Behavioral and electrophysiological results in auditory processing disorders Luciana Macedo de Resende PhD.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EHDI Information Management Les R. Schmeltz, MS, CCC-A Iowa Les R. Schmeltz, MS, CCC-A Iowa.
Advertisements

SITE OF LESION TESTING:
Tier 4 Assessment Neurodevelopment Day 27 th March 2012.
Parent and Educator Information Dyslexia
Understanding Special Education services SPECIAL EDUCATION REFERRAL PROCESS.
Improving outcomes for children with Central Auditory Processing Disorder.
Chapter Eleven Individuals with Hearing Impairments.
Constraint Induced Auditory Therapy (CIAT)
Application of otoacoustic emissions in the diagnosis of hearing loss Bradley McPherson PhD Centre for Communication Disorders University of Hong Kong.
How to understand a research article Behavioral Research.
Pre-operative evaluation and post-operative rehabilitation for paediatric cochlear implantation Han Demin, M.D., Ph.D. Beijing Institute of Otolaryngology.
Strategy Report Hearing Loss By Jennifer Coughlin.
Primary Care Physician (PCP) is notified ASAP about the evaluation result and service plans in order to have a follow-up with the family. PCP shares results.
Temporal processing 2 Mechanisms responsible for developmental changes in temporal processing.
TOPIC 4 BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT MEASURES. The Audiometer Types Clinical Screening.
Overview of Behavioral and Clinical Research at the Boys Town National Research Hospital Nebraska Biomedical Research Retreat 2006.
Chapter 2 Syndromes, Developmental Disabilities, and Motor and Sensory Impairments that Affect Language and Speech.
Language-Based Learning Disabilities in the School-Age Population Chapter 9.
Asperger's Syndrome BY: LAUREN HUMMEL AND MIKAELLA METCALF.
Is it a Learning Disability or Vision Problem? The Eye M.D.’s role in screening and treating children to support school and life success Joint Policy Statement.
ASHA 1997 HEARING SCREENING GUIDELINES ASHA Guidelines for Hearing Screening - Children 1997.
Differentiating Auditory Processing Disorders from Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorders in the Deaf-Blind Population Charles I. Berlin Ph.D. Clinical.
INTRODUCTION FOR THE LIONHEART SCHOOL AUTISM AND ASPERGER’S.
What are Developmental Disorders? Presented by Carol Nati, MD, MS, DFAPA Medical Director, MHMRTC.
SPED 537 ECSE Methods Multiple Disabilities Ch 6 & 7 Deborah Chen, Ph.D. California State University, Northridge April
Clinical Experience in (C)APD (Screening, Diagnosis, Intervention)
Chapter Ten Individuals With Speech and Language Impairments.
Screening Implementation: Referral and Follow-up What Do You Do When the Screening Test Is of Concern? Paul H. Lipkin, MD D-PIP Training Workshop June.
Creating sound valuewww.hearingcrc.org Kelley Graydon 1,2,, Gary Rance 1,2, Dani Tomlin 1,2 Richard Dowell 1,2 & Bram Van Dun 1,4. 1 The HEARing Cooperative.
C ENTRAL A UDITORY P ROCESSING D ISORDERS AND A SSISTIVE L ISTENING D EVICES R EVIEW.
Hearing and Swallowing Disorders ICD-9-CM Recommendations American Speech-Language-Hearing Association September 29, 2006 Baltimore, MD.
SPED 537 ECSE Methods Multiple Disabilities Ch 6 Deborah Chen, Ph.D. California State University, Northridge March 27-28, 2006.
Do negative attitudes towards loud music prevent music- induced hearing loss? Stephen Widén University West, Sweden Soly ErlandssonUniversity West, Sweden.
MENTAL DISORDERS Department of Pediatrics Soochow University Affiliated Children’s Hospital.
CAPD: ”Behavioral assessment”
Clinical Applications
Multidisciplinary Diagnosis of (C)APD: Panel Discussion Teri James Bellis, Ph.D. The University of South Dakota Vermillion, SD USA.
CSD 2230 HUMAN COMMUNICATION DISORDERS Topic 5 Hearing Disorders and Hearing Loss Assessment.
Frank E. Musiek, Ph.D., Jennifer Shinn, M.S., and Christine Hare, M. A.
Jadranka Handzic M.D., Ph.D., Professor of Otolaryngology, Audiology and Vestibulology Department for Otolaryngology and Audiology University Hospital.
PEDIATRIC AND MENTALLY RETARDED POPULATIONS. Minimum Response Levels (MRL’s) No response at threshold Respond at supra-threshold levels Response = hearing.
Ann Morrison, Ph.D..  effects/59/mp3/607974_SOUNDDOGS__su.m p3 effects/59/mp3/607974_SOUNDDOGS__su.m.
1 Central Auditory Processing Disorder Trish Doty + Sarah Ackerman.
Acoustic Immittance Otoacoustic Emissions Auditory Evoked Potentials Objective Tests.
*0570 Developmental Delay By Tami Jo Redinger. Definition  A student with a severe delay in developmental functions at a developmental level 2 or more.
HEART RATE VARIABILITY AND LEARNING IN THE WEEK PREMIE Krueger, C., Behnke, M., Gerhardt, K., DeCasper, A., vanOostrom, H. Pilot Study funded through.
Late Talkers Phoniatric Dept., 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague, Czech Republic O. Dlouhá.
Auditory Processing Disorders. Definition Observed defciency in one or more of the following behaviors: –Sound localization –Auditory disrcrimination.
Autistic Disorder Fatima AlHaidar Professor, Child & Adolescent Psychiatrist KSU.
Psychological Testing
Chapter Eleven Individuals With Speech and Language Impairments.
SPED 537 ECSE Methods: Multiple Disabilities Chapter 3 Deborah Chen, Ph.D. California State University, Northridge February 13-14, 2006.
Intensity representation 2 Mechanisms underlying the development of intensity representation.
Language Assessment. Purposes of Assessment – Identifying children with language disorders – Identifying areas of deficit in a child’s language – Designing.
Understanding Auditory Processing.  Referred to as those internal processes that a person uses to make sense out of auditory messages.  Has been described.
D EFINITION OF AUDITORY PROCESSING DISORDER  APD is defect in the neural processing of auditory stimuli that caused by higher level of language, cognitive.
Audiometry. A B D C Otoacoustic Emissions Test.
Mountain BOCES. Definition of APD A deficit in the processing of information that is specific to the auditory modality. The problem may be exacerbated.
Newborn Hearing Screening. R EPUBLIC A CT N O AN ACT ESTABLISHING A UNIVERSAL NEWBORN HEARING SCREENING PROGRAM FOR THE PREVENTION, EARLY DIAGNOSIS.
What can we expect of cochlear implants for listening to speech in noisy environments? Andrew Faulkner: UCL Speech Hearing and Phonetic Sciences.
Computer Architecture and Networks Lab. 컴퓨터 구조 및 네트워크 연구실 Middle-Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials : Basic Issues and Potentials Applications(3/3) 2009.
1 A Comparison of Motor Delays in Young Children: Autism Spectrum Disorder, Developmental Delay, and Developmental Concerns Beth Provost, Brian R. Lopez,
File Review Can be used to gather information during pre- referral process Requirements for eligibility for: Autism Spectrum Disorder, Communication, Emotional.
HEADS OF SERVICES TRAINING
Oregon Health & Science University
Language Processing Disorders
Introduction to CAPD: From A – Z, Referrals to Treatment
Middle and long-latency evoked potentials
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Sadegh jafarzadeh Ph.D Mashhad university of medical sciences
Presentation transcript:

Behavioral and electrophysiological results in auditory processing disorders Luciana Macedo de Resende PhD

Auditory processing disorders Despite normal hearing thresholds, there are auditory difficulties, such as understanding speech in noisy environments, sound discrimination, following verbal tasks... Present in different stages in life Diagnosis – after 8 years old May be related to language developmental disorders, ADHD, learning disorders, autism,...

Auditory processing disorders In Brazil: -Lack of epidemiological data concerning APD -Recommendation on Diagnostic procedures advise inclusion of behavioral and electrophysyologic audiological measures

Auditory processing assessment Auditory processing assessment Behavioral tests Speech in noise Low pass filtered speech test Monoaural Low redundancy tests Digits SSW Dichotic Tests PPS / DPS (temporal ordering) Gaps in noise (temporal resolution) Temporal processing tests MLD Sound localization Binaural interaction tests

Auditory processing assessment Auditory processing assessment Electrophysiological tests Auditory Brainstem response (ABR)Middle latency response (MLR)P300

Auditory processing assessment Auditory processing assessment Electrophysiological tests Relation to auditory development Add objectivity to the diagnostic process Help defining true auditory deficits: deficits with auditory ‘origin’ Measure intervention results

Auditory processing assessment Auditory development 20th gestational week – beginning of cochlear activity Birth: Sound detection Reflex responses Peripheral Maturation Childhood and adolescence: Central auditory maturation

Auditory processing assessment Auditory processing assessment Auditory development 1 Maturation of neural mechanisms acting in sound codification (processing) 2 Elaboration – auditory perception development using sound clues (auditory experience) 3 Flexibility to choose acoustic information necessary to sound identification

Behavioral and electrophysiological results in auditory processing disorders Purpose: describe the carachteristics and performance of patients referenced to auditory processing assessment and associate findings to complaints and also correlate behavioral and electrophysiological findings. Context: -University Hospital (Hospital das Clínicas /UFMG) -Secondary and tertiary health care facility -Aprox. 200 patients referred for auditory processing assessment during the study period

Behavioral and electrophysiological results in auditory processing disorders Methods Study design: Cross-sectional descriptive study. UFMG Ethical aproval no Patients referenced to the audiology service for auditory processing assessment were invited to participate in the study. All patients and/or parent´s patients signed an informed consent allowing assessment results to be included in the study.

Behavioral and electrophysiological results in auditory processing disorders Methods Procedures: - tonal audiometry, - tympanometry and acoustic reflexes, - behavioral and electrophysiological measures. Selected behavioral procedures included dichotic tests, monaural low redundancy tests, temporal processing tests and binaural interactions tests. Auditory brainstem response (ABR), middle latency responses (MLR) and P300 were the electrophysiological measures.

Behavioral and electrophysiological results in auditory processing disorders Methods Statistical analisys: - Chi square and Fisher’s exact test were used at statistical analysis to associate categorical variables, followed by Kappa’s to observe the degree of associations. T test and Mann-Whitney were also used. Variables distribution was assessed with Kolmogorov- Smirnov and a p-value of 5% was adopted

Results and discussion Descriptive analysis: - number of patients: 159 (43.4% female and 56.6% male) - mean age: 15,3 years old - source of referral: neurologists, speech therapists, otolaryngologists

Results and discussion Audiometry and Immitance results: 100% with hearing thresholds within normal limits 100% with type A tympanometry 89% contra lateral acoustic reflexes present 11% contra lateral acoustic reflexes absent or increased

Results and discussion Behavioral tests performance

Results and discussion Electrophysiological tests performance

Results and discussion Behavioral and Electrophysiological tests performance X Main complaints No association was found relating auditory processing assessment results and complaints Each case presents it´s particularity, each patient has a history and background that determines varied patterns of response

Results and discussion P300 LatencyP300 Amplitude Auditory closure 0,4520,701 Temporal ordering 0,8650,006* Temporal resolution 0,940,805 Dichotic listening 0,4450,009* Binaural interaction 0,1940,074 teste T (valor p ≤ 0,005) Subjects with impaired dichotic listening and temporal ordering presented smaller mean P300 amplitudes.

Results and discussion teste T (valor p ≤ 0,005) Kappa correlation: medium strength correlation between P300, MLR and temporal ordering. VariablesRE reflexLE reflexABRRE MLRLE MLREar effect L Ear effect R Electrode effect L Electrode effect R MLRP300 Auditory closure 0,5150,5550,1540,019*0,036*____0,003*0,64 Temporal ordering 0,1540,4140,2040,1830,510,0630,2010,5630,025*0,1550,016* Temporal resolution 0,640,6050,5910,5730,6680,4340,1820,4270,5930,4640,508 Dicothic listening 0,6660,9040,2290,5710,3270,1370,6320,7070,0980,4030,016* Binaural interaction 0,019*0,013*0,5240,450,3250,5350,0640,3420,4650,4380,22 *p<0,05, Fisher´s exact test or Chi-square.

Results and discussion Correlation among behavioral and electrophysiological tests, when assessing auditory processing, adds objectivity in intervention definition and diagnostic confirmation. Auditory processing may be the cause of learning and language disabilities or may be a manifestation of other conditions such as ADHD, SLI. A detailed auditory processing assessment is crucial for a successful intervention plan.

Behavioral and electrophysiological results in auditory processing disorders Conclusion Patient´s main complaint was learning disability and behavioral results indicated most disorders in auditory temporal processing aspects and dichotic listening. Correlation was observed between behavioral and electrophysiological measures, particularly auditory closure and MLRs, temporal ordering and MLR and P300, dichotic listening and P300, binaural interaction and acoustic reflexes. Individuals with learning disabilities may present maturational delay in cortical structures related to auditory abilities assessed with behavioral and electrophysiological measures. Both measures are relevant in diagnosing auditory processing disorders and directing auditory intervention plans.

Thank you!