The e-Framework Bill Olivier Director Development, Systems and Technology JISC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Polycom Unified Collaboration for IBM Lotus Sametime and IBM Lotus Notes January 2010.
Advertisements

Center + Edge Do Web Computing and Peer Computing Intersect? Andrew Mahon Director, Strategic Marketing.
19/02/2006 The NESSI European Technology Platform 2nd Workshop – Shanghai Feb 2006 Stefano De Panfilis R&D Laboratories Engineering Ingegneria.
1 From Grids to Service-Oriented Knowledge Utilities research challenges Thierry Priol.
Service Framework Reference Models Bill Olivier Director, CETIS.
Research Councils ICT Conference Welcome Malcolm Atkinson Director 17 th May 2004.
R e D R e S S Resource Discovery for Researchers in e-Social Science ReDReSS A Joint Application from Lancaster and Daresbury (7 social scientists, 6 computer/computational.
Joint Information Systems Committee 25/08/2014 | slide 1 JISC Core Middleware Programme Meeting Middleware in Development Joint Information Systems CommitteeSupporting.
Service Oriented Architecture Inevitable? What next?
Current impacts of cloud migration on broadband network operations and businesses David Sterling Partner, i 3 m 3 Solutions.
Building an Operational Enterprise Architecture and Service Oriented Architecture Best Practices Presented by: Ajay Budhraja Copyright 2006 Ajay Budhraja,
The New Face of Enterprise Collaboration Trends, Observations, and Lessons Learned.
Developing a Reference Model of ePortfolio Peter Rees Jones CETIS (The UK Centre for Educational Technology Interoperability Standards) Drawing on the.
e-Framework Components and Responsibilities.
Supporting education and research E-learning tools, standards and systems Sarah Porter Head of Development, JISC.
Service Oriented Architecture Concepts March 27, 2006 Chris Armstrong
© 2006 IBM Corporation IBM Software Group Relevance of Service Orientated Architecture to an Academic Infrastructure Gareth Greenwood, e-learning Evangelist,
Intelligent Grid Solutions 1 / 18 Convergence of Grid and Web technologies Alexander Wöhrer und Peter Brezany Institute for Software.
Stuart Sim Chief Architect Global Education & research Sun Client Solutions Blog:
Thee-Framework for Education & Research The e-Framework for Education & Research an Overview TEN Competence, Jan 2007 Bill Olivier,
Service Oriented Application Integration (SOAI) IT 490 NJIT.
FREMA: e-Learning Framework Reference Model for Assessment David Millard Yvonne Howard IAM, DSSE, LTG University of Southampton, UK.
Main Drivers for SLICT Unacceptably wide variations in standards and resources Use of ICT skills in learning still under developed Gap between best and.
ELearning Frameworks: What, Why and Who, Where & When Daniel Rehak, Learning Systems Architecture Lab, USA Kerry Blinco, Dept. Education Science and Training,
Jens Haeusser Director, Strategy IT, UBC Open Source, Community Source, and SOA Seminars in Academic Computing, Directors Leadership Seminar, August 7,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Page 1 Open Knowledge Initiative CSG - Princeton, 05/07/03.
SOA – Development Organization Yogish Pai. 2 IT organization are structured to meet the business needs LOB-IT Aligned to a particular business unit for.
a Service Oriented Architecture
VOEF and Open Textbooks. Currently, Virginia schools must rely on publishers and commercial integrators to provide authoritative learning content resources.
Delivering an Architecture for the Social Enterprise Alpesh Doshi, Fintricity Information Age Social&Mobile Business Conference Tuesday 31st January 2012.
 Cloud computing  Workflow  Workflow lifecycle  Workflow design  Workflow tools : xcp, eucalyptus, open nebula.
Adaptive Services Grid FP6 – IST Develop a prototype of an open development platform for adaptive services registration,
SOA in Higher Education Workshop Service-Oriented Architecture with Thomas Erl, SOA Systems Inc. University of British Columbia Vancouver BC Canada |
Copyright ©2004 Virtusa Corporation | CONFIDENTIAL Service Oriented Architecture Ruwan Wijesinghe.
M.A.Doman Short video intro Model for enabling the delivery of computing as a SERVICE.
ELearning Frameworks: What, Why and Who, Where & When Daniel Rehak, Learning Systems Architecture Lab, USA Kerry Blinco, Dept. Education Science and Training,
1 Hasan Rizvi Senior Vice President Fusion Middleware Development.
How eNet4S can benefit your project? eNet4S Software Solution Business Team Chief Technology Officer July 11, 2006.
Using virtual collaboration tools for designing innovative education scenarios Gabriel Dima University “Politehnica” of Bucharest, Romania.
1 The Benefits of an SOA in the Contact Center Brian Garr Program Director, IBM Speech Solutions.
Improving Integration of Learning and Management Systems Paul Shoesmith Director of Technical Strategy Becta.
UNINETT, Harstad, June 2004 Developing Sustainable E- Learning Frameworks to Support Teaching and Learning Lorna M. Campbell, CETIS
1 4/23/2007 Introduction to Grid computing Sunil Avutu Graduate Student Dept.of Computer Science.
Russ Hobby Program Manager Internet2 Cyberinfrastructure Architect UC Davis.
Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) Dennis Schwarz November 21, 2008.
SEEK Welcome Malcolm Atkinson Director 12 th May 2004.
Chapter 5 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
© 2005 IBM Corporation IBM Business-Centric SOA Event SOA on your terms and our expertise Operational Efficiency Achieved through People and SOA Martin.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing UCSD: Engineering Core 2 Portal and Grid Infrastructure.
NESSI at a glance Josep Martrat ATOS ORIGIN EGEE 1st Industry Day. Paris, 27 th April 2006.
Last Updated 1/17/02 1 Business Drivers Guiding Portal Evolution Portals Integrate web-based systems to increase productivity and reduce.
GRID Overview Internet2 Member Meeting Spring 2003 Sandra Redman Information Technology and Systems Center and Information Technology Research Center National.
The future of Statistical Production CSPA. 50 task team members 7 task teams CSPA 2015 project.
Marv Adams Chief Information Officer November 29, 2001.
Sakai: A Higher Education Initiative Jim Farmer at the Aviation Industry CBT Committee Meeting 2 February 2004, Phoenix, Arizona USA.
IEEE IT (Information Technology) Strategy – 2005 Unapproved.
Enabling the Digital Campus
Development of e-Science Application Portal on GAP WeiLong Ueng Academia Sinica Grid Computing
ITIL VS COBIT 06 PLM - Group 9
3/12/2013Computer Engg, IIT(BHU)1 CLOUD COMPUTING-1.
Supporting further and higher education E-learning Framework and Tools Tish Roberts JISC Programme Manager.
© Copyright AARNet Pty Ltd PRAGMA Update & some personal observations James Sankar Network Engineer - Middleware.
E-Supply chains, Collaborative Commerce and Corporate Portals Chapter 7.
Basic Concepts Key Learning Points : The objectives of this chapter are as follows:  To provide an introduction to the basic Concepts of enterprise architectures,
VOEF and Open Textbooks. Currently, Virginia schools must rely on publishers and commercial integrators to provide authoritative learning content resources.
HP Network and Service Provider Business Unit Sebastiano Tevarotto February 2003.
CIM Modeling for E&U - (Short Version)
Jens Haeusser Director, Strategy IT, UBC
Scott Thorne & Chuck Shubert
Knowledge Management Strategies to Improve Business Performance
Presentation transcript:

The e-Framework Bill Olivier Director Development, Systems and Technology JISC

Questions Addressed What is the e-Framework? Where did it come from? How is it used? What benefits? What are the risks? What does it mean for Programmes?

e-FrameworkServices Approach eLearning, eScience and the JISC IE have all adopted a service approach We need to ensure that we are not asking Institutions to implement incompatible infrastructures The e-Framework provides a coherent approach across all JISC development areas But it doesnt constrain what areas are addressed or what is developed Only how

What is the e-Framework? The e-Framework has two main parts: 1.A Set of Reference Models 2.A Set of Services but it will also include: 3.Guidance on: 1.Developing Reference Models 2.How to factor and define Services 3.How to deploy Reference Models & Services

Services are aligned with JISC 7 Key Areas e-Learninge-Research e-Administration e-Resources Information Environment Middleware Network Collaboration Security Services Management Collaboration (Video) Conferencing Chat, VOIP, Whiteboards Virtual Environments Groups, Members Virtual Organisations Workflow Process support CSCW, CSCL etc.

Users, User Agents and Services Domain Services User Agents (Tools, Applications, Portlets, Rich Clients, etc.) Learning Services Lighter weight User Tools, Applications, Portlets, etc. call on domain specific services, such as Learning, Teaching or Research, and either through them, or directly, they call on Common Services Research Services Administration Services Common Services Etc… Resource Services Security Services Messaging Services Etc… Users

Service Information The collection of Services factors functions. Each Service area contains: –A definition of the Service and links to: –The Interface Specification/s –Web Service toolkits (client and service adapters) –Service Implementations –Reference Models that use the Service

The e-Framework Reference Models form a Bridge between User Needs and the Services Reference Implementation A Reference Model shows how a set of Services are combined to meet a common User Need. User Needs Reference Model Domain Specific & Common Services Design The Reference Model then forms the basis for a Reference Implementation.

Reference Models Organisation Learning / Teaching / Research Process Learner, Teacher, Researcher Need Users Computer Use Case 1 Users Computer Use Case 2 Users Computer Use Case 3 Many tasks require several people to work together in a workflow or process. In such cases Reference Models set out the process and show how people and computers work together to accomplish the task.

Reference Models Users Computer/Portal Use Case Orchestration Web Service Service A Invoke Service B Invoke Typically User Tasks need to call on several services. Orchestration standards are emerging for creating composite services.

Reference Models Reference Models set out: 1.the learning, teaching or research requirement addressed 2.a set of tasks needed to fulfil this 3.the human and computer based workflows 4.the agents, applications and/or tools used 5.the data flows and operations involved 6.the services that will be called on –their orchestration (how several serve a single user) –and their choreography (how several users work with services) –the service interface specifications and any profiles (variations) to be used

Where did it come from? eBusiness has evolved: –Service Oriented Architectures –Web Services –adopted by IBM, Microsoft, Sun, Oracle, SAP, etc. eScience has evolved: –The GRID / Open Grid Service Architecture –Web Services eLearning has evolved: –MIT: the OKI service architecture and OSIDs –Carnegie Mellon/ADL: A layered service architecture –Sun: eLearning architecture –IMS: The Abstract Framework The e-Framework builds on and integrates these

How is it used? By the JISC (and its partners): As a planning tool –What has and hasnt been done –Who is doing what To provide coherence across development efforts To enable software to be used more widely To enable new software to build on and reuse old To lower the costs of apps, when services in place To enable incremental development Enable priorities to be addressed more rapidly Allow flexibility in future development

How is it used? By Institutions: To better align infrastructure with strategy To provide an adaptive, evolving infrastructure To ease communication with other organisations To more easily absorb the many new systems being developed for its core activities: –Learning & Teaching –Research To build on existing systems and increase their value To implement incrementally by focusing first on the most pressing needs To speed up implementation and ROI.

What are the Risks? Its too big a task for JISC –Seek partnership with others to implement We wont get agreement on service standards –Work with international consortia and standards bodies A monolithic approach –Incremental implementation allows switching at any time –Allows diversity within the approach –Doesnt dictate what should be developed, only how Its another IT fashion –This is the first time all major players have agreed on a common approach to integration across platforms in response to customer demand –Suppliers to the JISC community accept it –Builds on Web specifications which are relatively stable

Impact on Programmes? Greater community participation in: –Articulating needs –The development of Reference Models –The development of software –The development of specifications and standards Greater adherence and contribution to specifications and standards by projects Greater ability to build on earlier projects, thus delivering more for the same funding Increased communication across projects Incremental and iterative development from Prototypes through to usable products.

Questions?