Board of Trustees Quarterly Data Report Volume 1, Number 2 Graduation and Retention Update January 7, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
College Name City, State. Location Details Add a highlight about your college.
Advertisements

The Student Progression Study 2002 Update: Floridas Public High School Graduates Seven Years Later.
Institutional and Student Characteristics that Predict Graduation and Retention Rates Braden J. Hosch, Ph.D. Director of Institutional Research & Assessment.
Academic Outcomes of 4-Year University Freshman Cohorts: A Comparison of Dual Enrollees & Advanced Placement (AP) Credit Recipients Shoumi Mustafa and.
NIU – An Historical Snapshot Daniel House Office of Institutional Research Brian Brim Division of Academic and Student Affairs Daniel House Office of Institutional.
Southern Regional Education Board SREB College Completion and Affordability Perspectives from the SREB Fact Book on Higher Education, 2009 Lansdowne, Virginia.
© 2012 Boise State University1 Marcia Belcheir, Ph.D. Shari Ellertson, Ph.D. Boise State University Analyzing changes in retention and graduation.
Trends in College Pricing 2014For detailed data, visit: trends.collegeboard.org. Average Published Charges for Full-Time Undergraduates by Sector,
Trends in Higher Education Series 2014For detailed data, visit: trends.collegeboard.org. PRICES.
College Completion: Roadblocks & Strategies Appalachian Higher Education Network Conference Asheville, NC – June 10-12, 2014 Presented by: Zornitsa Georgieva.
Trends in Student Aid 2014For detailed data, visit: trends.collegeboard.org. Student Aid and Nonfederal Loans in 2013 Dollars (in Millions), to.
The University of British Columbia 2329 West Mall Vancouver, B.C. Canada V6T 1Z4 Telephone: East Mall Vancouver, Canada V6T.
College Presentation By: Moises Cortez And Brenden Lorsch Pivonka.
Strategic Plan Setting Retention and Graduation Targets Enrollment Management Advisory Council (EMAC) November 19, 2014.
What is financial aid? Financial Aid Awards Paid by Type.
State University System
The University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX September 6, Fall 2013 Preliminary Data Enrollment and Retention Recruitment.
Veterinary Becky Lerminiaux. Why Veterinary? I love being around animals. I take care of them I’m good with them I’d like to help all the animals being.
UMass Boston Retention, Persistence, and Graduation Rates UMass Boston Advising Collaborative March 28, 2013 Office of Institutional Research and Policy.
LEADERSHIP COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 10, 2013 Update on Curriculum Enrollment, Student Characteristics & Student Success.
The Perfect Demographic Storm: Extending the Benefits of Higher Education to the Next Wave of Students MASFAA Conference November 15-17, 2006 Julie Shields-Rutyna.
A Profile of BGSU Students Jie Wu Office of Institutional Research Summer 2008.
HOUSTON BAPTIST UNIVERSITY Mindy May. Type/Description/Setting  Located in Houston, Texas – the fourth most populated city in the United States  Suburban.
Total Student Aid and Nonfederal Loans Used to Finance Postsecondary Education Expenses in 2011 Dollars (in Millions), to SOURCE: The.

Where Are We & Where Do We Want to Be In 2012? UVI – Creating A New Strategic Plan April 2005.
The University of Hawai ʻ i at Mānoa ACCESS TO SUCCESS: LEADING INDICATORS WORKGROUP.
An Equal Opportunity University Transitions from High School to the University of Kentucky Mike Mullen Associate Provost for Undergraduate Education.
1 Florida Board of Governors Annual Accountability Report
Nonparametric Survival Analysis of Undergraduate Engineering Student Dropout Young Kyoung Min 1,3, Guili Zhang 1,4, Russell A. Long 2, Timothy J. Anderson.
Your Official Source on U.S. Higher Education EducationUSA.state.gov.
Trends in Higher Education Series 2006, October 24, The Price of College Sandy Baum Skidmore College and the College Board National.
An Alternate Approach to Studying Transfer Student Outcomes Suresh Gangireddy, GRA Lakshmi Kokatla, GRA Sam Houston State University Office of Institutional.
State University System of Florida B OARD OF G OVERNORS Access and Diversity in Florida Higher Education: Successful High School Services and University.
College Board TRENDS IN STUDENT AID Total Aid Awarded $134.8 Billion Graduate & Undergraduate 51% or 69 Billion in Loans (FFELP and Direct) –Undergrad.
Ethnicity CategoryFall 2009 Cohort (2 Years) Fall 2008 Cohort (3 Years) Fall 2007 Cohort (4 Years) Fall 2006 Cohort (5 Years) Fall 2005 Cohort (6 Years)
Trends in Student Aid 2015For detailed data, visit: trends.collegeboard.org. Student Aid and Nonfederal Loans in 2014 Dollars (in Millions), to.
Trends in College Pricing 2015For detailed data, visit: trends.collegeboard.org. Average Published Charges (Enrollment-Weighted) for Full-Time Undergraduates.
· IUPUI · Conceptualizing and Understanding Studies of Student Persistence University Planning, Institutional Research, & Accountability April 19, 2007.
Dual Enrollment. First Time in College (FTIC) Board of Governors: Regulation FTIC freshmen are defined as students who have earned a standard high.
Dual Enrollment. First Time in College (FTIC) Board of Governors: Regulation FTIC freshmen are defined as students who have earned a standard high.
Trends in Student Aid 2013For detailed data, visit: trends.collegeboard.org. Total Student Aid and Nonfederal Loans Used to Finance Postsecondary Education.
Vicki A. McCracken, Professor, School of Economic Sciences Fran Hermanson, Associate Director, Institutional Research Academic Performance and Persistence.
Understanding Graduation Rates. A Look Across Institutions.
Undergraduate Student Persistence & Graduation advisor UI/WSU Advising Symposium September 9, 2011 Joel Michalski, Ph.D. Candidate & Karla Makus, Academic.
A Few Facts about U of H More Info on U of H.
Template provided by: “posters4research.com” Academic Performance and Persistence of Undergraduate Students at a Land-Grant Institution: A Statistical.
Figure 1. First-Time-In-College 6-Year Graduation Rates * Year in which Cohort Entered 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0%
Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Data Highlight: Completion CAAP Meeting March 30,
SUPPORTING DATA 1 Pipeline Subcommittee June 29, 2010 DRAFT.
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH, PLANNING, AND PERFORMANCE BETH BEAN Remedial Education Policy Review Task Force and Advisory Board.
Abstract Improving student success in postsecondary education is a key federal, state, and university objective that is inseparable from the focus on increasing.
Board of Trustees Student Life & Facilities Committee Enrollment Update October 16, 2012.
INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH FAST FACTS ACADEMIC YEAR Source:
Community College of Baltimore County
THE PATH FORWARD KCTCS Strategic Plan
Trends in Higher Education Series
Florida Board of Governors Performance & Accountability Committee
University of Michigan
KCTCS Strategic Plan Retention PM Update Board of Regents June 2017.
IPEDS COMPARISON FALL 2010 – FALL 2014
Peer Institutions Comparative Research York College, CUNY
KCTCS Strategic Plan Update: Retention rates
Measuring Student Success Ysu 2020 Strategic plan – Cornerstone update
Trends in Higher Education Series
Student Aid and Nonfederal Loans in 2013 Dollars (in Millions), to
Student Aid and Nonfederal Loans in 2014 Dollars (in Millions), to
Getting to Know Our AHS Undergraduate Students
USG Dual Enrollment Data and Trends
Presentation transcript:

Board of Trustees Quarterly Data Report Volume 1, Number 2 Graduation and Retention Update January 7, 2014

Retention Rates Cohort Entering Year 1st Year Retention 2nd Year Retention 3rd Year Retention 4th Year Retention 5th Year Retention SummerFallSummerFallSummerFallSummerFallSummerFall % 79.2%83.9% %69.6% 84.0%83.5%68.5%70.4% %70.5%62.0% 81.9%83.5%68.5%72.0%60.2%63.4% %71.5%65.2%60.2% 83.5%84.5%71.2%71.9%63.4%67.1%58.5%61.9% %72.2%66.4%63.4%60.6% 85.0%84.8%72.3%72.1%66.5%66.3%63.9%63.2%60.6%60.5%

Retention Rates FTICs Entering Fall 2012 On- Campus Housing Off- Campus Housing Percent of Students in On- and Off-Campus Housing89.8%10.2% Average Grade Point Average Average Number of Hours Attempted Average Hours Successfully Completed Percent of Students Retained in Fall %80.8%

Graduation Rates Six Year UNF FTIC Graduation Rates FTIC Entry Year Six Years Later Graduated from UNF45%49%46%49%47% Rank among SUS institutions6 th 5 th 6 th (tied)6 th 6 th (tied) Graduated from an SUS Institution 54%57%54%56%55% Rank among SUS institutions5 th 6 th Graduated from a U.S. Institution* 61%65%62%65%64% *Do not have data for other state institutions

Relation between Retention and Graduation Predictor Variable Public Masters (n =167) Public and Nonprofit Masters (n =361) Bachelor's degree within 6 years Full-time retention rate Bachelor’s degree within 6 years Full-time retention rate rr2r2 rr2r2 rr2r2 rr2r2 Bachelor’s degree within 6 years Full-time retention rate

Positive Predictors of Institutional Graduation Rates Predictor Variable Public Masters (n =167) Public and Nonprofit Masters (n =361) Bachelor's degree within 6 years Full-time retention rate Bachelor’s degree within 6 years Full-time retention rate rr2r2 rr2r2 rr2r2 rr2r2 SAT I Math 25th % score SAT I Verbal 25th % score ACT Composite 25th % score SAT I Math 75th % score SAT I Verbal 75th % score ACT Composite 75th % score

Positive Predictors of Institutional Graduation Rates Predictor Variable Public Masters (n =167) Public and Nonprofit Masters (n =361) Bachelor's degree within 6 years Full-time retention rate Bachelor’s degree within 6 years Full-time retention rate rr2r2 rr2r2 rr2r2 rr2r2 Total dormitory capacity Tuition and fees, % Students Living on Campus % enrollment that is White, non-Hispanic FTIC as a % all undergrads In-state required fees for full-time undergrads

Negative Predictors of Institutional Graduation Rates Predictor Variable Public Masters (n =167) Public and Nonprofit Masters (n =361) Bachelor's degree within 6 years Full-time retention rate Bachelor’s degree within 6 years Full-time retention rate rr2r2 rr2r2 rr2r2 rr2r2 % full-time FTICs receiving Pell grants % undergrad students receiving Pell % receiving federal grant aid % enrollment that is Black, non-Hispanic Transfer-out rate – bachelor’s cohort New transfer students as % of all new students

Predictive Modeling for 2005 Cohorts (227 Public and Non-Profit Privates) Retention, 2006Graduation, 2011 FactorEffectSignificance EffectSignificance UNF 1.929None None Peers / Aspirants 2.205None 4.471None Undergraduate Pct ***-0.101** FTE vs. Total Enrolled 0.126**0.188** Matriculation Rate ***-0.171***** SAT Math 25th percentile 0.049***0.085***** SAT Verbal 75th percentile 0.024**0.043*** ACT 25th percentile 0.369None1.109**** Pct. Female 0.091**0.164*** Pct. Hispanic 0.075**0.137*** Total Univ. Revenues 0.026****0.021** Tuition+Fees Pct. of Revs None0.075** Avg. Pell Grant ****-0.007**** Pct. With Pell Grant None-0.116** Pct. Living on Campus 0.067*0.135*** Transfers as Pct. of New ****-0.162***** Student / Faculty Ratio 0.390***0.260None Town Location *-0.058None Admission Rate * None Variation Explained 68% 83%

After accounting for student & institutional factors, our retention and graduation rates are essentially the same as other comprehensive masters institutions. Stated otherwise, we are positioned right where one would expect us to be. Once we know the factors in the preceding table, factors found to be insignificant include: Predictive Modeling for 2005 Cohorts (227 Public and Non-Profit Privates) –Whether school is public or private –City, rural, or suburban locations –Total enrollment –Total undergrads –Total applicants –Total FTE –FTIC percentage –Other SAT or ACT thresholds –Total tuition & fee revenue –Affordability index –Percentage of black students –Percentage of white students –Percentage with any aid –Percentage of FTICs with Pell –Average Pell for FTICs –Total dorm rooms –Remoteness of location

Upon ArrivalAfter Fall termAfter Spring term Factor EffectSignif. EffectSignif.EffectSignif. Lived on campus in Fall0.244*****0.238*****0.169** Housing made mandatory0.101None-0.011None-0.124None SAT0.000None0.000None0.000None High School GPA0.530*****0.062None-0.014None AP credits0.014****0.008*0.003None Fall Hours Attempted0.014None-0.006None Fall Hours Earned0.017None-0.002None Fall GPA0.495*****0.254***** Spring Hours Attempted0.002None Spring Hours Earned0.034*** Spring GPA0.273***** Asian0.266None0.215None0.365* Asian Pacific Islander0.346**0.407***0.305* Black0.202*0.231**0.203None Hispanic-0.044None0.018None-0.024None Multi-racial-0.094None-0.016None-0.074None Non-resident alien0.376*0.029None-0.156None Ethnicity not reported3.824None3.825None 4.422None Female0.005None-0.040None None Predictive Modeling of Second-Year Retention (UNF Students Only, Cohorts)

Upon ArrivalAfter Fall termAfter Spring term FactorEffectSignif.EffectSignif.EffectSignif. Declared major in BCH-0.103None-0.100None-0.121None Declared major in CCB0.050None0.046None0.069None Declared major in COEHS-0.028None0.002None-0.005None Declared major in CCEC0.035None0.129None0.169* Did not declare major0.070None0.059None0.099None From Out-of-State-0.441*****-0.594*****-0.631***** From Region **-0.268**-0.231* From Region ****-0.225****-0.206*** From Region *****-0.381*****-0.319**** From Region ***-0.270***-0.195** From Region None-0.239None-0.238None From Region None-0.229None-0.288None Year None0.034None-0.082None Year None0.068None-0.064None Year None0.002None-0.102None Year None None None Variation Explained 6.5% 21.4% 22.2% Sample Size Predictive Modeling of Second-Year Retention (UNF Students Only, Cohorts)

A student’s grades are the key driver of retention and graduation. Living on campus is highly related to retention at all three points in time. Moreover, the size of the effect of on-campus housing on retention was the same whether on- campus was mandatory or optional. Upon a student’s arrival at UNF, high school GPA and AP credits are good predictors of retention, whereas SAT scores are not. Once the FTIC gets through his/her first fall, even the high school GPA is no longer a good predictor. After the first spring, AP credits also drop out as good predictors. Fall term GPA is a strong predictor once student gets through his/her first Fall term. Spring term GPA and spring hours earned are strong predictors once student gets through his/her first Spring term. Predictive Modeling of Second-Year Retention (UNF Students Only, Cohorts)

There is evidence we retain Black, Asian-Pacific Islander, and Asian students more readily than White students. There is no gender effect. There is no effect of the college being targeted as they come in our door (all comparisons are versus COAS), but CCEC majors show higher retention once they’re through the spring term. Out-of-state students, and students from all regions except regions 6 and 7, are retained at a lower rate than region 2 (our home region). Once through the spring term, 2012 FTICs do show higher retention than FTICs from all earlier years, but there’s not conclusive evidence that 2012 was indeed better (i.e., the differences observed could be random). Predictive Modeling of Second-Year Retention (UNF Students Only, Cohorts)