2007 Grade 3-8 English Test Results. 2 Raising Achievement Over past several years, Board of Regents has voted measures to raise standards and require.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title I & Title III Annual Parent Meeting
Advertisements

LINDSAY CLARE MATSUMURA HELEN GARNIER BRIAN JUNKER LAUREN RESNICK DONNA DIPRIMA BICKEL June 30, 2010 Institute of Educational Sciences Conference Evidence.
NYC SPECIAL EDUCATION REFORM Preliminary Results 1 February 2012.
TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP The Philadelphia Story The School District of Philadelphia’s CEO Region Gregory Shannon, Regional Superintendent Malika A.
NYC ACHIEVEMENT GAINS COMPARED TO OTHER LARGE CITIES SINCE 2003 Changes in NAEP scores Leonie Haimson & Elli Marcus Class Size Matters January.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009.
School Report Cards 2004– The Bottom Line More schools are making Adequate Yearly Progress. Fewer students show serious academic problems (Level.
Presentation by Rebecca H. Cort, Deputy Commissioner Office of Vocational and Educational Services for Individuals with Disabilities Statewide Briefing,
School Report Cards For 2003–2004
1 Performance of English Language Learners on the 2008 Grades 3-8 ELA Tests David Abrams Assistant Commissioner for Standards, Assessment, and Reporting.
1 Academic Performance of English Language Learners on Grades 3-8 ELA Tests (2007 to 2009) David Abrams Assistant Commissioner Office of Standards, Assessment.
Rutland High School Technical Review Visit Looking At Results Planning Next Steps Learning About Resources.
New York State Education Department State Science Initiative Statewide Strategic Plan for Science Science Education Advisory Committee March 29, 2006.
1 Leanna Stiefel and Amy Ellen Schwartz Faculty, Wagner Graduate School and Colin Chellman Research Associate, Institute for Education and Social Policy.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
The Heart of Improvement: Leadership. The Story of Thomasville City Schools…
Grade 3-8 Mathematics Test Results. 2 The Bottom Line This is the first year in which students took State tests in Grades 3,4,5,6,7, and 8. With.
Grade 3-8 English. 2 The Bottom Line This is the first year in which students took State tests in Grades 3,4,5,6,7, and 8. With the new individual.
1 Graduation and Other Results: Students Who Began 9 th Grade in 2000 and 2001.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
Grade 3-8 English Language Arts and Mathematics Results August 8, 2011.
March 2010 what the school readiness data mean for Harford County’s children ©
1 Highly Qualified Teachers New Results for
Salem-Keizer Public Schools Budget Message.
Problem Based Learning. Facts The school is on the state list to be taken over because of failing ELA scores. Parents can use a voucher if scores don’t.
Instruction, Assessment & Student Achievement Presented: September 23, 2013 Bessie Weller Elementary School.
District Vision “To Become a Premier District” District Instructional Goals 1.Increase AA, Hispanic, & low SES scores on TAKS science & math to meet or.
Lansing Central School District District Assessment Results Presentation January 24, 2011 Dr. Stephen L. Grimm, Superintendent District Leadership Team.
Proficiency Delivery Plan Strategies Curriculum, Assessment & Alignment Continuous Instructional Improvement System ( CIITS) New Accountability Model KY.
Strategic Planning Update Kentucky Board of Education January 31, 2012.
Fall Testing Update David Abrams Assistant Commissioner for Standards, Assessment, & Reporting Middle Level Liaisons & Support Schools Network November.
1 Student Assessment Report One Goal: Support Student Success West Hempstead UFSD Board of Education Presentation August 20, 2013.
1 Results for Students and Individuals with Disabilities September 2008.
Children Entering School Ready to Learn The Maryland School Readiness Report what the school readiness data mean for Maryland’s children.
Rebecca H. Cort, Deputy Commissioner NYSED VESID Presentation to NYS Staff / Curriculum Development Network Targeted Activities to Improve Results for.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2000, 2001, and 2002.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Grade 3-8 English Language Arts English Language Arts Grades 3, 4, and 5 Total Public.
English Language Arts (ELA) & 2007 English Language Arts (ELA) Total Public In grades 5-8, the percentage of students meeting the ELA Learning.
Students with Disabilities in the P-16 Framework: Outcomes and Improvement Strategies Rebecca H. Cort VESID October 2007 Statewide Meeting.
Grade 3-8 Math. 2 Regents: Raising Standards, with Extra Help to Achieve Them The Regents approved new, higher math standards in March A.
Lackawanna City School District Title 1 Program School Year Currently funded through Title 1:Currently funded through Title 1: -Academic Intervention.
Grade 3-8 English Language Arts and Math Results.
Southern Regional Education Board High Schools That Work Jo Kister, SREB Consultant Archived Information.
Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004.
PASSION, PERSISTANCE AND PIZAZZ: THE PAGE 1 EXPERIENCE PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL COLUMBIA BOROUGH SCHOOL DISTRICT DR. P. DIANE FREY.
Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 Supplemental Packet.
1 Grade 3-8 English Language Arts Results Student Growth Tracked Over Time: 2006 – 2009 Grade-by-grade testing began in The tests and data.
Strategic Plan 2017 How will you contribute to our success?
Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004 Supplemental Packet.
2009 Grade 3-8 Math Additional Slides 1. Math Percentage of Students Statewide Scoring at Levels 3 and 4, Grades The percentage of students.
1 School Report Cards 2002–2003 An Overview. 2 School Report Card: Overall Trends Elementary school achievement is up in English and math over Middle.
Ready At Five & Maryland State Department of Education.
Minnesota’s Promise World-Class Schools, World-Class State.
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
Children Entering School Ready to Learn The Maryland School Readiness Report what the school readiness data mean for Maryland’s children.
1 Leading the Next Generation of Education Reform in New York State New York State Education Department James A. Kadamus September 22, 2005.
STAFF/CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT NETWORK (S/CDN) September 14, 2006 Albany Marriott Hotel Presented by: Jean C. Stevens Interim Deputy Commissioner New York.
2016 State Assessment Highlights
Cecil County March 2012 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Prince George’s County
Washington County Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Harford County Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Baltimore City March 2012 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Dalton Middle School Data Review
Calvert County March 2012 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Worcester County March 2012 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Talbot County Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Frederick County March 2012 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Presentation transcript:

2007 Grade 3-8 English Test Results

2 Raising Achievement Over past several years, Board of Regents has voted measures to raise standards and require students get extra help. When first 4 th grade test was given in 1999, only 48% of students achieved the standards. This year, 68% did. In 1999, only 48% achieved standards in 8 th grade. This year 57% did.

3 Raising Achievement The rise in middle school performance this year is a good sign, but we still need to do better. The grade 3-8 tests, introduced last year, will help schools and parents understand even better how their children are performing from year to year.

4 Raising Achievement Essential that schools use new funding wisely. Contract for Excellence School Assistance Teams Distinguished Educators All will help.

5 The Bottom Line: Scores are Up, Especially in Middle School Achievement in grades 3-8 is up overall. Scores increased most in middle school – grades 6-8. Important because middle school performance has lagged for years. And fewer students are showing serious academic problems.

6 The Bottom Line: ELL Students Did Better Than Predicted Because of new federal NCLB rules, more than twice as many English Language Learners took the grade 3-8 tests. But their performance dipped only modestly in each grade. However, this change in rules affected the overall performance of Hispanic and Asian-American students.

7 The Bottom Line: Students with Disabilities Improved Especially important – fewer students with disabilities showed serious academic problems.

8 Achievement is up statewide, especially in the middle grades. Important because middle school performance has lagged. Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4 Grade 3 = 185, ,457 Grade 4 = 190, ,499 Grade 5 = 201, ,133 Grade 6 = 204, ,463 Grade 7 = 210, ,839 Grade 8 = 212, ,971 Grades 3-8= 1,205,1201,228,362 Number Tested

9 English Language Learners did better than predicted, despite the tremendous increase in the numbers who took the test. More than 3/4 of ELL students are in New York City. Percentage of ELL Students Scoring at Levels 3 and Grade 3 3,68417,093 Grade 4 4,37914,200 Grade 5 6,686 11,480 Grade 6 5,585 9,934 Grade 7 6,234 9,299 Grade 8 5,85210,076 Grades ,42072,082 Number of ELL Students Tested

10 A smaller percentage of ELL students showed serious academic problems in 2007 than in Percentage of ELL Students Scoring at Level 1

11 Performance differences among racial/ethnic groups were substantial across grades 3-8. The Hispanic group includes the largest percentage of ELL students (22%); the Asian group the second largest percentage (11%). Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4

12 In every grade, fewer students with disabilities showed serious academic problems. Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 1

13 Here’s More of the Story

14 Achievement is up statewide, especially in the middle grades. Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4 Grade 3 = 185, ,457 Grade 4 = 190, ,499 Grade 5 = 201, ,133 Grade 6 = 204, ,463 Grade 7 = 210, ,839 Grade 8 = 212, ,971 Grades 3-8= 1,205,1201,228,362 Number Tested

15 Fewer students showed serious academic problems in every grade except grade 3. Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 1

16 Elementary English: Key Fact Behind the Increase in Grade 8 Average scores moved over the dividing line between Levels 2 and 3 this year. At each grade level, a score of 650 signifies meeting the standards. At all grade levels, the average student met the standards. In grades 6-8, the mean scale score increased by 3-5 points in

17 Performance of English Language Learners

18 English Language Learners did better than predicted, despite the tremendous increase in the numbers who took the test. More than 3/4 of ELL students are in New York City. Percentage of ELL Students Scoring at Levels 3 and Grade 3 3,68417,093 Grade 4 4,37914,200 Grade 5 6,686 11,480 Grade 6 5,585 9,934 Grade 7 6,234 9,299 Grade 8 5,85210,076 Grades ,42072,082 Number of ELL Students Tested

19 A smaller percentage of ELL students showed serious academic problems in 2007 than in Percentage of ELL Students Scoring at Level 1

20 A higher percentage of English Language Learners in New York City achieved the learning standards in 2007 than in More than 3/4 of ELL students are in New York City. Percentage of ELL Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4

21 In New York City, fewer English Language Learners showed serious academic problems in 2007 than in Percentage of ELL Students Scoring at Level 1

22 Performance of Students Who Are Not English Language Learners

23 Statewide, in each grade, more students who were not English Language Learners met the standards in 2007 than in Percentage of Not ELL Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4 Number of not ELL Students Tested Grade 3 = 182, ,364 Grade 4 = 187, ,299 Grade 5 = 195,162190,653 Grade 6 = 199,697194,529 Grade 7 = 205,019202,540 Grade 8 = 207,177203,895 Grades 3-8 = 1,176,7471,156,280

24 Statewide, in every grade, fewer students who were not English Language Learners showed serious academic problems in 2007 than in Percentage of Not ELL Students Scoring at Level 1

25 Students Who Were Not English Language Learners: In New York City, the percentage of students meeting the standards increased in Performance in the middle grades especially increased. Percentage of Not ELL Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4 Number of Not ELL Students Tested Grade 3 = 59,62958,413 Grade 4 = 62,205 59,060 Grade 5 = 64,804 62,650 Grade 6 = 65,754 62,016 Grade 7 = 66,021 65,354 Grade 8 = 66,769 65,315 Grades 3-8= 385,182372,808

26 In New York City, a smaller percentage of students who were not ELL showed serious academic problems in Percentage of Not ELL Students Scoring at Level 1

27 Results by Racial/Ethnic Group

28 Performance differences among racial/ethnic groups were substantial across grades 3-8. The Hispanic group includes the largest percentage of ELL students (22%); the Asian group the second largest percentage (11%). Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4

29 The percentage of students with serious academic problems decreased for all racial/ethnic groups except Asian-Americans. Percentage of Students Scoring at Level 1

30 Results for Students with Disabilities

31 The percentage of students with disabilities meeting the standards increased in 2007, although results remained low. Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4 Grade 3 = 23,811 26,692 Grade 4 = 26,474 28,281 Grade 5 = 28,987 29,985 Grade 6 = 28,883 29,055 Grade 7 = 29,237 29,842 Grade 8 = 29,119 29,514 Grades 3-8= 166, ,369 Number Tested

32 In every grade, fewer students with disabilities showed serious academic problems. Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 1

33 Percentage of Students Scoring at Level 3 and 4 Results varied widely among need/resource categories. Students with disabilities in Low Need Districts were much more likely to meet the standards. In most categories, more students with disabilities met the standards.

34 Percentage of Students Scoring at Level 1 The percentage of students with disabilities showing serious academic problems decreased in every need/resource category.

35 Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4 Among the Big 5 Cities, New York City had the largest percentage of students with disabilities meeting the standards. A larger percentage of students met the Standards in 2007 than in *Rochester to provide corrected data for 2007

36 Percentage of Students Scoring at Level 1 Fewer students showed serious academic problems in 2007 than in *Rochester to provide corrected data for 2007

37 Results by Gender

38 The disparity in graduation rate is foreshadowed by the larger percentage of females than males who meet the standards at every grade level. Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4

39 Results by Need/Resource Capacity Category For All Students

40 Percentage of All Students Scoring at Level 3 and 4 For all students, gains varied across grades 3-8 among the need/resource categories. The smallest overall increase was in New York City, where more than 3/4 of ELL students were enrolled.

41 Percentage of All Students Scoring at Level 1 For all students, the percentage of students with serious academic problems decreased in all need/resource categories.

42 Results for the Big 5 Cities

43 Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4 The Big 5 showed substantial differences in meeting the standards in grades 3-8.

44 Percentage of Students Scoring at Level 1 In each Big 5 district, fewer students showed serious problems in 2007 than in 2006.

45 The Bottom Line: Scores are Up, Especially in Middle School Achievement in grades 3-8 is up overall. Scores increased most in middle school – grades 6-8. Important because middle school performance has lagged for years. And fewer students are showing serious academic problems.

46 The Bottom Line: ELL Students Did Better Than Predicted Because of new federal NCLB rules, more than twice as many English Language Learners took the grade 3-8 tests. But their performance dipped only modestly in each grade. However, this change in rules affected the overall performance of Hispanic and Asian-American students.

47 The Bottom Line: Students with Disabilities Improved Especially important – fewer students with disabilities showed serious academic problems.

48 Every classroom teacher is seen as a teacher of reading, with support from all school faculty and staff. Administration and faculty share high expectations for student success. Instruction is based on regular local assessments and analysis of data. Before- and after-school instruction is aligned with regular instructional program. Technology enhances instruction. What Successful Schools Did To Improve Student Performance

49 Extra help programs focus on literacy. Saturday morning Pre-K program sponsored by community partners. Peer coaching for teachers, sometimes across schools, as well as formal and informal daily teacher observations by instructional leaders. Weekly professional development focused on English, with sharing of best practices. What Successful Schools Did To Improve Student Performance

50 Use strategic leadership to build a school climate that improves achievement. Align local curriculum and instruction with State standards. Use national, state and local data to inform instruction. Faculty work together on curriculum and instructional issues across subject areas. Professional development must be practical and respond to what the data show. What Do Other Experts Say?

51 Regents Actions to Support Literacy Implement a comprehensive literacy strategy: –Renew State learning standards, emphasizing literacy across all subjects. –Revise teacher preparation requirements affecting literacy. –Provide professional development to support instruction.

52 Regents Actions to Support Literacy Bring the Contract for Excellence to life. Create school assistance teams and Distinguished Educators to help schools that need help. Support regional literacy conferences.

53 Professional development through the BOCES Higher education institutions in partnership with school/districts Public broadcasting – literacy programs NYS Library and statewide library systems Teacher Centers Statewide professional associations NYS cultural institutions Literacy Zones – eight under way, a dozen more planned over next three years Additional USNY Assets to Help Schools

2007 Grade 3-8 English Test Results