A Glimpse of the Science Behind the American Cancer Society Access to Care Campaign Impact of Being Uninsured or Underinsured on Individuals with Cancer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BREAST CANCER IN IDAHO This PowerPoint presentation was created as a collaborative effort among the Cancer Data Registry of Idaho/ Idaho.
Advertisements

4.6 Assessment of Evaluation and Treatment 2013 Analytic Lung Cancer.
Linking Multilevel Analysis to Health Policy Interventions Richard B. Warnecke, Sarah Gehlert, Carol Ferrans, Richard Barrett, Julie Darnell, Young Cho,
April 6, o What is cancer? o Cancer statistics o Cancer prevention and early detection o Cancer disparities o Cancer survivorship o Cancer research.
Otis W. Brawley, M.D. Chief Medical and Scientific Officer Executive Vice President American Cancer Society Professor of Hematology, Medical Oncology,
Every Woman, Every Time: Disparities in Breast Cancer Tony L. Weaver, D.O. ALOMA 2015.
Giving Induction Radiation in Addition to Chemotherapy Is Not Associated with Improved Survival of NSCLC Patients with Operable Mediastinal Nodal Disease.
Cancer and Minorities Norma Kanarek, MPH, PhD Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Department of.
Impact of Cancer Diagnosis and Chemotherapy on Mammography Use Xinhua Yu, M.B., Ph.D. A. Marshall McBean, M.D., M.Sc. Beth A. Virnig, Ph.D., M.P.H Division.
As noted by Gary H. Lyman (JCO, 2012) “CER is an important framework for systematically identifying and summarizing the totality of evidence on the effectiveness,
Breast Cancer Detection, Treatment, and Survival in Medicare and Medicaid Insured Patients Cathy J. Bradley, Ph.D. Professor of Health Administration Co-leader,
A Colonscope is used to remove or biopsy polyps  Night Prep.
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Cancer Incidence, Survival and Treatment Linda C. Harlan, PhD, MPH National Cancer Institute Division of Cancer Control and.
Disparities in Cancer September 22, Introduction Despite notable advances in cancer prevention, screening, and treatment, a disproportionate number.
Nannozi Ssenkoloto, Program Manager October 8, 2013.
Epidemiology of Oral Cancer Module 1:. Epidemiology of Cancer, U.S.
Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Massachusetts, Bureau of Health Statistics, Research and Evaluation Massachusetts Department of Public Health.
Prostate Screening in 2009: New Findings and New Questions Durado Brooks, MD, MPH Director, Prostate and Colorectal Cancer.
Health Care Reform Through the Cancer Lens State and Private Sector Reforms for Hispanic Healthcare Edward E. Partridge, MD National Board President American.
The Relationship of Surgeon and Hospital Volume with Long-Term Survival For Women with Breast Cancer Patrick J. Roohan New York State Department of Health.
INCIDENCE AND SURVIVAL TRENDS OF COLORECTAL CANCER FROM 2002 TO 2011 BE Ansa; E Alema-Mensah; MD Claridy; JQ Sheats; B Fontenot, and SA Smith Georgia Regents.
1 VA Hospice and Palliative Care: Identifying Veterans at High Risk of Mortality Ann Hendricks PhD, Lynn Wolfsfeld MPP Health Care Financing & Economics.
Cancer Healthy Kansans 2010 Steering Committee Meeting May 12, 2005.
PROSTATE CANCER JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL CANCER REGISTRY Prepared by Theresa SanLorenzo-Caswell, CTR 09/01/2013.
CANCER INCIDENCE IN NEW JERSEY BY COUNTY, for the Comprehensive Cancer Control Plan County Needs Assessments August 2003 Prepared by: Cancer.
MELANOMA JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL CANCER REGISTRY Prepared by Theresa SanLorenzo-Caswell, CTR 10/16/20014.
“The African American Prostate Cancer Crisis in Numbers”
Access to Health Care: The Cancer Perspective Daniel E. Smith President, American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network (ACS CAN) November 2007.
Spillover Effects of State Mandated-Benefit Laws The Case of Outpatient Breast Cancer Surgery June 5, 2007 John Bian, Ph.D., Atlanta VAMC, American Cancer.
CANCER CONTROL NHPA’s. What is it? Cancer is a term to describe a diverse group of diseases in which some of the cells in body become defective. The following.
Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology Scientific Meeting 2013 Epidemiology Working Group.
Tools to Access the Latest Cancer Statistics Paul Miller Washington Reporting Fellowships program presentation April 15, 2013.
THYROID CANCER JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL CANCER REGISTRY Prepared by Theresa SanLorenzo-Caswell, CTR 10/16/20014.
Incorporating Multiple Evidence Sources for the Assessment of Breast Cancer Policies and Practices J. Jackson-Thompson, Gentry White, Missouri Cancer Registry,
Diversity and the Burden of Cancer David C. Momrow, M.P.H. Senior Vice President of Cancer Control American Cancer Society – Eastern Division January 21,
1 An Overview of Colorectal Cancer in Delaware Delaware Health Care Commission November 3, 2011.
Urban/Rural Differences in Survival Among Medicare Beneficiaries with Breast Cancer Melony E.S. Sorbero, Ph.D. RAND Corporation Funded by Health Resources.
The Inflammatory Breast Cancer Cancer Registry Paul H. Levine, M.D. Paul H. Levine, M.D. The George Washington University School of Public Health and Health.
Medicaid and the 4 A’s: Use of 1115 Waivers and State Plan Amendments American Cancer Society Washington, Dc June 5, 2008 Erin Reidy
Treatment Patterns in the Management of Prostate Cancer: Lessons Learned from the Florida Cancer Data System Vonetta L. Williams, PhD, MPH, CTR June 23,
Peterson-Kaiser Health System Tracker What are recent trends in cancer spending and outcomes?
CANCER National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report Chartbook on Effective Treatment.
Access to Care: Essential to Winning the Fight Against Cancer Ruth Parriott MWD Government Relations Director.
FRENCH high-resolution studies - Breast cancer: 1990, 1997, 2003, 2010 ? - Colorectal cancer: 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010 ? - Prostate cancer: 1995,
Using SEER-Medicare Data to Enhance Registry Data to Assess Quality of Care Joan Warren Applied Research Program National Cancer Institute NAACCR June.
Widening of Socioeconomic Disparities in U.S. Mortality from Major Cancers Ahmedin Jemal, PhD Elizabeth Ward, PhD June 10, 2008 Kinsey T, Jemal A, Liff.
Florida Cancer Plan Phil Roland, MD FACS FACOG Florida State Chair A Commission on Cancer.
Premature deaths due to Prostate Cancer: The Role of Diagnosis and Treatment Appathurai Balamurugan MD, MPH S William Ross MD Chris Fisher, BS Jim Files,
Slideset on: Patel P, Hanson DL, Sullivan PS, et al. Incidence of types of cancer among HIV-infected persons compared with the general population in the.
BREAST CANCER BY STAGE OF DISEASE AT DIAGNOSIS, CENTRAL OKLAHOMA Arthur Owora, MPH; Aaron Wendelboe, PhD; David Thompson, PhD; Janis Campbell, PhD The.
Evaluation of the Community Patient Navigation Program within the Community Education and Outreach Initiative (CEOI) Patient Navigation is one strategy.
Arnold School of Public Health Health Services Policy and Management 1 Women’s Cancer Screening Services Utilization Versus Their Insurance Source Presenter:
Variation in place of death from cancer: studies in South East England Elizabeth Davies, Peter Madden, Victoria Coupland, Karen Linklater, Henrik Møller.
What does the data tell us? Colorectal CANCER IN NEVADA
2 Incidence SABER This module presents statistics from Chapter 2: Incidence Ontario Cancer Statistics 2016 Chapter 2: Incidence.
Cancer Statistics 2016 A Presentation from the American Cancer Society
Cancer Statistics 2016 A Presentation from the American Cancer Society
Cervical Cancer in California
Patient Navigation Process
Cancer Epidemiology Kara P. Wiseman, MPH, Phd
It is estimated that about 1
It is estimated that almost 1
6 Cancer survival Ontario Cancer Statistics 2018 Chapter 6: Cancer survival.
Bronx Community Health Dashboard: Other Cancers Last Updated: 01/09/2018 See last slide for more information about this project.
Estimated current cancer incidence
Oncology Market Forecast
Standard 3.1 Patient Navigation Process
It is estimated that more than 1
Megan Eguchi, MPh Sana karam, md, phd
Colorectal cancer survival disparities in California
Presentation transcript:

A Glimpse of the Science Behind the American Cancer Society Access to Care Campaign Impact of Being Uninsured or Underinsured on Individuals with Cancer National Congress on the Un and Underinsured December 11, 2007 Nicole M. Schrag, MSPH, MT(ASCP) Health Services Research American Cancer Society

Insurance Status among Cancer Patients Under Age 65 Patients Under 65: 11% uninsured 15% Medicaid or other public insurance Higher among minorities Blacks: 14% uninsured, 33% public Hispanics: 20% uninsured, 24% public data from Thorpe & Howard, Health Affairs 2003

National Cancer Database (NCDB) Hospital-based cancer registry jointly sponsored by the American Cancer Society and the American College of Surgeons Collects data from approximately 1400 Commission on Cancer hospitals annually Receives reports on approximately 72%of the new cancer diagnoses in the United States –Patient demographic and clinical characteristics, including insurance status and vital status (at up to five years following diagnosis)

Analysis of NCDB: Insurance status and stage of cancer at diagnosis for women with breast cancer Comparisons between patients with early stage disease (stage I) vs. more advanced stage (stage II or stage III/IV combined) at diagnosis Insurance status groups: – Uninsured, Medicaid, Medicare <65, Medicare 65+, Other Government Insurance, Private

Impact of Insurance on Stage at Diagnosis for Breast Cancer Compared to women with private insurance, those with Medicaid or who were uninsured had approximately 50% increase in the likelihood of having stage II disease at diagnosis and a 2.4 to 2.5 fold increase in the likelihood of having advanced stage disease at diagnosis.

Colorectal cancer Prostate Lung cancer Urinary bladder cancer Uterine cancer Melanoma of the skin Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Kidney Thyroid cancer Ovarian cancer Pancreatic cancer Laryngeal & Oropharyngeal cancer Other evaluations of impact of insurance and stage at diagnosis:

Study Conclusions Those who were uninsured or covered by Medicaid were significantly more likely to present with advanced disease than were those with private health insurance. Stronger effect in cancers detectable early by screening or symptoms Patients from ethnic/racial minorities were also more likely to present with advanced disease.

Impact of Disparities on Receipt of Cancer Treatment Previous studies have been mixed – some showing significant impact of insurance status, race/ethnicity, age, and other factors or cancer care patterns, others showing no significant differences

ACS HSR Study – Impact of Patient & Facility Characteristics on Receipt of SLNB Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) – lymph node exploration technique accompanying breast cancer surgery Involves assessment of “sentinel nodes” linked to cancer site rather than full removal of all nodes using axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) – If sentinel nodes are positive, full ALND is performed SLNB results in substantially decreased patient morbidity (impaired movement, lymphedema) with the same clinical efficacy

Impact of Insurance on Receipt of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) for Breast Cancer Uninsured patients and those with Medicaid, Medicare for disabled patients (<65), or other government plans were significantly less likely to receive SLNB compared to patients with private insurance

Changes in SLNB Rates Over Time – by Insurance Status

Study Conclusions Substantial disparities exist with respect to receipt of SLNB, based on age, race/ethnicity, and insurance status Disparities by insurance status in receipt of SLNB were minimal in 1998, when this technique was initially used, and have grown substantially over the past seven years

Impact of Disparities on Cancer Survival A number of studies have evaluated differences in survival using small populations (e.g., state-level data) or restricted age groups (e.g., SEER-Medicare patients) Used NCDB data to assess risk of death by cancer site (or all sites combined) for insured vs. uninsured/Medicaid patients, while controlling for other patient characteristics Example = colorectal cancer

Adjusted Colorectal Cancer Survival, All Stages Combined, by Insurance Status, among Patients Diagnosed in and Reported to the NCDB

Adjusted Colorectal Cancer Survival by Stages and Insurance Status, among Patients Diagnosed in and Reported to the NCDB

Conclusions from Survival Analysis Substantial differences in survival are observed between privately insured and uninsured/Medicaid patients at all stages Differences seen for all cancers combined and most individual cancer sites

In Conclusion … Analyses to date using the NCDB have indicated significant disparities in stage at diagnosis, treatment patterns, and mortality for cancer patients who are uninsured or covered by Medicaid. Improving access to care among uninsured and Medicaid patients with cancer will not remove all disparities, but it is likely to substantially improve many of these findings.