IRB Belmont Report Federally mandated Risks -> minimized & reasonable Informed consent rospective Approval Prospective Approval Monitoring for subject.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation and Human Subjects Research Julie M. Aultman, Ph.D. Chair, Institutional Review Board Associate Professor, Family and Community Medicine Northeast.
Advertisements

Marian University is sponsored by the Sisters of St. Francis, Oldenburg. Human Subjects Research and the Marian University Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Human Subjects Protections, Concepts, and Procedures Office of Research and Sponsored Programs Tom Lombardo, Ph.D., Director, Research Integrity & Compliance.
Information Sharing 1. Overview Inquiries into sexual violence incidents are extremely sensitive. Collecting and sharing information on GBV can be dangerous,
Research Involving Human Subjects All research involving the participation of human subjects must be submitted for review by the IRB (Institutional Review.
Institutional Review Board Guidance.  Independent Ethics Committee  Ethical Review Board  Research Ethics Committee 2.
Evaluating Risk 1 IRB CELT Presentation Colleen Donaldson – IRB Administrator Julie Wilkens – IRB Coordinator.
DO NO HARM IRRB Presentation Purposes Responsibilities Processes NLU IRRB Home page.
 Daylene Meuschke, Ed.D Barry Gribbons, Ph.D RP Conference: April 2, 2013.
Protecting Human Participants in Research syr
Research Involving Human Subjects Review of Risk and Protection from Harm.
Ethical Guidelines for Research with Human Participants
8 Criteria for IRB Approval of Research 45 CFR (a)
Human Subjects Research Dr. John S. Irvine Chairperson, NMSU Institutional Review Board for Human Subjects Research
How to Obtain Institutional Review Board (IRB) Approval Richard Wagner Associate Director UCSF Human Research Protection Program August 14, 2008.
Cornell Evaluation Network The Use of Human Participants in Research Office of Research Integrity and Assurance ~ May 14, 2007.
Avoiding the Pitfalls of an IRB Submission Chris Ayres Chair, Institutional Review Board Social & Behavioral Science & Chair, Department of Kinesiology,
Research and AWC Faculty Seminar, February 19, 2009, Mary Schaal, M.Ed.
 Understanding the IRB Process University of Tennessee Health Science Center Institutional Review Board.
Research Involving Human Subjects All research involving the participation of human subjects must be submitted for review by the IRB (Institutional Review.
What is your Acronym IQ? ASC DOC DOS FYS SACS NEH NIH OSHA IRB TGIF.
The IRB Approval Process Michael Bingham, JD Assistant Director, University of Wisconsin-Madison Education IRB
What is your Acronym IQ? ASC DOC DOS FYS SACS NEH NIH OSHA IRB TGIF.
The Human Subjects Institutional Review Board Workshop Part 1: An Introduction to Human Subjects Research Ethics and the IRB Process Presented by Alena.
RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH MARGARITA M. CARDONA DIRECTOR OF SPONSORED RESEARCH Institutional Review Board.
University of North Carolina at Greensboro Protecting Research Participants.
The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.
Office of Research Integrity and Compliance March 2011.
How to Successfully Apply to the IRB Richard Gordin, IRB Chair True Rubal, Administrator / Director For the Protection of Human Participants in Research.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
Human Subjects Protections Research Ethics. Basic Assumptions about How Research Should be Conducted Subjects should be protected from harm. Subjects.
To Know from Robinson (2014) HOW to do: – Define sample universe Exclude/include criteria – Decide sample size Epistemological & practical issues – Select.
Chapter 5 Conducting & Reading Research Baumgartner et al Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research.
Marian University is sponsored by the Sisters of St. Francis, Oldenburg. Human Subjects Research and the Marian University Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Institutional Review Board Protecting Human Research Subjects.
Dustin Yocum, MA Institutional Review Board University of Illinois HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH.
Institutional Review Board Issues for Classroom Research Sharon McWhorter IRB Administrator, The University of Akron (With assistance from Phil Allen,
Western Oregon University INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD.
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
TUN IRB: The Basics February 26, IRB Function Review human-subject research Ensure the rights & welfare of human subjects are adequately protected.
What Institutional Researchers Should Know about the IRB Susan Thompson Senior Research Analyst Office of Institutional Research Presented at the Texas.
CUNY Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) School of Professional Studies April 18, 2013
Regulations 201: Thorny Issues What is Research? Exempt and Expedited Reviews.
WELCOME to the TULANE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION OFFICE WORKSHOP for SOCIAL/BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (March 2, 2010) Tulane University HRPO Uptown.
Donna B. Konradi, DNS, RN, CNE GERO 586 Understanding the Ethics of Research.
Joni Barnard IRB Information Session: EHE Workshop 10/13/2015.
Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research. Historical Perspective on Ethics Nazi Experimentation in WWII –“medical experiments” –Nuremberg War Crime Trials.
Ann Billetz, Ph.D. 11/6/09. Excerpt from MCLA’s IRB policy.
 What is an IRB and why do we need one at Western?  Who needs to submit proposals to the IRB?  If approved, how long is your proposal good for?  Is.
HUMAN SUBJECTS QUIZ! TRUE OR FALSE?
THE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD. WHAT IS AN IRB? An IRB is committee set up by an institution to review, approve, and regulate research conducted under.
Copyright c 2001 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.1 Chapter 5 Research Ethics All researchers, even students, have a responsibility to conduct ethical research.
 The purpose of IRB is to ensure the rights of research subjects are protected  In accordance with the ethical standards of the U.S. Department of Health.
 The purpose of IRB is to ensure the rights of research subjects are protected  In accordance with the ethical standards of the U.S. Department of Health.
Protecting Human Subjects Overview of the Issues Applications to Educational Research The IRB Process.
Investigator Initiated Research Best Practices for IRB: SBER Corey Zolondek, Ph.D. IRB Operations Manager Wayne State University.
Chapter 3: Ethical guidelines for psychological research.
IRB BASICS Ethics and Human Subject Protections Summer 2016
Human subjects protections and the IRb
SOU Institutional Review Board
Chapter 5 Research Ethics
© 2016 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Introduction to the Institutional Review Board
SOU Institutional Review Board
Intro to Projects – Research with Human Subjects
CUNY Human Research Protection Program (HRPP)
Human subjects protections and the IRb
Human Participants Research
Office of Research Integrity and Protections
Research with Human Subjects
Presentation transcript:

IRB Belmont Report Federally mandated Risks -> minimized & reasonable Informed consent rospective Approval Prospective Approval Monitoring for subject & info safety

“Human Subject” §46.102(f)  Living indivs’  Data via intervention or interaction  Identifiable private info How do you know if you’re using human participants?

Risks minimized Risk vs. Benefits ratio Equitable selection Informed Consent appropriate Privacy, confidentiality, safety - maximized Safeguards Design - scientifically sound What does the IRB look for?

Inclusion of Human Participants Respect for Persons Beneficence Justice

What is Informed Consent? Process throughout Means to ensure: – “respect for persons” – mutual understanding – continuous, voluntary PARTS: –Initial consent –Continual understanding-assessment –W/draw anytime

Analyzing Risks & Benefits To judge, IRB needs full info about: – WHO & HOW: selection & recruitment of subjects – WHAT, WHEN, WHERE: research design – WHY: scientific rationale conflicts of interest?

Confidentiality – Trust – Candor – Access to “private” data – “Sensitive” topics –Thus…lends credibility to research Increase protections w/ likelihood of disclosure/harm

3 “Levels” of Review Exempt Expedited Full Check Yourself (before you wreck yourself!) – A quantitative, non-identifying (i.e., anonymous) survey about what adults (convenience sample) eat each day – Qualitative, in-depth, in-person interview study about people’s divorce experiences – Survey study about communication abilities to figure out if you’ve learned anything through a class. I don’t plan to use it for publication – just for class evaluation purposes

A SURVEY ON YOUR EXPERIENCES WITH A FORMERLY ABUSIVE PARTNER This research is being conducted by Jessica Eckstein and Katie Lever-Mazzuto, faculty members in the Communication Department at Western Connecticut State University.This study will survey men and women who have experienced any type of physical and/or psychological abuse from romantic partners. The survey will be conducted online and will take approximately minutes to complete. Computer use can be monitored and is impossible to completely clear. If you are afraid your Internet and/or computer usage might be monitored by your former partner or otherwise present a danger to your safety, please consider taking this survey at another time or at a location at which you will not be monitored. Your participation in this research is entirely voluntary. You must be at least 18 years of age or older to participate and must be a U.S. resident or reside in the U.S. The survey contains items about you and your relationship, the kinds of abuse you experienced, the types of communication you used with this person, and how you felt about the abuse. There are no direct benefits to you from participating. However, the information you provide may help us better understand the experiences of abuse victims. If you are free to respond without your computer being monitored by an abusive partner, the only risks to you would be any discomfort you may experience when thinking about your abuse. Your information will remain anonymous. You don’t have to answer any questions you don’t want to answer, and you can stop the survey or us with questions at any time. If you choose to contact us via , we will not retain your address and it will not be linked to any information you provide in the survey. The results of this study may be used for publication in an academic journal or presentation at an academic conference, but I will change or omit any information that could identify you before using quotations taken from your responses. In other words, quotations will not be linked to you. Before proceeding, you must agree to the following: I am 18 years of age or older. I reside in the United States and/or am a U.S. citizen. I am not currently living with an abusive partner. I understand that it may be unsafe for me to take this survey using a computer monitored by an abusive partner. I have read and understand the above consent form and voluntarily agree to participate in this study. Please print a copy of this consent form for your records. If you want to speak to a counselor, to learn more about domestic violence, or to learn more about resources available in your community, you may contact the Domestic Abuse Helpline for Men and Women toll-free 24-hours a day [phone: HELPLINE, website: or the National Domestic Violence Hotline [phone: SAFE, website: If you have questions about the study, you may contact us at [ phone (203) , address: 120 Berkshire Hall, 181 White St., Danbury, CT 06810]. This research project (Proposal # ) has been reviewed and approved by the WCSU Institutional Review Board. If you have questions concerning the rights of the subjects involved in research studies please call the WCSU Assurances Administrator, at (203) This study is valid until February 4th, 2010.