2000 H.R Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century.
The law on Intermediary Liability in India
AUDIT, RECOVERY PROCEDURES & PENALTIES UNDER SALES TAX ACT, 1990 AND FEDERAL EXCISE ACT 2005 BY MUNIR QURESHI CHIEF COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (SOUTH)
OFFENCES AND PENALTIES
Use of force Ocga
 The Preamble says the act was brought for allowing the acquisition of land needed for public purpose and for companies and for determining the amount.
Engineering Ethics. Engineering Ethics ( II ) Wael. A. Moustafa MA.Sc., P.Eng. May 18, 2011 Mechanical Engineering Department Umm Al-Qura University.
C OMPANIES ACT,2013 Adv. Arun Saxena Saxena & Saxena Law Chambers Advocates & Attorneys , New Delhi House 27, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi –
Minimum Wages Act 1948.
Sec Warranty of Title and Against Infringement; Buyer's Obligation Against Infringement (1) Subject to subsection (2) there is in a contract for.
RELEVANT PROVISIONS OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 1973 FOR RECOVERY OF PROVIDENT FUND DUES Section-46 : 1.In making an arrest the police officer or.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم. DEFAMATION Defamation according to Somali penal code  Art (Defamation). –  Whoever other than in the cases referred to.
Chapter # 03 Registrar Of Companies Salman Masood Sheikh M.Com, MBA, M.Phil, ACMA,FPA, AITM, ACPA, CA (Int) Director Quality Assurance, Superior University,
1. Object and Usefulness of Secretarial Audit “Secretarial Audit of a company conducted by a Practising Company Secretary on the same lines as financial.
Criminal Law Lecture 5 Sources  Criminal Code (CAP 154) – Includes all major offences and criminal responsibility  Criminal Procedure Law (CAP 155)
Amendments of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 Neeraj Aarora Advocate FICWA, LLB, MBA (IT), PGD (Cyber Law, DLTA & ADR), CFE (USA), BCFE (USA) Empanelled.
COMPANIES ACT,2013 section 143 Advocate Arun Saxena Saxena & Saxena Law Chambers Advocates & Attorneys , New Delhi House, 27, Barakhamba Road, New.
C OMPANIES ACT,2013 CA. Arun Saxena Saxena & Saxena Chartered Accountants 811, Ansal Bhawan 16, Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi – Mob.:
OM PRAKASH SAH ARTICLE-KHATUWALA ASSOCIATES (Chartered Accountants) Ph: 11.
The Bankers` Books Evidence Act. Banks keep their accounting and its details in various ledgers, registers. When any claim of the bank is required to established.
BY Suhail Anjum Siddiqui,Advocate B.com.(Hons)LL.B(Hons.) MBA.
FORMATION OF COMPANY. Steps for formation of a company  Electronic filing of form  Incorporation of company  Certificate of incorporation  Promoter.
COMPANIES ACT, 2013 CHAPTER VI – REGISTRATION OF CHARGES Adv. Arun Saxena Saxena & Saxena Law Chambers Advocates & Attorneys , New Delhi House 27,
Law for Business and Personal Use © Thomson South-Western CHAPTER 4 Criminal Law and Procedure 4-1 Criminal Law 4-2 Criminal Procedure.
ADR UNDER VILLAGE COURT ACT-2006
Indian Penal Code Rape laws in India Kumar Neeraj.
Sophie Honohan Barrister-at-Law, Accredited Mediator 21 st April, 2016 Health Identifiers Act Conference.
ADR UNDER LABOUR CODE 2006.
1 24. “(1) The Certification Council may grant accreditation to certification service provider, its cryptography services, electronic signature or advanced.
Courts of Law Amendment Bill
IPC- I Module 2 File 5.
CONTEMPT OF COURT UNDER CR.P.C.
False Evidence and Offences against Public Justice
Facts which need not be proved by evidence
"The Sky is like Father The Earth is like Mother and The Space as Their Son The Universe consisting the Three is like a Family and Any kind of damage.
Trial before court of session
Rape (Sec 375, 376 IPC) A man is said to commit "rape" who, except in the case hereinafter excepted, has sexual intercourse with a woman under circumstances.
Presentation transcript:

Indian Penal Code Act, 1860 Neeraj Aarora Advocate FICWA, LLB, MBA (IT), PGD (Cyber Law, DLTA & ADR), CFE (USA), BCFE (USA) Empanelled Legal Expert with DIT, Govt. of India

 Amendment in IT Act Legal Provisions 2/22/20132Neeraj Aarora

Section 4 - Extension of Code to Extra - Territorial Offences  The provisions of this Code apply also to any offence committed by:-  any citizen of India in any place without and beyond India;  any person on any ship or aircraft registered in India wherever it may be;  any person in any place without and beyond India committing offence targeting a computer resource located in India. 2/22/20133Neeraj Aarora

Section 4 - Extension of Code to Extra - Territorial Offences  Explanation - In this section – a) the word “offence” includes every act committed outside India which, if committed in India, would be punishable under this Code; b) the expression “computer resource” shall have the meaning assigned to it in clause (k) of sub-section (1) of Section 2 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (21 of 2000). 2/22/20134Neeraj Aarora

Section 29A – Electronic Record  The words “electronic record” shall have the meaning assigned to them in clause (t) of sub-section (1) of Section 2 of the Information Technology Act, /22/20135Neeraj Aarora

Section Concealing Design to Commit Offence Punishable with Death or Imprisonment for Life Whoever intending to facilitate or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby facilitate the commission of an offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life, voluntarily conceals by any act or omission or by the use of encryption or any other information hiding tool, the existence of a design to commit such offence or makes any representation which he knows to be false respecting such design, [if offence be committed; if offence be not committed] shall, if that offence be committed, be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, or, if the offence be not committed, with imprisonment of either description, for a term which may extend to three years; and in either case shall also be liable to fine. 2/22/20136Neeraj Aarora

Section Public Servant Concealing Design to Commit Offence which it is his Duty to Prevent Whoever, being a public servant, intending to facilitate or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby facilitate the commission of an offence which it is his duty as such public servant to prevent, voluntarily conceals by any act or omission or by the use of encryption or any other information hiding tool, the existence of a design to commit such offence, or makes any representation which he knows to be false respecting such design, [if offence be committed] shall, if the offence be committed, be punished with imprisonment of any description provided for the offence, for a term which may extend to one- half of the longest term of such imprisonment, or with such fine as is provided for that offence, or with both; 2/22/20137Neeraj Aarora

Section 167 – Public Servant Framing an Incorrect Document with Intent to Cause Injury  Whoever, being a public servant, and being, as such public servant,  charged with the preparation or translation of any document or electronic record, frames or translates  that document or electronic record in a manner which he knows or believes to be incorrect,  intending thereby to cause or knowing it to be likely that he may thereby cause injury to any person, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both. 2/22/20138Neeraj Aarora

Section Fabricating False Evidence  Whoever causes any circumstance to exist or makes any false entry in any book or record, or electronic record or makes any document or electronic record containing a false statement,  intending that such circumstance, false entry or false statement may appear in evidence in a judicial proceeding, or in a proceeding taken by law before a public servant as such, or before an arbitrator,  and that such circumstance, false entry or false statement, so appearing in evidence, may cause any person who in such proceeding is to form an opinion upon the evidence, to entertain an erroneous opinion touching any point material to the result of such proceeding is said "to fabricate false evidence". 2/22/20139Neeraj Aarora

Section Destruction of Document to Prevent its Production As Evidence  Whoever secrets or destroys any document or electronic record  which he may be lawfully compelled to produce as evidence in a Court of Justice, or in any proceeding lawfully held before a public servant, as such,  or obliterates or renders illegible the whole or any part of such document or electronic record with the intention of preventing the same from being produced or used as evidence before such Court or public servant as aforesaid,  or after he shall have been lawfully summoned or required to produce the same for that purpose, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both. 2/22/201310Neeraj Aarora

Section 463 – Forgery  Whoever makes any false documents or false electronic record or part of a document or electronic record, with intent to cause damage or injury, to the public or to any person, or to support any claim or title, or to cause any person to part with property, or to enter into any express or implied contract, or with intent to commit fraud or that fraud may be committed, commits forgery. 2/22/201311Neeraj Aarora

Section Making a False Document  A person is said to make a false document or false electronic record -  First - Who dishonestly or fraudulently – a. makes, signs, seals or executes a document or part of a document; b. makes or transmits any electronic record or part of any electronic record; c. affixes any electronic signature on any electronic record; d. Makes any mark denoting the execution of a document or the authenticity of the electronic signature, 2/22/201312Neeraj Aarora

Section 464 – Making a False Document  With the intention of causing it to be believed that such document or part of a document, electronic record or electronic signature was made, signed, sealed, executed, transmitted or affixed by or by the authority of a person by whom or by whose authority he knows that it was not made, signed, sealed, executed or affixed; or 2/22/2013Neeraj Aarora13

Section Making a False Document  Secondly - Who, without lawful authority, dishonestly or fraudulently, by cancellation or otherwise,  alters a document in any material part thereof, after it has been made, executed or affixed with electronic signature either by himself or by any other person, whether such person be living or dead at the time of such alteration; or  Thirdly - Who dishonestly or fraudulently causes any person  to sign, seal, execute or alter a document or an electronic record or to affix his electronic signature on any electronic record knowing  that such person by reason of unsoundness of mind or intoxication cannot, or that by reason of deception practised upon him, he does not know the contents of the document or the nature of the alteration. 2/22/201314Neeraj Aarora

Section Forgery of Record of Court or of Public Register, Etc.  Whoever forges a document or an electronic record, purporting to be a record or proceeding of or in a Court of Justice, or a register of birth, baptism, marriage or burial, or a register kept by a public servant as such,  or a certificate or document purporting to be made by a public servant in his official capacity, or an authority to institute or defend a suit, or to take any proceedings therein, or to confess judgment, or a power of attorney, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine. 2/22/201315Neeraj Aarora

Section Forgery of Record of Court or of Public Register, Etc. Explanation For the purposes of this section “register” includes any list, data or record of any entries maintained in the electronic form as defined in clause (r) of sub-section (1) of Section 2 of the Information Technology Act, /22/201316Neeraj Aarora

Section Forgery For Purpose Of Cheating  Whoever commits forgery, intending that the document or electronic record forged shall be used for the purpose of cheating, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine. 2/22/201317Neeraj Aarora

Section 469 – Forgery For Purpose Of Harming Reputation  Whoever commits forgery, intending that the document or electronic record forged shall harm the reputation of any party, or knowing that it is likely to be used for that purpose, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, and shall also be liable to fine. 2/22/201318Neeraj Aarora

Section 470–Forged Document Or Electronic Record  A false document or electronic record made wholly or in part by forgery is designated “a forged document or electronic record”. Section 471 – Using as Genuine a Forged Document  Whoever fraudulently or dishonestly uses as genuine any document or electronic record which he knows or has reason to believe to be a forged document, shall be punished in the same manner as if he had forged such document or electronic record. 2/22/201319Neeraj Aarora

Section Having Possession of Document Described in Section 466 or 467, Knowing it To Be Forged And Intending To Use it Genuine  Whoever has in his possession any document, knowing the same to be forged,  and intending that the same shall fraudulently or dishonestly be used as genuine, shall,  if the document is one of the description mentioned in section 466 of this Code, be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine; and if the document is one of the description mentioned in section 467, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment of either description, for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine. 2/22/201320Neeraj Aarora

Section 477 A - Falsification of Accounts  Whoever, being a clerk, officer or servant, or employed or acting in the capacity of a clerk, officer or servant,  willfully, and with intent to defraud, destroys, alters, mutilates or falsifies any book, paper, writing, valuable security or account  which belongs to or is in the possession of his employer, or has been received by him for or on behalf of his employer, or willfully, and  with intent to defraud, makes or abets the making of any false entry in, or omits or alters or abets the omission or alteration of any material particular from or in. any such book, electronic record, paper, writing, valuable security or account, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, or with fine, or with both. 2/22/2013Neeraj Aarora21

THANK YOU ! NEERAJ AARORA ADVOCATE s: Websites: © HAZEN LEGAL ASSOCIATES, 2012 All Rights Reserved