1 Ringberg Castle Workshop on AGN Physics, 25.11.2004 AGN hosts at 0.05<z<2.7: Young stars and mergers? Knud Jahnke (AIP), Lutz Wisotzki (AIP) Sebastián.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Less than 10% of star formation in z~0.6 massive galaxies is directly triggered by galaxy mergers Aday R. Robaina & Eric Bell, Ros Skelton, Dan McIntosh,
Advertisements

Malaysia 2009 Sugata Kaviraj Oxford/UCL Collaborators: Sukyoung Yi, Kevin Schawinski, Eric Gawiser, Pieter van Dokkum, Richard Ellis Malaysia 2009 Early-type.
CDFS SA12 SA15 Morphologies & Star Formation Histories of Massive Galaxies at z > 1.3 P. McCarthy & The GDDS Team Venice 2006.
207th AAS Meeting Washington D.C., 8-13 January The Spitzer SWIRE Legacy Program Spitzer Wide-Area Infrared Extragalactic Survey Mari Polletta (UCSD)
Tidal Dwarves in Wolf-Rayet galaxies Ángel R. López-Sánchez & César Esteban Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias.
Spectacular Shells in the Host Galaxy of the QSO MC Nicola Bennert University of California Riverside Collaborators: Gabriela Canalizo, Bruno.
The properties of AGN host galaxies: Any clues for AGN feedback? Knud Jahnke, MPIA GEMS team (Chien, Hans- Walter, Klaus, Rachel + 15) COSMOS team (Eva,
QSO host galaxy properties from GEMS and COSMOS from z=0 to 3 Knud Jahnke Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, Heidelberg Sebastián F. Sánchez (CAHA) Lutz.
Formation of Globular Clusters in  CDM Cosmology Oleg Gnedin (University of Michigan)
Molecular gas in the z~6 quasar host galaxies Ran Wang National Radio Astronomy Observatory Steward Observatory, University of Atrizona Collaborators:
Eight billion years of galaxy evolution Eric Bell Borch, Zheng, Wolf, Papovich, Le Floc’h, & COMBO-17, MIPS, and GEMS teams Venice
Downsizing & Galaxy Formation 2 nd Mitchell Symposium - April 2006 P. McCarthy OCIW Gemini Deep Deep Survey Team.
SFR and COSMOS Bahram Mobasher + the COSMOS Team.
Hubble Space Telescope Images of Post-Starburst Quasars Michael S. Brotherton, S. Cales, R. Ganguly, Z. Shang (University of Wyoming) G. Canalizo (University.
CCAT survey of the GEMS Legacy field in ECDF-S Shardha Jogee (UT Austin)
“ Testing the predictive power of semi-analytic models using the Sloan Digital Sky Survey” Juan Esteban González Birmingham, 24/06/08 Collaborators: Cedric.
Space Density of Heavily-Obscured AGN, Star Formation and Mergers Ezequiel Treister (IfA, Hawaii Ezequiel Treister (IfA, Hawaii) Meg Urry, Priya Natarajan,
Sugata Kaviraj Hertfordshire Heidelberg 14 July 2014 With: Stas Shabala, Richard Ellis, Adam Deller, Enno Middelberg, Kevin Schawinski, Sukyoung Yi Star.
Venice – March 2006 Discovery of an Extremely Massive and Evolved Galaxy at z ~ 6.5 B. Mobasher (STScI)
Obscured AGN in the (z)COSMOS survey AGN9, Ferrara, May Angela Bongiorno Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik, Garching, GERMANY AND.
Renzini Ringberg The cosmic star formation rate from the FDF and the Goods-S Fields R.P. Saglia – MPE reporting work of/with R. Bender, N.
The Evolution of Quasars and Massive Black Holes “Quasar Hosts and the Black Hole-Spheroid Connection”: Dunlop 2004 “The Evolution of Quasars”: Osmer 2004.
Black Hole Growth and Galaxy Evolution Meg Urry Yale University.
Deep Surveys with the VLA: The CDFS and UDF K.I. Kellermann, E.B. Fomalont (NRAO), E. Richards, J. Kelly (NRAO & UVa), Neal Miller, NRAO and Johns Hopkins.
The 2MASS Red AGN Survey R. Cutri, B. Nelson, D. Kirkpatrick (IPAC/Caltech) M. Skrutskie (U. Virginia) P. Francis (ANU/MSSSO) P. Smith. G. Schmidt, D.
KASI Galaxy Evolution Journal Club The Morphology of Passively Evolving Galaxies at z~2 from Hubble Space Telescope/WFC3 Deep Imaging in the Hubble Ultra.
A study of a ULIRG-to-QSO transition object: possibly another gas-rich/gas-poor merger and a serendipitous line detection Manuel Aravena, Jeff Wagg, Padelis.
Local SMBH and Galaxy Correlations M bul / M BH  800 M BH -σ* relation (Gebhardt et al. 2000, Ferrarese & Merritt 2000) (e.g. Kormendy & Richstone 1995,
Fueling QSOs: The Relevance of Mergers Nicola Bennert University of California Riverside in collaboration with Gabriela Canalizo (UCR), Bruno Jungwiert.
The Environmental Effect on the UV Color-Magnitude Relation of Early-type Galaxies Hwihyun Kim Journal Club 10/24/2008 Schawinski et al. 2007, ApJS 173,
Berkeley, 16 th – 18 th May 2004Wide-Field Imaging from Space Weak lensing with GEMS Galaxy Evolution from Morphologies and SEDS Catherine Heymans Max-Planck-Institute.
“Nature and Descendants of Sub-mm and Lyman-break Galaxies in Lambda-CDM” Juan Esteban González Collaborators: Cedric Lacey, Carlton Baugh, Carlos Frenk,
With: V. Smolcic, A. Karim,, B. Magnelli, A.Zirm, M. Michalowski, P. Capak, K. Sheth, K. Schawinski, S. Wuyts, D. Sanders, A. Man, D. Lutz, J. Staguhn,
The Local Universe A CCAT perspective Christine Wilson McMaster University, Canada 7 January 20131AAS 221 – Long Beach, CA.
FRI RADIO GALAXIES AT z > 1 STUDYING THE BUILDING BLOCKS OF TODAY'S MOST MASSIVE GALAXIES AND CLUSTERS Marco Chiaberge Space Telescope Science Institute.
Naoyuki Tamura (University of Durham) The Universe at Redshifts from 1 to 2 for Early-Type Galaxies ~ Unveiling “Build-up Era” with FMOS ~
Stellar Populations of High- Redshift Star-Forming Galaxies Using Rest-Frame Optical and UV Imaging Nicholas Bond (Rutgers University) Collaborators: Eric.
Major dry-merger rate and extremely massive major dry-mergers of BCGs Deng Zugan June 31st Taiwan.
Deep Chandra image in the Boötes Field Junxian Wang Johns Hopkins University.
Weak Gravitational Flexion from HST GEMS and STAGES Barnaby Rowe with David Bacon (Portsmouth), Andy Taylor (Edinburgh), Catherine Heymans (U.B.C.), Richard.
Subaru Wide-Field Survey of M87 Globular Cluster Populations N.Arimoto (NAOJ) N.Tamura, R.Sharples (Durham) M.Onodera (Tokyo, NAOJ), K.Ohta(Kyoto) J.-C.Cuillandre.
Lyman Break Galaxies in Large Quasar Groups at z~1 G Williger (Louisville/JHU), R Clowes (Central Lancashire), L Campusano (U de Chile), L Haberzettl &
Probing the nuclear emission structure in the LINER F with the VLTI by Konstantina & Jürgen Abstract: LINER bear an AGN with unusual properties.
A multi-band view on the evolution of starburst merging galaxies A multi-band view on the evolution of starburst merging galaxies Yiping Wang (王益萍) Purple.
The origin of E+A galaxies
Investigating dark matter halos of galaxies from the COMBO-17 survey Martina Kleinheinrich (Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie, Heidelberg) & Hans-Walter.
GEMS Collaboration Meeting Baltimore, Jan 20-21, 2003 What do we want to accomplish?  Get to know each other  Take stock of our status quo –Data, software.
The Star Formation- Density Relation …and the Cluster Abell 901/2 in COMBO-17 Christian Wolf (Oxford) Eric Bell, Anna Gallazzi, Klaus Meisenheimer (MPIA.
联 合 天 体 物 理 中 心 Joint Center for Astrophysics The half-light radius distribution of LBGs and their stellar mass function Chenggang Shu Joint Center for.
1 The outskirts of spiral galaxies as viewed by SDSS Ignacio Trujillo & Michael Pohlen.
The First Galaxies in the Hubble Frontier Fields Rachana Bhatawdekar, Christopher Conselice The University of Nottingham.
The First Galaxies in the Hubble Frontier Fields Rachana Bhatawdekar, Christopher Conselice The University of Nottingham.
David R. Law Hubble Fellow, UCLA The Physical Structure of Galaxies at z ~ John McDonald, CFHT Galaxies in the Distant Universe: Ringberg Castle.
The evolution of galaxy sizes since z=3 Ignacio Trujillo (MPIA) & the FIRES team (Trujillo et al. 2004, ApJ, 604, 521) (Trujillo et al. 2005, ApJ, submitted,
Evidence for a Population of Massive Evolved Galaxies at z > 6.5 Bahram Mobasher M.Dickinson NOAO H. Ferguson STScI M. Giavalisco, M. Stiavelli STScI Alvio.
Red-Sequence Galaxies with young stars and dust The cluster A901/902 seen with COMBO-17 Christian Wolf (Oxford) Meghan E. Gray (Nottingham) Klaus Meisenheimer.
How are galaxies influenced by their environment? rachel somerville STScI Predictions & insights from hierarchical models with thanks to Eric Bell the.
The Formation and Evolution of Galaxies Michael Balogh University of Waterloo.
KASI Galaxy Evolution Journal Club A Massive Protocluster of Galaxies at a Redshift of z ~ P. L. Capak et al. 2011, Nature, in press (arXive: )
The GOOD NICMOS Survey (GNS): Observing Massive Galaxies at z > 2 Christopher J. Conselice (University of Nottingham) with Asa Bluck, Ruth Gruethbacher,
Understanding the assembly of massive galaxies at z ~ : mid-infrared view from the Spitzer First Look Survey Lin Yan Spitzer Science Center Caltech.
9 Gyr of massive galaxy evolution Bell (MPIA), Wolf (Oxford), Papovich (Arizona), McIntosh (UMass), and the COMBO-17, GEMS and MIPS teams Baltimore 27.
The optical morphologies of the 2Jy sample of southern radio galaxies Cristina Ramos Almeida & Clive N. Tadhunter University of Sheffield.
The Genesis and Star Formation Histories of Massive Galaxies Sept 27, 2004 P. J. McCarthy MGCT Carnegie Observatories.
AGN in the VVDS (Bongiorno, Gavignaud, Zamorani et al.) 1.What has been done: main results on Type 1 AGN evolution and accretion properties of faint AGN.
QSO host galaxy properties from GEMS and COSMOS from z=0 to 3
Fueling QSOs: The Relevance of Mergers
A Survey of Starburst Galaxies An effort to help understand the starburst phenomenon and its importance to galaxy evolution Megan Sosey & Duilia deMello.
Quasars: old black holes with young stars (?)
The merger-AGN connection since z~1: causal or circumstantial?
Presentation transcript:

1 Ringberg Castle Workshop on AGN Physics, AGN hosts at 0.05<z<2.7: Young stars and mergers? Knud Jahnke (AIP), Lutz Wisotzki (AIP) Sebastián F. Sánchez (AIP, CAHA/IAA) Björn Kuhlbrodt (AIP) + the GEMS collaboration: Marco Barden, Eric Bell, Andrea Borch, Boris Häußler, Klaus Meisenheimer, Hans-Walter Rix (MPIA) Steve Beckwith, Chien Peng, Rachel Somerville (STScI) John Caldwell, Sharda Jogee (UT Austin) Dan McIntosh (U Massachusetts) Chris Wolf (Oxford) © 2004, Knud Jahnke,

2 Ringberg Castle Workshop on AGN Physics, AGN hosts at 0.05<z<2.7: Young stars and mergers? Motivation: ● Merger-AGN connection ● Starburst-AGN connection  study type 1 AGN/quasar host galaxies up to high z ● luminous AGN ● large physical scales ● colours/morphologies/asymmetries ● use well selected samples

3 Ringberg Castle Workshop on AGN Physics, AGN hosts at 0.05<z<2.7: Young stars and mergers?

4 Ringberg Castle Workshop on AGN Physics, M B ~ -23 M B ~ M B ~ AGN samples

5 Ringberg Castle Workshop on AGN Physics, Hamburg/ESO quasar survey: southern extragalactic sky ● optical objective prism survey ● targets bright QSOs, 13<B J <17.5 ● flux limited sample of 415 bright QSOs COMBO-17 (PI C. Wolf): 4 x 30' x 30', ● 17 bands (UBVRI + 12 medium) ● object classification, incl. broad-line AGN ● spectrophotometric redshifts ● 8,000 stars ● 150,000 galaxies ● 35,000 redshifts (R<24) ● ~300 BL AGN AGN samples

6 Ringberg Castle Workshop on AGN Physics, AGN samples z<0.2: BVRIJHK ground based photometry z>0.5: GEMS (PI H.-W. Rix) ● E-CDFS, 30' x 30' ● 80 HST ACS pointings ● F606W (=V) + F850LP (=z) bands, 1 orbit/pointing/band ● ~80 BL AGN + ~500 X-ray AGN (Chandra) 3 sub-samples: ● Å, optical-UV colour ● 1.1<z<1.8: V<4000Å, UV luminosity only ● 1.8<z<2.75: V+z<4000Å, UV-UV colour for 1.5<z<2.0: NICMOS imaging, cycle 13 (31 orbits granted) ● optical-UV colour

7 Ringberg Castle Workshop on AGN Physics, AGN samples Selection criteria: ● z<0.2: HES, complete, optically flux limited ● z>0.5: COMBO-17 AGN class ● R<24 (M B = ) ● 'Host galaxy resolved' criterion: >5% of total flux ● 0.5<z<1.8: 2d modelling with GALFIT (C. Y. Peng et al.) 0.05<z<0.2:19 total19 resolved 0.5<z<1.1: 15 total15 resolved 1.1<z<1.8: 19 total13 resolved 1.8<z<2.75: 23 total9 resolved

8 Ringberg Castle Workshop on AGN Physics, AGN samples Selection criteria: ● z<0.2: HES, complete, optically flux limited ● z>0.5: COMBO-17 AGN class ● R<24 (M B = ) ● 'Host galaxy resolved' criterion: >5% of total flux ● 0.5<z<1.8: 2d modelling with GALFIT (C. Y. Peng et al.) 0.05<z<0.2:19 total19 resolved 0.5<z<1.1: 15 total15 resolved 1.1<z<1.8: 19 total13 resolved 1.8<z<2.75: 23 total9 resolved Jahnke, Kuhlbrodt, Wisotzki, 2004, MNRAS, 325, 52

9 Ringberg Castle Workshop on AGN Physics, <z<0.2 HE , z= kpc

10 Ringberg Castle Workshop on AGN Physics, <z<0.2 HE , z= kpc

11 Ringberg Castle Workshop on AGN Physics, <z<0.2 HE , z= kpc

12 Ringberg Castle Workshop on AGN Physics, Resolved: 19/19 Morphologies: 9/19: early type galaxies 10/19: late type galaxies Distortions: 6/19: ongoing interaction 3/19: other asymmetries 0.05<z<0.2 ~30-45% were/are tidally interacting ~55% show no signs of interaction

13 Ringberg Castle Workshop on AGN Physics, <z<0.2 optical-NIR colour-magnitude diagram early type hosts

14 Ringberg Castle Workshop on AGN Physics, Colours: early type hosts blue compared to inactive (V-K) as blue as late type hosts but not starburst young stellar component throughout host (not circumnuclear) mix of young and underlying old 0.05<z<0.2

15 Ringberg Castle Workshop on AGN Physics, AGN samples Selection criteria: ● z<0.2: HES, complete, optically flux limited ● z>0.5: COMBO-17 AGN class ● R<24 (M B = ) ● 'Host galaxy resolved' criterion: >5% of total flux ● 0.5<z<1.8: 2d modelling with GALFIT (C. Y. Peng et al.) 0.05<z<0.2:19 total19 resolved 0.5<z<1.1: 15 total15 resolved 1.1<z<1.8: 19 total13 resolved 1.8<z<2.75: 23 total9 resolved Sánchez, Jahnke, Wisotzki, et al., 2004, ApJ, 614, 586

16 Ringberg Castle Workshop on AGN Physics, <z<1.1 COMBO-17 CDFS 42601, z= kpc

17 Ringberg Castle Workshop on AGN Physics, <z<1.1 COMBO-17 CDFS 15731, z=0.835

18 Ringberg Castle Workshop on AGN Physics, <z<1.1 COMBO-17 CDFS 47615, z=0.649

19 Ringberg Castle Workshop on AGN Physics, <z<1.1 COMBO-17 CDFS 39432, z=0.738

20 Ringberg Castle Workshop on AGN Physics, Resolved: 15/15 Morphologies: 12/15: early type (by Sérsic fit) 3/15: likely disk dominated Distortions: 4/15: probable ongoing interaction 3/15: other possible asymmetries 0.5<z<1.1 ~25-50% were/are tidally interacting ~50% show no signs of interaction

21 Ringberg Castle Workshop on AGN Physics, <z<1.1 observed colours

22 Ringberg Castle Workshop on AGN Physics, <z<1.1 rest-frame colours

23 Ringberg Castle Workshop on AGN Physics, <z<1.1 Kormendy relation z=0.7 z=0

24 Ringberg Castle Workshop on AGN Physics, Colours of early type hosts: 5/12: globally blue +4/12: at blue edge of red sequence only 3/12: red Host luminosities: M V = Stellar masses: early type hosts right on z=0.7 Kormendy relation so not unusual M/L, underlying old population? 0.5<z<1.1

25 Ringberg Castle Workshop on AGN Physics, AGN samples Selection criteria: ● z<0.2: HES, complete, optically flux limited ● z>0.5: COMBO-17 AGN class ● R<24 (M B = ) ● 'Host galaxy resolved' criterion: >5% of total flux ● 0.5<z<1.8: 2d modelling with GALFIT (C. Y. Peng et al.) 0.05<z<0.2:19 total19 resolved 0.5<z<1.1: 15 total15 resolved 1.1<z<1.8: 19 total13 resolved 1.8<z<2.75: 23 total9 resolved

26 Ringberg Castle Workshop on AGN Physics, <z<1.8 COMBO-17 CDFS 18256, z= kpc

27 Ringberg Castle Workshop on AGN Physics, <z<1.8 COMBO-17 CDFS 54839, z=1.428

28 Ringberg Castle Workshop on AGN Physics, <z<1.8 COMBO-17 CDFS 16155, z=1.285

29 Ringberg Castle Workshop on AGN Physics, <z<1.8 COMBO-17 CDFS 04050, z=1.635

30 Ringberg Castle Workshop on AGN Physics, Resolved: 13/19 Morphologies: 2/13: likely disk dominated (by Sérsic fit) 11/13: undecidable Distortions: 5/13 resolved, symmetric 1/5: knots (but likely PSF-structure) 2/5: nearby (<1.5'') companions 8/13 resolved with asymmetries or extensions 1.1<z<1.8 ~60% were/are tidally interacting ~40% show no signs of interaction

31 Ringberg Castle Workshop on AGN Physics, <z< nm luminosity/SFR vs. redshift

32 Ringberg Castle Workshop on AGN Physics, Colours: N/A Luminosities: few erg/s/Å (at 200nm) few M sun /yr star formation (if starforming) not strong starburst 1.1<z<1.8

33 Ringberg Castle Workshop on AGN Physics, AGN samples Selection criteria: ● z<0.2: HES, complete, optically flux limited ● z>0.5: COMBO-17 AGN class ● R<24 (M B = ) ● 'Host galaxy resolved' criterion: >5% of total flux ● 0.5<z<1.8: 2d modelling with GALFIT (C. Y. Peng et al.) 0.05<z<0.2:19 total19 resolved 0.5<z<1.1: 15 total15 resolved 1.1<z<1.8: 19 total13 resolved 1.8<z<2.75: 23 total9 resolved Jahnke, Sánchez, Wisotzki, et al., 2004, ApJ, 614, 568

34 Ringberg Castle Workshop on AGN Physics, <z<2.75 COMBO-17 CDFS 05498, z=2.075

35 Ringberg Castle Workshop on AGN Physics, <z<2.75 COMBO-17 CDFS 11922, z=2.539

36 Ringberg Castle Workshop on AGN Physics, <z<2.75 UV spectral slope vs. 200nm mag LBGs (z=2.5)

37 Ringberg Castle Workshop on AGN Physics, <z< nm luminosity/SFR vs. redshift

38 Ringberg Castle Workshop on AGN Physics, <z<2.75 UV colour vs. redshift

39 Ringberg Castle Workshop on AGN Physics, Colours: ● slightly UV-redder than LBGs ● young stellar component ● but not in starburst-phase UV luminosities: ● similar to LBGs ● either: post-starburst young population ● or: ongoing starformation (5 M sun /yr from UV) 1.8<z<2.75

40 Ringberg Castle Workshop on AGN Physics, Some conclusions many hosts: ● globally young stellar populations, from z=0.1 to 2.8 ● many blue early type host galaxies ● at z=2: UV light similar LBG merging vs. no interaction (z<1.8): z<0.2:30% merger, 15% possibly interacting, 55% smooth 0.5<z<1.1:25% merger, 25% possibly interacting, 50% smooth 1.1<z<1.8:60% possibly interacting, 40% smooth tentative: merger fraction increasing with z

41 Ringberg Castle Workshop on AGN Physics, Some more conclusions Two options: delay or gas rich E's 1) Delay/evolutionary sequence? ● progenitor → merger/starburst → delay → AGN ● colour: upper limit for delay (few 100 Myr) ● (smooth) morphology: lower limit for delay (few 100 Myr) 2) Gas rich early type host plus intermittent AGN phase ● explains smooth early type hosts ● so is only gas-richness special? Diagnostics? ● stellar population age dating AGN hosts ● search for merger signs in smooth hosts insert your favorite physics here

42 Ringberg Castle Workshop on AGN Physics, ~fin~