Comparison of the Progression of Coronary Atherosclerosis for Two High Efficacy Statin Regimens with Different HDL Effects: SATURN Study Results SJ Nicholls,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reversing Atherosclerosis with Aggressive Lipid Lowering Reversing Atherosclerosis with Aggressive Lipid Lowering Presented at American Heart Association.
Advertisements

Lipid-altering Efficacy and Safety Profile of Co-administered Extended Release Niacin/Laropiprant and Simvastatin in Patients With Dyslipidemia Gilbert.
1 CAMELOT: Study Design A Morbidity and Mortality Study Patients with documented CAD on standard-of-care therapies* (n=1997) Clinical events (morbidity.
Effect of Rosuvastatin Therapy on Coronary Artery Stenosis Assessed by Quantitative Coronary Angiography in ASTEROID CM Ballantyne, 1 JS Raichlen, 2 SJ.
Robert K Huff PharmD. Candidate May Objectives The study was designed to examine 3 main aspects Biochemical effects Safety Tolerability Evacetrapib.
Henry C. Ginsberg, MD College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York For The ACCORD Study Group.
Slide Source: Lipids Online Slide Library Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy (PROVE IT): Design Cannon CP.
Simvastatin Increases HDL-C and Apolipoprotein A-1 Levels Significantly More Than Atorvastatin John P. Kastelein, Evan A. Stein, Michael A. Davidson, John.
Clinical Trial Results. org Statins, High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, and Regression of Coronary Atherosclerosis Stephen J. Nicholls, MBBS, PhD; E.
Henry N. Ginsberg, MD College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York For The ACCORD Study Group.
CE-1 CRESTOR ® Clinical Development Efficacy James W. Blasetto, MD, MPH Senior Director, Clinical Research.
Lipid-Modulating Effects of Evacetrapib, a Novel CETP Inhibitor, Administered as Monotherapy or in Combination with the Most Commonly-Used Statins SJ.
Downloaded from Slide 1 Ezetimibe Coadministered with Atorvastatin in Patients with Hypercholesterolemia and Coronary Heart.
ASTEROID A Study To evaluate the Effect of Rosuvastatin On Intravascular ultrasound- Derived coronary atheroma burden.
Clinical experience with ezetimibe/simvastatin in a Mediterranean population The SETTLE Study I. Migdalis a, A. Efthimiadis b, St. Pappas c, D. Alexopoulos.
ASTEROID A Study to Evaluate the Effect of Rosuvastatin on Intravascular Ultrasound-Derived Coronary Atheroma Burden   References Nissen et al. Effect.
Downloaded from Slide 1 Dual Inhibition of Two Sources of Cholesterol: Absorption and Production in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
Slide 1 EZT 2002-W-6022-SS Ezetimibe Co-administered with Statins: Efficacy and Tolerability Copyright © 2003 MSP Singapore Company, LLC. All rights reserved.
BackgroundBackground HDL-C levels are inversely related to CV event rates. HDL-C levels are inversely related to CV event rates. Torcetrapib, a cholesteryl.
Management of Elevated Cholesterol in the Primary Prevention Group of Adult Japanese (MEGA) Trial MEGA Trial Presented at The American Heart Association.
SATURN: Objective To compare the effects of rosuvastatin 40 mg versus atorvastatin 80 mg on progression of coronary atherosclerosis assessed by intravascular.
SPARCL Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels trial.
Arterial Biology for the Investigation of the Treatment Effects of Reducing Cholesterol 2 ARBITER-2 Trial Presented at The American Heart Association Scientific.
Clinical Trial Results. org SAGE Trial Prakash Deedwania, MD; Peter H. Stone, MD; C. Noel Bairey Merz, MD; Juan Cosin-Aguilar, MD; Nevres Koylan, MD; Don.
Effect of the Renin Inhibitor Aliskiren on Progression of Coronary Atherosclerosis: AQUARIUS Study Results SJ Nicholls, GL Bakris, JJP Kastelein, V Menon,
Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study CARDS Dr Sachin Kadoo.
Slide Source: Lipids Online Slide Library ASTEROID Population at Baseline (n=507) Patients Completing (n=349) Patients Not Completing.
Effect of on Oral Agent Inducing ApoA-I Synthesis on Progression of Coronary Atherosclerosis: Results of the ASSURE Study SJ Nicholls, CM Ballantyne, PJ.
Results of the First Major Clinical Trial of An Oral Agent Inducing ApoA-I Synthesis: A New Approach to Raising HDL and CV Risk Modification SJ Nicholls,
PERISCOPE Comparison of Pioglitazone vs. Glimepiride on Progression of Coronary Atherosclerosis in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Stephen J. Nicholls MBBS.
for The STRADIVARIUS Investigators
VBWG Growth in heart disease, 2000–2050 Deaths Population Foot DK et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:
Clinical Trial Results. org METEOR Trial Presented at the American College of Cardiology Annual Scientific Session March, 2007 Presented by Dr. John R.
Secretory Phospholipase A 2 Inhibition with Varespladib and Cardiovascular Events in Patients with an Acute Coronary Syndrome: Results of the VISTA-16.
Flow of Patients Through the Trial Nissen SE, et al. JAMA 2008;299:
Slide Source: Lipids Online Slide Library Reversal of Atherosclerosis with Aggressive Lipid Lowering (REVERSAL) Nissen SE et al. JAMA.
Clinical Trial Results. org ILLUSTRATE Presented at the American College of Cardiology Annual Scientific Session March, 2007 Presented by Dr. Steven E.
Statins The AURORA Trial Reference Fellstrom BC. Rosuvastatin and cardiovascular events in patients undergoing hemodialysis. N Engl J Med. 2009;360. A.
CETP inhibition: Where are we now? Prof. John Kastelein Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Copyleft Clinical Trial Results. You Must Redistribute Slides ASTEROID Trial A Study to Evaluate the Effect of Rosuvastatin on Intravascular Ultrasound-Derived.
Results of the GLAGOV Trial
Effects of Combination Lipid Therapy on Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD)
Effect of the PCSK9 Inhibitor, Evolocumab, on the Composition of Coronary Atherosclerosis: Insights from the GLAGOV Trial SJ Nicholls, H Kassahun, DM Brennan,
NICE –CG 181 Continuum of CVD Risk and its treatment
Results of the GLAGOV Trial
Christie M. Ballantyne, MD
Results of the CARAT Study
The American College of Cardiology Presented by Dr. Steven E. Nissen
Baseline characteristics and effectiveness results
European Society of Cardiology 2017 Clinical Trial Update I
Stephen J Nicholls MBBS PhD FRACP FACC
REVEAL: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of anacetrapib in 30,449 patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease Louise Bowman on behalf of the HPS.
Effects of Anacetrapib on the Incidence of New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus and on Vascular Events in People With Diabetes Louise Bowman & Martin Landray on.
The American Heart Association Presented by Dr. Steven E. Nissen
Senior Medical Director, Cardiovascular
Treatment LDL-C: baseline (mg/dL) LDL-C: 24 mo (mg/dL) p
The ASSERT Study.
GLAGOV Trial design: Patients with CAD and elevated LDL cholesterol on statin therapy were randomized to subcutaneous evolocumab (n = 484) vs. subcutaneous.
Effect of on Oral Agent Inducing ApoA-I Synthesis on Progression of Coronary Atherosclerosis: Results of the ASSURE Study SJ Nicholls, CM Ballantyne, PJ.
Effects of Combination Lipid Therapy on Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD)
The following slides highlight a report on presentations from the Late-Breaking Clinical Trial Sessions and a Satellite Symposium at the 76th Annual Scientific.
Section 7: Aggressive vs moderate approach to lipid lowering
These slides highlight a presentation from a Special Session of the Late-Breaking Clinical Trials sessions during the American College of Cardiology 2005.
Stephen J. Nicholls, MBBS, PhD; E
Flow of Patients Through the Trial
Flow of Patients Through Trial
Baseline Characteristics, Blood Pressures, and Laboratory Values
Major classes of drugs to reduce lipids
Simvastatin With or Without Ezetimibe in Familial Hypercholesterolemia
Presentation transcript:

Comparison of the Progression of Coronary Atherosclerosis for Two High Efficacy Statin Regimens with Different HDL Effects: SATURN Study Results SJ Nicholls, CM Ballantyne, PJ Barter, MJ Chapman, RM Erbel, P Libby, JS Raichlen, M Borgman, K Wolski and SE Nissen Cleveland Clinic Heart & Vascular Institute

Disclosures Research support: AstraZeneca, Anthera, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Resverlogix, Roche and LipoScience Consulting and honoraria: AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Anthera, Omthera, Merck, Takeda, Resverlogix, Sanofi-Aventis, CSL Behring, Esperion, Boehringer Ingelheim SATURN was sponsored by AstraZeneca Research support: AstraZeneca, Anthera, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Resverlogix, Roche and LipoScience Consulting and honoraria: AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Anthera, Omthera, Merck, Takeda, Resverlogix, Sanofi-Aventis, CSL Behring, Esperion, Boehringer Ingelheim SATURN was sponsored by AstraZeneca

Steering Committee Steven Nissen (Chair) Stephen Nicholls (Principal Investigator) Philip Barter Christie Ballantyne John Chapman Raimund Erbel Peter Libby Joel Raichlen (non-voting) Steven Nissen (Chair) Stephen Nicholls (Principal Investigator) Philip Barter Christie Ballantyne John Chapman Raimund Erbel Peter Libby Joel Raichlen (non-voting)

Background Statins have consistently reduced cardiovascular event rates in large randomized controlled clinical trials. Imaging studies have shown that statins have a favorable effect on disease progression. The effects on plaque burden appear to correlate with both lowering of LDL-C and raising of HDL-C. However, no study has compared the effects of maximal dosages of the most efficacious statin regimens on progression of coronary atherosclerosis. Statins have consistently reduced cardiovascular event rates in large randomized controlled clinical trials. Imaging studies have shown that statins have a favorable effect on disease progression. The effects on plaque burden appear to correlate with both lowering of LDL-C and raising of HDL-C. However, no study has compared the effects of maximal dosages of the most efficacious statin regimens on progression of coronary atherosclerosis.

Objective To compare the effects of rosuvastatin 40 mg versus atorvastatin 80 mg on progression of coronary atherosclerosis assessed by intravascular ultrasound.

Rosuvastatin 40 mg (n =694) Atorvastatin 80 mg (n=691) Safety Lipids Safety IVUS Lipids Safety Lipids Safety Safety Visit: Week: 1 – Screening Period 2 –2 Rosuva 20 mg Atorva 40 mg IVUS Lipids Randomization Period Lipids Safety Safety 1385 patients with symptomatic CAD (angiographic stenosis >20%) LDL-C with (>80 mg/dL) or without (>100 mg/dL) statin use last 4 weeks 1385 patients with symptomatic CAD (angiographic stenosis >20%) LDL-C with (>80 mg/dL) or without (>100 mg/dL) statin use last 4 weeks Study Design

4255 patients screened and 1578 patients treated at centers in North America, Europe, South America and Australia Atorvastatin 80 mg (n=691)Rosuvastatin 40 mg (n=694) 24 months treatment Follow-up IVUS of originally imaged “target” vessel (n=1039) Treatment for 2 weeks with atorvastatin 40 mg or rosuvastatin 20 mg for 2 weeks to achieve LDL-C <116 mg/dL SATURN Trial: Flow of Patients 346 (25%) patients withdrew or did not have an evaluable final IVUS

Clinical Characteristics Parameter Atorvastatin (n=519) Rosuvastatin (n=520) Mean age in years Males74.4%72.9% Median Body Mass Index History of Hypertension70.7%70.0% History of Diabetes16.8%13.8% Prior Statin Use61.5%58.3% Concomitant Medications Anti-platelet Therapy97.9%97.5% Beta-blockers61.1%60.6% ACE Inhibitors44.5%43.5% Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists15.8%16.7%

Time-Weighted Lipid Levels and hsCRP Parameter Atorvastatin (n=519) Rosuvastatin (n=520) P Value LDL cholesterol (mg/dL) <0.001 HDL cholesterol (mg/dL) Triglycerides (mg/dL)* LDL:HDL cholesterol1.51.3<0.01 hsCRP (mg/L)* Presented as least-square means. *Median values

Primary IVUS Efficacy Parameter Change Percent Atheroma Volume P=0.17† P<0.001* Median Change Percent Atheroma Volume † comparison between groups. * comparison from baseline

Secondary IVUS Efficacy Parameter Change Total Atheroma Volume (mm 3 ) P=0.01† P=0.01* P<0.001* Median Change in Total Atheroma Volume † comparison between groups. * comparison from baseline

Fraction of Patients Exhibiting Regression AtorvastatinRosuvastatin 63.2% 68.5% 64.7% 71.3% P=0.02P=0.07 Percent of Patients Percent Atheroma Volume Total Atheroma Volume

Subgroups Demonstrating Heterogeneity Change Percent Atheroma Volume Females Baseline LDL-C ≥Mean Baseline HDL-C ≥Mean Achieved HDL-C ≥Mean P=0.01 P=0.02 P=0.03 *P values for heterogeneity AtorvastatinRosuvastatin

LDL-C and Disease Progression Median Change Percent Atheroma Volume

Adverse Events: Safety Population (n=1385) Parameter Atorvastatin (n=691) Rosuvastatin (n=691) Major cardiovascular event7.1%7.5% ALT >3x ULN†2.0%0.7% CK >5x ULN0.7%0.3% Proteinuria*1.7%3.8% Creatinine >ULN3.0%3.3% Change HbA1c (%) † P=0.04 and * P=0.02 for comparison between groups

Conclusions Rosuvastatin 40 mg resulted in moderately lower LDL-C and higher HDL-C than atorvastatin 80 mg. For the primary IVUS endpoint, the extent of regression was similar for both regimens (P=0.17). However, for the secondary IVUS endpoint, a greater degree of regression was observed with rosuvastatin compared with atorvastatin (P=0.01). A low number of clinical and biochemical adverse events were observed in both groups. Rosuvastatin 40 mg resulted in moderately lower LDL-C and higher HDL-C than atorvastatin 80 mg. For the primary IVUS endpoint, the extent of regression was similar for both regimens (P=0.17). However, for the secondary IVUS endpoint, a greater degree of regression was observed with rosuvastatin compared with atorvastatin (P=0.01). A low number of clinical and biochemical adverse events were observed in both groups.

Publication Available On-line

A Final Thought Maximal statin therapy, achieving optimal LDL-C and HDL-C levels, is well tolerated and promotes extensive disease regression. The extent and frequency of regression observed in the SATURN trial is unprecedented. The finding that nearly one third of patients continue to progress supports the need to develop additional anti-atherosclerotic therapies. Maximal statin therapy, achieving optimal LDL-C and HDL-C levels, is well tolerated and promotes extensive disease regression. The extent and frequency of regression observed in the SATURN trial is unprecedented. The finding that nearly one third of patients continue to progress supports the need to develop additional anti-atherosclerotic therapies.