CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION. California Perspective on Real Time Pricing Michael R. Jaske, Ph.D. California Energy Commission Committee on Regional Electric.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
Advertisements

R&D 1 Demand Response and Pricing in France EDFs experience New regulation Main goals 10/11 th April 2007.
California Roundup: Summary of DR Activity in California John Goodin Lead, Demand Response 2008 National Town Meeting on Demand Response June 3, 2008.
Gloria Godson VP, Federal Regulatory Policy Reliability Pricing Model Part 2.
Critical Peak Pricing Gulf Power’s Experience Dan Merilatt, V.P. Marketing Services GoodCents Solutions, Inc. Stone Mountain, GA September 9, 2002.
Energy Storage Definitions/Definitions ETWG 18 Feb 2013.
CPUC Procurement Policies Robert L. Strauss California Public Utilities Commission Energy Division - Procurement Section.
Electrical Billing and Rates MAE406 Energy Conservation in Industry Stephen Terry.
How Energy Efficiency and Demand Response can Help Air Quality Presentation to the California Electricity and Air Quality Conference October 3, 2006 Mary.
November 2001 CHRISTENSENASSOCIATES RTP as a Demand Response Program – How Much Load Response Can You Expect? Peak Load Management Alliance Fall Conference.
Solutions to California’s Energy Crisis: Real-Time Pricing by Frank Wolak Chairman, Market Surveillance Committee March 17, 2001.
Dynamic Pricing, Tariffs, and Price Responsive Demand Programs Real Time Pricing at Georgia Power Company and Duke Power Company Michael T. O’Sheasy Christensen.
1 Wealth Transfers Under Real-time Electricity Pricing Severin Borenstein Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley University of California Energy Institute.
The California energy crisis Introduction (Wolak March ‘01) –Wholesale: averaged $33 MWH in 1999, $116 MWH in 2000, $310MWH Jan –Natural gas $3-$4.
Energy Production and Use in California Source: California Energy Commission
Measurement, Verification, and Forecasting Protocols for Demand Response Resources: Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
What’s Coming Down with Energy in California Lon W. House, Ph.D ACWA Fall Conference 2003 San Diego, CA.
Cost of Service Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker.
Welcome New York Independent System Operator. (Pre-NYISO) Regulated Market Physical contracts Regulated industry Cost Based System Two Party Deals Bundled.
Presentation to the: Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Demand-Side Response Working Group December 8, 2006 Gas Utility Decoupling in New Jersey A.
Electric Restructuring In Pennsylvania Sonny Popowsky Pennsylvania Consumer Advocate May 10, 2007 Institute for Regulatory Policy Studies Transforming.
1 Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
BGS-CIEP Rate - Energy Components (Continued)
FERC Assessment of Demand Response & Advanced Metering 2006 APPA Business & Financial Conference September 18, 2006 – Session 11 (PMA) Presented by: Larry.
Retail Competition: Managing a Difficult Transition David L. O’Connor Commissioner Massachusetts Division of Energy Resources (DOER) Presentation to National.
FERC’s Role in Demand Response David Kathan ABA Teleconference December 14, 2005.
Context, Principles, and Key Questions for Allowance Allocation in the Electricity Sector Joint Workshop of the Public Utilities Commission and Energy.
2 nd ACC Workshop June 20, 2014 The SSVEC Perspective David Bane, Key Account Manager
How to Help Your Customers Read Their Electric Bills and Apply for Incentives Charley Budd, KEMA.
Summer 2004 and Beyond Lon W. House, Ph.D ACWA/Edison Joint Presentation June 24, 2004.
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Demand Response Workshop September 15, Definitions are important Demand response –“Changes in electricity usage by end-use customers from their.
FCC Field Hearing on Energy and the Environment Cambridge, MA; November 30, 2009.
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
Linking the Wholesale and Retail Markets through Dynamic Retail Pricing Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September.
1March 24, 2000California PX Demand Responsiveness Workshop Christensen Associates Lessons from California The Role of Demand Response Energy Markets in.
Demand Response in Energy and Capacity Markets David Kathan FERC IRPS Conference May 12, 2006.
1 Knowing Your Customers Better Through Load Research Presented By: Lawrence M. Strawn Senior Retail Pricing Coordinator Orlando Utilities Commission September.
1 Electricity Use in California: Past Trends and Present Usage Patterns Rich Brown May 2002.
Commercial & Industrial Customer Implications of Smart Metering Allan Boucher Capgemini Canada.
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Electricity Supply Adequacy in the West Daniel Nix Deputy Director California Energy Commission April 2000 Committee on Regional.
1 Demand Response A 28 Year History of Demand Response Programs for the Electric Cooperatives of Arkansas by Forest Kessinger Manager, Rates and Forecasting.
June CHRISTENSENASSOCIATES EFFICIENT PRICING OF STANDBY DISTRIBUTION SERVICES Presented to Edison Electric Institute Distributed Generation Task.
DR issues in California discussed last year in March Historical DR in California: some background issues –Twenty years of programs/tariffs I/C and AC cycling.
An Overview of Demand Response in California July 2011.
Demand Response
Government’s Evolving Role in Resource Planning and Environmental Protection Arthur H. Rosenfeld, Commissioner California Energy Commission April 19, 2002.
Extra electricity slides
Incentives and Rate Designs for Efficiency and Demand Response Drs. Steven D. Braithwait & Laurence D. Kirsch CA Energy Consulting DRRC/CEC Workshop January.
New Incentives for Pursuing Demand Response Scott Strauss and Sean Flynn Spiegel & McDiarmid APPA Legal Seminar San Francisco – November 2004.
Role Of ERC in the WESM To enforce the rules and regulations governing the operations of the WESM and monitors the activities of the Market Operator and.
California Energy Action Plan December 7, 2004 Energy Report: 2004 and 2005 Overview December 7, 2004.
CEC Load Management Standards Workshop March 3, Update on the CPUC’s Demand Response and Advanced Metering Proceedings Bruce Kaneshiro Energy Division.
Cost of Service Studies April 14,  Used to reasonably allocate costs (revenue requirement) incurred by utility amongst customer classes  2 Types.
San Diego Gas & Electric February 24 th, 2016 Energy Matinee Pricing Tariff Proposal.
©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003.
Matinee Pricing Opt-in Pilot Rate Proposal (R ) Commission Workshop February 24, 2016 Manager, Pricing Design.
The Rooftop Solar Revolution Implications for Consumer Advocates Lon Huber Tim Schneider.
CPUC Resource Adequacy Program – LAO briefing May 25, 2009.
1 RMS Update to RMWG June 6, Market Process for Solar & Wind Devices Retail customers are purchasing and installing wind and solar equipment on.
California Product Offerings
Time of Use Rates: A Practical Option – If Done Well
Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
SEIA Perspective on Marginal/Avoided CAISO Transmission Costs
The New Texas Wholesale/Retail Market
Maximizing Grid Benefits of DERs through Rate Design
Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
Christensen Associates
Commissioner Anne C. George
Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
Presentation transcript:

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION

California Perspective on Real Time Pricing Michael R. Jaske, Ph.D. California Energy Commission Committee on Regional Electric Power Cooperation April 18, 2001

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION What is Real Time Pricing? a. Any rate design in which retail prices vary by hour of the day for different days of the week. b. Generally RTP designs compute retail prices in an hour based on wholesale market prices at that hour. c. RTP requires: (1) interval meters synched with time; (2) telecommunications to upload/download usage data; (3) rate designs affecting total electricity bill.

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION TOU rates have prespecified values for groups of hours that are thought to have similar costs of generation. TOU meters do not keep a chronological record of usage,but merely accumulate usage into 3-4 “buckets” of hours. There is no necessary correlation between TOU rates and wholesale market prices. How does RTP differ from TOU rates?

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION RTP rates are superior to TOU rates in conveying actual market prices to end-users; RTP rates elicit responses from end-users when market prices are actually high or low, not when regulators believe prices ought to be high or low. RTP rates are much superior to TOU rates in providing demand responsiveness as a counter force to generator market What are the key benefits of RTP?

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION What are the costs of RTP? Development of an RTP signal that is representative of purchases at the margin; Metering and telecommunication installations at many end-user sites; Modifications to billing systems to accommodate massive increases in usage data; Loss of certainty in rate structures.

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION How do proposed TOU rates compare to RTP? The 3/26/2001 Assigned Commissioner Ruling in the Rate Stabilization proceeding proposed very large increases in TOU on peak rates, e.g., increasing from $0.06 to $0.36/kW. (1) Implication: massive cost increases for peak summer use or major disruption to traditional business activities; (2) Compared to market prices, $0.36/kWh probably too high in many lower demand hours, e.g., a cool June afternoon; (3) Compared to market prices, $0.36/kWh is probably too low to fully recover market costs in highly stressed hours. An RTP based on market prices would revise these retail rates so that they were based on supply/demand conditions pertinent to that hour driving imbalance energy prices.

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION How can retail rates include RTP? Set retail rates for commodity energy equal to wholesale market prices and separate charges can recover costs of transmission,distribution and other utility costs; Blend RTP retail rates based on spot market purchases and regulated costs of utility-owned power plants and long run contract purchases; Retail rates can be the rate for marginal changes in consumption relative to a historic baseline usage pattern, e.g., the Georgia Power RTP approach.

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION What is California doing with respect to RTP? AB29X provides $35 million to the CEC for RTP equipment installation for all end-users > 200 kW; In current CPUC Rate Stabilization proceeding, several parties advocated RTP as element of market structure; CEC recommended in rate design testimony to CPUC on 4/13/2001, that RTP be endorsed as a policy with implementation in phases, and proposed that a Georgia Power-style RTP supplement be available to any end-user with appropriate metering equipment; CAISO began releasing day imbalance energy costs on 2/12/2001, and wants to generate and publish imbalance costs on an hourly basis as an RTP price signal.

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Why should Western States be interested in RTP? Many utilities in western states are “net short” meaning their own utility-owned and controlled generation is less than their loads. All such utilities and/or their customers are exposed to short term market prices. Even “net long” states can be vulnerable to short supply if they have merchant plants that can sell elsewhere To the extent each utility is exposed to Western short term market prices, all such utilities and/or their customers benefit when any utility using RTP principles cause market clearing prices to decline.

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION California Perspective on Real Time Pricing Michael R. Jaske, Ph.D. California Energy Commission Committee on Regional Electric Power Cooperation April 18, 2001

CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION