Lecture 8: Quasi-experiments Aims & Objectives –To differentiate between true and quasi-experiments –To discuss the nature of random allocation –To examine.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. Part Three SOURCES AND COLLECTION OF DATA.
Advertisements

Andrea M. Landis, PhD, RN UW LEAH
Reading Improvement Through Homework Help Fatimah Washington Ed Fall 2010.
Experimental Design I. Definition of Experimental Design
Validity of Quantitative Research Conclusions. Internal Validity External Validity Issues of Cause and Effect Issues of Generalizability Validity of Quantitative.
Experimental Research Designs
©2005, Pearson Education/Prentice Hall CHAPTER 5 Experimental Strategies.
Questions  Is Exam 2 going to be cumulative or will it just cover the second part of the information?  Are cause-and-effect relationships the same as.
Introduction to Research Design Threats to Internal Validity Two or More Groups Social Threats.
Validity Validity of measurement Validity of research
Chapter 9 Group-Level Research Designs. CHARACTERISTICS OF “IDEAL” EXPERIMENTS Controlling the Time Order of Variables Manipulating the Independent Variable.
MSc Applied Psychology PYM403 Research Methods Validity and Reliability in Research.
Research Methods in MIS: Experimentation Dr. Deepak Khazanchi Acknowledgment: Some of the information in this presentation is Based on Cooper and Schindler.
Group-Level Research Designs
Sampling; Experiments. Sampling  Logic: representative sampling  Sample should have the same variations existing in the larger population  Biased samples.
Sampling and Experimental Control Goals of clinical research is to make generalizations beyond the individual studied to others with similar conditions.
Educational Research by John W. Creswell. Copyright © 2002 by Pearson Education. All rights reserved. Slide 1 Chapter 11 Experimental and Quasi-experimental.
Aaker, Kumar, Day Seventh Edition Instructor’s Presentation Slides
Validity Lecture Overview Overview of the concept Different types of validity Threats to validity and strategies for handling them Examples of validity.
L1 Chapter 11 Experimental and Quasi- experimental Designs Dr. Bill Bauer.
Experimental Design 264a Marketing Research. Criteria for Establishing a Causal Relationship Concomitant variation Temporal variation Control over other.
Experimental Research Take some action and observe its effects Take some action and observe its effects Extension of natural science to social science.
Experimental Design The Gold Standard?.
I want to test a wound treatment or educational program in my clinical setting with patient groups that are convenient or that already exist, How do I.
Copyright © 2008 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved. John W. Creswell Educational Research: Planning,
Chapter 11 Experimental Designs
Power Point Slides by Ronald J. Shope in collaboration with John W. Creswell Chapter 11 Experimental Designs.
Design Experimental Control. Experimental control allows causal inference (IV caused observed change in DV) Experiment has internal validity when it fulfills.
Experimental Research Validity and Confounds. What is it? Systematic inquiry that is characterized by: Systematic inquiry that is characterized by: An.
Techniques of research control: -Extraneous variables (confounding) are: The variables which could have an unwanted effect on the dependent variable under.
Understanding Research Design Can have confusing terms Research Methodology The entire process from question to analysis Research Design Clearly defined.
Experimental Design Chapter 1 Research Strategies and the Control of Nuisance Variables.
Research methods and statistics.  Internal validity is concerned about the causal-effect relationship in a study ◦ Can observed changes be attributed.
Quantitative Research SPED 500 Dr. Sandra Beyda Designs that maximize objectivity by using numbers, statistics, structure, and experimenter control Modes.
Chapter 8 – Lecture 6. Hypothesis Question Initial Idea (0ften Vague) Initial ObservationsSearch Existing Lit. Statement of the problem Operational definition.
Experimental & Quasi-Experimental Designs Dr. Guerette.
Chapter 11.  The general plan for carrying out a study where the independent variable is changed  Determines the internal validity  Should provide.
SOCW 671: #6 Research Designs Review for 1 st Quiz.
Causal inference A cause must always be relative to another cause Wrong: –Eating an avocado before taking a test causes better performance on the test.
 The basic components of experiments are: 1) taking action 2) observing the consequence of that action  Experimental model is most closely linked to.
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS. Categories Lab experiments –Experiments done in artificial or contrived environment Field experiments –Experiments done in natural.
11-1 Chapter 11 Experiments and Test Markets Learning Objectives Understand... uses for experimentation advantages and disadvantages of the experimental.
Experiments.  Labs (update and questions)  STATA Introduction  Intro to Experiments and Experimental Design 2.
Experimental Research Design Causality & Validity Threats to Validity –Construct (particular to experiments) –Internal –External – already discussed.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Business Research Methods, 10eCopyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 10 Experiments.
Can you hear me now? Keeping threats to validity from muffling assessment messages Maureen Donohue-Smith, Ph.D., RN Elmira College.
Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Research
CHOOSING A RESEARCH DESIGN
Experimental Research
Experiments Why would a double-blind experiment be used?
Instructor’s manual Mass Media Research: An Introduction, 7th Edition
Chapter 8 Experimental Design The nature of an experimental design
Part Three SOURCES AND COLLECTION OF DATA
DUET.
Experiments: Part 3.
Making Causal Inferences and Ruling out Rival Explanations
Introduction to Design
Experiments and Quasi-Experiments
How do we misinterpret? Common threats to validity
Hypothesis Testing, Validity &
Experiments and Quasi-Experiments
Experiments: Validity, Reliability and Other Design Considerations
Experiments II: Validity and Design Considerations
Experiments: Part 2.
Experiments: Part 3.
Experiments: Part 3.
Group Experimental Design
Experimental Design I. Definition of Experimental Design
Chapter 11 EDPR 7521 Dr. Kakali Bhattacharya
Types of Designs: R: Random Assignment of subjects to groups
Presentation transcript:

Lecture 8: Quasi-experiments Aims & Objectives –To differentiate between true and quasi-experiments –To discuss the nature of random allocation –To examine threats to experimental validity –To examine some basic quasi-experimental designs

Type of general approaches to design Descriptive What, where, when and to whom Relational Co-variaton Experimental Causal analysis via random allocation Quasi-experimental Causal statements when groups are not equivalent – no random allocation

Random allocation Every potential subject has an equal chance of being in any condition Simple randomisation Block randomisation –Blocks A&B, produce sequences e.g., AABB, ABAB. Sequences are selected at random and subjects selected at random into that block Stratified randomisation –Select on a characteristic that influences the groups and have block randomisation lists within those blocks

Internal validity: I Ruling out a third cause –Randomisation controls for History effects Maturation effects Mortality Statistical regression to the mean –Randomisation does not control for Effects equalising groups –Diffusion of treatment effects –Compensatory rivalry –Compensatory equalisation Effect separating groups –Resentful demoralisation

Statistical validity Risk of making a type 1 error –Power –Fishing –Reliability of measures, treatments –Random irrelevance –Random heterogeneity of respondents

External validity:generalisation Is the effect stable –Over time –Across individuals –Across IVs & DVs –Across places

Mook Research is not always about generalizability of findings Conceptualisation of generalizability are base don an agricultural model Experiments are about generalizability of theory not findings

Construct validity Experimenter effects –Structural Mono-operation bias Mono-method bias Poor explication of constructs –Interpersonal Demand characteristics Apprehension evaluation Rosenthal effect

Quasi-experiments Nomenclature X = a treatment O = Observation … = Not randomly assigned

Uninterrupted designs OXOOXO One group pre- post test design Threats = history, maturation regression

Non-equivalent groups OXO …………O Untreated control group with pre and post test

Reverse treatments OX+O ……………. Ox-O

ITSDs OOOOXOOOO ……………….. OOOO OO OOOXOOO OOXOOO OOO With switch replication

ARIMA OOOXOOO Upward drift Upward constant Gradual upwards No change

Regression discontinuity Depression ShortLong Poverty

Randomized field trials Randomisation by independent group Make seek treatment elsewhere –Within condition effects Placebo-control

Experiments: the last word Experiments are important because they allow us to show what can or ought to happen –Bio feedback –Milgram –Sherrifs boys camp study