Extending Simplex model to model Ph  E transmission JANNEKE m. de kort & C.V. DolAn Contact:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fitting Bivariate Models October 21, 2014 Elizabeth Prom-Wormley & Hermine Maes
Advertisements

Phenotypic factor analysis
Confirmatory Factor Analysis
Univariate Model Fitting
Multivariate Mx Exercise D Posthuma Files: \\danielle\Multivariate.
4.1 Slack Variables and the Simplex Method Maximizing Objective Functions Maximize the objective function subject to: What would this look like?
Associations Among Adolescent Conduct Problems and Perceived Peer and Parental Acceptance of Adolescent Alcohol Use Julia D. Grant, Kathleen K. Bucholz,
Estimating “Heritability” using Genetic Data David Evans University of Queensland.
Path Analysis Danielle Dick Boulder Path Analysis Allows us to represent linear models for the relationships between variables in diagrammatic form.
Multivariate Analysis Nick Martin, Hermine Maes TC21 March 2008 HGEN619 10/20/03.
Extended sibships Danielle Posthuma Kate Morley Files: \\danielle\ExtSibs.
Chapter 3: Genetic Bases of Child Development Module 3.1 Mechanisms of Heredity Module 3.2 Genetic Disorders Module 3.3 Heredity is Not Destiny Children.
Developmental models. Multivariate analysis choleski models factor models –y =  f + u genetic factor models –P j = h G j + c C j + e E j –common pathway.
Longitudinal Modeling Nathan, Lindon & Mike LongitudinalTwinAnalysis_MatrixRawCon.R GenEpiHelperFunctions.R jepq.txt.
Univariate Analysis in Mx Boulder, Group Structure Title Type: Data/ Calculation/ Constraint Reading Data Matrices Declaration Assigning Specifications/
Multivariate Analysis Hermine Maes TC19 March 2006 HGEN619 10/20/03.
Biometrical Genetics Pak Sham & Shaun Purcell Twin Workshop, March 2002.
David M. Evans Sarah E. Medland Developmental Models in Genetic Research Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics Oxford United Kingdom Twin Workshop Boulder.
Heterogeneity II Danielle Dick, Tim York, Marleen de Moor, Dorret Boomsma Boulder Twin Workshop March 2010.
Genetic Growth Curve Models Practica Boulder, March 2008 Irene Rebollo & Gitta Lubke & Mike Neale VU Amsterdam NL & Notre Dame, US & VCU, US.
Gene x Environment Interactions Brad Verhulst (With lots of help from slides written by Hermine and Liz) September 30, 2014.
Regressing SNPs on a latent variable Michel Nivard & Nick Martin.
Path Analysis Frühling Rijsdijk SGDP Centre Institute of Psychiatry King’s College London, UK.
Introduction to Multivariate Genetic Analysis Kate Morley and Frühling Rijsdijk 21st Twin and Family Methodology Workshop, March 2008.
Path Analysis Frühling Rijsdijk. Biometrical Genetic Theory Aims of session:  Derivation of Predicted Var/Cov matrices Using: (1)Path Tracing Rules (2)Covariance.
Structural Equation Modeling Intro to SEM Psy 524 Ainsworth.
Path Analysis HGEN619 class Method of Path Analysis allows us to represent linear models for the relationship between variables in diagrammatic.
“Beyond Twins” Lindon Eaves, VIPBG, Richmond Boulder CO, March 2012.
Standard genetic simplex models in the classical twin design with phenotype to E transmission Conor Dolan & Janneke de Kort Biological Psychology, VU 1.
Karri Silventoinen University of Helsinki Osaka University.
Continuously moderated effects of A,C, and E in the twin design Conor V Dolan & Sanja Franić (BioPsy VU) Boulder Twin Workshop March 4, 2014 Based on PPTs.
 Go to Faculty/marleen/Boulder2012/Moderating_cov  Copy all files to your own directory  Go to Faculty/sanja/Boulder2012/Moderating_covariances _IQ_SES.
Institute of Psychiatry King’s College London, UK
Introduction to Multivariate Genetic Analysis (2) Marleen de Moor, Kees-Jan Kan & Nick Martin March 7, 20121M. de Moor, Twin Workshop Boulder.
Cholesky decomposition May 27th 2015 Helsinki, Finland E. Vuoksimaa.
Univariate modeling Sarah Medland. Starting at the beginning… Data preparation – The algebra style used in Mx expects 1 line per case/family – (Almost)
Longitudinal Modeling Nathan Gillespie & Dorret Boomsma \\nathan\2008\Longitudinal neuro_f_chol.mx neuro_f_simplex.mx jepq6.dat.
Gene-Environment Interaction & Correlation Danielle Dick & Danielle Posthuma Leuven 2008.
Distributions, Iteration, Simulation Why R will rock your world (if it hasn’t already)
Longitudinal Modeling Nathan & Lindon Template_Developmental_Twin_Continuous_Matrix.R Template_Developmental_Twin_Ordinal_Matrix.R jepq.txt GenEpiHelperFunctions.R.
Structural Equation Modeling Mgmt 291 Lecture 3 – CFA and Hybrid Models Oct. 12, 2009.
Attention Problems – SNP association Dorret Boomsma Toos van Beijsterveldt Michel Nivard.
Mx modeling of methylation data: twin correlations [means, SD, correlation] ACE / ADE latent factor model regression [sex and age] genetic association.
Continuous heterogeneity Danielle Dick & Sarah Medland Boulder Twin Workshop March 2006.
Genetic simplex modeling of personality in adolescent Australian twins N.A. GILLESPIE 1, D. M. EVANS 1, N.G. MARTIN 1 1 Queensland Institute of Medical.
Introduction to Genetic Theory
Introduction to Multivariate Genetic Analysis Danielle Posthuma & Meike Bartels.
Developmental Models/ Longitudinal Data Analysis Danielle Dick & Nathan Gillespie Boulder, March 2006.
March 7, 2012M. de Moor, Twin Workshop Boulder1 Copy files Go to Faculty\marleen\Boulder2012\Multivariate Copy all files to your own directory Go to Faculty\kees\Boulder2012\Multivariate.
Multivariate Genetic Analysis (Introduction) Frühling Rijsdijk Wednesday March 8, 2006.
Extended Pedigrees HGEN619 class 2007.
Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci ;57(1): doi: /iovs Figure Legend:
Genetic simplex model: practical
Multivariate Analysis
Bivariate analysis HGEN619 class 2006.
Introduction to Multivariate Genetic Analysis
Re-introduction to openMx
MRC SGDP Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience
Path Analysis Danielle Dick Boulder 2008
Modelos para datos longitudinales
Univariate modeling Sarah Medland.
Continuously moderated effects of A,C, and E in the twin design
in the classical twin design
GxE and GxG interactions
Pak Sham & Shaun Purcell Twin Workshop, March 2002
Longitudinal Modeling
Sarah Medland faculty/sarah/2018/Tuesday
Multivariate Genetic Analysis: Introduction
Presentation transcript:

Extending Simplex model to model Ph  E transmission JANNEKE m. de kort & C.V. DolAn Contact: JM de Kort, BOULDER, 6 march 2014JM de Kort, BOULDER, 6 march

Nature versus Nurture Role GEcov in Psychopathology ADHD diagnosis GE covariance: Genotypic control over environmental exposures  Evocative: Behavior of individual evokes reaction from environment consistent with genotype  Do people with ADHD evoke different behavior in others?  ADHD child : Intrudes on games more often  ADHD adolescent : Has more frequent school disciplinary actions  ADHD adult: more often has work conflicts  Active: Individuals actively seek out environments consistent with their phenotype (e.g. Niche Picking)  Do people diagnosed with ADHD seek more risky environments  ADHD child : climb more trees  ADHD adolescent : does more binge drinking and has casual sex more often  ADHD adults: has more driving violations, uses more drugs JM de Kort, twin workshop boulder 6 march 2014JM de Kort, twin workshop boulder 6 march

twin 1 twin 2 Translate path diagram into matrices ACE SIMPLEXPh->E SIMPLEX Competing models

S = 4 observed variables for twin 1, 4 for twin 2, thus 8 x 8 twin 1 twin 2 t = 1 t = 2 t = 3 t = 4 varP11 covP11P12 varP12 covP11P13 covP12P13 varP13 covP11P14 covP12P14 covP13P14 varP14 covP11P21 covP12P21 covP13P21 covP14P21 varP21 covP11P22 covP12P22 covP13P22 covP14P22 covP21P22 varP22 covP11P23 covP12P23 covP13P23 covP14P23 covP21P23 covP22P23 varP23 covP11P24 covP12P24 covP13P24 covP14P24 covP21P24 covP22P23 covP23P24 varP24 OBJECTIVE: model the observed covariance matrix

Matrices used in Model  = Λ  -  -t  Λ t  ne = number of latent variables in the model ny = number of observed variables ∑ = Sigma = Expected covariance matrix observed variables y = ny x ny Λ = Lambda =Factor Loading Matrix= ny x ne Β = Beta = Matrix with regression coefficients between latent variables = ne x ne ϴ = Theta = Matrix with residuals= ny x ny Ψ = Psy = Matrix with variances and covariance between latent variables = ne x ne

Dimensions of matrices for 4 time points in normal simplex specification ∑MZ = Λ * solve(I- Β) * ΨMZ * t(solve(I- Β)) * t(Λ) + ϴMZ ∑DZ = Λ * solve(I- Β) * ΨDZ * t(solve(I- Β)) * t(Λ) + ϴDZ  Twins = 2  Time points = 4  ny = 4 time points for 2 twins = 8  ne = latent variables A, C, E at each timepoint for each twin: 3 x 4 x 2 = 24 ∑ = Sigma = 8 x 8= ny x ny Λ = Lambda =8 x 24= ny x ne Β = Beta = 24 x 24 = ne x ne Ψ = Psy= 24 x 24= ne x ne ϴ = Theta= 8 x 8= ny x ny Does not allow us to regress E on P

PROBLEM: Regression from Observed to Latent variable 7 Normally PSY matrix only has latent variables. In case of twin modeling: the variables A, C, and E  24 x 24 Problem Impossible to regress from observed to latent For that we need all variables in Ψ, thus P, A, C, and E. Solution: Change dimensions of matrices Beam observed variables into Ψ space

Dimensions of matrices for 4 time points in our simplex specification ∑MZ = Λ * solve(I- Β) * ΨMZ * t(solve(I- Β)) * t(Λ) + ϴMZ ∑DZ = Λ * solve(I- Β) * ΨDZ * t(solve(I- Β)) * t(Λ) + ϴDZ  Twins = 2  Time points = 4  ny = 4 time points for 2 twins = 8  ne = latent variables A, C, E plus observed P at each time point for each twin: 4 x 4 x 2 = 32 ∑ = Sigma = 8 x 8= ny x ny Λ = Lambda =8 x 32= ny x ne Β = Beta = 32 x 32 = ne x ne Ψ = Psy= 32 x 32= ne x ne ϴ = Theta= 8 x 8= ny x ny SIMPLEX matrix explanation

Specification SIMPLEX in OpenMx 9

General code10 Open: SIMPLEX practical

PRACTICAL Replicate findings in following article11

Model fitting: Ph -> E SIMPLEX MODEL DATA: Full scale Intelligence In MZ and DZ twins Measured 4 time points NTR data12 Return to: SIMPLEX practical

13 FIT 0

14 y12 E12 y22 E22 C2 A12 A22 AA EE EE CC a2 c2 e2 a2 c2 e2 AA FIT 1 DROP a time specific

15 FIT 2 DROP E TRANSMISSION

16 FIT 3 DROP A innovation Time 3 and time 4

17 DROP covariance between E FIT 4

JM de Kort, introdunction Notre Dame, 30 january 2014JM de Kort, introdunction Notre Dame, 30 january SET bA equal over time FIT 5

19 TEST PH->E transmission FIT 6

Final model20 y E y E y E y E y E y E y E y E AAAA AAAA A A E E EE EE

21 A1E1 G-E covariance Correlated E – But not C! A1 E1 A2 E within between