BAMC 2001 Reading Diffuse Interface Models Adam A Wheeler University of Southampton Jeff McFadden, NIST Dan Anderson, GWU Bill Boettinger, NIST Rich Braun,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Phase Field Modeling of Electrochemistry J. E. Guyer, W. J. Boettinger, J. A. Warren & G. B. McFadden Features common to electrochemistry & melt growth.
Advertisements

Lecture 15: Capillary motion
Heat Transfer with Change of Phase in Continuous Casting Ernesto Gutierrez-Miravete Rensselaer at Hartford ANSYS Users Group Meeting September 28, 2010.
Self-propelled motion of a fluid droplet under chemical reaction Shunsuke Yabunaka 1, Takao Ohta 1, Natsuhiko Yoshinaga 2 1)Department of physics, Kyoto.
NASA Microgravity Research Program
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft E. A. Brener Institut für Festkörperforschung, Pattern formation during diffusion limited transformations in solids.
The Challenge of Using Phase-Field Techniques in the Simulation of Low Anisotropy Structures A.M. Mullis Institute for Materials Research University of.
CHAPTER 8 Phase Diagrams 8-1.
Simulations of solidification microstructures by the phase-field method Mathis Plapp Laboratoire de Physique de la Matière Condensée CNRS/Ecole Polytechnique,
Hydrodynamic Slip Boundary Condition for the Moving Contact Line in collaboration with Xiao-Ping Wang (Mathematics Dept, HKUST) Ping Sheng (Physics Dept,
~0.5 m Computational grid size Process ~5 mm REV Modeling Microsegregation In Metal Alloys – Vaughan Voller, University of Minnesota 1 of 14 Can we build.
Modeling of Micro segregation in Metal Alloys Vaughan R. Voller University of Minnesota.
16/12/ Texture alignment in simple shear Hans Mühlhaus,Frederic Dufour and Louis Moresi.
Voller, University of Minnesota Application of an Enthalpy Method for Dendritic Solidification Vaughan R. Voller and N. Murfield.
A variational approach to the moving contact line hydrodynamics
James Sprittles ECS 2007 Viscous Flow Over a Chemically Patterned Surface J.E. Sprittles Y.D. Shikhmurzaev.
Computational grid size ~0.5 m Process ~5 mm REV Maco-Micro Modeling— Simple methods for incorporating small scale effects into large scale solidification.
Session III: Computational Modelling of Solidification Processing Analytical Models of Solidification Phenomena V. Voller QUESTION: As models of solidification.
An Enthalpy Based Scheme for Simulating Dendritic Growth V.R. Voller 4d o (blue) 3.25d o (black) 2.5d o (red) Dendrite shape with 3 grid sizes shows reasonable.
GROWING NUMERICAL CRYSTALS Vaughan Voller, and Man Liang, University of Minnesota We revisit an analytical solution in Carslaw and Jaeger for the solidification.
Molecular Dynamics Simulation Study of Solid-Liquid Interface Properties of HCP Mg Yunfei Bai Supervisor Dr. Jeff Hoyt McMaster University 1.
Conservation Laws for Continua
Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 169 Frank H. T. Rhodes Hall Cornell University Ithaca,
Unique additive information measures – Boltzmann-Gibbs-Shannon, Fisher and beyond Peter Ván BME, Department of Chemical Physics Thermodynamic Research.
Sino-German Workshop on Electromagnetic Processing of Materials, – Shanghai, PR China Use of magnetic fields during solidification under.
NTNU Short Course on solidification at IISc October – November 2012 Lars Arnberg, NTNU 1.Introduction – basic concepts 29/10 1.Nucleation - grain refinement.
G.B. McFadden and S.R. Coriell, NIST and R.F. Sekerka, CMU Analytic Solution of Non-Axisymmetric Isothermal Dendrites NASA Microgravity Research Program,
Lecture 9 Phase Diagrams 8-1.
J. Slutsker, G. McFadden, J. Warren, W. Boettinger, (NIST) K. Thornton, A. Roytburd, P. Voorhees, (U Mich, U Md, NWU) Surface Energy and Surface Stress.
James Sprittles BAMC 2007 Viscous Flow Over a Chemically Patterned Surface J.E Sprittles Y.D. Shikhmurzaev.
NTNU 1 Solidification, Lecture 4 Three phase solidification Eutectic growth Types of eutectics Peritectic growth Segregation Macro / microsegregation Lever.
NASA Microgravity Research Program
Phase Field Modeling of Interdiffusion Microstructures K. Wu, J. E. Morral and Y. Wang Department of Materials Science and Engineering The Ohio State University.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MUTAC Review April , 2004, LBNL Target Simulation Roman Samulyak, in collaboration with.
Molecular Dynamics Study of Solidification in the Aluminum-Silicon System Supervisor: Dr. Jeffrey J Hoyt Peyman Saidi Winter 2013.
The Onsager Principle and Hydrodynamic Boundary Conditions Ping Sheng Department of Physics and William Mong Institute of Nano Science and Technology The.
Byeong-Joo Lee Byeong-Joo Lee General Background ※ References: 1. W.D. Kingery, H.K. Bowen and.
Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 169 Frank H. T. Rhodes Hall Cornell University Ithaca,
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MUTAC Review January 14-15, 2003, FNAL Target Simulations Roman Samulyak Center for Data Intensive.
Microstructure and Phase Transformations in Multicomponent Systems
A MULTI-SCALE/MULTI-PHYSICS MODELING FRAMEWORK FOR SOLIDIFICATION SYSTEMS Vaughan R Voller Saint Anthony Falls Lab University of Minnesota Acknowledgments.
Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory MULTISCALE MODELING OF ALLOY SOLIDIFICATION LIJIAN TAN NICHOLAS ZABARAS Date: 24 July 2007 Sibley School.
An Enthalpy Model for Dendrite Growth Vaughan Voller University of Minnesota.
Microsegregation Models and their Role In Macroscale Calculations Vaughan R. Voller University of Minnesota.
Analysis of Hydrodynamic and Interfacial Instabilities During Cooperative Monotectic Growth  Cooperative monotectic growth  Sources of flow with a fluid-fluid.
LATTICE BOLTZMANN SIMULATIONS OF COMPLEX FLUIDS Julia Yeomans Rudolph Peierls Centre for Theoretical Physics University of Oxford.
Ale with Mixed Elements 10 – 14 September 2007 Ale with Mixed Elements Ale with Mixed Elements C. Aymard, J. Flament, J.P. Perlat.
INFLUENCE OF FREEZING RATE OSCILLATIONS AND CONVECTION ON EUTECTIC MICROSTRUCTURE Liya L. Regel, William R. Wilcox, Dimitri Popov, Fengcui Li International.
Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 169 Frank H. T. Rhodes Hall Cornell University Ithaca,
Numerical Simulation of Dendritic Solidification
Modelling of the motion of phase interfaces; coupling of thermodynamics and kinetics John Ågren Dept of Materials Science and Engineering Royal Institute.
Key Issues in Solidification Modeling—
NTNU 1 Solidification, Lecture 3 1 Interface stability Constitutional undercooling Planar / cellular / dendritic growth front Cells and dendrites Growth.
Durham, 6th-13th December 2001 CASTEP Developers’ Group with support from the ESF  k Network The Nuts and Bolts of First-Principles Simulation 20: Surfaces.
Lecture 7 Review of Difficult Topics MATLS 4L04: Aluminum Section.
Microstructure From Processing: Evaluation and Modelling Diffusional growth: Lecture 5 Martin Strangwood, Phase Transformations and Microstructural Modelling,
Materials Process Design and Control Laboratory MULTISCALE COMPUTATIONAL MODELING OF ALLOY SOLIDIFICATION PROCESSES Materials Process Design and Control.
Phase Transformation by Dr.Srimala.
Phase Diagrams 8-1.
Hydrodynamics of slowly miscible liquids
© 2016 Cengage Learning Engineering. All Rights Reserved.
A First Course on Kinetics and Reaction Engineering
Numerical Simulation of Dendritic Solidification
Growth Kinetics Byeong-Joo Lee Microstructure Evolution POSTECH - MSE
CHAPTER 8 Phase Diagrams 1.
CHAPTER 8 Phase Diagrams 1.
Modeling Phase Changes in Finite Element Analysis
Description of Phase Transformation
Phase Diagram.
Presentation transcript:

BAMC 2001 Reading Diffuse Interface Models Adam A Wheeler University of Southampton Jeff McFadden, NIST Dan Anderson, GWU Bill Boettinger, NIST Rich Braun, U Delaware John Cahn, NIST Britta Nestler, Foundry Inst. Aachen Lorenz Ratke, DLR Bob Sekerka, CMU Outline Background: History; Microstructure Phase-field Models Anisotropy Solid-solid Phase Transitions Complex Binary Alloys

600 BC History 1500 BC Crystallisation of Alum 1556AD

Freezing a Pure Liquid Dendrite Glicksman Hele Shaw Saffman & Taylor

Simple Binary Alloy Solidification Billia et al Bernard Convection Cerisier

Microstructure Solidification of a material yields complex interfacial structure Important to the physical properties of the casting Cast agricultural aluminium transmission housing from Stahl Specialty Co.

Nickel Silver (50 microns)

Cu-Cr Alloy (50 microns)

Microstructure Microstructure: evolves on different time an length scales; involves changes in topology; physical processes on different scales; several different phases.

Free Boundary Problems Solid Liquid Interface is a surface; No thickness; Physical properties: Surface energy, kinetics Conservation of energy

Phase-field Model Dynamics Introduce free-energy functional: Introduce the phase- field variable: Langer mid 70’s 0 1

Phase-field Equations Governing equations:First & second laws Thermodynamic derivation Energy functionals: Require positive entropy production (Penrose & Fife 90, Wang, Sekerka, AAW et al 93)

Planar Interface where Exact isothermal travelling wave solution: where Particular phase-field equation when

Sharp Interface Asymptotics Consider limit in which Different distinguished limits possible. (Caginalp 89…, McFadden et al 2000 ) Can retrieve free boundary problem with Or variation of Hele-Shaw problem...

Numerics Advantages - no need to track interface - can compute complex interface shapes Disadvantage - have to resolve thin interfacial layers First calculations (Kobayashi 91, AAW et al 93) State-of-the-art algorithms (Elliot, Provatas et al) use adaptive finite element methods Simulation of dendritic growth into an undercooled liquid...

Provatas, Goldenfeld & Dantzig (99) Dendrite Simulation

Surface Energy Anisotropy Recall: Suggests: where: Phase-field equation: where the so-called -vector is defined by:

Sharp Interface Formulation Phase field Sharp interface limit: McFadden & AAW 96 is a natural extension of the Cahn-Hoffman of sharp interface theory Cahn & Hoffman (1972,4) is normal to the -plot: Isothermal equilibrium shape given by Corners form when -plot is concave;

Corners & Edges In Phase-Field Steady case: where Noether’s Thm: where interpret as a “stress tensor” changes type when -plot is concave. AAW & McFadden 97

Jump conditions give: where and Corners/Edges Weak shocks (force balance)

FCC Binary Alloy (CuAu) Order parameters: Four sub-lattices with occupation densities: Braun, Cahn McFadden & AAW 97

Symmetries of FCC imply where Dynamics: Dynamics

Bulk states: Disodered: CuAu: Cu3Au: Mixed modes: Bulk States CuAu (L10) Cu3Au (L12)

Interfaces IPB: Disorder-Cu3Au in (y,z)-plane Surface energy dependence on interface orientation Kikuchi & Cahn (1977)

Summary FCC models predicts: surface energy dependence and hence equilibrium shapes; internal structure of interface. FCC & phase-field fall into a general class of (anisotropic) multiple-order-parameter models;

Two Immiscible Viscous Liquids where denotes which liquid; assume Anderson, McFadden & AAW 2000

Binary Alloys Can extend these ideas to binary alloys: Results in pdes involving a composition (a conserved order parameter) temperature and one (or more) non- conserved order parameters

Simple Binary Alloy The liquid may solidify into a solid with a different composition AAW, Boettinger & McFadden 93

Eutectic Binary Alloy In eutectic alloys the liquid can solidify into two different solid phases which can coexist together Nestler & AAW 99AAW Boettinger & McFadden 96 Experiments: Mercy & Ginibre

Varicose Instability Expts: G. Faivre

Simulation of Wavelength Selection

Growth of Eutectic Al-Si Grain SEM Photograph

Monotectic Binary Alloy A liquid phase can “solidify” into both a solid and a different liquid phase. Nestler, AAW, Ratke & Stocker 00 Expt: Grugel et al.

Incorporation of L2 in to the solid phase Expt: Grugel et al.

Nucleation in L1 and incorporation of L2 in to solid Expt: Grugel et al.

Phase-field models provide a regularised version of Stefan problems Develop a generalised -vector and -tensor theory for anisotropic surface energy; corners & edges Can be generalised to models of internal structure on interfaces; include material deformation (fluid flow); models of complex alloys; Computations: provides a vehicle for computing complex realistic microstructure; accuracy/algorithms. Conclusions