Amaldi conference, June 2005 1 Lock acquisition scheme for the Advanced LIGO optical configuration Amaldi conference June24, 2005 O. Miyakawa, Caltech.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik (Albert-Einstein-Institut) HOMODYNE AND HETERODYNE READOUT OF A SIGNAL- RECYCLED GRAVITATIONAL WAVE DETECTOR.
Advertisements

Gravitational Wave Astronomy Dr. Giles Hammond Institute for Gravitational Research SUPA, University of Glasgow Universität Jena, August 2010.
Spring LSC 2001 LIGO-G W E2 Amplitude Calibration of the Hanford Recombined 2km IFO Michael Landry, LIGO Hanford Observatory Luca Matone, Benoit.
LIGO NSF review, 11/10/05 1 AdLIGO Optical configuration and control Nov 10, 2005 Alan Weinstein for AdLIGO Interferometer Sensing and Control (ISC) and.
1 Virgo commissioning status M.Barsuglia LAL Orsay.
LIGO NSF review, 11/10/05 1 AdLIGO Optical configuration and control Nov 10, 2005 Alan Weinstein for AdLIGO Interferometer Sensing and Control (ISC) and.
Optical Springs at the 40m 1 QND Workshop, Hannover Dec 14, 2005 Robert Ward for the 40m Team Osamu Miyakawa, Rana Adhikari, Matthew Evans, Benjamin Abbott,
Caltech 40m Current Issues University of Florida Kentaro Somiya.
NSF : Nov. 10, LIGO End to End simulation overview  Time domain simulation written in C++  Like MATLAB with Interferometer toolbox  Major physics.
LIGO- G05XXXX-00-R 40m meeting, May Experimental update from the 40m team 40m TAC meeting May 13, 2005 O. Miyakawa, Caltech and the 40m collaboration.
40m TAC, 10/13/05 1 Lock acquisition procedure towards detuned RSE Start with no DOFs controlled, all optics aligned. Re-align each 1.5 hours. ITMy ITMx.
40m Modeling and Experiment 1 Modeling the 40m QND Workshop, Hannover Dec 15, 2005 Robert Ward Seiji Kawamura, Osamu Miyakawa, Hiro Yamamoto, Matthew Evans,
40m TAC, 10/13/05 1 Report to the 40m Technical Advisory Committee October 13, 2005 The 40m Team Ben Abbott, Rana Adhikari, Dan Busby, Jay Heefner, Osamu.
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v1.
Towards dual recycling with the aid of time and frequency domain simulations M. Malec for the GEO 600 team Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik Albert-Einstein-Institut.
G R DC Readout for Advanced LIGO P Fritschel LSC meeting Hannover, 21 August 2003.
LIGO- G R 40m Progress, LSC meeting, Aug m Laboratory Upgrade Progress Report Osamu Miyakawa, Caltech 40m Technical Advisory Committee.
LIGO-G R Aspen Current Status of the 40m Detuned RSE Prototype Seiji Kawamura 2004 Aspen Winter Conference on Gravitational Waves Gravitational.
Interferometer Control Matt Evans …talk mostly taken from…
Stefan Hild October 2007 LSC-Virgo meeting Hannover Interferometers with detuned arm cavaties.
LIGO- G R 40m Progress, LSC meeting, 3/031 40m Laboratory Upgrade Progress Report Osamu Miyakawa, Caltech 40m Technical Advisory Committee LIGO-G R.
LIGO- G R Telecon on June, Mach-Zender interferometer to eliminate sidebands of sidebands for Advanced LIGO Osamu Miyakawa, Caltech.
1 Wan Wu, Volker Quetschke, Ira Thorpe, Rodrigo Delgadillo, Guido Mueller, David Reitze, and David Tanner Noise associated with the EOM in Advanced LIGO.
LIGO- G R Amaldi7 July 14 th, 2007 R. Ward, Caltech 1 DC Readout Experiment at the Caltech 40m Laboratory Robert Ward Caltech Amaldi 7 July 14.
LIGO- G R Sensing and control, SPIE conference, June Sensing and control of the Advanced LIGO optical configuration SPIE conference at.
RSE Experiment in Japan Feb. 20 th, 2004 Aspen Meeting LIGO-G Z K.Somiya, O.Miyakawa, P.Beyersdorf, and S.Kawamura.
1 1.Definition 2.Deliverables 3.Status of preliminary design 4.Risks 5.Tasks to be done 6.Decisions to be taken 7.Required simulations 8.Planning ISC workshop:
LIGO- G R Aspen winter conference, January Toward the Advanced LIGO optical configuration investigated in 40meter prototype Aspen winter.
Isola d’Elba, Italy 2006GWADW-VESF meeting Diagonalizing sensing matrix of RSE interferometer Shuichi Sato TAMA project National Astronomical Observatory.
Robert Ward NAOJ seminar, March 1, The Caltech 40m Prototype Detuned RSE Interferometer Robert Ward NAOJ seminar March 1, 2006 Osamu Miyakawa, Rana.
LIGO- G R LIGO seminar, November Optical spring and optical resonance in the 40m Detuned RSE interferometer LIGO seminar November 1, 2005.
LIGO- G R 40m Progress, LSC meeting, 8/021 40m Laboratory Upgrade Progress Report Dennis Ugolini, Caltech 40m Technical Advisory Committee LIGO-G R.
Advanced LIGO Simulation, 6/1/06 Elba G E 1 ✦ LIGO I experience ✦ FP cavity : LIGO I vs AdvLIGO ✦ Simulation tools ✦ Time domain model Advanced.
Dual Recycling in GEO 600 H. Grote, A. Freise, M. Malec for the GEO600 team Institut für Atom- und Molekülphysik University of Hannover Max-Planck-Institut.
LIGO- G R LSC meeting at LSU, August Caltech 40m Lab Update LSC meeting at LSU Aug 16, 2006 Robert Ward, Caltech and the 40m team: Rana.
Institute for Cosmic Ray Research Univ. of Tokyo Development of an RSE Interferometer Using the Third Harmonic Demodulation LIGO-G Z Osamu Miyakawa,
Aligning Advanced Detectors L. Barsotti, M. Evans, P. Fritschel LIGO/MIT Understanding Detector Performance and Ground-Based Detector Designs LIGO-G
LIGO- G R 40m weekly meeting, Jan 05, Explore demodulation phase for DDM on 40m RSE prototype Osamu Miyakawa, Caltech LIGO-G R.
Jan 17th 2006Ward Candicacy1 Length Sensing and Control for an Advanced Gravitational Wave Detector Robert Ward PhD Candidacy Caltech, 17 Jan 2006.
MOTIVATION OF THIS PROJECT Testing the control scheme with a prototype interferometer to demonstrate the control of the tuned RSE for LCGT is necessary.
Concept and Current Status of Japan 4m RSE March Kentaro Somiya LIGO-G Z.
1 Locking in Virgo Matteo Barsuglia ILIAS, Cascina, July 7 th 2004.
LIGO- G Z LSC meeting at Baton Rouge, March Caltech 40m Lab Update LSC Meeting Baton Rouge Mar 21, 2007 Robert Ward, Caltech and the 40m.
LIGO-G Z March 2007, LSC meeting, Osamu Miyakawa 1 Osamu Miyakawa Hiroaki Yamamoto March 21, 2006 LSC meeting Modeling of AdLIGO arm lock acquisition.
Caltech, February 12th1 Virgo central interferometer: commissioning and engineering runs Matteo Barsuglia Laboratoire de l’Accelerateur Lineaire, Orsay.
1 DC readout for Virgo+? E. Tournefier WG1 meeting, Hannover January 23 rd,2007 DC vs AC readout: technical noises Output mode cleaner for DC readout.
Monica VarvellaIEEE - GW Workshop Roma, October 21, M.Varvella Virgo LAL Orsay / LIGO CalTech Time-domain model for AdvLIGO Interferometer Gravitational.
LIGO- G R 40m/AdLIGO, LSC, August Issues in sensing and control of the 40m and Advanced LIGO optical configuration LSC meeting, August.
LIGO-G R DC Detection at the 40m Lab DC Detection Experiment at the 40m Lab Robert Ward for the 40m Lab to the AIC group Livingston LSC meeting.
LIGO-G Z 3) Current Status & Plan for Japan RSE -- Stabilization and Installation of PRC & Detuning -- LSC Livingston 2002 Kentaro Somiya.
LIGO- G R Amaldi7 July 14 th, 2007 R. Ward, Caltech 1 Prototyping for eLIGO: Power Recycled Fabry Perot Michelson DARM RF ITMy ITMx BS PRM SRM.
1 Fumiko 2006 Elba Meeting Current status of the 4m RSE.
Testing Advanced LIGO length sensing and control scheme at the Caltech 40m interferometer. at the Caltech 40m interferometer. Yoichi Aso*, Rana Adhikari,
Main Interferometer Subsystem
Main Interferometer Subsystem
Demonstration of lock acquisition and optical response on
Yoichi Aso on behalf of the LCGT ISC Group
Heterodyne Readout for Advanced LIGO
Homodyne or heterodyne Readout for Advanced LIGO?
Current Status of the 40m Detuned RSE Prototype
Workshop on Gravitational Wave Detectors, IEEE, Rome, October 21, 2004
Heterodyne Readout for Advanced LIGO
40m Laboratory Upgrade Progress Report
Effect of sideband of sideband on 40m and Advanced LIGO
Advanced LIGO optical configuration investigated in 40meter prototype
Estimation of each loop shot noise limit for AdLIGO
Progress report from 40m team for the Advanced LIGO
40m TAC Update October 2006 The 40m Team 11 April 2019 G I.
Homodyne detection: understanding the laser noise amplitude transfer function Jérôme Degallaix Ilias meeting – June 2007.
Presentation transcript:

Amaldi conference, June Lock acquisition scheme for the Advanced LIGO optical configuration Amaldi conference June24, 2005 O. Miyakawa, Caltech and the 40m collaboration

Amaldi conference, June Caltech 40 meter prototype interferometer Objectives  Develop lock acquisition procedure of detuned Resonant Sideband Extraction (RSE) interferometer, as close as possible to AdLIGO optical design BS PRM SRM X arm Dark port Bright port Y arm  Characterize noise mechanisms  Verify optical spring and optical resonance  Develop DC readout scheme  Extrapolate to AdLIGO via simulation

Amaldi conference, June AdLIGO signal extraction scheme  Arm cavity signals are extracted from beat between carrier and f 1 or f 2.  Central part (Michelson, PRC, SRC) signals are extracted from beat between f 1 and f 2, not including arm cavity information. f1f1 -f 1 f2f2 -f 2 Carrier (Resonant on arms) Single demodulation Arm information Double demodulation Central part information  Mach-Zehnder will be installed to eliminate sidebands of sidebands.  Only + f 2 is resonant on SRC.  Unbalanced sidebands of +/-f 2 due to detuned SRC produce good error signal for Central part. ETMy ETMx ITMy ITMx BS PRM SRM 4km f2f2 f1f1

Amaldi conference, June DOF for length control : L  =( L x  L y ) / 2 : L  = L x  L y : l  =( l x  l y ) / 2 =2.257m : l  = l x  l y = 0.451m : l s =( l sx  l sy ) / 2 =2.15m PortDem. Freq. LL LL ll ll l s SPf1f E-9-1.2E-3-1.3E-6-2.3E-6 APf2f2 -4.8E-911.2E-81.3E-3-1.7E-8 SP f1  f2f1  f2 -1.7E-3-3.0E E-2-1.0E-1 AP f1  f2f1  f2 -6.2E-41.5E-37.5E-117.1E-2 PO f1  f2f1  f2 3.6E-32.7E-34.6E-1-2.3E-21 Signal Extraction Matrix (in-lock) Common of arms Differential of arms Power recycling cavity Michelson Signal recycling cavity Laser ETMy ETMx ITMy ITMx BS PRM SRM SP AP PO lxlx lyly l sx l sy L x =38.55m Finesse=1235 L y =38.55m Finesse=1235 Phase Modulation f 1 =33MHz f 2 =166MHz T =7% G PR =14.5

Amaldi conference, June Differences between AdvLIGO and 40m prototype  100 times shorter cavity length  Arm cavity finesse at 40m chosen to be = to AdvLIGO ( = 1235 ) »Storage time is x100 shorter.  Control RF sidebands are 33/166 MHz instead of 9/180 MHz »Due to shorter PRC length, less signal separation.  LIGO-I 10-watt laser, negligible thermal effects »180W laser will be used in AdvLIGO.  Noisier seismic environment in town, smaller stack »~1x10 -6 m at 1Hz.  LIGO-I single pendulum suspensions are used »AdvLIGO will use triple (MC, BS, PRM, SRM) and quad (ITMs, ETMs) suspensions.

Amaldi conference, June Lock acquisition procedure towards detuned RSE ITMy ITMx BS PRM SRM ETMx ETMy Shutter Carrier 33MHz 166MHz DRMI using DDM Off-resonant arms using DC lock (POX/TrX), (POY/TrY) SP166/PRC, AP166/PRC (POX/TrX) + (POY/TrY), (POX/TrX) – (POY/TrY) (TrX + TrY), (TrX – TrY) / (TrX + TrY) Ideas for arm control signal RSE Done In progress Done

Amaldi conference, June DRMI lock using double demodulation with unbalanced sideband by detuned cavity August 2004  DRMI locked with carrier resonance (like GEO configuration) November 2004  DRMI locked with sideband resonance (Carrier is anti resonant preparing for RSE.) Carrier 33MHz Unbalanced 166MHz Belongs to next carrier Belongs to next carrier Carrier 33MHz 166MHz ITMy ITMx BS PRM SRM OSA DDM PD Typical lock acquisition time : ~10sec Longest lock : 2.5hour

Amaldi conference, June Struggling lock acquisition for arm cavities Problems  High recycling gain of ~15 produces 94% coupling between two arms.  Very high coupled finesse of ~  Slow sampling rate of 16kHz for direct lock acquisition. So, we have two steps  Each arm lock using transmitted light with DC offset. …done  Reduce offset to have full resonance of carrier. …in progress

Amaldi conference, June Error signal is produced by only transmitted light as Smaller coupling Wider linear range than RF error signal. Off-resonant DC lock scheme for arm cavity Off-resonant Lock point Resonant Lock

Amaldi conference, June All 5 degrees of freedom under controlled with DC offset on L + loop Both arms locked with DRMI  Lock acquisition time ~1 min  Lasts ~ 20 min  Can be switched to common/differential control L- : AP166 with no offset L+ : Trx+Try with DC offset Yarm lock Xarm lock Arm power Error signal Ideal lock point Offset lock Have started trying to reduce offset from L+ loop But…

Amaldi conference, June Peak changing due to reduction of offset Peak started from 1.6kHz and reached to ~450H. This peak introduces phase delay around unity gain frequency.

Amaldi conference, June CARM at 218 pm offset (~locking point) Unity Gain Frequency

Amaldi conference, June CARM at 118 pm offset Unity Gain Frequency

Amaldi conference, June CARM offset at 59 pm (losing lock) Unity Gain Frequency

Amaldi conference, June L- optical gain with RSE peak Optical gain of L- loop DARM_IN1/DARM_OUT,divided by pendulum transfer function No offset on L- loop 150pm offset on L+ loop Optical resonance of detuned RSE can be seen around the design RSE peak of 4kHz. Q of this peak is about 6. Design RSE peak ~ 4kHz

Amaldi conference, June DARM, operating point

Amaldi conference, June Summary  All 5DOFs are locked with some offset on L+.  RSE detuning peak was seen.  L + loop has a detuning peak with DC offset and it introduces phase delay around unity gain frequency with reducing offset.  Fortunately, Advanced LIGO will not have L + peak problem ! Cavity pole of single arm is around 16Hz from the beginning, far below from unity gain frequency of L + loop around 300Hz.  Fast frequency control or proper compensative digital filter may fix this problem for 40m. Hope we succeed in locking full RSE very soon!

Amaldi conference, June DC Readout at the 40m  DC Readout eliminates several sources of technical noise (mainly due to the RF sidebands): –Oscillator phase noise –Effects of unstable recycling cavity. –The arm-filtered carrier light will serve as a heavily stabilized local oscillator. –Perfect spatial overlap of LO and GW signal at PD.  DC Readout has the potential for QND measurements, without major modifications to the IFO.  We can use a 3 or 4-mirror OMC to reject RF sidebands. »Finesse ~ 500, In-vacuum, on a seismic stack.  The DC Detection diode »an aluminum stand to hold a bare photodiode, and verified that the block can radiate 100 mW safely. from SRM From SRM