Conducting Exempt Research: An Overview of Human Subjects Protections Issues and the Review Process at ASU.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

Human Investigation Committee  Is It Research?  Is It Human Subjects Research?  Is It Human Subjects Research that requires IRB review?
QI project or research? Thomas F. Byrd M.D. HRRC Chair Subcommitees 2 and 4 December 3, 2013.
Is it Research?. Is It Research? 2 Elements –The project involves a systematic investigation –The design (meaning goal, purpose, or intent) of the investigation.
Introduction to Human Subjects Research at the University of Michigan – Dearborn. Debra Schneider IRB Administrator (313)
THE UW HEALTH SCIENCES IRB S OVERVIEW PRACTICAL REGULATORY ISSUES IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH.
 Daylene Meuschke, Ed.D Barry Gribbons, Ph.D RP Conference: April 2, 2013.
Exempt Research Mary Banks BS, BSN IRB Director CRC IRB and BUMC IRB.
IRB 101: Introduction to Human Subject Research
 Federal regulations specify “engagement” at the institutional level  Cornell has a Federalwide Assurance specifying its commitment to comply with regulations.
Request For Exemption RFE. A Review of Penn’s Commitment to Research Research is a substantial and esteemed enterprise at Penn. The research community.
Is this Research? Exempt? Expedited?
Tasha Osafo, CIP Assistant Director IRB Office Exempt Review.
Quick Facts about Exempt Research No continuing review required IRB Reviewer makes Exempt determination 6 OHRP & 4 FDA categories(1 category overlaps)
Lisa Denney, MPH HRPP Assistant Director Melanie Mace, MA HRPP Education and Training Coordinator Bill Woods, PhD CAPS Policy and Ethics Core November.
Conducting Exempt Research An Overview of Human Subjects Protections Issues and the Review Process at ASU Office of Research Integrity and Assurance Institutional.
Cornell Evaluation Network The Use of Human Participants in Research Office of Research Integrity and Assurance ~ May 14, 2007.
Expedited vs Exempt by Richard R. Riker MD Vice-Chair, IRB Maine Medical Center.
The IRB Approval Process Michael Bingham, JD Assistant Director, University of Wisconsin-Madison Education IRB
Teaching Research Methods (Classroom Protocols) Boston University Charles River Campus Boston University Medical Center Mary A. Banks BS, BSN IRB Director.
Research Ethics The Protection of Human Subjects.
1 Developed by: U-MIC To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the.
SLCL Human Subjects Review Committee. Who we are Four faculty from SLCL: – Melissa Bowles, Chair (SIP) – José Ignacio Hualde (Linguistics/SIP) – Jennifer.
RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH MARGARITA M. CARDONA DIRECTOR OF SPONSORED RESEARCH Institutional Review Board.
The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.
Office of Research Integrity and Compliance March 2011.
How to Successfully Apply to the IRB Richard Gordin, IRB Chair True Rubal, Administrator / Director For the Protection of Human Participants in Research.
The Linguistics Department Institutional Review Board Committee Silvina Montrul, chair Fred Davidson Irene Koshik Ryan Shosted September 22, 2008.
Human Subject Research View from the IRB Anthony J. Filipovitch Minnesota State University Mankato.
SUNY Oswego Human Subjects Committee Last Revised 10/28/2011.
Human Subjects Research at ASU An Overview. Overview Definitions Historical Framework Federal Guidelines Human Subjects Research at ASU.
A step-by-step guide to help you determine if your research protocol is required to be reviewed by the Lindenwood University IRB INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD.
Institutional Review Board Procedures and Implications After the applied dissertation committee has approved the proposal and the IRB package, the student.
Marian University is sponsored by the Sisters of St. Francis, Oldenburg. Human Subjects Research and the Marian University Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Education Research and Social & Behavioral Science IRB.
Dustin Yocum, MA Institutional Review Board University of Illinois HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH.
Institutional Review Board Issues for Classroom Research Sharon McWhorter IRB Administrator, The University of Akron (With assistance from Phil Allen,
UD IRB Guidelines for Applications for: Registrations of exempt research, Expedited IRB review, Full IRB review.
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
Human Research Ethics: Issues and Procedures Dr. Constance Jones Chair, Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects.
HRPP Policies & Forms Chapter Two Created/Revised for AAHRPP June 1, 2007.
Regulations 201: Thorny Issues What is Research? Exempt and Expedited Reviews.
 Epidemiology -- Research – or Not Research? Medical Research Summit March Tom Puglisi, PhD.
Conducting Research at Lincoln IRB/HRPP Policies, Procedures & Good Clinical Practices B Kanna MD, MPH, FACP Associate Program Director of Internal Medicine.
Human Subjects Protection Program Office of Research Compliance Navigating through the current HSPP and IRB Presented by: Danielle Griffin, M.S. Research.
Paul Hryvniak MS, CIP Alyssa Speier, MS, CIP September 30, 2014 Student Human Research Education Session Tel:
Human Subjects Research at Mines Colorado School of Mines New Faculty Orientation November 20, 2015.
Susan Loess-Perez, MS, CIP, CCRC Director of Research Compliance Office of Research Services Graduate Thesis and Dissertation Conference February 6, 2016.
Human Research Protection Program 101 March 20, 2007 Cincinnati, OH.
PRIMER: Human Subjects, Past, Present, and Future Susan Metosky, Arizona State University Debra Murphy, Arizona State University.
Research Ethics Office of Research Compliance. Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Covers 9 content areas –Animal Subjects (IACUC) –Human Subjects (IRB)
Created by Steve Martin, PA-C IRB Application Received Exempt Complete Yes No Mississippi College IRB Application Process Determine Review Category Expedited.
Protecting Human Subjects Overview of the Issues Applications to Educational Research The IRB Process.
Presentation prepared for GCSU ENGAGE INSTITUTION REVIEW BOARD (IRB): FUNCTION AND SERVICE Tsu-Ming Chiang, Chair Whitney Heppner, Vice Chair Qiana Wilson,
What is exempt research? Angela Bain, IRB Administrator
Submitting human subjects research
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
SOU Institutional Review Board
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
Introduction to the Institutional Review Board
Submitting human subjects research
SOU Institutional Review Board
This takes approximately 5 minutes or less from start to finish
Intro to Projects – Research with Human Subjects
What types of research are exempt and ohrp guidance on exemptions
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. Associate Dean,
Common Rule Update: Exempt categories UT IRB
What the IRB is looking for when reviewing your protocol
Human Participants Research
Current IRB at DMACC September 2018.
Presentation transcript:

Conducting Exempt Research: An Overview of Human Subjects Protections Issues and the Review Process at ASU

OVERVIEW Definitions Process at ASU Filling out the Application for Exempt Research Contact Information

WHAT IS HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH? Research “a systematic investigation, including research development, testing and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge” Human Subject “a living individual about whom an investigator conducting research obtains data through intervention or interaction with the individual or identifiable private information”

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARDS (IRB) IRBs were instituted in direct response to 20 th century research abuses that occurred such as: –Nazi War Crimes of World War II –Tuskegee Syphilis study which was conducted between 1932 and 1972 by the US Public Health Services on black men in Alabama

IRB Role assess the ethics of the proposed research promote fully informed and voluntary participation by participants throughout the study maximize participant safety once someone enrolls in the study

IRB OVERSIGHT In the United States, IRBs are governed by Federal Regulations. These are the minimum standards for protection of participants. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) State regulations and local polices apply ASU has institutional policies for the protection of human subjects participating in research At ASU, the IRB is administered through the Office of Research Integrity and Assurance (ORIA)

ASU HUMAN SUBJECTS REVIEW All human subjects research must be reviewed & approved prior to data collection Exempt Studies (focus of this presentation) Expedited Review Full Board REVIEW TIME DEPENDS UPON THE TYPE OF STUDY! Exempt studies takes approximately 1-2 weeks from receipt of study.

WHAT DOES EXEMPT MEAN? For Institutional Review Board (IRB) submissions, exempt refers to 6 categories of low risk research (described later) The ASU IRB is responsible for determining that the proposed research meets criteria for exemption allowed by Federal Regulations:

WEBSITE

SUMMARY OF EXEMPT RESEARCH Category 1: Research conducted in established or commonly Accepted educational settings, involving normal educational practices (i) research on regular and special education instructional strategies, or (ii) research on effectiveness of or comparison among instructional techniques, curricula, or classroom management methods.

SUMMARY OF EXEMPT RESEARCH Category 2: Research involving use of educational tests, survey procedures, interview procedures or observation of public behavior unless: (i) information obtained is recorded in such a manner that human subjects can be identified, directly or through identifiers linked to subjects; and (ii) any disclosure of the human subjects' responses outside the research could reasonably place the subjects at risk of criminal or civil liability or be damaging to the subjects' financial standing, employability, or reputation.

Category 3: Research involving the use of educational tests (cognitive, diagnostic, aptitude, achievement), survey procedures, interview procedures, or observation of public behavior that is not exempt if: (i)human subjects are elected or appointed public officials or candidates for public office; or (ii) federal statute(s) require(s) without exception that confidentiality of personally identifiable information will be maintained throughout research and thereafter Category 4: Research involving the collection or study of existing data, documents, records, pathological specimens, or diagnostic specimens, if these sources are publicly available or if the information is recorded by the investigator in such a manner that subjects cannot be identified, directly or through identifiers linked to the subjects.

Category 5: Research and demonstration projects which are conducted by or subject to the approval of department or agency heads, and which are designed to study, evaluate, or otherwise examine: (i)Public benefit or service programs; (ii) procedures for obtaining benefits or services under those programs; (iii) possible changes in or alternatives to those programs or procedures; or (iv) possible changes in methods or levels of payment for benefits or services under those programs.

Category 6: Taste and food quality evaluation and consumer acceptance studies (i)if wholesome foods without additives are consumed or (ii) if a food is consumed that contains a food ingredient at or below the level and for a use found to be safe, or agricultural chemical or environmental contaminant at or below level found to be safe, by the FDA or approved by the EPA or the Food Safety and Inspection Service of the USDA.

FILLING OUT THE APPLICATION The principal investigator (PI) is a faculty or staff member who observes the project with the following responsibilities: –Submission of the application –Oversees the conduct of the research –Student researchers cannot serve as the PI Co-Investigator (CO-I) is anyone who has responsibility for the project’s design, implementation, data collection, data analysis, or who has contact with study participants

FILLING OUT THE APPLICATION Question 1 should be a brief description of the study including a succinct explanation of the procedures and methods. You should be able to understand what the proposed study entails. Question 2 is a brief summary of the procedures that will be used to recruit participants. You should be able to understand how participants will be recruited. For question 3, if the project is funded, the researchers should submit a copy of the grants or proposals used to fund this project. The human subjects description should be consistent with the proposal.

FILLING OUT THE APPLICATION For question 4, the research team should include the number and age range of potential participants. If the researchers will be looking at data only, the application should say DA. For question 5, submit copies of recruitment materials, survey instruments, interview questions/themes, and other data collection tools.

OTHER MATERIALS Due to the low-risk nature of exempt studies, a written consent form is not necessary. Instead the research team should develop and submit the following. –Cover Letter-for anonymous surveys –Information letter-for interviews –Information letter for group interviews- focus group interviews Templates can be found at:

HOW WILL THE DATA BE USED? Blue terms are research & black terms are situation dependent Dissertation Publication/journal article Thesis Undergraduate honors project Results released to participants/parents Results released to employer or school Results released to agency or organization Conferences/presentations Other:

OTHER USES OF DATA: CLASSROOM RESEARCH Classroom projects that involve systematic collection of data and for which the objective or design is to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge are considered research. In other words, if a student plans to use the data outside of the classroom, then the project is considered research. This type of project should be reviewed by the IRB. Classroom projects that are designed with the objective of providing students with training about and experience with research methods are not considered research. In these cases, students will not use the data outside of the classroom. This type of project does not require IRB review.

CATEGORY 1: TERMS AND EXAMPLES “Commonly accepted” programs include preschools, elementary schools, middle schools, high schools, and colleges Evaluation of 2 methods of a 4 th grade instruction commonly used in a school district A study of 2 case management methods for mainstreaming handicapped elementary school students Research with minors who are under 18 can be exempt under category 1

CATEGORY 2 EXAMPLES Surveys of adults who are over 18 on attitudes about shopping. Survey can be done in person or online. Survey asking Likert scale questions in which respondents rate qualities that they feel are important in leaders. Interviews with individuals who are over 18 about attitudes about global warming. In this case individuals can remain anonymous or be quoted directly.

CAVEATS The exemption at 45 CFR (b)(2), for research involving survey or interview procedures or observation of public behavior, does not apply to research with children, except for research involving observations of public behavior when the investigator(s) do not participate in the activities being observed. The responses of participants can be “identifiable” so long as the results would not place them at risk for criminal or civil liability.

WHEN IS SURVEY RESEARCH NOT EXEMPT? Study involves children under age 18 and the research does not fall under exempt category 1 Sensitive topics are used and results are not anonymous. For example, there is a longitudinal study with a master list in which participants are asked about illegal drug use Prisoners are part of study population

CATEGORY 3 EXAMPLES Survey research on attitudes about social service policies of standing state governors Observation research on public presentations by city council representatives at neighborhood meetings

CATEGORY 4 EXAMPLES Research that uses publically available data from websites such as the National Center for Education Statistics or Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Data from school records that is given to the research team without any identifiers or way to identify subjects (AIMS data for example)

CATEGORIES 5 AND 6 EXAMPLES Category 5 is rarely seen the university setting For category 6, an example would be a study of how individuals age and their perception of sugar. Individuals of different ages would be asked to consume sugar and respond to questions

HUMAN SUBJECTS TRAINING ALL researchers must document training. This includes faculty and student researchers. Training is valid for 3 years CITI Training is required for investigators who have not taken training in the past 3 years: Contact the IRB if you have taken other trainings to see if they will be accepted

OTHER COMMON QUESTIONS Research with minors can be exempt under category 1 Research with prisoners cannot be exempt Research with Native American participants can be exempt. If the study will occur on Tribal Land, Tribal permission will be required before exemption can be granted at ASU

OTHER COMMON QUESTIONS There is no expiration date for exempt studies at ASU Modifications do not have to be submitted unless the exempt status would change. For example, the research was an anonymous survey of individuals and would now include year olds

WHAT IF THE STUDY DOES NOT MEET CRITERIA FOR EXEMPTION? If the proposed research does not meet criteria for exemption, then it can be reviewed under criteria for minimal risk research under expedited criteria or considered by the committee at a convened meeting. Submit 1 most appropriate form for review by the IRB: –Social Behavioral Application –Bioscience Application Please contact the IRB if you have questions regarding whether your research is Social Behavioral or Bioscience

CONTACT INFORMATION General (480) Justin Ford, IRB (480) Susan Metosky, IRB Administrator (480) Alice Garnett, IRB Coordinator Sr. (480) Debra Murphy, Director for Research Integrity and Assurance (480)